Sheriff-Chairman face-off; PTC predictions

Cal Beverly's picture

Opinions about local stuff, not necessarily in order of importance:

Sheriff versus County Commission chairman on accounting for federally-dispensed drug forfeiture money: Gentlemen, gentlemen, please.

The county sheriff’s department has a drug squad that participates in multi-county investigations and property seizures. Until now, the department has spent the federally-audited money for undercover vehicles, surveillance equipment and a very public helicopter.

Chairman Greg Dunn and other commissioners, for some stated reasons and probably a lot of unstated ones, want the county financial department to count those beans and account for all the property bought with the drug seizure proceeds.

The sheriff traded in some drug-money-funded vehicles for some new wheels without telling the county commission, and the chairman sent three county employees to the dealership to repossess the county-titled vehicles.

That led to an intimidating number of deputies to a big-time traffic stop of the three employees and interrogations while in custody.

Not a pretty picture, even if missile-silo-sized egos are in play here.

Guys, you look foolish. On the sheriff’s side: Foolish stop, foolish interrogation and foolish intimidation. On the commission’s side: foolish confrontations, foolish public displays of out-sized egos run amok, foolish and childish governmental example of “He took my toy”; “No, it’s my toy!”

Fayette County can do better. You guys pointing your weapons at each other from the county office building to the sheriff’s department absolutely need to do better.

Take it private, guys. Work out your differences in a mature, adult way. There is a middle ground that will work for both sides. Find it. Voters might punish both sides if both sides have too much pride and ego to seek reconciliation.

Chairman Dunn, if you really want to be sheriff, run for the office. If you really want to run a county police department, say so, publicly. Stop hiding behind a controversy that you mostly manufactured yourself.

Sheriff, if you don’t want the public checking out your expenditures, retire to private life. As long as you are a public official, expect the public to want to know how you are handling public money. Drug seizure money is public money, whether it’s got a “federal” label on it or not. The public deserves an accounting.

***

First considerations before the rookie Peachtree City Council: Monopolize garbage pickup, raise golf cart fees, approve a dense residential development on the city’s western side, and prepare to make homeowners pay for rainwater runoff.

If this is what the voters really wanted when they voted last fall, they are getting it in spades.

Results: Even a rookie council in a majority Republican city recognizes the dangers inherent in a monopoly (although former Maine resident Judi-ann Rutherford voted to take away residents’ right to choose their own provider). They raised cart fees. They approved a development that the last council tabled. Now we get 23 homes on less than 8.5 acres on the city’s west side. And they take their advice on stormwater issues from the engineering firm that will be paid for developing the utility to handle rainwater runoff.

My, my, my. And this is just the first few weeks’ work product for the new council.

Look for these issues to bubble up out of the city bureaucracy:

1. A renewed push for a 1,000-acre-plus Westside annexation with multiple thousands of first-time residents and double that number of vehicles pouring from two outlets onto Ga. highways 54 and 74. Traffic and school overcrowding issues will be shushed away or downplayed. Reason given: To develop county land to Peachtree City standards as a protective measure for our borders. That rationale, if followed logically, would take PTC all the way eastward to Fayetteville and all the way south to Brooks.

2. Rezoning and converting multiple dozens of acres now zoned industrial into high-density residential developments. How? First the council-picked land use committees will be tasked with “overhauling” the city’s land use plan. Once they change the land use map to be more developer-friendly, the first rezoning requests will begin to pour in. Look for them to be approved, with the council ruefully explaining that since the land use map calls for such development, the council really has no choice but to go along.

3. “Redevelopment” as the new buzzword. Older areas, including commercial and church areas, will be considered for newer, updated and invariably more intense use. You won’t believe what commercial and residential developments the next four years will bring to PTC. And you won’t like most of them.

