PTC to explore trash franchise initiative, make recycling mandatory

Tue, 08/12/2008 - 7:33pm
By: The Citizen

Peachtree City officials will seek proposals from a number of trash haulers for a city-wide trash franchise.

Should such a franchise be enacted, all residents would have to subscribe to the same trash provider, a big change from the current free market system. Everyone would also be charged a fee on the same bill for recycling.

“Our feeling is you would be likely to start recycling if you’re paying for it already,” City Manager Bernie McMullen told council at a workshop meeting Tuesday night.

The city is not proposing any enforcement on people who don’t recycle, McMullen said.
Other potential benefits to a franchise include lowering the number of trash trucks in circulation which not also would reduce wear and tear on city streets but also spills of fluid from the trucks. Councilman Steve Boone cautioned council not to select the lowest bid, because that company might use older trucks that cause problems.

Instead the city should look for the “optimum service,” Boone said.

There was some disagreement among council members as to the potential benefits and pitfalls of using a singular trash hauling service. But all agreed to proceed with getting proposals from the companies so they can be evaluated for merit.

The city would not be required to choose any of the RFPs, as it can reject them all if it sees fit.

If there’s a big benefit to implementing a trash franchise in terms of money savings and other areas, the city must promote those to the citizens, who might otherwise be upset about being forced to use one trash provider, Boone said.

Going to a franchise system would not work if residents are allowed to opt out and choose another company, because in essence the city would be using the same current free market system, McMullen said. But Councilman Don Haddix suggested some allowance be made for residents who share garbage cans with others.

The RFP includes a way for senior citizens to provide medical documentation to qualify for their cans to be picked up at their home so they don’t have to roll them to the curb, officials said.

As one city staffer pointed out Tuesday night, if there are any problems with trash service under a franchise system, it’s easy to figure out who’s responsible. The proposal would also include a cash bond the provider must post, from which the city can levy fines for substantiated complaints.

The RFP also includes the pickup of yard debris for free once a week, officials said.
Haddix said recycling in his subdivision didn’t take off at all, as just one of 75 residents began to recycle when the service was offered.

“We do have a demographic in this city where people do not understand this and will never understand this,” Haddix said.

Haddix was also concerned about residents being forced to make room for two separate cans in their garage when some people have small garages and rules in their subdivision where cans can’t be left outside.

Councilwoman Cyndi Plunkett said the RFP should include a premium service citizens could pay extra for so they could have trash pickup on Saturdays because some residents are away from town Monday through Friday.

“I think when you start to take away people’s choices, you start to get into trouble,” Plunkett said.

McMullen said the city is looking at changing its ordinances so residents are required to maintain trash service, so if their service is cutoff for non-payment, they may be taken to municipal court to be forced to pay their bill.

McMullen also suggested adding a fee to the trash bills to pay for the estimated $1 million for the city to relocate its recycling center and build access roads and security fencing for the property, which would be located behind the city’s police department. He noted the city’s current recycling center will basically be unusable once Rockaway Road is realigned and the cart path system is installed on Ga. Highway 74 south as part of the road widening project.

It’s possible a trash provider would operate the recycling center on the city’s behalf, adding more variety to the types of recycling residents can participate in, McMullen said.

login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
MissPittyPat's picture
Submitted by MissPittyPat on Thu, 08/14/2008 - 9:19am.

Paying for trash pick up is not required in PTC? I did not know about this, guess that is the reason I see people driving in to dump their trash at the recreation center. One woman in particular, pulled out three garbage bags so heavy she had to drag them and struggled lifting in trash bin in front of dog park. I could not imagine what these people were doing, thought maybe they were working early evenings, picking up the grounds.


bad_ptc's picture
Submitted by bad_ptc on Thu, 08/14/2008 - 7:32am.

The Mayor and McMullen don’t give a damn about people recycling or the wear and tear on city streets. They want the ability to tack on “FEES” so they can generate additional revenue for projects that the citizens are forced to pay for. This has nothing to do with saving a homeowner any money or recycling.

Why else would McMullen say; ”the city is looking at changing its ordinances so residents are required to maintain trash service, so if their service is cutoff for non-payment, they may be taken to municipal court to be forced to pay their bill.”

