1 in 10 PTC workers volunteer for 25% cuts

Mon, 01/26/2009 - 2:44pm
By: John Munford

More cuts coming to address $3.5M shortfall next year

A little more than 10 percent of Peachtree City’s 324 full and part-time employees indicated in a survey that they would voluntarily accept 25 percent pay cuts, City Manager Bernie McMullen said Monday afternoon.

A total of 266 employees responded to the survey, which was conducted at the request of the City Council following a recommendation two weeks ago to eliminate 23 employees from its landscaping crews and replace them with contracted services.
Such a move would save a projected $840,000 from the city’s upcoming 2009-2010 budget, which faces a projected $3.5 million shortfall, officials have said.

28 employees said they would be willing to take a voluntary 25 percent pay cut, McMullen said. Another 238 employees said in the survey that they would not. Still another 58 employees did not respond to the survey.

Further budget cuts are being identified by city staff and will be proposed at an upcoming City Council meeting, McMullen said.

City staff previously calculated that a 12.5 percent pay cut for all employees and a one day a month furlough would save $1.94 million. Eliminating cost of living raises for all employees would save an additional $700,000.

In contrast, making up for the $3.5 million shortfall without any cuts would require a property tax increase of approximately $200 a home, officials have said.

McMullen said some employees have proposed further cost-cutting steps but many of them were already being addressed in the city’s future plans in one form or another.
The survey results, meanwhile, will be presented to council at its February 5 meeting. The decision on the 23 layoffs will be considered at the Feb. 19 council meeting.

McMullen said the layoffs are “unpleasant” and particularly so for the employees who would be affected.

“It’s something I feel like we have to do when we look out for the taxpayer and look at the most cost effective way to deliver services,” McMullen said.

McMullen has previously said that the landscaping and mowing crews handle other jobs in the city that will need to be addressed otherwise if the job cuts are approved. Included in those tasks are litter collection, emergency tree removal, road kill removal and interior building painting. They also perform functions for various special events hosted in the city by various groups.

McMullen said he has instructed the directors of the public works and leisure services departments to do the best they can to cover those areas. Meanwhile he is proposing a significant cutback to landscaping services by halting the upkeep of landscaping at subdivision entrances. Instead the various homeowners associations could perhaps resume that maintenance, McMullen said.

McMullen is proposing the affected employees would get six weeks severance pay and medical insurance with a COBRA option thereafter and access to the city's employee assistance program for three months.

Also, the city will require any contractor assuming the services to consider any of the eliminated city employees for any new jobs created by that contract.

A total of 58 employees didn’t respond to the pay cut survey, though some of those could have represented some part-timers who weren’t scheduled to work by the time the surveys were due Thursday, McMullen said. Some other employees might have decided they had other reasons not to respond, McMullen said.

At council’s direction the surveys were to be anonymous.

McMullen said the current year’s budget has been pared down significantly though many of those cuts represent a one-time-only savings.

The city is reeling financially like many other local governments due to a drop in sales tax collections. Also the city has not realized more than $600,000 in projected savings in this year’s budget that were planned due to personnel vacancies because attrition has not occurred in large part due to the poor job market, McMullen said.

login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by mthom5436 on Tue, 01/27/2009 - 12:36pm.

It is really nice that some of the city employees volunteered to take a pay cut but is it really necessary. Why can't the city management just learn to manage money? How much did we just spend to redecorate all the Squad cars to commemorate Chief Skip’s inauguration? Why not just repair the thermal imagers? Were the ridiculous police ATVs necessary? (They look really cool) How about that trip to China? The City Managers new car to celebrate getting his drivers license back. I know some of some of these things were not that expensive but every dollar counts. I guess it’s just easier to take from lower level employees than it is to exercise financial discipline.

Submitted by MrBeef on Sun, 02/01/2009 - 3:36pm.

to ask from anyone. Why are things being looked at as an all or nothing? If EVERYONE gives a little, then NO ONE gets hurt alot.

Now they want to take away sick time, annual leave and holiday pay from part time workers and save $45,000. They could take away just ONE day from EVERYONE and that would save the same money.

