Drilling for oil off of FL coast is no solution to the oil crisis

carbonunit52's picture

Editorial by U.S. senator Bill Nelson

carbonunit52's blog | login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
travisstrickland1's picture
Submitted by travisstrickland1 on Mon, 05/26/2008 - 9:47am.

Three years ago, in 2005, the US consumed about 20.8 million barrels of oil PER DAY. I seriously doubt oil consumption has dropped in the past few years, despite the price increase. Add to this rapid consumption the growing demand from other countries for the same oil.

Drilling in America is futile because there's not enough oil to make a difference in the price or in how long we can safely depend on oil as our major energy resource.

The coasts of Florida and ANWR's environmental integrity along with the obvious non-impact drilling would have should be enough reason to not drill in and of themselves. But, the debate gets fueled, especially on crappy cable talk shows, by people blaming environmentalists and liberals in general for high oil prices due to the lack of drilling. Lefties make the same mistake whem they blame Bush. This is a supply and demand problem, pure and simple. It is, however, a geo-political, human rights, and environemtnal problem as well. Our use of oil has caused a lot of problems around the world and we should do what we can to make the process of getting off the stuff as easy as possible.

As many have suggested, people need to do their part by changing their lifestyles and do what they can to reduce their demand for oil. Carpooling, taking public transit (when possible), and just driving less will benefit everyone. Lower demand equals lower prices. Less use equal less money spent on such an expensive item. Less burning of gas equals less pollution. It's hard to take people's complaints seriously when they aren't willing to make any changes to benefit themselves.


Cyclist's picture
Submitted by Cyclist on Mon, 05/26/2008 - 8:01am.

cited the need to protect Florida's unique environment and tourism from the presences of offshore oil rigs. Well if you don't get a handle around energy supplies then there well be very limited tourism in Florida to enjoy that unique environment.
-------------------------------------------
Caution - The Surgeon General has determined that constant blogging is an addiction that can cause a sedentary life style.


carbonunit52's picture
Submitted by carbonunit52 on Mon, 05/26/2008 - 8:09am.

will be the last place to run low on gasoline, which flows toward money.


Git Real's picture
Submitted by Git Real on Sun, 05/25/2008 - 10:37pm.

No one said it was the solution, But it is a very important part of the solution until technologies permit the desired reliances on the fossil fuels that we so desire.

I've said it once and I'll say it again. I'll start believing that we're taking our energy issues seriously when I start seeing parents putting their kids on the school buses and the car rider drop-off and pick-up lines are reduced by 50 - 60%. Over half those cars drop their kids off and then make the return trips home so that the parental unit can watch Springer and the soaps uninterrupted.

I figure that it's just a matter of time before the oil company haters start screaming at the oil companies to do something domestically when the brown-outs and gas lines hit. Then we can all start blaming the Republicans for now developing these rich reserves sooner.
________

"That man was Griffin Judicial Circuit District Attorney Scott Ballard".

CLICK HERE FOR THE REST OF THE STORY


yardman5508's picture
Submitted by yardman5508 on Mon, 05/26/2008 - 4:36am.

that exploring new sources of oil is the answer to alternate fuel development. My impression is that new sources of oil will merely extend the control of the oil companies to our energy situation. Rather than invest in new exploration we should be investing in new technologies. We should stop sacrificing R&D to the bottom line. Keep the faith.

Even a dead fish can go with the flow.


Submitted by sageadvice on Mon, 05/26/2008 - 5:31am.

We will eventually promote new sources of oil since it is there. However it is now too late to stop a catastrophe in supply. We decided to use other's oil before ours and it didn't work out!

You are correct, we need to weaken the oil companies control of economics.

Everyone is also ignoring the fact that we need to reduce our usage of oil soon. That crap you see all around Atlanta of energy gobbling vehicles going bumper to bumper will have to die out. Europe and Asia saw that years ago. They have cars that get up to three times our mileage.

Also, we use about nine times s much petroleum for other things than gas! Maybe it is time for peanut fibers for clothes? (Wooden (chipcore) instruments instead of plastic, no bags at grocery stores,
and many other uses curtailed)

Git Real's picture
Submitted by Git Real on Mon, 05/26/2008 - 7:15am.

Everybody thinks that oil is all about fueling our cars, trucks and airplanes. It is soooooo much more than that. What we burn in our transportation needs is only a part of what we need oil for. The products produced from oil is so wide spread, varied and necessary for our economy and country to survive. Look at our usage of HDPE products: food containers of all sorts, telecommunications and computer products, duct for underground power a communications pathways, wraps on wire and fiber optic products, household goods, building materials of all sorts, medical devices and products.... My goodness the list is endless.

And when it's all said and done all the talk about being evil oil companies and protecting our view off our beaches will be cast aside when folks really start to realize how important petroleum products are to our every day needs. Take many of these products out of peoples hands and watch the pendulum swing in their attitudes to oil companies. A time will come when the same whiners will be blaming big oil for not developing more of our domestic resources.

________

"That man was Griffin Judicial Circuit District Attorney Scott Ballard".

CLICK HERE FOR THE REST OF THE STORY


yardman5508's picture
Submitted by yardman5508 on Mon, 05/26/2008 - 7:38am.

We can allow exploration for new sources AFTER we have broken our transportation dependence. Your are correct in as much as there are plenty of "essential" uses for hydrocarbons. That is all the more reason that we should allocate what we have left to those sorts of usage, and focus our transportation solutions in other directions. Keep the faith.

Even a dead fish can go with the flow.


carbonunit52's picture
Submitted by carbonunit52 on Sun, 05/25/2008 - 10:58pm.

does appear to be energy intensive. Look how traffic is decreased when school is not in session. It is beginning to dawn on people that it cannot be business as usual, but really, interfering with Jerry Springer? Is nothing sacred?

It may surpise you that I believe that there should be drilling done in the gulf, on areas already set aside for it, but not close to the shore line to make it that much easier on the oil companies. Waiting much longer will create a more desparate approach, which will involve sacrificing good practices for expediancy. It is not a matter of if, it is a matter of when the drilling is done but if anyone thinks that there will ever be oil rigs visible from the FL beaches, they are mistaken.


Submitted by sageadvice on Mon, 05/26/2008 - 3:53am.

There will be tankers on the beach if it becomes necessary!

NUK_1's picture
Submitted by NUK_1 on Mon, 05/26/2008 - 4:33am.

As long as Florida is a key electoral college state that is hotly contested, there ain't going to be oil platforms in the sights of people sitting on Destin's white sandy beaches and emerald green water. No chance.

I agree with carbon that an opportunity exists and it's much better to do it now before it's a panic and hurried decisions are made without careful thought to the consequences, but it's way further out than what was originally proposed when W took office and Jeb as FL Gov. had to squash the idea of platforms a mile off the coastline.


Submitted by sageadvice on Mon, 05/26/2008 - 5:14am.

I can't understand why you think that if there were gas shortages in the USA, people couldn't heat their homes, factories were closing down, etc., that tankers on Destin beach or anywhere would be out of the question.
There would be hi-jacking on the beach!
We assume too much.
Of course we will start another war before we go that far as a cover.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.