-->
Search the ArchivesNavigationContact InformationThe Citizen Newspapers For Advertising Information Email us your news! For technical difficulties |
Is "No Child Left Behind" still relevant?Wed, 12/03/2008 - 10:24am
By: sniffles5
What do you think about the "No Child Left Behind" laws? My feeling is that it has morphed into something not intended by the original coalition of lawmakers who enacted this law. My understanding is that NCLB was to be the first step in an "upgrade" of educational standards throughout America. One of the things that makes America unique is local control of the education curriculum. NCLB was a multi-prong approach (carrot and stick, if you will) to raise standards by using federal funds to assist local school boards, the trade-off being high-stakes testing. What we actually got was something very close to a "hostile takeover" of local school systems by the federal government. Education mandates were never funded, yet high-stakes testing became the law of the land, so in effect, NCLB is nothing more than a synonym for high-stakes testing. As I don't believe this was the original intent of the law, I feel that high-stakes testing should be scrapped and Congress should go back to the drawing board. What do YOU think? login to post comments | next forum topic |