PTC to ask employees to OK 25% pay cuts

Thu, 01/15/2009 - 7:06pm
By: The Citizen

Fate of new 54 traffic light postponed

Some 23 Peachtree City employees who were recommended to be “downsized” got a reprieve tonight ... at least for 30 days.

Instead the City Council directed staff to survey all employees tomorrow to ask if they would be willing to take a 25 percent pay cut beginning next week.

The city's budget outlook is so dire that even such a drastic move would fall short of wiping out the projected $3.5 million shortfall for the 2010-2011 fiscal year budget.

All 23 positions are on the city’s landscaping and mowing crews with four at the city’s recreation department and the remaining 19 at the public works department. That would save an estimated $840,000 a year, not including an anticipated cut in service with less mowing and landscaping done, said City Manager Bernie McMullen.

In addition to mowing parks and right of way areas the crews also handle litter collection and a number of functions for special events hosted by the city.

The special events duties, along with emergency tree removal and other services, would have to be addressed in future outsourcing contracts and in other ways, City Manager Bernie McMullen said.

It was said that if a 20 percent pay cut was enacted across the board on all employees including public safety, the city would save $1.2 million a year. Getting rid of anticipated cost of living increases would save another $700,000.

Mayor Harold Logsdon warned that the more time goes by without action on the matter, the city’s budget picture worsens.

Logsdon said he will not let the city “go bankrupt on his watch,” even though it’s happening to other situations.

Part of the problem is dwindling sales tax revenues due to the downturn in the economy, McMullen said. Also the city has not realized more than $600,000 in savings from personnel vacancies because attrition has not occurred as expected in large part due to the poor job market, McMullen added.

McMullen said he is not proposing any cuts on public safety personnel. It was revealed that city staff have considered implementing city-wide paycuts of 20 percent for all personnel except police and fire because they are needed on duty.

That pay cut would even affect McMullen, he said.

Employee furloughs and many other options have been considered, officials said.

Council members were incredibly averse to the idea of a property tax increase to cover the projected $3.5 million shortfall. Doing so would raise city residents tax bills by about $200 per home, officals said.

Regardless of the survey results, the City Council did not commit to taking any specific action regarding dismissals or across the board pay cuts.

The survey of city employees is to be done anonymously so those who decide against the salary decrease would not face any retribution.

In other business, council voted to postpone a decision on applying for a traffic light on Ga. Highway 54 West at Line Creek Drive. In the meantime they have scheduled a workshop meeting for Friday, Jan. 23 at 5 p.m. specifically to get comments from residents in the Cardiff Park and Planterra Ridge subdivisions about a potential road connection for the shopping center planned for the intersection.

That proposed road would hook up with Planterra Way, a move previously opposed by some Planterra residents.

login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by lucidtroll on Fri, 01/16/2009 - 7:12pm.

O
DOOOOOOH!!!!!!!!!!!!!

TIME TIME HENDRIX!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

HAHHAHAHAhAHAHAhAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA

11B2V SUA SPONTE 2-87 HOOOOO HAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!

Submitted by MYTMITE on Mon, 01/19/2009 - 1:01am.

WE, the people in Peachtree City, do not need to watch the new TV show "The United States of Tara", about a mutli-personality woman. We have our own multi in our midst and once more the amoeba has split or whatever. Welcome, Lucid Troll, where do you keep Bonkers, Dollar and et al when you emerge? When you write 'we' on this site are you writing about a normal family or the many faces of you? I must admit--my favorites are when one self posts and the other responds--sometimes backing up the first and sometimes dissenting. I think I have seen you around town having conversations with yourself. I wish you would reconsider running for office. Look what we would save--five or six workers for the price of one--that is if all of you could reach an agreement on anything. Do you get tired when one of you has insomnia? Do you have a California King Sized bed for all of you to fit? Are you ever lonely? Fill us in--each and everyone of you. Inquiring minds want to know.

Cyclist's picture
Submitted by Cyclist on Fri, 01/16/2009 - 7:16pm.

$ has spawned again! Smiling
-------------------------------------------
Caution - The Surgeon General has determined that constant blogging is an addiction that can cause a sedentary life style.


Submitted by lucidtroll on Fri, 01/16/2009 - 6:36pm.

STARTING WITH ALL IN THE FEDERAL GOVERMENT,CONGRESS 25%, HOUSE OF REPS 25%, ATF,25% FBI,25% IRS IRS IRS, 25% PAY CUTS????

I ARE ESSSS TWENTY FIVE PERCENT PAY CUT YEAH!!!!!

ITS THE P A T R I O T I C thing 2 doo doo doo
HOWBOUT DAT!!!!!!!!!!!!

PAY CUTS ? It is about time the damned goverment lead by example!!!!

WAAAA WAAAA you flew in a corperate jet BFD!!!!!!!!!!!
Hey people of the US of A, ever wonder how much it cost to hall a federal congressmen or senator fat a@@ around in a cadillac LIMO ( made by GM )?

