A nation of thieves

Walter Williams's picture

Edgar K. Browning, professor of economics at Texas A&M University, has a new book aptly titled “Stealing from Each Other.” Its subtitle, “How the Welfare State Robs Americans of Money and Spirit,” goes to the heart of what the book is about.

The rise of equalitarian ideology has driven Americans to steal from one another. Browning explains that certain kinds of equality have been a cherished value in America. Equality under the law and, within reason, equality of opportunity is consistent with a free society. Equality of results is an anathema to a free society and within it lie the seeds of tyranny.

Browning entertains a discussion about when inequalities are just or unjust. For example, college graduates earn income higher than high-school dropouts. Some people prefer to work many hours and earn more than others who prefer to work fewer. Students who spend 25 or more hours a week on classroom preparation earn higher grades than students who spend five hours. Most would agree that these inequalities are just.

There are other sources of inequalities that are unjust, such as: when incomes result from fraud, corruption, stealing, exploitation, oppression and the like. Such sources of inequality play an insignificant role in producing income inequality in America. Most economists agree that income is closely related to productivity.

Much of the justification for the welfare state is to reduce income inequality by making income transfers to the poor. Browning provides some statistics that might help us to evaluate the sincerity and truthfulness of this claim.

In 2005, total federal, state and local government expenditures on 85 welfare programs were $620 billion. That’s larger than national defense ($495 billion) or public education ($472 billion). The 2005 official poverty count was 37 million persons. That means welfare expenditures per poor person were $16,750, or $67,000 for a poor family of four.

Those figures understate poverty expenditures because poor people are recipients of non-welfare programs such as Social Security, Medicare, private charity and uncompensated medical care.

The question that naturally arises is if we’re spending enough to lift everyone out of poverty, why is there still poverty? The obvious answer is poor people are not receiving all the money being spent in their name. Non-poor people are getting the bulk of it.

Browning’s concluding chapter tells us what the welfare state costs us. He acknowledges the non-economic costs such as infringements on liberty and strains on the political process, but focuses on the quantitative economic costs.

The disincentive effects of Social Security have reduced the GDP by 10 percent, the federal income tax (as opposed to a proportional tax) by 9 percent and past deficits by 3.5 percent for a total of 22.5 percent. He guesses that welfare programs have reduced GDP by 2.5 percent.

The overall effect of redistributionist policies has created incentives that have reduced GDP by a total of 25 percent. Without those, our GDP would be close to $18 trillion instead of $14 trillion.

So what’s Browning’s solution? First, he reminds us of the biblical admonition, “Thou shalt not steal.” Government income redistribution programs produce the same result as theft. In fact, that’s what a thief does; he redistributes income. The difference between government and thievery is mostly a matter of legality.

Browning’s solution is captured in the title of his last chapter, “Just Say No,” where he proposes, “The federal government shall not adopt any policies that transfer income (resources) from some Americans to other Americans.”

He agrees with James Madison, the father of our Constitution, who said, “I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents.”

For years I’ve used Professor Browning’s and his colleague Mark A. Zupan’s excellent textbook “Microeconomics: Price Theory and Applications” in my intermediate microeconomics class. “Stealing from Each Other” is a continuation of his academic excellence.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.

login to post comments | Walter Williams's blog

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by skyspy on Fri, 08/08/2008 - 6:43am.

Thank you for drawing attention to this book.

620 billion with a B spent on welfare programs??! This is why I refuse to work overtime. When I work overtime I'm basically paying for people who don't want to work. More than half of it goes to taxes. Only in America are people punished for being ambitious and hard working. No wonder many companies are moving overseas. Why stay where you are punished for being successful.

620 billion dollars stolen from the taxpayers to pay for people who want to sit around and get everything for free.

Submitted by Bonkers on Fri, 08/08/2008 - 7:39am.

So 50% of your overtime pay goes to taxes?

That must mean you are in the very highest tax bracket!

You should be thankful for all that money for a no-sweat job. (ditch digging).

You are the reason for our near revolution in this country! You and Rush and Hannity!

Submitted by MYTMITE on Fri, 08/08/2008 - 10:37am.

to lose a good portion of that money to taxes. Have you ever worked overtime, have you ever worked? In this world, that is.

All our give-aways by our government are sending this country down the tube. There are some programs that are beneficial and some people who take advantage of those programs and better themselves. Then, there are other programs that take away any incentive for someone to work. I am sorry, when young women keep having babies from different fathers and their amount of the dole is just increased when the child is born, that is wrong. Where is the responsibility? Both the mother and the absentee father are shirking resposibility. There is WIC, there are food stamps, there is welfare per se, there is free schooling for mothers, free daycare, free meals at school, free childcare at school before and after school with breakfast and snacks served. Tax breaks--even people who do not pay taxes getting money (I won't say "back" because it was never paid in). These are only a few of the programs available to young single mothers. Some do take advantage and go on to be self supporting, many do not but continue on in this lifestyle. The men go on their merry way, often moving on to other young women whom they impregnate, never a care or worry about taking care of the babies they have made. And the saddest part is that the young women see nothing wrong with this--why worry about daddy supporting his child/children--after all there is Big Daddy (the taxpayer) to provide everything needed.
At one time, if a young woman got pregnant there was a wedding and responsibility, or no wedding and the family stepped in and helped. Now it is assumed that Big Daddy will be there. Why should the family be inconvenienced?--Big Daddy has big pockets.
Don't get me wrong--I think everyone deserves a helping hand if they are helping themselves. But we are producing a nation of people who do not have a sense of responsibility, but do have a sense of entitlement. This does nothing to build character, pride or induce young parents to raise productive children. This is not a black, brown, or white issue--there are young women of all colors and ethnic backgrounds in this situation. This is a self-fullfilling prophecy. We as a nation are our own worse enemy and if we do not change, it will not take a conquering nation to bring us down, we will do it to ourselves. And it is as if we are all walking around with blinders on. God help us.

Submitted by Spyglass on Fri, 08/08/2008 - 8:26am.

And that's saying a LOT.

Submitted by skyspy on Fri, 08/08/2008 - 8:20am.

I'm going to consider the source .....and as usual discount what you write.

Yes, I am in the highest tax bracket. I'm sure that is shocking to you,...somone typing away in their mothers basement because it beats getting a job....

Near "revolution" How is that? Are any of the welfare people going to stop having kids to get a "pay raise" and start actually working at an honest job? Are you going to get a job $dollar?? Yes, if our welfare spending went down that would be a revolution in this country, and one I would welcome.

Submitted by Bonkers on Fri, 08/08/2008 - 1:13pm.

Dumbest response ever? You haven't read all of mine obviously.

How much are you discounting it?

Time and a half over 40 hours work is purdy good money! If only the old government didn't take half (.75 of the total OT) of it! Guess you jumped a bracket!
In highest bracket huh? I remember when that was 90%---way back.

I did my job for 60 years. For my country and for myself. I neither can nor need to work now.

Woman leave your five kids alone and get a job! Great advice.
By the way what does marriage have to do with it---nothing. Having a daddy there does make a difference, husband or not.
Until these people you speak of are yanked out of ignorance, it will continue.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.