Two billboards set for Fayette as county settles lawsuit

Thu, 07/24/2008 - 10:09pm
By: John Thompson

After years of legal battles, the Fayette County Commission settled a lawsuit Thursday night to allow two billboards to be erected in the county.
The settlement was presented by Decatur lawyer Laurel Henderson who represented the county in its battle with Tanner Advertising.
The billboard will be located in north Fayette County at 145 Walker Parkway and near the the intersection of Ga. Highways 85 and 279. In her recommendation for the settlement, Henderson said recent legal decisions would not favor Fayette County continuing the fight.
Henderson said the company originally wanted eight billboards, but settled for two, along with $50,000 in legal fees and a $5,000 payment to Curtis Coffey, who was also involved in the suit.
Henderson said the county had already lost twice in the Georgia Supreme Court, who had sent the issue back to Superior Court. She estimated it would cost the county at least another $100,000 in legal fees, and possibly millions in damages if Tanner won the lawsuit Fayette County’s highways and byways won’t be seeing any new billboards in the near future.
In 2006, the U.S. 11th Circuit Court of Appeals rejected outdoor advertising company Tanner Advertising’s request to allow more billboards and reject the county’s 1998 sign ordinance.
In the 47-page opinion, the court cited the county’s recent repeal of the 1998 ordinance and replacement with a new version in 2005.
“Because all but one of the challenges by Tanner were rendered moot by the 2005 Sign Ordinance, and Tanner lacks standing to challenge the remaining provision, we now dismiss this appeal,” wrote the justices.
In 2003, Tanner submitted eight applications for billboards that were 50 feet in height and 672 square feet in size. The applications were rejected on the same day by the county and Tanner subsequently filed suit claiming the sign ordinance violated the First Amendment.
The case has bounced among various court jurisdictions until the county requested an en banc hearing of all the judges in the 11th Circuit.
But Tanner appealed, and the issue was sent back to Superior Court.
“I think it would foolish for us not to settle for the benefit of the taxpayers,” said Commissioner Herb Frady.
Chairman Jack Smith explained that former county attorney Bill McNally had recommended Henderson to represent the county and that she had been involved with sign ordinances for more than 20 years.
But Commissioner Peter Pfeifer, who cast the lone dissenting vote on the settlement, said the county was making a mistake.
“We didn’t lose in the Supreme Court. It was just sent back to the local courts. This does not ensure we won’t have future lawsuits.”

login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
cowtipn's picture
Submitted by cowtipn on Mon, 07/28/2008 - 4:02pm.

There are four states that ban ALL billboards; Vermont, Alaska, Hawaii, and Maine. Last I checked, their economies were fine and their residents were happy and proud.


Submitted by itcouldhappen on Fri, 07/25/2008 - 12:43pm.

We'll boycott anything advertised on the billboards!!

Submitted by Spyglass on Fri, 07/25/2008 - 9:01am.

Frankly, I don't understand why they can't. I too, will boycott any business's I see advertised here, and would encourage others to do the same.

Submitted by Bonkers on Fri, 07/25/2008 - 2:05pm.

Someone who wants advertising will buy time on the signs.

You wouldn't buy any anyway.

Your elected reps are the problem!

Submitted by MYTMITE on Fri, 07/25/2008 - 1:15pm.

We have no control of anything or so it seems. We can't tell developers what type of stores we want or do not want, we cannot say we do not want billboards littering our county. Why are the rights of the billboard companies and developers etc., more important than our rights. They have a right to make a living, we should have a right as a community to retain the type of environment we have/had. Run-away development, unsightly billboards, etc; they all eat away at the investment we have made in our homes. What do we have to do to insure that we still have some rights?? Rebel?? March on the courts? It seems to work for some. Those of us who are law-abiding, hardworking, everyday citizens don't want to rock the boat so we gripe but accept what is thrown at us. I guess that adage 'The squeaky wheel gets the grease' is true. Maybe we all need to start 'squeaking' more. Maybe boycotting is the first step. I am with the rest of you. Maybe we can go down to Tanner's with placards voicing our displeasure!

Submitted by Bonkers on Fri, 07/25/2008 - 2:11pm.

Hope you are beginning to see the connection between developers and politicians!

In a society of business worship above home value or even morals, we will always end up with billboards and even worse!

Planned communities are supposed to avoid that but as you can see, it doesn't work there either. Two six lane roads through the middle of PTC!
Who could possibly call that "planning?"

Submitted by The Beekman on Fri, 07/25/2008 - 7:52am.

...that we are on the road to looking like Roswell Rd and other busy main streets in Atlanta, taking away from the quaintness that Feyetteville and the surrounding cities have. If one guy has the ability to put signs up then this opens the flood gate for every other Tom, Dick and Harry to place one up too. Unfortuantely Fayettevile is and has gone to the dogs, and the rest of the county will now follow.
I agree with the comment that we should boycot the businesses that put their adds on the billboard, so maybe if this dim witted, near sighted shmuck goes out of business because no one wants to use his billboard we might get back what the county just seemed to weak to put up a good case in court for.

Submitted by PTC Avenger on Thu, 07/24/2008 - 10:18pm.

I for one will boycott any product advertised on these billboards and make a point of writing/calling or visiting in person the business on the billboard and telling them why I am boycotting their business.

The crime is already making its way here, now it appears the billboard eye sores are on the move too. Goodbye Fayette County, it was good while it lasted.

Submitted by Eliza on Fri, 07/25/2008 - 8:57am.

I agree with you, Avenger! I rarely drive in that vicinity, but will make a point of trying to keep up with who's buying space on those billboards and I will not buy the products/services. If enough people would object strongly enough it might make those billboards total failures - and could prevent others from being built in the county.

The main thing will be to let the advertisers know that we are not buying their products, and why.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.