”McMullen also suggested adding a fee to the trash bills to pay for the estimated $1 million for the city to relocate its recycling center and build access roads and security fencing for the property,…”

IT’S A HIDDEN TAX FOR GODS SAKE!

There will be language in the contract that will allow the city to increase their “FEES” on an “AS NEEDED” basis with no justification. Additionally there won’t be any language that in any way limits where or how those revenues can be used. The Mayor could redecorate is office or buy a new car for himself with the money.

Has there been any mention of forcing all the commercial entities in the city to participate?

If the intent of this proposal was to increase participation in recycling it would have included incentives, not “fees” or threats of legal action.

When the elections role around in 2009, I hope the citizens of PTC are prepared to dump the three stooges we have on the current council and elect three that are more citizen supportive like Sturbaum and Haddix.


Submitted by Bonkers on Thu, 08/14/2008 - 8:12am.

You do know that we send off these jokers to consultants, whom we pay, to teach them how to raise money in ways that aren't deemed to be taxes?

Many don't realize that!

Getting a trash company to bill ad-ons for them would be ideal!
It is similar to getting the telephone company now to bill us for 911, etc., instead of including the cost in taxes!

Plopping on sales taxes in various percentages puts the retail guys at fault---not the politicians!

Then there are hunting and fishing and driving and all kinds of working licenses.

Car tags and car worth tax could be included in the regular county tax bill---but it isn't. Everyone now has 2-3 cars, nearly.

The golf cart and drainage run off fees could also be included in one tax by the city, but they are not. I don't even have any run-off!
Anyway a concrete parking lot runs off a thousand times more than ground!

sniffles5's picture
Submitted by sniffles5 on Thu, 08/14/2008 - 12:55am.

"Councilman Steve Boone cautioned council not to select the lowest bid...."

Good Christ, they've dropped all pretense about serving the public interest.

I'm beginning to think Boone's "Optimum Service" is newspeak for "that which personally enriches me and Harold".

They've basically put the big waste management companies on notice that there are big, big profits to be made in Peachtree City and the city will handle collections if you have the right connections.


Submitted by MYTMITE on Wed, 08/13/2008 - 8:50pm.

You do not pay for trash pick-up per se. You have to purchase and use only one special kind of trash bag and they are purchased at Publix (I don't know what the arrangement between Publix and city is.)You can put out as many bags as you want because you have already paid with the purchase of the bag. That seemed to work very well. I don't know the particulars of the operation but it is a city known for it's beauty and cleanliness. No messy trash laying around.

Submitted by Bonkers on Wed, 08/13/2008 - 9:29pm.

So those who can't afford the $2 bags do what?
Pitch it in the lake or bay? Or over the bank?

Can you imagine bag theft at night with your trash on the road?

SouthernBelle's picture
Submitted by SouthernBelle on Wed, 08/13/2008 - 8:27pm.

I think it should be mandatory. Recycling is mandatory in a lot of places. That's all I'll say about that. I'm not going to get into the "politics" of mandatory recycling, but I do think it should be mandatory.

SouthernBelle, GRACE is a VIRTUE


NUK_1's picture
Submitted by NUK_1 on Wed, 08/13/2008 - 3:01pm.

Mandatory trash service? Big Brother Bernie strikes out yet again. I guess it wasn't dictatorial enough to to propose eliminating competition and creating a monopoly so the kicker of you have to pay for the monopoly whether you use it or not had to be added. This is insane. This is NOT what I want to ever see my elected leaders getting involved with.

Add to this fiasco Bernie's idea of the city becoming a collection agent for the PRIVATE sanitation company by hauling non-payers to a into court and I have to wonder just how adrift a local government could possibly get.

Oh yeah...Don, if Logsdon is for it, Boone is x2 for it. I'm counting on you to try and pound some sanity into Cynthia Plunkett before it's too late. Even if the RFP's look fantastic, there are elements to these ideas that show a lack of any common sense whatsoever.


mudcat's picture
Submitted by mudcat on Wed, 08/13/2008 - 7:10pm.

You said "pound some sanity into Cynthia Plunkett before it's too late" Too late for what? God knows I have been pounded but it has never been too late.

But back to the trash collection - why not leave it alone? Who cares? I used to, but let free enterprise rule.

BTW, your avitar sucks. Get a photo of Dan Tennant and put it up there.


