David Simmons declines to respond to Citizen questions

Tue, 07/01/2008 - 5:00pm
By: The Citizen

Simmons, David_web mug

David Simmons refused to answer the questions posed by The Citizen.

Following is text of a letter submitted and signed by all four candidates in the sheriff's race: (scroll down further to read the questions authored by The Citizen)

“The candidates for the Office of Sheriff of Fayette County have discussed your invitation to participate in the online candidate forum being hosted by The Citizen. Unfortunately, we have decided unanimously not to participate in this forum, in this format.

“While we have chosen not to participate in this forum, please understand that we are not opposed to discussing our positions on issues or responding to citizens’ questions involving the sheriff’s election. Citizens with legitimate questions or concerns may attend any of the published candidate forums or contact us via email or telephone information, which is published on our individual websites.

“The blogs on the online edition of The Citizen contain many slanderous and baseless attacks on the character of each candidate for office. Many things are reported as fact when, in fact, they are little more than rumor or biased personal opinions transparently disguised as fact.

“We are more than willing to discuss issues related to our campaigns in an open forum where a sense of responsibility on the part of the questioners in important.

“In several threads from various posts online about each of the candidates for sheriff, there have been countless attacks that are completely outlandish, untruthful and defamatory to say the least. We believe that participating in a forum of this type will only invite more of these type comments and be unproductive.

“Besides, we are all busy campaigning for office and responding to baseless anonymous attacks would consume an enormous amount of time which we feel would be better spent on more constructive business.

Sincerely,
Barry Babb
Wayne Hannah
Thomas Mindar
David Simmons”

THE QUESTIONS:
Questions for ALL candidates for Fayette sheriff:

1. What is the extent of Fayette County’s “gang problem” currently and how do you specifically plan to address it?

2. Are the department's responses to crime in Fayette right now just about right or do they need improvement?

3. What are the department’s biggest weaknesses and how do you specifically plan to address them?

4. What are the department’s greatest strengths, and how will you build on them?

5. Three of the four candidates work for the sheriff’s department now. After the summer primary, should the unsuccessful deputies start looking for other jobs? What is your philosophy on dealing with in-department opponents after you win?

6. Describe in detail how you will do things differently than Sheriff Johnson has done them. Or do you intend NOT to do things differently?

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Questions for specific candidates:

TO DAVID SIMMONS:

1. Some have questioned your credentials after your website did not mention your time working for the Georgia Building Authority. Tell us why that was omitted and provide details of your job title and day-to-day duties. Also provide details of why you resigned/quit/were downsized or fired from the position.

2. You have touted your FBI training as proof that you are better prepared. Please explain what aspects of that training you want to apply to the way the sheriff’s office enforces law in Fayette County.

3. Previously, you had a testimonial on your website from Ike McKinnon, who served as chief for several years while you were his chief of staff at the Detroit Police Department. After a blogger started questioning Mr. McKinnon’s motives in an apparently scandal-plagued police department, Mr. McKinnon’s testimonial was removed from your website. Could you explain why, in detail, you decided to remove the letter of recommendation from Mr. McKinnon, who called you a good friend?

4. You have alleged that Fayette County has had a dramatic spike in commercial and residential burglaries, but according to the sheriff’s office Fayette is on track to have just 13 more burglaries this calendar year compared to last calendar year. Assuming those numbers are accurate, how do you explain how your data is “off”? Or do you feel comfortable your data is correct and charge that the sheriff’s department’s data is inaccurate?

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -

TO WAYNE HANNAH:

1. Will your wife continue to work for the sheriff’s office if you are elected? If so, how do you plan to address the inevitable problem of conflict of interest, whether real or perceived?

2. Have you — as charged by some — been campaigning in uniform and using your department vehicle for campaign work? If so, how do you justify the use of a taxpayer-funded vehicle? Did you get permission from the sheriff to do so?

3. Please explain your side of the scenario where you went to a man’s house to talk to him about political sign issues; (this issue was detailed in a letter to the editor several weeks ago); the letter writer accused you of attempting to intimidate him but a blogger said you actually know the letter writer and that he is a neighbor you are acquainted with.

4. Please explain your alleged recent “visit” to the sheriff’s department’s roll call in terms of who requested it and what it accomplished? Was the same opportunity extended to all candidates?

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -

TO BARRY BABB:

1. You have been accused of being “too religious” by some observers, and one blogger said you have bible classes at the sheriff’s office. Is this true and why do you consider it to be appropriate?

2. Should Fayette County continue its practice of aggressively pursuing fleeing suspects at high speeds in vehicle chases, or do you think such actions endanger the motoring public?