4. The independent water and sewer authority seeking new customers — outside PTC. Reason given: more capacity than is needed for city use. More money needed to keep rates from increasing even more than they will. Senoia, across the line in Coweta County, wants to tap on so they can put ever more residents on ever-smaller lots. Why not Tyrone? Why not sewer the county?

Oh, my, my, my.

Happy new year.

login to post comments | Cal Beverly's blog

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Leoah Whineknott's picture
Submitted by Leoah Whineknott on Wed, 01/25/2006 - 3:17am.

Cal,

Your comments about the Sheriff-Chairman face-off are so true. I couldn't agree more!

But, I sincerely hope you are as wrong about your predictions for PTC's new leadership as you were about Steve Brown. It would be tragic for PTC to loose more industrial land.

What's your prediction for the west side if the property isn't annexed? Treeless County Subdivisions? Commercial/Industrial development? Or, is your money on the status quo?

Leoah Whineknott


Submitted by ptcjenn on Tue, 01/24/2006 - 10:06pm.

If the new companies that they're wanting to bring into the industrial section of PTC are all going to be like Noveon then bring on the little houses, the more the merrier! I prefer my environment to be free of carcinogens, but maybe that's just me. Got to scorecard.org - the results there are from 2002 so nothing current yet, but look up the results for Noveon in other towns if you feel like trash service or fast food wrappers on the cart paths are the biggest environmental concerns in Peachtree City. I see where people who worry about high density subdivisions are coming from, but really - wouldn't you rather have more new homes going in than companies like Noveon or (thank goodness they're gone) Photocircuits? Drive around that part of town - it's not going to be wooded lots with 'For Sale' signs forever.

H. Hamster's picture
Submitted by H. Hamster on Tue, 01/24/2006 - 7:49pm.

Looks like Steve Brown is still perched like a canary on Cal's shoulder telling him what to write. Obviously what he/they wrote is all nonsense, but I really like the one on "Redevelopment" I vote for Wynnmeade first. After that we can look at Twiggs. Can you spell "Eminent Domain?"


Cal Beverly's picture
Submitted by Cal Beverly on Wed, 01/25/2006 - 1:25am.

Tiny fuzzy one, you are cute, but you really ought to try for an original thought occasionally if you're going to do this publicly. Otherwise, folks might start thinking you are really a parrot (you know, endlessly repeating the same tired old guard line), instead of a cuddly little rodent who's still digging through the cage litter and pellets of something unpleasant trying to get into the new year.

As for blaming Steve Brown for my editorial transgressions, do your math: I precede him in PTC by at least 16 years. Ask my friends at the old PCDC; you probably know most of them. Blame me for him, if you must, but puh-leeze, don't blame him for me.

Nonsensically but respectfully (in honor of those twitchy white whiskers),
Your editorial buddy Cal


H. Hamster's picture
Submitted by H. Hamster on Wed, 01/25/2006 - 6:52am.

Yes indeed some of us do blame you for him 4 or 5 years ago giving his anti-everything ravings free and widespread coverage. That led to his election in a runoff against a Delta pilot by a small margin largely fueled by voters who knew nothing of the issues except what they read in your paper. Fortunately, it didn't happen the second time, but enough history.

You are exactly right, original thought is good and the redevelopment discussion is just that. Very few in Peachtree City have ever thought about the fact that some neighborhoods and shopping centers are nearing the end of their functional life span and will need attention of some kind - one of which is total replacement. Very difficult issue to address and implement, but this council may have to begin that process. Sorry about the Wynnmeade swipe, but people need to be thinking about redevelopment and what it means to them and their neighborhood and what they expect council to do about it - which is almost certainly plan for it rather than ignore the issue - I hope.

My whiskers are actually light blond, yours however...


Robert W. Morgan's picture
Submitted by Robert W. Morgan on Wed, 01/25/2006 - 7:38pm.

I have thought about this subject since I arrived here in the 1980's. It happens everywhere. Old neighborhoods are replaced with new ones and obsolete shopping centers are torn down.

Yes, we should do something about it.