You can take away a little from everywhere and up the millage rate, a little and hopefully it doesn't affect people too much. When you start taking big chunks, like ripping away benefits or haveing to raise the millage rate by two or three mill, you start to affect ALOT of people and that is not good.

There should have been several years of solving these problems BEFORE they not bad.

Spear Road Guy's picture
Submitted by Spear Road Guy on Tue, 01/27/2009 - 3:56pm.

You have to know the mayor and his city council buddies voted against to 25 percent decrease so they can get their pay raise! What was the raise, 100 percent or something like that?

You can't forget the tennis center bailout either. How many millions was that one?

Vote Republican


Submitted by Biggis101 on Tue, 01/27/2009 - 1:31pm.

I agree with some of the points you have made, however, the one about the police cars..... The new police cars were not "redecorated" for the new chief. They were new cars that had already been purchased to replace old cars getting passed down to other departments in the city because they had reached their limit on miles for public safety. The new paint scheme was ordered instead of the old one. NO NEW COST. Oh, and as far as the ATVs are concerned, we have wanted the police to patrol the cart paths more for years. This is one of the steps the police have taken to do that. I'm glad there out there. It makes me feel better when my family is out on the paths.

Submitted by petty on Tue, 01/27/2009 - 2:04am.

In the Philippines a lot of BPO companies had undergone cost cutting. Everyone is just affected...

DarkMadam's picture
Submitted by DarkMadam on Mon, 01/26/2009 - 7:41pm.

$16K to replace 2 thermal imagers
Peachtree City will be spending $16,600 to replace two thermal imagers for the fire department instead of paying almost $8,000 to repair them.

Uhhhhhhh Hhhheeellllloooooo? This is the 7th story down. Wish it were placed right under this one!


Submitted by skyspy on Tue, 01/27/2009 - 1:46pm.

10 million times more important than keeping the kedron pool open in the winter. Do you know that it costs the city $250,000.00 to put the bubble up and down? Did you know that supposedly the bubble we have needs to be replaced? I wonder how much that would cost.

Thermal Imagers save lives and cost less than a stupid bubble.

Submitted by Nitpickers on Tue, 01/27/2009 - 3:39pm.

lives have the "thermal imagers" saved here?

What is it anyway--looks through doors for fire on the other side?

Only place I have seen one is on TV!

Do we have those oil fire capping suits for our cops? John Wayne wore one in a movie.

Submitted by Nitpickers on Tue, 01/27/2009 - 3:39pm.

lives have the "thermal imagers" saved here?

What is it anyway--looks through doors for fire on the other side?

Only place I have seen one is on TV!

Do we have those oil fire capping suits for our cops? John Wayne wore one in a movie.

look to the future's picture
Submitted by look to the future on Mon, 01/26/2009 - 7:28pm.

...go these poor souls. Open your eyes folks, your jobs may be next. The solution is going take sacrifice by us all, not just a few.


DarkMadam's picture
Submitted by DarkMadam on Mon, 01/26/2009 - 7:39pm.

I think this is a fight worth fighting! I couldn't have said it better!


DarkMadam's picture
Submitted by DarkMadam on Mon, 01/26/2009 - 7:12pm.

Ok Folks, it's time to get it together. We just can not let this happen. I was looking over listings of minutes from our City Councel's retreat from LAST YEAR. They saw this coming and sat idly by and let it! Nowhere at the meeting where the purposed 25% pay cut was it EVER said to be permanent! That just APPEARED as almost an after thought on the survey. That is your city council at work. Wiggle, wiggle and more wiggle. If there is a there is a loop hole they can jump through backwards, naked, and on fire to keep from having to cut their own pay or the budget of unneeded things such as fireworks ($60,000) and that stupid fountain at city hall ($20,000), they will do it. Can I be the only one that does not believe that I can not trust them to have looked at everything? These are the same people that voted themselves a PAY RAISE this year!!!!!!!! I urge any citizen, and employee of the city, whether this cut affects you or not, you could be included in the next one (you don't actually think this will be the only one do you?) to write to me at JeanieLynne@yahoo.com with any ideas you may have. Become a voice that matters. Unless you get involved the City Council considers you to be one that doesn't matter. I will be meeting with concerned citizens tomorrow and any constructive ideas you have will help.