ITS NOT JUST A LOCAL PROBLEM ANYMORE!!!!!!!!!

Hey OBAMA time to get the FEDS to LEAD BY EXAMPLE DONT U THINK?

TWENTY FIVE % OFF ALL FEDERAL GOVERMENT EMPLOYEES PAY.... EH !!!!

hutch866's picture
Submitted by hutch866 on Fri, 01/16/2009 - 6:58pm.

I'm still waiting for the lucid part tp show up.

I yam what I yam....Popeye


Cyclist's picture
Submitted by Cyclist on Fri, 01/16/2009 - 6:54pm.

Welcome to the little world. BTW, what's your choice of alcohol? Smiling
-------------------------------------------
Caution - The Surgeon General has determined that constant blogging is an addiction that can cause a sedentary life style.


Submitted by lucidtroll on Fri, 01/16/2009 - 6:36pm.

STARTING WITH ALL IN THE FEDERAL GOVERMENT,CONGRESS 25%, HOUSE OF REPS 25%, ATF,25% FBI,25% IRS IRS IRS, 25% PAY CUTS????

I ARE ESSSS TWENTY FIVE PERCENT PAY CUT YEAH!!!!!

ITS THE P A T R I O T I C thing 2 doo doo doo
HOWBOUT DAT!!!!!!!!!!!!

PAY CUTS ? It is about time the damned goverment lead by example!!!!

WAAAA WAAAA you flew in a corperate jet BFD!!!!!!!!!!!
Hey people of the US of A, ever wonder how much it cost to hall a federal congressmen or senator fat a@@ around in a cadillac LIMO ( made by GM )?

ITS NOT JUST A LOCAL PROBLEM ANYMORE!!!!!!!!!

Hey OBAMA time to get the FEDS to LEAD BY EXAMPLE DONT U THINK?

TWENTY FIVE % OFF ALL FEDERAL GOVERMENT EMPLOYEES PAY.... EH !!!!

Submitted by lion on Fri, 01/16/2009 - 6:24pm.

Raise taxes to cover the shortfall. And then move on.

3.5 million deficit for city of 35,000 is $100 per citizen.

PTC is a more affluent city than most. We can afford it. And the few extra amenities are what makes PTC different.

And quit whining about how much the City Manager is paid.

Whether he is worth his salary (whatever that is), that issue does not address the deficit problem.

DarkMadam's picture
Submitted by DarkMadam on Mon, 01/19/2009 - 12:02am.

Are you currently earning $297,000 per year? I am pretty darn sure that the new president of these United States has a salary of about that. What job functions could he possibly do that would justify that income? Good Grief Man what are you thinking?


Submitted by enotsm19 on Thu, 01/29/2009 - 10:27am.

I believe the 297,000 a year was a combination of the City Manager, the Assistant City Manager and one other person salaries. Extreme I know, but the City Manager is not making that much alone.

Submitted by IMNSIO on Fri, 01/16/2009 - 7:30pm.

It occurred to me that firing 23 employees was only going to solve less than a third of the problem.

I'd rather pay an extra hundred bucks, which will be divided in my escrow and cost me about 8 bucks a month, than see 23 people fired. Not to mention seeing the roadsides knee high in grass. Make the small tax hike for now and cut back something else later if things don't get better.

Submitted by ShannonbDDgirl on Fri, 01/16/2009 - 3:00pm.

ptc job cuts
now most of you dont know that the city does not even pay their employees enough to live in the city they work so hard to keep up.My husband is part of the landscape dept. that will be replaced if voted by the city council. It was clear to me last night at the meeting that the mayor and council members did not care to hear about the results of the surveys handed out to the wonderful citizens that pay their salaries, they were willing to make the decision right then to go ahead with the job cuts with out any regards to the quality of service you would receive from the out sourcing. My husband does way more than just plant shrubs and prune trees. His job is the main source of income and insurance for our family with three small children. What does the mayor recommend we do when he lets the employees go and my husband cant find another job comparable to what he was making. That leaves us struggling to pay bills, uable to afford health care, we would for sure lose our home to foreclosure. This doesnt just affect our family. The landscape crew is a big family we all know each other, our kids play together it would affect them in the very same way. They would lose everything just like us. So I urge all citizens to help us come up with another way for the city to fix the budget crisis other than putting hard working men and their families out of a job and a home. I wish you all could have seen the digust on the mayors face when this issue was tabled to allow time to hear from the Citizens of Peachtree City. Wouldnt we all like to know where the money went to begin with??????????????? We need your support thanks to all that will help

ShannonbDDgirl's blog | add new comment

Don Haddix's picture
Submitted by Don Haddix on Fri, 01/16/2009 - 1:30pm.

There are a lot of issues on the table and differing opinions in Council over some areas. Other areas we all agree upon.