Cal, if you would, please get Munford or one of the others to put a series of articles together on old neighborhoods in Peachtree City and what their future may be if the city does pursue redevelopment. That would be intersting and informative. Those articles would also provide a forum for citizens to respond with their input.

It is defintely going to happen. Better the city should set down some ground rules instead of letting some outside developer coming in and taking over a neighborhood.

Please don't say it couldn't happen here. That is incorrect.


John Munford's picture
Submitted by John Munford on Wed, 01/25/2006 - 11:11pm.

If memory serves me correctly, the city's comprehensive plan task force (and development/zoning staff) will be working on exactly this type of question: infill development and redevelopment.

Fortunately, the city is relatively protected due to setback requirements in the zoning laws. One potential problem is making sure that a razed home is not replaced with a gaudy, ostentatious new home that adds another story or two to the exterior.

In reality, however, I think that's fairly unlikely, at least on tracts less than one acre. Why would someone buy a home in an older (or blighted) neighborhood only to have their nice newly-built home where it would be a virtual island in the middle of a sea of rental properties and the like? Makes no sense; that's not to say it couldn't happen though.

I can see such problems happening in the more ritzy areas of town, where large lots host very upscale housing. It could be that some really rich dude/dudette decides to move here and add a 5,000 sq. ft. addition. Maybe that person's idea of style doesn't fit in the neighborhood. Maybe the subdivision's covenants don't even begin to address architectural changes to a lot (hint, hint, get on the ball with this one folks!).

The result could be pretty nasty. But again, this is something I think could be addressed in covenants, etc. and the city may not have the legal wherewithal to require a certain architecture for a given rebuilt home. Remember, I'm not a lawyer and I could be totally wrong, and your mileage may vary.


Robert W. Morgan's picture
Submitted by Robert W. Morgan on Thu, 01/26/2006 - 6:49am.

John, those are good thoughts as far as they go, but the real redevlopment issue is when an entire neighborhood or shopping center is bought out by one developer and razed. What that developer builds on that site then becomes the issue. If you look at some of the older neighborhoods, you will find very liberal zoning with covenants that limit the use to whatever is built there now. Problem is covenants only last 20 years in Georgia and need to be renewed by 100% of those in the neighborhood - which will never happen.

The result is we have older single-family residential neighborhoods built on land zoned for apartments, condominiums, office parks or even commercial. A neighborhood buyout in one of those by a big developer would force the city to scramble and play catch up after the developer applied for a higher density zoning. What you would hear is exactly what you heard at Logsdon's first council meeting "The property is already zoned for this use and there is nothing we can do to regulate it beyond that" which is legally and technically correct.

Anyone living here should know what their subdivision is actually zoned, what the land use is and if the city has created an overlay district to prevent a stealth rezoning. Better yet, the city should look at this seriously and quickly. Most neighborhoods are not vulnerable to this, but the few that are will really be surprised.


Submitted by Sailon on Thu, 01/26/2006 - 8:26am.

What an amazing surprise! New PTC administration is developer friendly, I can't believe it. People's homes anymore are secondary to business and we might as well agree to that since we don't ever put a person in charge who looks out for us, and the developers' do. That piece of land sitting on a 30 degree slope at "The Avenue" should clue everyone in as to what will happen everywhere else in PTC. Unless an overpass is built for 54 over 74 at that intersection, I forsee that half-mile to the Coweta line as the most dangerous and slowest in the world, possibly. Who got rich there? Follow the money, as deep throat said.

Submitted by Sam on Sat, 02/04/2006 - 10:16pm.

Get the real facts... You my friend need to get the real facts before you go to print. My goodness how easy it is to have the subscribers and ad payers pay your salery to have the propergander that you have. Try having real reporters search for the truth behind the stories that you report on. For once I would love to read both side of the stories in your paper and not the slant you try to impliment on your reporters to keep their jobs. Good grief Charlie Brown !!!!

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.