I have attempted to find where Hillary Clinton talked to the dead, but find nothing!

Nancy Reagan even called astrologers as to the timliness of President Reagan's trips. He also listened to her.

Obama, like many people, is not familiar with such things as astrology and seances. All bunk and stupidity.
He probably just mixed up the whole thing with Pro Wrestling and NASCAR!! Other crutches some have.

The fact you couldn't find anything about Hillary talking to the dead really doesn't surprise me or anyone who reads your posts. Let me help you:

First you go to www.google.com

Then you type in "Hillary Clinton talking to the dead"

Press Enter or Hit Google Search (in case that was your problem)

Then look at the very first returned hit on the list. (click on that little link thingy)

A CNN story, of all things, will magically appear.

In case this is more than you can handle, I'll even throw in the link for you. You'll need to click on it though:

Links for Dummies

BTW, you mentioning other's crutches is amusing since you can't even manage to find that little nugget.

I remember Woodward and this crap!
I'm not sure that I can explain it simple enough for you to understand how some people write, but here goes:

Hillary was advised by an editor (as are all writers) to use the old ploy of pretending to talk to someone famous that you know for their ideas--she even suggested Elanor Roosevelt! Hillary tried that in her writing! That is all there was to it! You didn't even read the whole article apparently.

Nancy Reagan however called her "astrologer" (one who reads the stars) nearly every day for Ronnie! The "handlers" kept them both going for at least a year!

Here is another quote regarding Hillary and her "ploy of pretending to talk to someone famous":

When she was first lady, Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., worked with spiritual adviser Jean Houston to access an "Eleanor Roosevelt-like consciousness" from within her own psyche. Clinton wrote in a column that Roosevelt "usually responds by telling me to buck up, or at least to grow skin as thick as a rhinoceros."

Another link for dummies

Now I know you say there was nothing to it and in your world that is probably true. To those of us who can think, when one writes columns about the exact ideas the "imaginary friend" was responding back with, that lends credibility. Maybe if Slick Willie could have made do with "imaginary friends" like she did, things might have ended up better for him.

Now, go pick your nose and quit bothering me.....

I am going to have to agree with Nitpickers about the Reagans--they were stupid nuts and we were lucky to get out of that administration with only an additional 5-6 Trillion dollars worth of debt that he sunk into corporations and war machines, and of course the California Mafia! Russia went broke on their own hook (and the cheap price of oil)--he had little if anything to do with their downfall.

I agree that Nitpickers, I, and others should not waste any of your time as you are like the religious nuts who are constantly hanging onto false details---preaching to others to go your way, and refuse to be peaceful within your own mind with your own "silent" prayers, instead of making a fool out of yourself in public!

Reagan is gone, thank goodness for the USA, and we may someday clear up all the debt and mistakes he, Nixon, and Bush have made.

Obama isn't the answer, but he won due to such gibberish as has Limbaugh, Hannity, Coulter, Boortz and scores of other idiots rant about every day!

McCain would have been better for at least four years.

You would serve your happiness better if you would not concentrate on a few of our citizens who are poorer, dumber, and lazier than are you.

"I agree that Nitpickers, I, and others should not waste any of your time...."

Cool, I'll hold you and your alter ego to that. It's been fun....

"You would serve your happiness better if you would not concentrate on a few of our citizens who are poorer, dumber, and lazier than are you."

I feel the obligation when someone writes me directly, but I agree. Please refer back to my first point.

You know, you don't have agree with Nit$ all the time.
-------------------------------------------
Caution - The Surgeon General has determined that constant blogging is an addiction that can cause a sedentary life style.

Refresh my memory...when was the last time the Decider had a press conference?

Thank you for pointing out that President-elect Obama did this nation a great service by reminding us that, contrary to the revisionist notion that Reagan and his wife were "Christians", they actually depended upon astrology and other arcane occultinfluences to drive their lives.

Obama did goof when he said "seances", he should have said "astrologers". Minor miscue.

I hope Barry doesn't make any sudden stops or you'll end up with a broken neck as far as your head is up his....

Barry's own spokesperson called it a "careless and offhanded remark" and you call it "a great service"???? As I said before, you are one easy mark.

Let me do the nation another great service by pointing out that your fellow liberal fruitcake Hillary was the one that had the imaginary conversations with Eleanor Roosevelt. Would that qualify as "arcane occult influences" as you put it??

Don't be so sensitive to your Messiah's mistakes being pointed out. We'll be making sure you see and hear every one of them. You did it. Deal with it.

Let's see, those 18-29 year old kids get a job, a mortgage, get married, and have kids. They become conservatives and start voting Republican! Then they start looking for Republican areas to move to so their kids can go to good schools.

BTW, ever notice how liberals like Snotty move to Republican states, towns, and neighborhoods - - to enjoy our low taxes, (relatively) good government, low crime, etc. You never hear of mass migration from Georgia to Taxachusetts or cities like Philly and Newark.