Early last year I proposed, backed by Doug Sturbaum, a survey, on how to handle tax issues. There has been debate over what should be in the survey.

The survey finally went out and you should receive it in the next day or two. Please fill it out as soon as possible and return. Add comments as you wish. And be sure to tell us how you want to hand the budget issues, as in service cuts, in what areas, tax increase or a combination of both.

The more responses the better.

Your taxes will go up about $80.00 per $1,000.00 of assessed value per mill.

If the Homestead, credits and such are cut, those amounts reflected on your property tax bill as credits will then be paid by you.

A problem we face is we hear about no cuts in service, etc, but no tax increase at the same time. Just not realistic.

We have been cutting and trimming all over the place. And deferring maintenance, which is not good because it can cause even higher repair costs in the future.

The outsourcing of landscaping was done last year. Employees were retained to give chances to move to other jobs. It has not been happening.

On issues of direct contact and communications with them, that is not a proper function of Council. It is a Staff responsibility, with some limitations controlled by Council.

There has been lots of feedback, via email and word of mouth. I can count on one hand those who have said raise their taxes.

And yes, Doug Sturbaum and I have been voting against the 54 Development additions beyond the base GC ordinance from the beginning.

Sorry, folks, but I cannot get into debates in this format on the budget issues.

Please give us the survey feed back asap.

Don Haddix
PTC Councilman
Post 1
donhaddix.com


Submitted by dollaradayandno... on Fri, 01/16/2009 - 4:46pm.

I have never understood what "cuts in service" means!

I know what cuts in capital spending means. I know what cuts in expenses mean.
I do not know what cuts in service means!

Will you stop treating my sewage?
Treating my drinking water?
Only have sewage and water certain hours of the day?
Cut out the third shift for police and firemen?
Call them at home for a fire?
Only six cop cars show up at a robbed store instead of twelve?
Maybe, like Matt Dillon you could enlist the blacksmith and a traveling Arkansas bum, Festus, to help out?
Will it take an extra 6 minutes to answer a 911 call?

Until you say exactly what "cuts in service" means, no one will believe you!

Submitted by ShannonbDDgirl on Fri, 01/16/2009 - 4:40pm.

What other jobs? You chose to spring this on them at the last minute, May be if they would have heard about it LAST Year they all might have new jobs, but to spring this on them in one day and expect everyone not to be upset give me a break, its not your world being flipped upside down, not your home your going to lose, or your health care. Find them new jobs and they will gladly leave your 850,000 dollars behind!!!!!!!!!!! you all can sit up their and say this is a hard decision, and its in the best interst of the citizens that you make your decisions. But who in their right minds would not wait for feedback from the very city they serve and claim to do everything in its best interest? Contradicting yourselves huh?

Submitted by enotsm19 on Fri, 01/16/2009 - 2:56pm.

The problem of doing pay cuts across the board is you have your public safety personnel required to be on duty 24/7. To cut their pay 25%, while still expecting them to work 40 plus hours a week would be cruel. Most other city employee would just not work 1 extra day a week, so instead of working 40 hours a week, they'd work 32 hours a week. This is something you cannot do with Fire/police/EMT. To cut out 25% pay for most public safety personnel would put starting pay for police at 24,000 and move anybody making over 40,000 down to 30,000. Even in the time of a tough economy you do not want to do this to the very people who are protecting your property and your lives. Do I agree in a 25% pay cut, NO, that will put most employees well below their starting pay. But a lot of people complained about have the 23 positions cut, having taxes increase and so forth. Maybe the city should look at holding off on purchases and possibly look into pay increase holds.

Submitted by dollaradayandno... on Fri, 01/16/2009 - 5:00pm.

No one said anything about people staying home one day and working 32 hours.
More like working six days for 25% less! Suspend OT pay!

There would be no "starting pay for police." None would be hired.

Please get off the thing of "some" can not be cut!

Submitted by enotsm19 on Fri, 01/16/2009 - 3:17pm.

Get over myself? First off you don't even know me! Secondly, why don't you offer to have your taxes increased 25%? I mean if you are going to so easily take money away from these hard working individuals, then the least you can do is take away the same amount from your household income and give it to the city. That only seems fair, so how about you quit being so judgmental and offer up your money. Cut the pay of public safety officials and you decrease city revenue even more, especially since speeding tickets or any other tickets bring the city money. As for the laid off or pay cut, well after the crap the public safety personnel take, they may just opt to quit. And guess what, you won't find anybody that would work harder for 24,000 a year. Might be nice not having to hear people complain about your ever move.

