New council candidate irked at 'big decisions'

Mon, 02/16/2009 - 5:32pm
By: The Citizen

Imker, Eric_2_PTC COUncil canidate 2009

A retired engineer and current member of the Peachtree City Recreation Commission is the latest resident to announce candidacy for a seat on the City Council.

Eric Imker, 53, has declared his bid to run for the Post 1 seat that will be vacated by Don Haddix, who has already announced his plans to run for Mayor. The winner of the Post 1 seat will fill the remaining two years on Haddix’s term in office.

Imker said he decided to run for office based on a number of decisions made by the majority of the City Council in the past several years. His interest was provoked initially when it took a citizen uprising to convince the council to ditch the TDK Boulevard road extension project in June 2007.

“Basically council had to be prodded to make a decision not to expand,” Imker said of the project that would have linked the city and Coweta County via a new bridge over Line Creek. The project became controversial after Coweta County announced it had approved 3,000 homes near the bridge that would have likely added significant traffic to Ga. Highway 74 at TDK Boulevard and Crosstown Drive.

Since then, Imker said he particularly disagrees with the council agreeing to sell most of a city road to accommodate a shopping center developer ... and the subsequent traffic light that was approved by the City Council for said shopping center. That light will only make traffic worse, Imker said.

Imker said the stretch of retail on Ga. Highway 54 West has come to look like Tara Boulevard in Clayton County, which he contends “is not what the founding fathers of the city had in mind.”

Imker admits that some of the decisions made by council recently have gotten under his skin.

“Sometimes it just makes me really boil when I see things happening,” Imker said.
Imker also cited the incomplete golf cart path bridge on Ga. Highway 54 West over the CSX railroad tracks as another issue that has bothered him.

Though Imker said he isn’t sure how he would have voted on two annexations approved by council last year, Imker said he can see approving such annexations when there is a benefit to the city. Imker said he didn’t think those two annexations had such a benefit, and he thinks the city didn’t need to approve the higher density in exchange for the MacDuff Parkway extension, which he contends would have been done in the future anyway.

Likewise, Imker said he is skeptical about the theory of annexing property because the city might not like how it is developed by another government.

“That doesn’t wash with me,” Imker said.
Imker, who has lived here for nearly six years and retired after a few short years at Panasonic, said he plans to stay in Peachtree City the rest of his life.
Imker said he has only spoken to City Councilman Don Haddix once, though they seem to have a similar vision about how the city should be run.

As far as the city’s budget deficit and financial management is concerned, Imker noted his experience managing a billion-dollar project: a satellite that was put into orbit by a Space Shuttle as part of the U.S. missile defense program then known as “Star Wars.”

Imker, who lives in the Ashford Park subdivision, said he is looking forward to hearing from other candidates’ viewpoints. He strongly feels the voting block of Mayor Harold Logsdon and councilman Steve Boone and Cyndi Plunkett needs to be broken up; all three are up for re-election though none has yet announced if they will seek office again.

“The mayor and the other two council members who vote with him on nearly every issue have to go,” Imker said in a press release announcing his candidacy.

Imker notes that he has worked with Plunkett on recreation matters as she is the council liaison with the recreation commission. He said his bid for office is “nothing against her,” but he feels strongly the city needs to change its direction.

In his press release Imker criticizes the business relationship between Mayor Harold Logsdon and City Manager Bernie McMullen, who have entered a partnership to purchase homes, renovate them and then sell them.

“This is no way to show the public that you are on the up and up,” Imker said. “Mere appearance of impropriety should be considered off the table.”

login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by Titum Gan Eiri Ort on Wed, 02/18/2009 - 9:50pm.

Mr. Imker just wish to add my thanks for stepping up to run for council. We need someone like you that can divide the good from the bad. I am glad you see the problem with the City Manager and Mayor being in business together. I learned from Mr. Haddix that the Mayor also give the City Manager his evluation each year for his pay raise and bonus. Do you think it is wrong that a guy you are in a private business with outside of work, should take part in any recommendation for your pay raise at work? I think NOT !!!! The Mayor has also looked the other way when the City Manager has not done his job, or when he has been arrested. My question to you is, will you get rid of the current City Manager when you are elected ?

Steve Brown's picture
Submitted by Steve Brown on Tue, 02/17/2009 - 12:02pm.

The Tara Blvd. comment might be a stretch, but I get his point about things going in the wrong direction.

All of Mr. Imker's points are legitimate.

On the finance/budget situation, one simple solution is to not increase expenses beyond revenue. Another is do not raid the reserve funds for pet projects not in the budget. The Logsdon/Boone/Plunkett problem was a lack of fiscal discipline. Now, with a fall in the sales taxes, their errors are exacerbated.

Vanessa Fleisch is soft on the details. Hopefully, she will expand her platform in the short-term. Her start was a bit weak, but let's see if she makes some solid points in some letters to the editor.

As for my running this time around, I have made it known that if Logsdon/Boone/Plunkett run unopposed, I would enter the race. However, if qualified people enter those races with a firm appreciation of following the Comprehensive Land Use Plan and our ordinances, I see no need to run.


Submitted by Titum Gan Eiri Ort on Wed, 02/18/2009 - 9:36pm.