NUK_1's picture
Submitted by NUK_1 on Wed, 08/13/2008 - 7:18pm.

Both the pounding and the Dan Tennant photo. I was going to use a Steve Brown one where it appears he had a mullet, but I figured that might upset the powers that be. PLus, someone might think that is actually me and that would be bad, real bad.


Don Haddix's picture
Submitted by Don Haddix on Wed, 08/13/2008 - 12:40pm.

A lot of things said and questioned were not in this article.

Harold is for it. Boone I am not sure about. The rest of us are not convinced but are willing to see the final proposals from the providers.

Mandatory is a deal killer for at least two of us.

Don Haddix
PTC Councilman
Post 1
donhaddix.com


Evil Elvis's picture
Submitted by Evil Elvis on Thu, 08/14/2008 - 8:55am.

Has the city considered using the collection trucks to read water meters (via a device on the truck that reads the meters rather than a person entering data)? It's being done in several other communities and has resulted in large savings by not having to send a meter reader around. Occasionally, the municiaplity can even sell the service to other utility providers, such as Georgia Power. Con-Ed is doing it in Brooklyn and Queens.


NUK_1's picture
Submitted by NUK_1 on Thu, 08/14/2008 - 9:12am.

That's the County's realm. If they aren't already reading meters by radio or wireless, they might be interested. Most cities of any size do already are these days.


Evil Elvis's picture
Submitted by Evil Elvis on Thu, 08/14/2008 - 7:06pm.

I wasn't completely befuddled by the "Fayette County" portion of my Fayette County water bill. It is, however, a service that can be sold that would generate easy revenue for the city and lower costs for the county.


NUK_1's picture
Submitted by NUK_1 on Thu, 08/14/2008 - 7:17pm.

You have to understand that some people think the schools in PTC are operated by the city itself, so I don't ever assume too much here Smiling


Evil Elvis's picture
Submitted by Evil Elvis on Thu, 08/14/2008 - 7:29pm.

My statement wasn't clear.


Don Haddix's picture
Submitted by Don Haddix on Thu, 08/14/2008 - 10:36am.

They are read wirelessly from a pick up truck now.

Yes. Fayette County Water System does the water, WASA does sewer and both are on a combined billing.

PTC does own the Stormwater Utility.

With all things being so busy I really need to shift my statements on these things back to the website in my sig line. So look there for issues and a place to ask questions. I cannot guarantee you are going to be answered here or your concerns even noted.

Thanks.

Don Haddix
PTC Councilman
Post 1
donhaddix.com


Submitted by Spyglass on Wed, 08/13/2008 - 1:47pm.

If you don't make it mandatory, what is the point?

All I would ask as a PTC Citizen is to LOOK at the proposals and make a decision based on what's best for all.

Me, I would love to see less Trash Trucks on my street IF the deal is good enough. My Bill has gone up a good bit lately with the trash company I currently use, one of at least 3 I see on my street weekly.

Don Haddix's picture
Submitted by Don Haddix on Wed, 08/13/2008 - 2:12pm.

That is why we went ahead with the FRP. To be able to see the full proposal.

Understand many things cannot be recycled or no recycling buyer is available for some things, such as glass. Also everyone will have a minimum of two trucks go through, one for trash and one for recycling. Potentially double that if your street is a route for an area or areas where a single set of trucks cannot handle all the pickups.

This can mean increased cost without a lowering of truck traffic. Maybe even an increase in traffic for some.

It will not fix the issues of compressing grease and other substances onto pavement any better than can be currently accomplished with regulations on all trucks now.

I am just trying to say this is far from a cut and dry issues. There are no simplistic answers here. And becoming a nanny state is not something I want to do.

Don Haddix
PTC Councilman
Post 1
donhaddix.com


Submitted by Spyglass on Wed, 08/13/2008 - 4:18pm.

Which is totally possible..

By Mandatory, I'm not saying everyone has to have trash pickup. I thought it was just IF you did have trash pickup, you would use the City approved vendor (if it agreed to and put into place). Otherwise, I see no point in proceeding.

On a 2nd note, I can't for the life of me see how anyone would not want trash pickup. But I disgress.

Again, thanks for your comments.

Stinger's picture
Submitted by Stinger on Wed, 08/13/2008 - 11:19am.