Submitted by amc700 on Sun, 01/18/2009 - 9:21pm.

amc700

For the fine citizen(s) who said that they had taken an 80% pay cut... You obviously have no idea about what the fire dept. and police dept. do. Try and tell the families that have needed the fire dept. because they were having a heart attack or their house was on fire and was saved from total destruction because of the fast response of these professionals. These men and women sacrifice more than their time,they put their life on the line everyday to serve and protect the citizens. As the times get even harder, these are the people that we will need the most. No one knows what tomorrow has in store for them, it could be your life that a firefighter or police officer holds in their hands. So please keep your ignorant thoughts to yourself. We need to stand behind our public safety departments and fight for them. And for the 500,000 fire engine, this equipment is much needed to do their job safely and efficiently. Just some things to think about.

Submitted by enotsm19 on Thu, 01/29/2009 - 10:36am.

You miss read my post. I was defending our public safety. I was pointing out that if they had to take a pay cut, most would drop down to 25-30,000k per year. I know what they do especially since I am married to one and I know the countless lives they save and the countless lives my husband has save in his years of service. So I agree with you that people need to realize that just because it doesn't seem like they see the officers or fire fighters in shoot outs or fighting major fires these fine people do a lot behind the scenes.

Submitted by rmoc on Fri, 01/16/2009 - 9:29pm.

Boy, you are a real piece of work if you think cops and firefighters are not worth 30K..I bet you don't go to work without a chance you won't come back. Look at Charleston, they cut back on public safety and 11 firefighters lost their lives. This is the #1 way our tax dollars should be spent..PUBLIC SAFETY.

Submitted by enotsm19 on Fri, 01/16/2009 - 9:16pm.

I'm not really going to waste my time since the reason they are talking 20% pay cuts for city employees and not public safety is simply because you cannot have certain days/hours where public safety isn't on duty. If you do want that, the go ahead Not Again expect everybody to have that same pay cut. Secondly, I too have been hit hard by the economy but would you want to take 25% of our soldiers pay? I mean after all they are protecting our country. Now about working in public safety for 24000 when you can go a few cities or counties over and start at least 32,000, I'm not rocket scientist, but I'm pretty sure people would look there.

My solution is that I think some jobs need to be cut, cost of living should be frozen and taxes increased. If after that they need to go into pay increase freezes then they should look into that, but to cut 25% of peoples pay would devastate the city. It would do more harm then good because you would have more people unable to live with their income. Also, you would have a lower standard of living for the city, who do you think you're going to get for 24,000?

cmc865's picture
Submitted by cmc865 on Fri, 01/16/2009 - 4:41pm.

you are a waste of human breath...Follow your own advice and DIE. You are a very negative SOB who offers no real advice....I would love to meet you face to face and debate like men.


Submitted by skippy875 on Sun, 01/18/2009 - 1:20pm.

That's not a nice statement to make that someone should follow their advice and DIE!!! You are supposed to save lives! Whats an SOB? Geeez, your uptight these days, but I still got love for ya!!!!

Submitted by buzzed on Fri, 01/16/2009 - 11:45am.

Last nigth at the council meeting you could tell that the mayor and council had their minds made up on what they wanted to do(wanted to cut jobs), and when the outpouring of support for the Employees showed up they saw that this would be a hard fight.Instead of cutting 23 peoples jobs, maybe lets try suspending the cost of living raise's that alone would save (if I can remember from last night) $700,000.00. Wow that is a big "drop in the bucket", then suspend the annual raises, that # I cant remember but I am sure it would be over $1,000,000.00. That would be a huge help towards balancing the budget.Or a 2 percent Millage rate increase would only cost the residents an average of $16.66 a month(2 Starbucks coffe's). I believe that a majority of the residents would be willing to pay that extra $16 a month to avoid their city becoming an eye sore like some surrounding cities. I agree that contracting the "mowing" out might be cheaper but these guys do so much more than just mow the grass, examples- tree pruning, emergency accident response,special event organization, litter removel, road kill removel, painting of city buildings,pest control,storm or other natural disasters occur who do you see out there removing all the fallen trees off of the roads and the ever wonderous cart paths thats right theses guys are the ones, it is my understanding that when a tree in a Greenbelt or city owned property is endangering a residents dwelling or property that a tree company is called in, resulting in a substancial cost to the citizens for example the last tree the city had to hire a Tree company to remove cost the tax payers $1,800.00.During an average week public works has to take down at least 10 trees due to disease or infestation, imagine what that would cost us to hire a company evfery time we needed a tree removed- BIG $$$$.Lets please just take another look at this before we make a big mistake and layoff 23 people (withmany years of dedicated service)to the city,I believe that is something that cant be taken back... Ok, lets say that Council does vote to make this reduction of workforce happen, what is going to come about when the residents see there beautiful city dwindiling away and that now there is trash all over the city and dead animals are laying in every street, not to mention having to hire someone every time we need something done.
There were alot of comments made last night about public safety- everyone knows that we need the police and fire protection (thats not in question) but what cost savings would there be if all the officers could drive their own vehicles to and from work instead of having "take home vehicles". Their is alot of talk about cutting peoples jobs and reducing workforce, but how many fire trucks does Peachtree city need, I understand that the city is expected to take delivery of yet another fire truck at the price of over $400,000.00.Try and justify that when 23 families will be losing their income. I have an idea lets fill in the fountain and plant bushes , that would be alot cheaper... Have a great day and Please be ready for the next meeting in February....

