Gay marriage and society: Look who’s calling McCain a moderate Democrat

Tue, 06/10/2008 - 3:19pm
By: Letters to the ...

It has been a while since I have felt compelled to respond to a Citizen commentary. However, after Terry Garlock’s column about his new-found enlightenment on the issue of same-sex marriage, it was not enough to shake my head in disbelief, but worthy of a few words in response.

I almost don’t know where to begin because there are two issues involved: marriage and homosexuality. But let me start with Garlock’s final comment relating to a “social question.”

Garlock states, “The commitment of marriage is a diminishing bedrock in our society, fewer are taking that legal step and the divorce rate is high.”

Bedrock, absolutely. Fewer are taking that step, yes, the sad truth. But that has nothing to do with issue of whether or not we allow same-sex marriage.

It is simply an abandonment of the institution of marriage by many of our citizens who try to divorce marriage as something NOT ordained by God. It is up to us, including myself, to teach our children the value of a successful marriage according to Christian teachings.

It is our DUTY as fathers and mothers to teach our children the virtues necessary for solid marriages and God’s role in bringing forth happiness.

You cannot separate religion from the issue because it has everything to do with “bedrock” of Christianity from the Old Testament to the New and for over 2,000 years since the first coming of Christ.

Man and woman brought together before God through marriage results in life-giving love. Marriage between same-sex couples simply cannot produce life-giving love.

It was obvious from Garlock’s column as he described his own “discomfort” that he too knows in his heart and conscience that same-sex marriage is wrong. Garlock (I would bet) believed same-sex marriage was wrong because the act of homosexuality is incompatible with the institution of marriage, and he knew this to be the truth.

I make an assumption, but I believe it is a safe one. How can same-sex couples obey God’s first commandment: ”Be fruitful and multiply”?

In my opinion, Garlock and others have grown susceptible to the continued barrage of the same-sex marriage rhetoric that any marriage between two grown adults is okay as long as they love each other. Or as Garlock contends, same-sex marriage could strengthen the institution of marriage.

These notions sound good, but they are in direct conflict in “hating the sin, loving the sinner.”

Sorry, Mr. Garlock, you cannot have it both ways. If you support same-sex marriage, you might as well tell your children the sinful act of sex between homosexuals is okay, as long as they are married. Just doesn’t make sense to me and it does not seem like a loving position to take.

I have had homosexual neighbors and coworkers. However, I have never abandoned Christian teaching to accommodate my relationship with them. I only treated them with kindness and respect, hoping and praying they would change their ways.

Again, you cannot divorce Christian principles from these issues; at least I cannot nor can most of Americans who proclaim a strong Christian faith.

In my opinion we have become a society of “lukewarmness” where we have weakened our consciences based on God’s law for the sake of “tolerance” and “acceptance.” Mr. Garlock’s position reminds me of the old story about placing a frog in slow boiling water.

For the great majority of this country who believe in marriage between man, woman, and God, we need to stick to our convictions about what is right and what is the TRUTH about marriage.

Truth trumps everything, and the truth about marriage between a man and woman is a non-negotiable issue for MOST of us, especially God.

I refuse to let the will of the minority and activist judges to continue to redefine what God has ordained to be the truth about marriage.

Mr. Garlock might be a conservative on economic and defense issues, but he is no different from McCain on social issues. I found it amusing Garlock calls McCain a moderate Democrat. Maybe he ought to take a close look in the mirror. May I also suggest a must read, “Lukewarmness – The Devil in Disguise” by Francis Carvajal?

Rick Walker

Peachtree City, Ga.

login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Main Stream's picture
Submitted by Main Stream on Wed, 06/18/2008 - 3:53pm.

"It is simply an abandonment of the institution of marriage by many of our citizens who try to divorce marriage as something NOT ordained by God."

"It is our DUTY as fathers and mothers to teach our children the virtues necessary for solid marriages and God’s role in bringing forth happiness."

"Man and woman brought together before God through marriage results in life-giving love."

Mr. Walker... then what about the millions of atheists and agnostics that don't believe in a Christian God?? Are their marriages null and void because they did not invoke the Bible-god into their marriage vows and ceremony?

You know, it's going to happen eventually, so you should try and get used to it. Gays will be allowed to get married. The wave has started and it will be difficult to stop. Just like interracial marriages, decades ago, were deemed illegal and this was found to be unconstitutional. The same will happen for gay marriage.


Submitted by MattG on Wed, 06/18/2008 - 2:47pm.

Mr Walker,

Since this country is in no way a theocracy, or governed as a christian nation, thankfully what you say carries little weight.

You also say- "How can same-sex couples obey God’s first commandment: ”Be fruitful and multiply”?"

Because it's not easy for couples over 40 to have children, do you believe that two adults over the age of 40 should not be able to be married since they cannot have children?

God struck down a man for working on the sabbath. Do you propose murdering people who work on Sundays?

You also say- "I refuse to let the will of the minority"

Thank you for not hiding the fact that you are not in favor of civil rights and are a bully.

AF A-10's picture
Submitted by AF A-10 on Thu, 06/12/2008 - 4:08pm.

My dear Rick, I could write you a book on your theocratic approach to US law and why I feel it is not where free societies should go, but I will limit my comment to this from your letter:

"You cannot separate religion from the issue because it has everything to do with “bedrock” of Christianity from the Old Testament to the New and for over 2,000 years since the first coming of Christ."

Rick, just like we don't criminalize not keeping the Sabbath holy; just like we don't lock Americans up for having Buddha statues and rubbing their bellies. Just like we don't criminalize kids that back talk their parents (not honoring thy father and mother), we must separate "legal" marriage from the good ole' church wedding. I do not believe we should replace our legal code with The King James New Testament. To argue that Christianity makes legal marriage between same sex persons inconceivable would require you to explain to Alan Keys' daughter and Dick Cheney's daughter why we aren't legally enforcing ALL of the precepts of the Christian faith. Why not impose our full religious will on the US subjects like Saudi Arabia and the old Taliban in Afghanistan. Women: Honor your husbands or else!

Kevin "Hack" King


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.