On the topic of what days of the week trash will be picked up:

“I think when you start to take away people’s choices, you start to get into trouble,” Plunkett said.

Apparently this doesn't apply when considering which trash company I can use?


RMEAV8R's picture
Submitted by RMEAV8R on Wed, 08/13/2008 - 10:35am.

Is there nothing else for the council to do except come up with ideas on how to force residents how their trash is picked up? Oh wait, I forgot it will decrease the wear and tear on city streets. No, it will lower the amount we pay for trash service. Oh yeah, if you don't pay your bill you will be hauled into court and fined and still have to pay for something that you disagree with and you take your own trash to the transfer station.

Drum roll please......the real reason is Uncle Bernie, the family alky, wants to add a fee to pay for the $1 million cost to relocate the recycling center.

Get a grip....I don't need or want your help in this area council! As for the recycling center, charge a fee for all of the tree businesses that are allowed to use it. Bet that will more than cover the cost. Another novel idea, charge a nominal fee for all who use it! Not everyone in the city uses the recycling center.

“Once in, you’ve got to see it through. You’ve got to perform without flinching whatever duty is assigned you, regardless of the difficulty or the danger attending it.”
Theodore Roosevelt, Remarks to Recruits, circa 1898


Submitted by Bonkers on Wed, 08/13/2008 - 7:57pm.

PTC is out of trash regulation.
Everyone is now on their own.
Several new companies are competing for all of the business.
I wish to recommend "Pedro's Trash Pick Up."
Pedro uses small donkeys to pull his two-wheeled cart with side-racks covered in canvas, and has low overhead.
He will get all your stuff for 1 dollar per week.

There are others who some have bags under the mules rear-ends, but they cost more.

I understand that Mike and a few others prefer this unregulated type of trash pick-up and I am for them using Pedro!

Mike King's picture
Submitted by Mike King on Wed, 08/13/2008 - 8:06pm.

You have once again missed your meds. Show up Saturday and maybe those of us with kind hearts will help you to once again levitate above your bird laden clock.


Submitted by Bonkers on Wed, 08/13/2008 - 9:25pm.

I just simply get fed-up with this "conservative" jabber all of the time about doing everything by being totally independent of our central government or our local government.
It makes no sense in most cases and you are smart enough to know it!

Yet, when the banks need a "bail-out" you guys are all for it..it is necessary! (or against it vocally but are glad it happened).

You want the Interstates and the roads and dams fixed, but want PTC to do their own, I suppose! Or maybe all toll roads and stock owned dams!

Who designs the Interstates and where they go? Seabaugh maybe? Or do we vote on it.

Should we close the mental institutions and jails (stuff of big government) which Georgia has nearly done by default anyway, or should we be taxed for them?

Should all residents of PTC attend pistol and AK-47 shooting classes in case we are attacked by Riverdale or a bunch of Muslims?

Should our soldiers get free health care, free clothes, free bullets, free food, free housing, free pensions, free places to buy cheap groceries, free health care after retired, free schooling, or, should we give them the money as salary and let them plan it all?

No, you say, that is NOT Socialist, that is necessity!

Bull.

Evil Elvis's picture
Submitted by Evil Elvis on Wed, 08/13/2008 - 11:26am.

"As for the recycling center, charge a fee for all of the tree businesses that are allowed to use it. Bet that will more than cover the cost."

Are you suggesting that tipping fees for what amounts to stump grinding would cover the entire opex for residential and commercial pickup, bulking and transfer?

You ain't shooting from the hip, pal, you're shooting from the kneecaps -- and missing the mark. Perhaps read the RFP and tinker around with the math involved.

And should the great state of Georgia ever decide to joint the 21st century and require municipal landfill diversion, your "alky" (and by that I suppose you mean his pH is too high) friend Bernie will have been far ahead of the field with an infrastructure in place.

I don't understand your profound and seemingly heart-felt desire to assert your right to not throw away trash. Some people like tilting windmills.

Way to pick your battles, bud. We can name the first recycling truck Rociante in your honor.


RMEAV8R's picture
Submitted by RMEAV8R on Wed, 08/13/2008 - 6:50pm.

"tipping fees for what amounts to stump grinding would cover the entire opex for residential and commercial pickup, bulking and transfer?"