DarkMadam's picture
Submitted by DarkMadam on Fri, 01/16/2009 - 11:57am.

your words echo mine exactly with one exception - you were off by about $100,000 on the truck. My understanding is that it is a total cost to the tax payers of $500,000.


Submitted by shafted2 on Fri, 01/16/2009 - 9:57pm.

I would like to know how the citys money is being spent. No one said anything about that last night. Why don't we look at how the money is being spent and go from there rather than jumping the gun and saying "hey, let's cut 23 jobs!" Makes more sense to me....Maybe part of the problem is that the money is not being spent in the appropriate manner.....

Submitted by Spyglass on Fri, 01/16/2009 - 11:03am.

That's my humble opinion....I like living here...get on with it.

Mike King's picture
Submitted by Mike King on Fri, 01/16/2009 - 11:11am.

You are absolutely correct, just raise the taxes a little bit and weather the storm.

That said when raised, do they remain so? Or, do they revert back to previous levels? History is replete with tax raises and those promises broken time and again. Where is the guarantee that "government will have learned its lesson?

Insanity is defined as doing the same thing over and over expecting to get a different result.

Just my two cents worth.


Submitted by Save Fayette on Fri, 01/16/2009 - 10:50am.

Consolidation
What Mayor and counsel need to look at is Consolidating PTC Fire and Rescue with Fayette County. The County runs one of the best Fire Departments in the State of Georgia. I have hear talk that PTC is wanting new fire trucks, equipment and personal.
Currently PTC only puts one-man per. Truck. By consolidating you can save lots of money.(Millions) BY Laying off the lowest paid employees that do lots of work is stupid. I have not heard how much a Landscape company would charge? I bet it is the same amount or more. Where is the savings? If you consolidate Emergency Services with Fayette County, PTC will save millions. Its has already been looked at. The only reason it has not, is the BIG EGOS of our elected officials in PTC. The name on the Fire Truck can still say PTC but Fayette Co. runs it, and not at a lost. But the Mayor has to let it go. Now is the Time.
Look at giving up the library and let the county run it. Tyron, Fayette and PTC can have their own library system. Not the Flint River who gets lots of our money.
There are lots of Duplicate services that the County provides and PTC. Why can’t they bring them together. WHY: Elected Officials EGOS and not thinking about us TAX Payers.

Submitted by intheknow on Fri, 01/16/2009 - 11:18am.

It's obvious you have NO idea what your talking about, i.e. "Currently PTC only puts one-man per truck", as actually every front line engine and medic unit in PCFD is presently staffed with a minimum of TWO personnel, and often an addition one or two volunteers. The County FD staffs their engines with two, and have three on their two Quints. Second, where are the savings you speak of? Sure the county would like nothing more than to add Peachtree City to their Fire Tax base, as its millage rate alone is almost as much as the entire currant millage Peachtree City rate for ALL services provided. That's Fire Police, Public Works, Recreation, Library, etc.... Check the facts before you post your next uninformed blog - Save Fayette

Submitted by PTCGOIL on Fri, 01/16/2009 - 10:41am.

A city council and mayor workshop has just been called for Fri. Jan. 23 at 5pm to "discuss" this issue.

Mr. Mayor-Keep stalling and trying to get your way, but it will NOT change the fact that WE don't want this signal, it's not needed and YOU need to come to terms with this fact. Stop wasting time and get this issue out of the way.

DarkMadam's picture
Submitted by DarkMadam on Fri, 01/16/2009 - 9:59am.

My name is Jeanie and my e-mail address is jeanielynne@yahoo.com. IF you would like to help come up with ideas for this budget lets get together. I am not the most educated, but my heart is in it. 1st thing needed is copies of all of the budget presentations shown last night (in their entirety. That is a good start. Also, talk to anyone in the city that will listen. Explain the purposed pay cuts that the employees are willing to take to save their jobs and get them to take the survey. I know this is a long shot, but nothing worth it is ever easy. Peachtree City has the chance to do something that every other city is trying to do. The difference is the people who care and will do what it takes to MAKE IT HAPPEN! And it can happen too!!


Mike King's picture
Submitted by Mike King on Fri, 01/16/2009 - 9:59am.

Surely, if the city can afford to upgrade the sound system at The Fred, the average citizen can afford to fork over an extra $250.00-$300.00. After all, it is we who elected the guy with the financial background to be mayor, and as the upstanding citizens we are, we take responsibility for our mistakes. In retrospect, however, to have elected his opponent did not seem to be an option.