3. Of all four candidates, you have lived in Fayette County the longest. Will you be able to set aside your friendships and personal relationships to be a fair and partial administrator? Please explain in detail how you plan to handle such issues.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -

TO THOMAS MINDAR:

1. A fellow deputy and a former one have called into question several interactions they’ve had with you that call into question your ability to control your temper. Characterize your temperament and your ability to stay cool when things are getting hot.

2. Compared to the other candidates you appear to have the least amount of experience in law enforcement. Others have said you lack any supervisory experience. How do you respond to those observations and how are you prepared to handle the gravity of administrative duties that are the sheriff’s responsibility?

3. On your website you indicate that you want to increase proactive and aggressive patrols. Do you plan to hire new deputies for these positions or do you plan to reassign current deputies to handle that workload? Also, please give us numbers in terms of how many patrol cars are out there now and how many you would like to see on the road.

login to post comments | previous forum topic | next forum topic

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by drewpdawg on Wed, 07/09/2008 - 8:41pm.

On Simmons personal website, he answers only the "general" form questions addressed to all the Sheriff's candidates. However, he fails to address those questions of personal regard for some reason.

Is there some reason these questions were left out?

Submitted by McGerkin88 on Wed, 07/09/2008 - 10:32pm.

that a "Gentleman's Agreement" was made to not answer any questions on this site, and the why was explained in their letter. My understanding that another venue was okay, but no questions would be answered by these candidates posed by the bloggers. Simmons honored that agreement.

Submitted by drewpdawg on Thu, 07/10/2008 - 11:49am.

McGerkin88, you are right that there was some sort of agreement to not answer the questions on this site, only in the forum/manner it was supposed to have been handled. Wayne Hannah was first to take the questions and post his personal answers to "all" questions posed to him on his personal website. This made people question the "gentleman's agreement" and the other candidates began saying they would answer the questions on other websites where they could simply paste their answers for citizens to view and not be addressed in a public forum as the Citizen had desired.

I don't disagree with the manner in which they chose to answer the questions, for those who have. However, Simmons failed to answer the questions posed directly to him regarding himself. He did answer on his website only the "general" questions posed to each candidate by the Citizen. In the very same manner he typed out his answers to the generally posed questions, he could have also answered those questions that were of personal nature.

Submitted by McGerkin88 on Thu, 07/10/2008 - 12:02pm.

"However, Simmons failed to answer the questions posed directly to him regarding himself. He did answer on his website only the "general" questions posed to each candidate by the Citizen."

Drewp, I clearly answered you about this statement. To better explain it to you again, it is my understanding that the "gentleman's agreement" was not to answer the bloggers questions AT ALL, on any venue.

"he could have also answered those questions that were of personal nature."

Simmons honored their agreement, as I have stated before, he is a honorable man.

Submitted by drewpdawg on Thu, 07/10/2008 - 12:12pm.

McGerkin88, I believe you must have the hard time comprehending.

You state in your previous post, " My understanding that another venue was okay, but no questions would be answered by these candidates posed by the bloggers.

So was it ok to answer on another venue or not?

1) Your candidate, along with the others, agreed to not answer the questions posed by the Citizen on the Citzen website, in the forum (manner) the Citizen was proposing.

2) They stated, they would not have a problem answering the questions in other manners such as was done on their personal websites.

3) Wayne Hannah, on his personal website, answered EVERY question posed to him, questions 1-6 which were addressed to ALL candidates and those that were addressed to himself personally.

4) Your candidate answered, on his personal website, only the questions posed to each candidate and failed to address those addressed to him personally. For your comprehension, I will paste those questions below.

____________________________________________________________________
Questions for specific candidates:

TO DAVID SIMMONS:

1. Some have questioned your credentials after your website did not mention your time working for the Georgia Building Authority. Tell us why that was omitted and provide details of your job title and day-to-day duties. Also provide details of why you resigned/quit/were downsized or fired from the position.

2. You have touted your FBI training as proof that you are better prepared. Please explain what aspects of that training you want to apply to the way the sheriff’s office enforces law in Fayette County.

3. Previously, you had a testimonial on your website from Ike McKinnon, who served as chief for several years while you were his chief of staff at the Detroit Police Department. After a blogger started questioning Mr. McKinnon’s motives in an apparently scandal-plagued police department, Mr. McKinnon’s testimonial was removed from your website. Could you explain why, in detail, you decided to remove the letter of recommendation from Mr. McKinnon, who called you a good friend?

4. You have alleged that Fayette County has had a dramatic spike in commercial and residential burglaries, but according to the sheriff’s office Fayette is on track to have just 13 more burglaries this calendar year compared to last calendar year. Assuming those numbers are accurate, how do you explain how your data is “off”? Or do you feel comfortable your data is correct and charge that the sheriff’s department’s data is inaccurate?