NOT...let me copy paste this reeeeaaaaalllllyyyyy reeeeaaaallllyyy slooooooooow so that you will be able to read it again and understand.

As for the recycling center, charge a fee for all of the tree businesses that are allowed to use it. Bet that will more than cover the cost. Another novel idea, charge a nominal fee for all who use it! Not everyone in the city uses the recycling center.

Read the original post that refers to charging fees to RELOCATE the Recycling Center....be very careful to read it SLOW so that you will understand that too!

You and Uncle Bernie must be good friends. I know that Uncle B has been convicted of DUI but your comment, "And should the great state of Georgia ever decide to joint the 21st century." was that a slip??? that will get you for "possession less, than one ounce." BE CAREFUL, big brother is always watching and trying to take your right to smoke a "joint" after a good lunch away!

“Once in, you’ve got to see it through. You’ve got to perform without flinching whatever duty is assigned you, regardless of the difficulty or the danger attending it.”
Theodore Roosevelt, Remarks to Recruits, circa 1898


Evil Elvis's picture
Submitted by Evil Elvis on Wed, 08/13/2008 - 7:31pm.

But you didn't really think it through.

Tipping fees include both the tonnage costs and any other related fees -- taxes, etc. Stump grinding is what is commonly done to the materials brought in by tree trimmers and removers.

Tipping fees for stump grinding is the very "fees for tree businesses" of which you referred.

So, on one hand you bet that is the answer while on the other typing NOT to the very same thing.

My point was that "fees" for "tree businesses" would not cover the operating expenses -- even if the company measured itself with EBITDA rather than EBIT (pushing the CAPEX depreciation below the "bottom line"). Y
Perhaps you're typing too slowly, friend.

I ran a rather large MRF with on-site 16 week composting. You sat down at a computer and tried to crack wise. You're in no position to question my expertise.

One wonders who taught you to believe that insults strengthened your argument.


RMEAV8R's picture
Submitted by RMEAV8R on Wed, 08/13/2008 - 8:02pm.

You want me to pay for the relocation of a facility that tree businesses are able to utilize for free and I and may other PTC residents don't use? What a socialist idea!!!!

OK, so I pick up the tab for someone else to dispose of refuse material that is a by product of their "BUSINESS" for free but I have to pay for it.

No thanks!

“Once in, you’ve got to see it through. You’ve got to perform without flinching whatever duty is assigned you, regardless of the difficulty or the danger attending it.”
Theodore Roosevelt, Remarks to Recruits, circa 1898


Mike King's picture
Submitted by Mike King on Wed, 08/13/2008 - 11:53am.

Are you telling me that the head beaureaucrat in Peachtree City knows better than I as to disposal of household waste? I think not. I have not, nor do I anticipate having the requirement of city officials telling me what is trash and what is recycle material.

As an adult, I prefer choices in lieu of direction. As far as the damage to city streets, we all know it's minor except for those who seek to find something for which to complain. As for the extra noise, perhaps those who are offended are those who complained about the train whistle some time back.

This city has more to worry about than getting bogged down deciding upon something that is best left alone!

Just my two cents worth.


Evil Elvis's picture
Submitted by Evil Elvis on Wed, 08/13/2008 - 12:34pm.

"Are you telling me that the head beaureaucrat in Peachtree City knows better than I as to disposal of household waste? I think not."

You're actually answering yourself here. What I wrote was clear enough and didn't need paraphrasing.

Should I assume your "we" is royal, or are you speaking for everybody?

You're in no position to question my expertise in this area, friend.


Mike King's picture
Submitted by Mike King on Wed, 08/13/2008 - 2:51pm.

It is certainly not my intent to challenge your expertise in this "trashy" arena, that ,sir, is yours to dispose as you wish. My point is simple, I do not need bureaucrats making decisions for me that I reserve to be mine.

Should you require the hand of "big brother" government to lead you along, well that's your choice.


Evil Elvis's picture
Submitted by Evil Elvis on Wed, 08/13/2008 - 7:33pm.

"My point is simple, I do not need bureaucrats making decisions for me that I reserve to be mine."

Point taken.

Rather than provide why I might be in favor of this (Should you require the hand of "big brother" government to lead you along, well that's your choice), why not ask me?


Mike King's picture
Submitted by Mike King on Wed, 08/13/2008 - 7:59pm.