Isn't it funny, though, when a really controversial decision has to be made on Council, it keeps being kicked down the road (54W traffic light). I'll bet that should one querry Mr Haddix or Sturbaum, they would have opted to kill the project which is exactly what the plurality of residents desire. It seems as if we have three Council Members and a resident of Colorado who stand against the rest of us remaining vigilant to keep the project alive as if their financial future rests upon it.

For me, I wish the mayoral election were next week so that I could remedy the mistake I made three years ago.

Elect Don Haddix as the next mayor of Peachtree City.


Submitted by rmoc on Fri, 01/16/2009 - 9:42am.

It seems that the city can only stick with one solution..where is creativity? 25% is excessive to expect people to suck up, many with families who may be the sole means of support. What about 10%? a slight tax increase($50 to $100 per home)? and laying off non-performing or unnecessary employees. The problem with the proposed layoffs is that they were only based on function, not merit or seniority. My company laid off 10 people and it was based on merit. Fortunately, my business is clearly measurable so it was easy for them to decide.

Submitted by lobsterballs on Fri, 01/16/2009 - 8:13am.

It was odd at the meeting last night that when they put up the slide showing the salary figures of the city employees that the City Manager quickly asked for them to be taken down. Sitting right at the top was the City Manager with a 300,000+ salary. Within Public Works and Recreation there are several "Managers" who do nothing and bring in large checks. Fire the city manager save 10 city employees, it is his fault the city has the deficit it does. Ask the manager over public works why he calls in contractors to do work that the city employees can do.

Submitted by Bonkers on Fri, 01/16/2009 - 7:25am.

First, why is Fayetteville and the County not in such budget trouble? Or, are they?

The above statements reminds me of the Republican Senators in Washington who said some time ago, on Monday, " we can not vote for a first bank bailout," and on Tuesday, then voted for it! Saying they really had no choice--I suppose they had a choice as long as they didn't have to VOTE! This time (yesterday) the Democrats did pretty much the same thing! Lot of principles at work in both cases!
Where is Bush in all this? Parties?

Now, as to the statement above about PTC budgets:
What is all of the procrastination for---due to pressures? First, "can" the lowest paid workers, hire professionals in their place, then today: ask those lowest paid guys to take a 25% pay cut! That asks for an obvious answer. It will be NO, since no one else is being asked to do so---especially those making 7-8 times as much! Such deceivry!

It also indicates that the 25% cut on these low end workers would save $840,000! Wasn't that the savings with them gone?

Also, it is stated that a 20% cut on ALL personnel would save 1.2 million! That indicates a total labor budget of about 6 million, doesn't it?

A cost of living total for everyone of $700,000? I would have thought that would be out first! Some of us (1 in 7 just need a job).

And it was anticipated that $700,000 worth of people would leave
and not be replaced? Cops and all? Where would they work?

So, now the latest is 20% reductions except police and fire? Boy what a stink that will make, won't it? They will be detested by a lot more people for that favor.

And lastly: I want a $200-500 dollar reduction in my home taxes, not a $200 increase! That $400 differential will buy my groceries for a month, right now! If I made over $100K, I wouldn't be too worried!
Did you see the people making over $60 on the school payroll? Almost everyone except the laborers--some 2-3 times that much---and the quantities of them!
It is a recession/depression folks---suck it up!
Don't cut working people's salaries, cut yours. Reduce the force--not their needed salary. They will work harder til better times! Those laidoff will get a year or so of unemployment and "bailouts."

And do it with intelligence and leadership if you have any.

Submitted by MYTMITE on Thu, 01/15/2009 - 11:33pm.

Was any action taken as to asking for the light at our unwanted shopping center or did the firings take too much time? Please keep on top of this as I am sure Logsdon (I never met a developer I didn't love) would love to sneak in that request. Thanks, Citizen, for keeping us up to date.

Submitted by Bonkers on Fri, 01/16/2009 - 7:42am.

No action was needed! All those empties will mostly stay empty, with or wothout a light!

When someone big actually does sign up, then the light will be installed during the big blush of publicity!

John Munford's picture
Submitted by John Munford on Thu, 01/15/2009 - 11:43pm.

They punted that too.


Submitted by UrKidding on Thu, 01/15/2009 - 11:56pm.

Put off today what you can ignore in the future.

Submitted by whynot on Fri, 01/16/2009 - 12:15am.

Your close; I like to call it, " stop listening to people who don't have a clue and lets get to work on fixing this mess. Wink,wink, I got your #!

Submitted by Bonkers on Fri, 01/16/2009 - 7:45am.

I have heard of your clothes, but not a your close!

Submitted by UrKidding on Thu, 01/15/2009 - 11:38pm.

That was funny!!

Submitted by do what you can on Thu, 01/15/2009 - 10:33pm.

