-->
Search the ArchivesNavigationContact InformationThe Citizen Newspapers For Advertising Information Email us your news! For technical difficulties |
GitReal: in need of a Reality CheckGitReal says: “As the Citizen previously reported, the subpoena was never filed with the court and served to Ballard AS REQUIRED. If it had been, the Prosecuting District Attorney would have known about it. Here is what District Attorney Mulholland had to say in regards to Softy Ballard’s phony subpoena appearance: Hey Git – is this really your train of logic in producing all your venom??? OK, here is a nice bird for you to munch! Show the link in The Citizen, if you can? Is the Citizen always right about their material? Show where the subpoena wasn’t filed with the court and served to Ballard? It’s your allegation - prove it!!! How can you call someone a liar if you weren’t there when the subpoena was served? Did the defense attorney really only suggest Ballard be on his witness list? Where is it stated that Mulholland would know everyone subpoenaed as a character witness at the hearing? Obviously Mulholland didn’t even know who his own attorneys had subpoenaed! These are but a few of the fallacies you base your whole arguments. You really need to assess your basis for reality…. honestguy4's blog | login to post comments |