...I'll bite; Do you really believe that mere citizens are incapable of taking it upon themselves to do the responsible thing and do what is best for the environment?

Granted there are those among us that take advantage of limited resources, but to remedy those shortcomings education and example setting is required to turn them around. Having "big brother" do it for us teaches nothing. It's kind of like continuous handouts whereby dependency is created within a welfare system and nothing is gained except perhaps for an undereducated and revolving door of constituents.

I do not challenge your expertise in either the recycling arena or trash disposal, I assume your integrity. I simply do believe that the administrators of Peachtree City have much bigger fish to fry than to assume yet another responsibility. Either way this particular ball bounces, we will live with it.


Evil Elvis's picture
Submitted by Evil Elvis on Wed, 08/13/2008 - 10:30pm.

"Do you really believe that mere citizens are incapable of taking it upon themselves to do the responsible thing and do what is best for the environment?"

I do not believe that. My thoughts on the matter have nothing to do with a lack of faith in my fellow man's ability to make choices. I simply believe there are worthwhile benefits of a franchaise contract.

It's been my experience that prices go down and quality of service goes up under a franchaise contract. Futher, the city can -- and should -- request participation from the hauler for various clean up events, such as cleaning up creek beds, cart paths, etc.

I personally worked with the City of Napa on such a franchaise deal. Aside from dramatically lowering prices, we also established a bi-annual "clean the river" event, hosted by the hauling company that took literally hundreds of tons of garbage out of the Napa River. Tje previous hodge podge of haulers had no vested interest in doing such things.

In my opinion, these are worthwhile tradeoffs for a decision (choosing one's one hauling company) that I doubt many people give too much thought about anyway.

Either way, I understand and respect your perspective.


Mike King's picture
Submitted by Mike King on Thu, 08/14/2008 - 5:47am.

Thanks for the dialog as you do have valid points and make your case well, it has been a pleasure.


Submitted by Dondol on Wed, 08/13/2008 - 1:26pm.

He is speaking for everyone that I have ask about this subject in the last couple of months. Not one person that I have ask is for this, it is all coming to light though. Bernie is looking for a way to pay for the relocation of the recycling center after the council voted to let a developer build there and re-align Rockaway Rd. For those of use that have been here for any time we realize whats happening. Its just convenient way for Bernie and the good mayor (Otis Campbell) to force the good people to pay for what they want. And they want to put you in Jail if you don't pay your bill, that there is progress.
The more that you speak on this subject the more we all believe that you are involved with the company that is pushing this.

Evil Elvis's picture
Submitted by Evil Elvis on Wed, 08/13/2008 - 7:17pm.

"The more that you speak on this subject the more we all believe that you are involved with the company that is pushing this."

I suppose that's easier to believe than to accept that someone with an informed opinion differs from your way of seeing things.


Mike King's picture
Submitted by Mike King on Wed, 08/13/2008 - 6:06am.

Isn't it odd that since government has proven itself time and again that it does few things well, but under the guise of making things better for all , they now wish to dip further into the wallets of those for whom they serve.

Reading through this article, I laughed aloud when I saw the comment by McMullen about charging residents extra to offset the cost of moving the recycling center. Just how long have we known that it was to be moved, and how had it been budgeted previously? It seems that our part time Council has allowed those that run the city day to day to run wild and unchecked. Just for grins, consider a police chief
with deviant behavioral characteristics, a mayor who lacks the fortitude to confront the issue, and a city manager so influenced by alcohol that he spills wine upon an arresting officers shoes just prior to his DUI, all within the last two years or so.

Add all of this up and I think you will find that this lack of leadership or holding any semblance of standards has set our fair town upon a downward spiral. The evidence is the unchecked commercial development coupled with the ever increasing empty spaces found throughout several commercial areas.

Just my two cents worth.


Submitted by skyspy on Wed, 08/13/2008 - 11:49am.

You described our situation very accurately. It's a shame, this used to be such a charming town.

RMEAV8R's picture
Submitted by RMEAV8R on Wed, 08/13/2008 - 6:56pm.

“Once in, you’ve got to see it through. You’ve got to perform without flinching whatever duty is assigned you, regardless of the difficulty or the danger attending it.”
Theodore Roosevelt, Remarks to Recruits, circa 1898


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.