I don't think that's how it works. Consider some one becoming “politically aware” at around 25, the age most people start voting. For everybody under 40 they have experienced Clinton's robust economic term with surpluses and Bush's devastation of the economy resulting in fantastic debt and the nationalization of large parts of the private sector. If Obama performs for the economy at an even average pace for a Dem. then by the time he leaves office two generations will see the Dem' as the party of rational fiscal management.

This shift is underway and has been since 1992. Take a look at this chart of the shifting of voting patterns:

President Map

Click on the “Voting Shift” button. You can also use the little slide bar to compare the race to '00, '96 and '92.

Devastating for Republicans. They are shrinking to a southern regional party.

Because we live in a very hard-core Palinista Rep. area it is hard to see.

And the probability is that it will get much worse. The Rep. base has been captured by the Palin wing of the Party, the exact segment that the Dems will probably not focus on attracting. I was listening to Rush the other day squealing in delight that Chris Shays had been defeated in Connecticut. His message was “good riddance”. Go Rush! Shrink that Party!

Reagan brought together the evangelical wing (that part that was only concerned about controlling aspects of sex), the national security Reps. and the fiscal conservatives. There is absolutely no reason that the evangelical faction and the fiscal conservatives (or national security types) are linked. The Dems. are already breaking off huge segments of the fiscal conservatives and given any Obama success in foreign affairs the Dems. will continue attracting the national security wing.

The more the Reps. tie themselves to the Palin/Rush/Sean/O'Reilly/Savage faction, the more they alienate virtually everybody else.

Look up the theory of political socialization sometime. It states that your political views are largely formed in school and university. The first big wave of conservatives came as a result of an unpopular Democrat (Carter) followed by a popular Republican (Reagan). The current big wave of progessives came as a result of a popular Democrat (Clinton) followed by an extremely unpopular Republican (Decider).

It's not getting any better for you guys either. The Democrats have been slowly but surely picking off moderate Republicans in both 2006 and 2008. The Republicans that are left are the hardcore fringe...you've got nothing to offer America. You've been "Palinized".

And now you have a President-elect who has garnered the highest percentage of votes for a non-incumbent since Eisenhower.

Virtually every key demographic has deserted you. Essentially what is left of the Republican party are older white men, a steadily diminishing demographic percentage-wise.

Enjoy your years in the wilderness!

I agree with some of what you say, Sniff, but +57 million votes for a weak Republican candidate during these turbulent economic times was impressive.

+57 million votes for a weak Republican candidate during these turbulent economic times was impressive.

Some say impressive, others say disturbing. The high percentage of voters that were willing to elect John McCain and put Sarah Palin in line to become the POTUS is a disturbing fact to me. In my opinion, it once more shows me that denial of the results of observable actions is an insidious aspect that is not to be taken lightly. My guard has not come down since the election and my goal is to energize the eligible voters in this country even more, and stress the importance of conscious and original thought in the process of selecting leaders, regardless of party affiliation.

"I can't wait until tomorrow, because I get more lovable every day."

What are saying is true but also basically irrelevant. Kentucky scored 38 points against nationally ranked Georgia yesterday but that doesn't make them a national powerhouse (AND they still lost!)

Sniffer is still drunk from arrogance at Barry's victory. Even though he cites where waves of voters defect at times following unpopular presidents, he wants to believe they have come home forever to liberalism. Politics, like business, is cyclical despite Sniffer's blind musings. Pssst, don't tell him....

Also, according to his "demographics", out of 120 million voters there are over 57 million "older white men". "Virtually every key demographic has deserted you." was the way he put it. That alone demonstrates how "straight" his demographics are.

Election Demographics

So, we are supposed to get all misty because some cat ripped-off a nonprofit (with his kid watching) and benefitted from someone else’s benefits he had no right to? Are you kidding me? Slipping into a museum without paying on someone else’s pass it STEALING! The Obama Effect indeed. Taking what you have no right to; shortsightedness to do what feels good for the moment. I guess this is just a sample of the freebies that the folks should expect now with no regard to the adults who have to pay the bills.

We used to go there when we lived in the Chicago area.

They have a display that involves two human cadavers--a male and a female. Apparently, each was frozen and then passed through a band saw with the result that they are cut into, say, one inch "steaks." The female was cut horizontally, and the male vertically. The cross-sections are displayed so that you can see where all of the organs and tissues are in relation to one another.

That's about the only thing I recall about that museum, as it sort of eclipsed everything else.

____________________

"Puddleglum" by Weatherwax (one of the Muddlings).

Jeeves to the Rescue

I remember that.

All too vividly.

I'm not sure I should have been allowed into that room at that age. I'm not sure I should be allowed into that room at this age.

You ruined my breakfast.

You were going to have sausages for breakfast.

"I can't wait until tomorrow, because I get more lovable every day."