DFCS official gets 10 years’ probation

Tue, 06/17/2008 - 4:10pm
By: Ben Nelms

Cylenthia Clark pleads guilty to child cruelty charge; job now in doubt

DFCS official Cylenthia Clark Tuesday pled guilty to child cruelty and received a 10-year probated sentence in Fayette Superior Court.

A condition of her plea also seems to mean her career in child welfare cases is over.

The trial in which Clark, the former Fulton County Department of Family and Children’s Services (DFCS) assistant director, had been indicted for first-degree cruelty to children was halted after only a few prosecution witnesses had been called.

Clark was arrested in March 2007 on a charge of one count of felony cruelty to children relating to a Feb. 7, 2007 incident involving marks and bruises found on her then-8-year-old daughter by Hood Avenue Elementary School personnel.

A subsequent investigation three weeks later by Fayetteville Police led to Clark’s March 10, 2007 arrest on cruelty charges.

A guilty plea was in the works and up for discussion at the proceedings prior to the jury being seated Monday afternoon. Intermittent talks continued until just before lunch Tuesday, with Clark agreeing to the terms and wording of the plea.

Clark was sentenced by Judge Chris Edwards to a full 10 years probation with the conditions that she not engage in corporal punishment and that she not work for an employer with supervisory authority of children or one responsible for the welfare of children. Clark was also granted first offender status.

It appeared at first that the trial would not take place, as Assistant District Attorney Warren Sellers and defense attorney Manny Arora both agreed to a negotiated guilty plea by Clark to first degree cruelty to children and that her actions had been cruel and excessive along with 10 years probation as a first offender.

Judge Edwards insisted on the verbiage “cruel and excessive” since those terms were listed on the indictment.

Arora and Sellers also agreed that she not engage in corporal punishment while on probation and that she would not be employed in a job in a supervisory capacity with children or with the welfare of children.

Arora said Clark would agree to the plea and the conditions.

Prior to the jury being seated, Judge Edwards then addressed Clark, beginning what was to be a review of the incident and the admissions contained in the guilty plea.

At one point early in his questioning Monday, Judge Edwards asked Clark if the way she engaged in spanking her daughter had been done maliciously. Clark answered, “No.” Arora immediately leaned over to say something to Clark and, seconds later, Judge Edwards told the bailiff to bring in the jury so the trial could begin.

In statements Tuesday morning, Judge Edwards noted that the indictment contained the phrase that Clark had “maliciously” caused cruel and excessive physical pain when striking her child with a belt, a stipulation that Clark would have been required to acknowledge for her guilty plea to be accepted. Without that acknowledgment the trial would have to proceed.

On Tuesday morning, Judge Edwards suggested, the defense and prosecution agreed and Clark admitted in her plea that malice could be expressed, not as ill-will or hatred, but with the awareness that the use of a belt to strike her child carried the likelihood that it would result in cruel and excessive physical pain. Clark was sentenced to probation minutes later.

Sellers in his opening statement Monday afternoon told jurors Clark’s daughter was crying at school and complaining that her back hurt. School personnel soon found a number of bruises and marks on the child.

The incident was referred to Fayette County DFCS and later to Fayetteville Police. Clark was arrested on March 10 on charges of cruelty to children.

Sellers said the Feb. 7 incident came after the girl had been in a physical altercation with a boy at her day care center and had hit one of the staff. He said later that day the girl was beaten with a large thick belt clad in her underwear and was struck on various areas of her body while standing, lying on the bed and floor and on her knees. Sellers said the girl later reported being hit by her mother more than 30 times.

Arora told jurors in his opening statements that the girl was on behavior-controlling medication and had, on occasion, been removed from school due to behavioral problems. He acknowledged that the 8-year-old had hit a boy at school and slugged a day care worker in the face earlier in the day.

Arora said that Clark had spanked her daughter with a belt on Feb. 7, striking her five to 10 times. Arora added that the child expressed issues of being without her father in Chicago since she and her three younger sisters had moved with their mother to Fayette County six months earlier.

Hood Avenue Elementary nurse Cindy Hill said she examined the young girl after she had been crying in class. Hill described several bruises or marks on the girl’s left arm, right thigh, lower back, upper right arm and below a shoulder blade. Hill said she did not see any marks or bruises on the girl’s face or neck.

A Hood Avenue teacher who had contact with Clark described her as a concerned mother, adding that the girl had good grades prior to and after the incident.

Clark said in a video-taped interview with Fayetteville Police Det. Debbie Chambers that her daughter suffers from attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), is strong-willed and can be manipulative and is difficult to re-direct when manifesting behavior episodes.

Clark told Chambers in the interview that she usually uses a belt for spankings, but on this occasion inadvertently picked up a different belt, one described by Sellers earlier as being thicker.