Why can we not get answers to these questions??

Submitted by McGerkin88 on Thu, 07/10/2008 - 12:19pm.

Questions for Specific Candidates-are the bloggers questions, the personal questions of which you speak.

"Wayne Hannah, on his personal website, answered EVERY question posed to him, questions 1-6 which were addressed to ALL candidates and those that were addressed to himself personally."

So, he must have broken the gentleman's agreement!

Is it tooooo simplistic for you? Is that the problem?

bad_ptc's picture
Submitted by bad_ptc on Thu, 07/10/2008 - 1:20pm.

Both you and grits seem unable to understand what was stated in the Sheriff candidates letter to The Citizen. See: grits just ASSumed

There was never any mention, from anyone, that the candidates would NOT answer any questions from anyone. "Unfortunately, we have decided unanimously not to participate in this forum, in this format."

You and others should stop trying to twist the 'facts' to fit your propaganda.


Submitted by McGerkin88 on Thu, 07/10/2008 - 1:55pm.

perhaps an explanation of what a "gentlemen's agreement" is.

"An unwritten agreement guaranteed only by the pledged word or secret understanding of the participants."

The letter posted is the agreement which is signed by all 4 for the public.

Submitted by drewpdawg on Thu, 07/10/2008 - 12:47pm.

McGerkin88, I think simple for me is not as simple for you!

Answer me this and that is all I ask. Why is it ok (honorable or whatever you call it) for your candidate to take the questions posed for the Citizen forum, and only answer the questions that tell us what he will do if elected? Do we not have a right to know about his qualifications and why he failed to list certain jobs? Do we not have a right to know about his character and some of his past associates who he "called" friend that were under cloud of scrutiny in Detroit? Do we not have a right to know about what his training obtained from the FBI Academy has taught him and how he intends on using it, if elected? Do we not have a right to know where he comes up with his statistics saying we have a growing crime rate that he wants us to believe he can fix?

Simple is, McGerkin88, we want answers!

Submitted by McGerkin88 on Thu, 07/10/2008 - 2:03pm.

"Why is it ok (honorable or whatever you call it) for your candidate to take the questions posed for the Citizen forum, and only answer the questions that tell us what he will do if elected?" Check out what is a "gentlemen's agreement" means.

Simmons lists his email and telephone number on his pamphlets and website. You are the one that choses to stay anonymous. Actually, he answers these questions with the many, many meet and greets and dinners and other forums the great citizens have provided for him. Some were open to the public.

Submitted by drewpdawg on Thu, 07/10/2008 - 3:23pm.

So, what does a "gentlemen's agreement" mean then? It has absolutely nothing to do with, "I will answer this question, but not that one."

These candidates got together and agreed to not answer questions on the Citizen forum under the format the Citizen proposed. That is it. Simple, as you may call it. The agreement had nothing to do with saying they would not/could not go anywhere else and answer the questions in the manner/form they chose.

Your candidate then decided to take the questions he wanted to answer and place them on his website to make it appear he was answering all of the questions from the proposed forum.

If your candidate will answer these questions by email or phone or he supposedly has answered them at the "many meet and greets", why would he not answer them like he did the generic questions on his own website? You have been to these forums also, do you know or have you heard him answer these particular questions? No, you haven't or you and his other supporters would have the answers too!

Submitted by McGerkin88 on Thu, 07/10/2008 - 3:55pm.

perhaps an explanation of what a "gentlemen's agreement" explained to Bad in a reply, thought you would read it.

"An unwritten agreement guaranteed only by the pledged word or secret understanding of the participants."

The letter posted is the agreement which is signed by all 4 for the public.

"why would he not answer them like he did the generic questions on his own website?" Because their was a "gentlemen's agreement" not to.

"No, you haven't or you and his other supporters would have the answers too!" I have, if you contact him, you would have the answer since you were not privileged to attend one.

You are just spouting off and assuming, go and do some true research by using your noggin.

Submitted by drewpdawg on Thu, 07/10/2008 - 4:04pm.

And just like Bad PTC pointed out, you are the one who is confused on what a "gentlemen's agreement" must mean. If you need proof, read Wayne Hannah's letter he submitted to the Citizen this week. It was never the intention of the candidates to not answer the questions. It was their agreement ONLY to not answer the questions on the online forum. Why is that so hard for you to understand?

And in what forum was that where Simmons answered any of the questions posed to him specifically about his FBI training, his association with Ike McKinnon, his crime stats, or his failing to list his previous jobs in GA? I have not heard or seen one forum where those particular questions were addressed in any way!

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.