It seems that if the citizens don't want to pay more taxes then the city should do away with many of the "community" events like fireworks, etc. How can you ask employess to take a 20% pay cut and then spend however much money on a fireworks show?? Where is the common sense here? For many people who have been with the city 3-5 years, a 20% pay cut would put their salaries BELOW what they were initally started at, at least in public safety. Be prepared for a mass exodus of public safety personnel should a pay cut be implemented. Already many of the public safety employess work many off duty jobs, as well as a second job, just to make ends meet. My opinion is to make the citizens PAY for the extras they get. You can't expect the same quailty of life without paying more for it. It's all part of inflation. Those people who would receive the pay cut are having the SAME financial difficulties that the rest of the nation is having...so what exepmts the citizens of PTC from having to pay a bit more to enjoy the same services they've always been given?! Greedy people...wake up before it's all gone-you'll have no one to blame but your self righteous selves.

Submitted by UrKidding on Thu, 01/15/2009 - 11:18pm.

Mass exodus?? Sorry but there are so many qualified people out of work right now that NO ONE is owed anything. Wake up people cut expenses, debt, and keep what you can. It's a new world.

Submitted by whynot on Thu, 01/15/2009 - 11:25pm.

It isn't a new world and it isn't the first time the economy has been bad. If anything we should have learned it is that taking steps backward doesn't always fix the problem. A careful examination of expenses can often fix areas of deficiency, such as high fuel cost within departments, and monitoring projects that can be delayed until the economy improves.

Submitted by UrKidding on Thu, 01/15/2009 - 11:34pm.

High fuel cost? Agree months ago but now? What do you mean expenses was there waste and why wasn't that fixed before? Projects than can be delayed how does that fit into a pay cut to keep a job?

Submitted by whynot on Thu, 01/15/2009 - 10:57pm.

I agree with your statements about the pay cuts. Everyone wants for people to take two steps back so we can balance an economy that isn't even close to being balanced for a couple of years. Hey I think we should get rid of the entire military and hospitals and when we get attacked again by terrorist we can all grab a shotgun and some bandages from the store and keep our country going because we have to show some good fireworks in July. If you want a really good laugh you should read Cal Beverly's crap article he wrote recently. He believes the newspaper is more important than education, public safety, and emergency medical services. Cal has had to see good employees of a newspaper that is primarily read online loose their jobs to a struggling economy. We should fire over half the teachers and public safety employees so he can feel good about loosing his assistant that fetches his coffee in the morning. Good luck to the citizens that will complain when their children don't receive the education they are entitled to, and to the people who 911 can't answer in a timely manner.

Submitted by ignorantcouncil on Thu, 01/15/2009 - 10:17pm.

...to raise taxes in Peachtree City! There hasn't been a tax increase in 7 years. The City Manager has recommended modest increases many times, but the mayor and council vote them down year after year. As a citizen, I'd rather pay a small increase each year, than to end up having to pay a huge increase eventually. The hole that's been dug is nearly impossible to climb out of now. Most city employees already are paid near the bottom of the pay scale, especially compared to private industry. To ask for a 25% pay cut with the economy where it is will cause serious financial hardships. Since we have a mayor and council that obviously fail to grasp reality here, it appears that we're headed for disaster.

opustv's picture
Submitted by opustv on Fri, 01/16/2009 - 2:05am.

Every city I have lived in get's to this budget crunch phase where they don't have the will to raise taxes and refuse to cut spending. The alternative they come up with is always the same...first we will see a proposal for "red light cameras" at major intersections in PTC to "improve safety." They are basically revenue generating machines for municipalities. Next we'll get a huge list of new laws that need enforcing like "no cell phones while driving." Just wait...it's coming. I can hear the Mayor justifying it in his tiny head.


Submitted by UrKidding on Thu, 01/15/2009 - 11:04pm.

Ok increase taxes? So I'm on the side of not cutting these jobs but if private industry is paying more than why stay at a 25% cut? Ah we pay two to three times the taxes of those counties around us (education being the highest). Small increase?? UrKidding right?? Let me get this right. In an economy that has the highest unemployement rate someone is willing to give up a job all together and find something new then take a pay cut. Ok

Spear Road Guy's picture
Submitted by Spear Road Guy on Thu, 01/15/2009 - 9:52pm.

The tax and over-spend mayor is taking the city to rock bottom $$.

You can't keep spending more than you bring in and not expect to get caught!!! Duh! I'm sure the employees are going to jump at the chance to take a 25 percent pay cut.

Everyone is so tired of the lies and ready to give him the boot.

Vote Republican


Submitted by UrKidding on Thu, 01/15/2009 - 8:36pm.

"The DOT requires such action" since when? CCD applied twice not the city and if I understand correctly it was not denied because the city didn't apply for it. It was because of the location and distance. Logsdon I can't wait to vote you out!!!

Submitted by UrKidding on Thu, 01/15/2009 - 8:30pm.

I wasn't able to make the meeting tonight but I hope someone ask if McMullen's taken a pay cut. If anyone in city management has taken a pay cut while proposing to cut jobs.

DarkMadam's picture
Submitted by DarkMadam on Fri, 01/16/2009 - 9:48am.

