Roundabout to be hashed out

Thu, 01/26/2006 - 2:51pm
By: John Munford

Sure a roundabout will be unique, but will it work at the intersection of Peachtree Parkway and Walt Banks Road, a busy junction adjacent to McIntosh High School?

That’s what the Peachtree City Council has to figure out at its meeting Thursday night. The city’s traffic consulting firm, QK4, will present proposed improvements, funding, levels of service and right of way needs for the project.

The roundabout would allow traffic to flow counter-clockwise, but all vehicles entering the roundabout must yield to traffic already inside the roundabout. City officials said if the go-ahead is given, a significant public information program will be implemented along with appropriate signage to guide motorists through safely.

All McIntosh High School traffic feeds onto Walt Banks Road, which has two outlets: onto Ga. Highway 54, and into the intersection of Walt Banks and Peachtree Parkway, site of the proposed roundabout.

The public is invited to attend the meeting, which starts at 7 p.m. at City Hall.

“This would be the first roundabout constructed by the city,” said Public Information Officer Betsy Tyler. “It is important to get direction from the Council and the citizens at this point, because similar projects have been discussed for other intersections in the future.”

In the past, officials have mentioned the possibility of putting a roundabout at the intersection of Peachtree Parkway and Crosstown Road.

Some of the funding for the roundabout is coming from the developer of the Lexington Commons commercial development, with the remainder coming from the city’s transportation Special Purpose Local Option Sales Tax revenues.

login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by Betsy Tyler on Thu, 01/26/2006 - 5:07pm.

Hi, John,
I just wanted to emphasize that this meeting is for discussion purposes only. The funding from SPLOST and the developer is actually for "improvements" to the intersection. The discussion will give staff direction as to whether to pursue the roundabout option or move ahead with other types of improvements.
Thanks!
Betsy Tyler
Public Information Officer
City of Peachtree City

Submitted by nusport on Fri, 01/27/2006 - 1:32pm.

Two words: McDonough Square.

Submitted by McDonoughDawg on Fri, 01/27/2006 - 4:51pm.

The Mcdonough Square, before the re-routing of Hwy 155, was the only place in Georgia where 4 State Highways came together. 42/20/81/155. The traffic count is not comparable. I used to live at Lake Dow and getting through the square was horrible. Comparing it to ANY section around here is laughable, not to sound demeaning, but traffic here is SO much better than Henry Co, it's one of the many reason I moved here almost 2 years ago.

That being said, I think it could work. I've seen them work in other areas. New Smyrna Beach, just south of Daytona for one.

H. Hamster's picture
Submitted by H. Hamster on Fri, 01/27/2006 - 8:13pm.

Well, sure they do with adult drivers. How do they work with the 16-year old driver who just figured out how to drive in a straight line? There's plenty of them at McIntosh H.S.

I predict the city will station a cop there every day during rush hours (yes its plural - like maybe 4 or 5 hours)instead of other duties, like catching internet predators. I really want more of those guys caught. Can't wait for the first Peachtree City resident to get "exposed"


Submitted by Gator on Sat, 01/28/2006 - 8:58am.

I live less than a mile from the Walt Banks/Peachtree Parkway intersection. Yes, traffic is heavy at certain times of the day but the current 4-way stop keeps things moving quite nicely. The cost of a roundabout versus any projected improvement in traffic flow does not justify the expenditure. I'm sure there are all kinds of studies that will support the construction of the roundabout (what did the studies cost us?), but somehow common sense seems to lose out. If this project goes forward, it will be a boondoggle with very little, if any, improvements.

Put the roundabout plans where they belong....in the circular file!

Submitted by pandora on Sat, 01/28/2006 - 9:13am.

Hah! Agreed.
Maybe this could be Cal's poll for next week: Roundabouts - "Love 'em"; "Hate 'em"; or "Let's give it a try and see how many teens and golf carts get wiped out."

Submitted by pandora on Sat, 01/28/2006 - 8:57am.

Hamster - I'm an adult driver, and only have two real references for these things. Being stuck on one in DC, and my frequent experience with confused, "wrong way" drivers at The Avenue. Needless to say, they scare me to death. Maybe this is just an roundabout way of making everyone avoid Parkway North!

H. Hamster's picture
Submitted by H. Hamster on Sat, 01/28/2006 - 4:34pm.

This whole idea came out of 1999 and 2000 with Basinger and Williams leading the way at the urging of McMenamin and Lenox. They aren't there anymore. The only thing that survives is their language in an impact fee document. Betsy is correct - it could go either way. A timed 4-way traffic light is the best option. A roundabout is second and a not timed 4-way traffic light is by far the worst scenario.

A not timed traffic light would be a nightmare - don't let that happen for sure! But please do go to the meeting on February 2 and tell them how you feel.


Robert W. Morgan's picture
Submitted by Robert W. Morgan on Sat, 01/28/2006 - 4:43pm.

You got to use all the keys furry one. A Roundabout is an excellent way to keep the traffic moving at an intersection like that where all the traffic goes north in the morning and south in the evening. School traffic mostly goes north and turns east in the AM, so that doesn't slow things down. The afternoon school traffic going west, then north thru the roundabout isn't an issue and the westbound school traffic going south will be held up so long that they will go out the other way. And kids are adaptable - they will learn the roundabout rules quicker than the old folks.

Perfect solution for there and later for Mc Intosh and Crosstown intersections along the Parkway. And yes indeed, go to the meeting and support this excellent idea.


Submitted by Citizen_Steve on Sun, 01/29/2006 - 8:53pm.

Agreed the traffic may move more efficiently however I'm concerned there'd be an increased danger to the students on golf carts.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.