-->
Search the ArchivesNavigationContact InformationThe Citizen Newspapers For Advertising Information Email us your news! For technical difficulties |
Opponents distorted ice rink issueTue, 11/18/2008 - 4:57pm
By: Letters to the ...
Despite the fact that the [$9.95 million Peachtree City] recreation bond was defeated, I feel compelled to share my perspective. It feels on some level this bond may have been defeated based on rumors and bad information. Although it seems the recreation bond was defeated by a large margin, the facts indicate that if only 13 citizens out of every 100 voted yes instead of no, the bond would have passed. If the bond was truly defeated because citizens didn’t want an ice arena or if they truly believed they could not afford the projected $2.18 per month increase in taxes, it would make sense. But more often I heard, “I’m not paying for some guy to get rich.” Based on my personal discussions with people, it appears it was primarily defeated because so many believed the city was funding a business that Dar Thompson or a private company was going to get “a kickback” or “get rich.” I have spent the last two weeks not only asking as many people as I can what their “thoughts” were and why and how they voted, but I personally spoke with Dar Thompson on three occasions and questioned the accusations made against him. Before last week, I didn’t know Dar Thompson. As only a 3-year resident of Peachtree City, I admit I don’t have the historic knowledge of politics here. I had the pleasure of meeting Dar two weeks ago and felt comfortable enough the first time we spoke to ask him, “Why do people think you are profiting and why are they so against you?” I went back to The Citizen and read as many articles to understand both sides of the argument. Again, the main reason this appears to have been defeated is a personal feeling that Dar, “One Man,” was going to “profit” from this venture and he wanted the city to fund it. People were offended that he had any part in this project. The irony in all of this is that it is simply not true. Mr. Thompson did not have a financial interest in the ice complex. Because he suggested adding a “fitness center amenity,” the focus shifted and somehow it became “Dar’s” project. The fitness center was intended as a small satellite location with some machines and cardio to be offered as an amenity for the parents whose kids were involved in the various sports activities at the complex. The fitness center was 100 percent funded by the tenant; none of the taxpayers’ dollars would go to this project. In the end the city would have owned a building, an asset, it didn’t have to fund. The bond for was for the ice complex, thus, if the sole purpose was to vote “no” because of “one man’s” involvement using the taxpayers’ dollar, I believe we were misinformed. After speaking with Dar, it made perfect sense to me that someone like him would be the impetus to start a project like this. I personally think the city is blessed to have a resident as knowledgeable in business management to be working on its behalf to bring this type of amenity to the city. If not Dar Thompson, then who? He has a proven track record of building, running and maintaining a successful business. If it is his idea and he has suggested adding a fitness center as a component of the rec center, why is this so offensive to people? When did it become a crime to make money running and profiting in business? The other comment often stated, “If this is such a great idea, let private business build it,” or, “I don’t want tax dollars spent on this type of recreation,” or, “I wouldn’t use this, why should I pay for it?” On the surface, I will admit I had similar initial thoughts. It’s easy to let our mind go that direction, especially in a tougher financial climate. But as I thought back on the reasons I selected Peachtree City over Newnan or other outlying areas, I remembered it was the recreation and the lifestyle that Peachtree City offered. The city/government built and funded ALL of the things that made our decision – the schools, the tennis center, Kedron Rec center, the golf cart paths and the parks. All of these amenities were provided with taxpayer funds. I’m proud to live in a community that dedicates resources to these amenities. What sparked my interest most in this idea is that Dar was smart enough to find a way to negotiate a project that wouldn’t burden the taxpayers with 100 percent of the costs as these other recreational amenities. By building the facility with the proposed plan, bringing in outside business and utilizing other resources, we as taxpayers would shoulder only a small portion of the entire cost of the project. Considering the current political climate, it was great to hear that private business was willing to help contribute to the cost. Instead this story was twisted and presented to the public as the city paying for a private company to “get rich.” The reality is that with the ice complex the CITY would stand to gain financially as well. Certainly the revenue from hotels, restaurants, retail, would add to the city budget. But residents of the city gain regardless if you ever step foot in the Ice Arena. A premiere center like this would certainly increase home values by adding another amenity and increasing the desire for people to pick Peachtree City over other cities. Residents also gain as they have a wonderful facility to use. It doesn’t feel like such a stretch or ridiculous to ask the citizens to share some of the risk and cost for a project of this scale. By bringing the outside ice management company on board, Dar has helped structure a deal that lowers the cost of the amenity to the citizens, but still provides the benefits. Why is this so offensive to us? Why shouldn’t a business profit, if we as citizens profit as well? I believe this paper has convinced the community that only ONE individual benefits and failed to demonstrate that we all really had something wonderful to gain at a relatively low cost. I hope this issue is not “dead in the water” and I hope residents reconsider and find a new way to go forward with this project. Will we sit around and watch those around us continue to raise the bar all the while we stand by and do nothing to better our community? I hope that the next big headline isn’t “Coweta County to open premier ice and sports complex.” Denise Sturman Peachtree City, Ga. login to post comments |