I was the very person that clearly asked that if we were talking about a 20% pay cut across the board if the council, Mayor and the City manager would be included and I was told "YES". Lets see... Hmmmm If we can save $880,000 with employee cuts and the City Manager Makes $297,000 yearly that adds another $59,400 to the amount. Does anyone realize that just a 20% reduction in his pay is more than any one of the 23 employees make in a year? In some cases it is the salary of 2 of them. What is wrong with the picture?


Submitted by IMNSIO on Fri, 01/16/2009 - 9:59am.

(guess that's not such a funny lead in after Michael Vick) but anyway, are you really under the impression that any City manager in this county makes 297k a year?

Submitted by enotsm19 on Fri, 01/16/2009 - 2:59pm.

Actually that is the second person who said that the city manager makes close to 300,000 and both were at the meeting last night.

Submitted by nepotism on Fri, 01/16/2009 - 4:57pm.

I am pretty sure that the 297k under city manager included the assistant city manager. Might also include one of the Staff assistants (not sure about that) Still a bunch of $$$ but just wanted to clarify, because there wasn't a line item for the Assistant. Most of you probably don't even know why there is an assistant city manager, he never has to say anything, or make decisions, so why do we have one? Im suprised nobody last night brought up the DUI stuff...Everybody stayed composed, and citizens gave their two cents....

As far as strictly head count why does Police and Fire need more people now (in a recession) than in 2005?

In 2005 the Fire Dept had 47 full time and 15 part time and in 2009 they have 59 Full Time and 21 Part Time??? (18 More bodies, than 2005!!!) And Police went up from 62 to 68. I guess they needed more people to work their Haunted House and Pumpkin Sale. Im all for safety but it's getting to a point where even if we reduced their headcounts by 15-20% it won't effect the time it would take to reach the scene of a fire (since we rarely have a fire anyway) as long as there are enough emt's to be first responders to traffic etc.

The police have time to park and chat with their fellow officers in unpatrolled areas, to shoot the breeze instead of getting on the street and creating revenue for the city.

Amazingly in those years (2005-2009) Public Works and Recreation stayed the same...(except for additional library staff) 7 Full Time and 12 Part Time (seems excessive also especially since they just reduced hours)
Click Here Here is the link to the budget.

Submitted by Titum Gan Eiri Ort on Fri, 01/16/2009 - 6:33pm.

Folks we can debate all day trying to decide who goes and who stays in PTC as workers in the future. We can talk about the money not there to pay bills. We can talk about a tax increase. We can talk about everything under the sun except the really main issue. The issue is the CITY MAMAGER not doing his job for along time. We pay him a vast amount of money to run the city, have a good fiscal plan, stand out as a good example both as a Citizen and Manager all of us can respect, and to make sure the city operates effectively and at the lowest cost possible and keep us safe. All of the fine citizens that are making suggestions here that are reasonable and have merit, are what we have been paying the City Manager to do and he has failed in that job. Just think about it for a second !!!! Ok let's just get rid of him tomorrow and finally hire a City Manager that has a background at fixing the type of problems we are now having. We know the current one can not do it because almost every suggestion he makes causes more problem the citizens now have to try to fix. I hope the city has learned not to hire some guy who is a friend of a City Councilmen to run a 12 million dollar company like Peachtree City. 4 years later we have a mess that may take us years to fix on either the backs of the lowest paid workers or with increased taxes on the citizens. Well let's just get rid of him like they do in a company when it is failing. Small Problem: He is in a business relationship with the Mayor who has done nothing but give him a raise each year, a bonus each year, saved his job with his very public DUI, allowed him to hire his son with a DUI as a fireman, hire department heads that are failures, add an assistant City Manager that seems to never be at work, cause unions to be appear both in the Fire and Police departments, hire past buddies to do consulting work for the city without bidding out the projects and on and on and on. Team that with a Mayor who could not balance his checking account with a calculator but ran on a platform as a top notch Money Manager. Do you know how sick and tired I am hearing citizens talking about elected official sitting in bars around town all the time or smelling liquor on their breath when they are talking to them in the morning, afternoon or evening.

Yes we have major problems that need to be fixed right away and they are right in front of us. Starting with a new City Manager with experience, and NO connection to Mayor. Then a new Mayor in Jan. 2010. I do not know either of these guys and did not vote for the Mayor, but it does not take a very bright person to see that they let ship sink while they took care of themselves.

I would not let either of these guys run the cash register at my business never mind my 12 million tax dollars. We need to point the finger where it belongs and that is the guy running the operation of the city. McMullen needs to be shown the door and quickly.

Submitted by dollaradayandno... on Fri, 01/16/2009 - 4:32pm.

No, I think not.
Another rumor gleaned from misreading something!

It is likely the total salary of him, his assistant, his secretary, and office expenses!

Last I heard his salary was about $130,00 plus and his asistant about $100,000 plus.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.