-->
Search the ArchivesNavigationContact InformationThe Citizen Newspapers For Advertising Information Email us your news! For technical difficulties |
Assessing Kathy CoxSun, 06/08/2008 - 3:22pm
By: sniffles5
I've noticed of late that it has become fairly commonplace - even amongst Republicans! - to bash our state superintendent of schools, Kathy Cox. I'm wondering what has happened to trigger this apparant groundswell of dissatisfaction? Was it any one particular event or just an overall feeling that she's accomplished so little? To this point, Kathy Cox has led an exceptionally charmed political life. She began her political career when she ran for the state house touting her schoolmarm credentials against Dan Lakly many years ago. Dan Lakly shot himself in the foot during a candidate forum, as I recall he was bragging about how LITTLE Fayette spent on education, and Cox squeaked out a 500 vote win. Cox then hitched her wagon to Lynn Westmoreland's rising star (mixed metaphor...sorry!) and bragged on several occasions that Lynn taught her everything she knew about politics...which may be the first time in recorded history that someone actually learned something from Lynn! One particular odious political trick she learned from Westmoreland was to never introduce any local legislation unless their was unanimous approval from the local government board. This, sadly, crippled Peachtree City for several years and allowed the loathesome Annie McMenamin to be a one-woman obstructionist. Cox then ran for school superintendent and got yet more political fortune thrown her way when the incumbent Republican got mired in a scandal regarding fur coats and plastic surgery paid at public expense. Cox got elected. One of her first orders of bidness as school superintendent was to attempt to ban the word "evolution" from school curriculum. "It's sooooo devisive!" She got publicly ridiculed, and rightly so, when her backroom maneuvering came to light. Since then she's had an uneven tenure as school superintendent. As a good Republican soldier, she's embraced such things as the concept of high-stakes student testing (i.e. No Child Left Behind Alive). She was noticeably AWOL from the Chance/Seay/Ramsey voucher scandal earlier this year. So, now we have a local "hero" as our school super. What could she be doing better? I'm not sure I have an answer for that. I've come to believe that she's doing the best job she can do, but that her best isn't quite good enough. Who else could do the job? I apologize for having all these questions and no real answers to propose. Regards, |