Clark said that while spanking the child, the girl began jumping around and scuffling with her, attempting to grab the belt. Chambers in the interview with Clark reminded her that when a child is squirming around in such a manner it is easy to hit another part of the body and that she should be wary of continuing the spanking.

Subsequent prosecution witnesses were from Children’s Health Care of Atlanta. Forensic interviewer Kelly Wood and Dr. Jordan Greenbaum described what they believed to be testimony and physical evidence of physical abuse.

Wood, in the interview with Clark’s daughter using an anatomical diagram of a girl, reported that she indicated a total of 34 marks or bruises inflicted on her. Arora called some of those marks and bruises into question, both with Wood and Greenbaum.

Also before the jury was seated, a facet of the proceedings that remained unexplained throughout the proceedings involved a question by Judge Edwards about the lapse in time between the school’s notification to Fayette County DFCS on Feb. 8, 2008 and the involvement of Fayetteville Police three weeks later on Feb. 27.

“What happened in three weeks to make it a crime?” Judge Edwards asked.

Responding to the question, Chambers said that police are usually contacted when marks are found on a child.

“For whatever reasons, we didn’t get the call for three weeks,” Chambers said.

Judge Edwards followed his question with another to Sellers, asking who makes the decision not to call, then three weeks later decides to contact police.

Sellers said that information might be included in a Georgia Bureau of Investigation report on DFCS that found no wrongdoing on the part of the agency. Arora made no comment.

login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by OneWhoKnows on Sat, 06/21/2008 - 8:49pm.

Also before the jury was seated, a facet of the proceedings that remained unexplained throughout the proceedings involved a question by Judge Edwards about the lapse in time between the school’s notification to Fayette County DFCS on Feb. 8, 2008 and the involvement of Fayetteville Police three weeks later on Feb. 27.

“What happened in three weeks to make it a crime?” Judge Edwards asked.

Responding to the question, Chambers said that police are usually contacted when marks are found on a child.

“For whatever reasons, we didn’t get the call for three weeks,” Chambers said.

Well . . . not exactly.

On April 17, 2007, Mary Dean Harvey, now-former Director of the Georgia Department of Family and Children Services, sent a letter to The Citizen regarding her assertion as to DFCS' role in the Cylenthia Clark matter.

She wrote:

    On Feb. 7 of this year, a mother named Cylenthia Clark spanked her 8-year-old child for fighting with a teacher in an after-school program.

    The next day the Fayette County DFCS office was contacted with a concern about the child and a DFCS investigation was opened.

    Following our normal procedure, the local police department was notified with a copy of the referral by fax.

    . . . .

    Three weeks after the incident, the police department launched its own investigation and for reasons of their own, they arrested the mother at her home in the presence of her children. That is a criminal matter and not a concern of DFCS.

By her own words, Ms. Harvey's letter suggests that three weeks elapsed between the fax from Fayette County DFCS and the instigation of the police investigation. The implication is that Fayette DFCS did not wait three weeks.

Submitted by fayette fan on Wed, 06/18/2008 - 10:04pm.

Where does Fayette DFCS go to get its good reputation back?

After this Chicago psycho-mama came down here, viciously BEAT her child, then tried to claim that Fayette DFCS was racist for following the State DFCS policies and having the child removed to safety, where do the employees of the Fayette County DFCS office go to get their reputation back?

After Virgil Fludd (who has no experience in child welfare) made a baseless claim that Fayette DFCS "takes" more black kids than white kids, when is he going to apologize to the child welfare professionals that work in that office every day to keep kids safe for using them for his political gain?

And, now that Clark has had to accept responsibility for her crime, is he going to go apologize to the Governor for perpetrating a lie? It would be a darn shame if this is the end of the story and none of the other liars paid a price for their part in this political witch hunt.

Frankly, the only thing that kept the outcome of this case from being perfect is that Clark and the rest of the Chicago Mob (BJ Walker, Isabel Blanko and Mary Dean Harvey) weren't sent back to Sweet Home Chicago.

Hopefully, the right people are paying attention and planning to do the right thing, soon.

Submitted by Sick of Fascists on Wed, 06/18/2008 - 10:17pm.

is the governor's seeming rubber-stamp acceptance of these folks. When the child advocate came down on the side of Fayette, she was replaced. We have lost good people in Fayette DFACS over this Clark affair. When is the governor going to clean house?

A.Huxley reborn's picture
Submitted by A.Huxley reborn on Wed, 06/18/2008 - 11:06pm.

To shamelessly try to muster up false accusations of racism during a political campaign, with the implicit goal of trying to 'create' a false 'issue' to further one's political career - at the expense of the safety and welfare of our children !!??... this is just another of a long list of examples why Virgil Fludd has only his own political self-preservation in mind. Politics as usual ~


Submitted by buckstopshere on Wed, 06/18/2008 - 11:31pm.

Start singing the fight song for the "fightin irish" na na na na na na na hey hey goodbye!!!!Virgil really has to go!!!!

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.