Submitted by Bonkers on Tue, 01/27/2009 - 6:50am.

The Town managers want to get rid of all those clods that they have to supervise!
They can blame the contractor for any messes, but not the current employees without getting into trouble about low wages, etc.

You have to understand that one can't sit at a desk if there are people out there you supervise!

Anyway, I never saw the comparison of what the contractor will do it for (and what they will do) against the current costs with the 23!

I know it leaves out a lot of stuff they now do!

Submitted by dollaradayandno... on Tue, 01/27/2009 - 1:19pm.

If that is the thing to do maybe we should contract the Administration?

At least the Police and Fire forces!

I don't think that they think we have the right to decide such stuff!

After all, we just pay for it and vote for them!

Submitted by ignorancesux on Wed, 01/28/2009 - 2:34pm.

I'm sure the police officers and firefighters who serve Peachtree City are just tickled to know that people in town are appauled at contracting out grass cutting services but would contract out actually necessary services without blinking an eye. Unbelievable...

Submitted by enotsm19 on Tue, 01/27/2009 - 2:47pm.

Where did you decide that the police and fire administration need to be contracted out? Chief Clarke has been doing an outstanding job in his first year, which by they way he was on a probationary period. He had done more for this city and placing a member in the DTF will help the department out even more. Will you be complaining when the police department gets a check for 50-100,000 from the county for their help in keeping drugs off the streets? I want to hear your thoughts when this happens and the department can use that money for things that the city budget will no longer have to budget. Secondly, you don't vote for most the police forces, just the sheriff's department. You vote for council members.

Submitted by Nitpickers on Tue, 01/27/2009 - 3:13pm.

Not the Police and fire administration alone---all of the department, and all of the town administration and supervisors except a mayor and his secretary and aid. Everything.

The DTF is just a waste of a person since the ATF people run all of that--they can get a cop to help them anytime. All should share in the money anyway.

The voting I am talking about is the Mayor, Council Sheriff, Supervisors, etc. They hire everyone else!! Although they seem to think that they don't work for anyone once they get there!

Submitted by enotsm19 on Tue, 01/27/2009 - 8:04pm.

The ATF doesn't run the DTF. The ATF is Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms, the DTF is the Drug Task Force, one has nothing to do with the other. The DEA may help out on cases, but for the most part it is the County, and Tyrone, Peachtree City and Fayetteville. And all the participating departments will get a share of the money. So basically, your proposal is for the city to contract out all departments?

Submitted by Nitpickers on Wed, 01/28/2009 - 3:03pm.

Well, it has always been a secret just who the DTF works for, but as best I can tell the react to information furnished by the district attorney (warrants) and the GBI---who, what, when, and where.

It is not my understanding that the local DTF has the knowledgeable people, connections to other states, or facilities to determine when drugs are coming up the road and just who the wholesalers are.

They do furnish grunts for arrests, etc., and for that share in the raids booty!

Submitted by enotsm19 on Thu, 01/29/2009 - 10:24am.

I never said the TNT works alone. I said that they conduct their own investigations based on tips they receive. They work with other departments as well as federal agencies, but they are not run by them as you have claimed. Tell me any law enforcement agency that is able to do investigations alone? They question people, they get tips and they investigate everything further before acting. They investigate based on tips and they arrest based on the results of investigations. And as another poster stated, why is it so wrong to contract out for landscaping, when I can sit there an watch four men laughing and chit chatting, while two other men trim shrubs. I know your alias name is nitpickers, but please stop nit picking. It seems like all you want to do is criticize our local police officers.

Submitted by fluffybear on Tue, 01/27/2009 - 1:32pm.

In Los Angeles County, several cities contract out with the county to provide Police and Fire Services. Typically, this is a sizable cost savings to both the cities and counties.
I am not sure if a set-up such as this would work in Fayette County but then again..

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.