Former Mayor Brown I do not know you but I have met you a couple of times. You seem like a nice smart guy. Looks like you have a lot of people that do not like you in town but I bet that was from doing your job as Mayor. Anyway let me get to the point. I knew you were Mayor when the current City Manager McMullen was hired by you and City Council at that time. It was strange to me that McMullen was running around during the election you lost, stabbing you in the back and selling his soul to Logsdon. I was at an event and just happen to be able to listen to a conversation he was having and just going off on you and how you were screwing up the city and needed to go. Said you were a child that needed to be sent to your room. Was telling people that Logsdon needed to be elected. I thought the City Manager should be working for the city not trying to get someone elected. As I listen to this guy who was drinking at the time go on, I thought this guy has no professional intergity and each days his actions prove to me he has none. Just thought you would like to know that he was feeding information to Logsdon to help him win. Sorry I did not call you back then to let you know.

Submitted by Spyglass on Tue, 02/17/2009 - 9:49am.

are beyond ridiculous. Please inform me of the exact area on Tara Blvd that area resembles, even SLIGHTLY. It's apparently become the "in" thing to say. Personally, I would like to hear ideas, instead of rhetoric.

cogitoergofay's picture
Submitted by cogitoergofay on Tue, 02/17/2009 - 7:28am.

Mr. Imker is running for an empty seat. He is an engineer by trade, a vocation requiring precision. He is already willing to take a critical view of how the city is run. I also agree that the business partnership of McMullen and Logsdon is highly unethical. They are in the business of remodeling houses in PTC. PTC must inspect and approve. They hire and fire the inspectors. They work together. The entire arrangement is pitifully unethical and speaks of a surprisingly brazen attitude by McMullen after his DUI conviction. One would think he would have ended up being highly concerned about restoring an image of propriety but this is obviously not the case.

Steve Brown, outspoken and fearless, may have lacked the calm consensus-building skills needed to be Mayor but may serve well in the position of Council member. True, he seemed to have many gaffes as Mayor but this would be attribute as a member of council. Remember that this is the guy who successfully stood up to the lawsuit challenge and concomitant threats of the former city attorney and won. Brown has much to offer albeit sans diplomacy.


DarkMadam's picture
Submitted by DarkMadam on Mon, 02/16/2009 - 7:28pm.

Hallelujah! Now, if Haddix doesn’t become mayor, and there is a reputable person that will run for the position, we just might have a council that accomplishes something other than wasteful spending and money hungry ethics. Now for the hard questions Mr. Imker. Are you on board with the "village" ideal for the city? If you have worked on big budget projects what can we expect from you regarding the $3.5 million deficit that your predecessors are leaving you with? Do you see a PTC where we will be able to hire back all of the employees that this council will fire come Thursday? Maybe set up a plan where they get first consideration for positions. Based, of course, on length of service, attendance, and moral ethics. And one last question, do you know someone that will run for Mayor besides Haddix. That would start us off with a clean slate with the exception of Boone and Sturbaum. Boone will have to be reelected or run against another competitor for his position and Sturbaum has some time left. Maybe there is light at the end of the tunnel and this time it wont be a train. Whoo Whoo!


jeebs's picture
Submitted by jeebs on Tue, 02/17/2009 - 12:10pm.

Dang, who tee-tee'd in your Corn Flakes? If there's a significant other in your life, they must either walk on water or eggshells just to maintain domestic tranquility. Sure, Council could (and should) delay their scheduled pay increase for at least a year until the economy improves, but that only returns $33,000 back to the City’s coffers and at best preserves maybe one job. Unless you know how to feed 5,000 with 5 loaves and 2 fishes, your solution to fixing the budget still won't wash.

Why do you keep nagging about something that was decided back in Aug 07, well before the economy went into the tank? (Now if you can prove these jokers knew that mess was coming back then, that would be something worth talking about!) It’s an election year for crying out loud. This issue isn’t going away.

But your ultimate solution is to throw out the whole bunch over a symbolic gesture and leave us Doug Sturbaum with barely two years experience under his belt as the wise old man? Shrewd. I can still remember all the hand wringing those namby-pambies went through when the pay issue first came up. The facts were (and still are) those jobs haven't even had a CPI adjustment since 1985 and based on the BLS Atl MSA, that's about all the pay raise amounted to. Regardless of who is sitting in those seats, $6,000/yr at an average of 20hrs/wk is only about $5.75/hr plus all the love and public adoration that goes along with that fat paycheck.

I’m not a Council apologist but if you want to get grumpy about job performance, or traffic, or crime, or overbuilt retail, or if you can document waste of public funds, that would be a soapbox worthy of your efforts.


DarkMadam's picture
Submitted by DarkMadam on Tue, 02/17/2009 - 2:03pm.

Don't be so condescending. Just because you and I have different opinions about what is important doesn’t mean you can act out like a school yard bully. And believe me, the firings are the tip of the iceberg and this council is the Titanic. Try downloading the 220 page city budgets for this year and a few years past. Steve Brown said it the clearest I have seen..."On the finance/budget situation, one simple solution is to not increase expenses beyond revenue." I have many reasons for why I feel the way I do. I can see that you would rather criticize and try to belittle me than to do the work like I did. The increase in pay is only one thing. Borrowing almost $2 million from the city reserves is a huge issue also. I am grumpy about job performance - specifically how the money in the budget is being spent. Upon reading the budget it became abundantly clear that no one was paying attention. Once you have read it, get back to me with your thoughts...


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.