The difference between Obama and his pastor

Thomas Sowell's picture

Sometimes unrelated events nevertheless tell a coherent story.

One newspaper story that caught my eye recently was about two high-powered schools in South Korea where Korean girls study 15 hours a day, preparing themselves for tests to get into elite colleges in the United States. Harvard, Yale and Princeton already have 34 students from those schools.

When a copy of the 50th anniversary report on members of the Harvard class of 1958 arrived in the mail recently, I thought back to one of my fellow students in that class who had worn a hole in the sole of his shoe but put a folded piece of newspaper in his shoe to cover the hole, rather than tell his parents.

He realized that they would buy him a new pair of shoes if they knew — and he also realized that they could not afford it.

He went on to become a professor at several well-known medical schools and to have various achievements and honors over the years.

From even further back in time, I received a letter recently from a man who grew up in my old neighborhood back in Harlem. When he and I were in the same junior high school, one day a teacher who saw him eating his brown bag lunch suddenly arranged for him to get a lunch from the school cafeteria without having to pay for it.

It happened so fast that my schoolmate had already taken a bite from the school lunch when he suddenly realized that he had been given charity — and he wouldn’t swallow the food. Instead he went to the toilet and spat it out.

By now his brown bag lunch had been thrown out, so he just went hungry that day. He went on to become a very successful psychiatrist.

Like everyone else, I have also been hearing a lot lately about Jeremiah Wright, former pastor of the church that Barack Obama has belonged to for 20 years.

Both men, in their different ways, have for decades been promoting the far left vision of victimization and grievances — Wright from his pulpit and Obama in roles ranging from community organizer to the United States Senate, where he has had the farthest left voting record.

Later, when the ultimate political prize — the White House — loomed on the horizon, Obama did a complete makeover, now portraying himself as a healer of divisions.

The difference between Barack Obama and Jeremiah Wright is that they are addressing different audiences, using different styles adapted to those audiences.

It is a difference between upscale demagoguery and ghetto demagoguery, playing the audience for suckers in both cases.

People on the far left like to flatter themselves that they are for the poor and the downtrodden. But what is most likely to lift people out of poverty — telling them that the world has done them wrong or promoting the work ethic of the Korean girls, the dogged determination of my Harvard classmate with the newspaper in his shoe, or the self-reliance of my fellow junior high school student in Harlem who had too much pride to take charity?

When young people go out into the world, what will they have to offer that can gain them the rewards they seek from others and the achievements they need for themselves?

Will they have the skills of science, technology or medicine?

Or will they have only the resentments that have been whipped up by the likes of Jeremiah Wright or the sense of entitlement from the government that has been Barack Obama’s stock in trade?

In the real world, a sense of grievance or entitlement, as a result of the mistreatment of your ancestors, is not likely to get you very far with people who are too busy dealing with current economic realities to spend much time thinking about their own ancestors, much less other people’s ancestors.

Another seemingly unrelated experience was being in a crowd at a graveside in a Jewish cemetery last week. That crowd included people who were black, white, Asian, Catholic, Jewish and no doubt others. This country has come a long way, just in my lifetime.

We don’t need people like either Jeremiah Wright or Barack Obama to take us backward.

The time is long overdue to stop gullibly accepting the left’s vision of itself as idealistic, rather than self-aggrandizing.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.

login to post comments | Thomas Sowell's blog

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
travisstrickland1's picture
Submitted by travisstrickland1 on Sun, 05/11/2008 - 10:43pm.

Is this paper's staff one sided or what? I wonder if Mr. Sowell knows he's the token black conservative on the editorial page for a paper that pretends to live up to journalistic standards. This is the kind of paper people read to validate things they already believe or to see what people on one of the far sides of the politcal spectrum are talking about (guess which side).


Git Real's picture
Submitted by Git Real on Mon, 05/12/2008 - 7:46am.

You have the AJC as an alternative. It is the kind of paper people read to validate things they already believe or to see what people on one of the far sides of the politcal spectrum are talking about (guess which side). And it's the place where us meat eaters go to see how people like you think.

________

"That man was Griffin Judicial Circuit District Attorney Scott Ballard".

CLICK HERE FOR THE REST OF THE STORY


travisstrickland1's picture
Submitted by travisstrickland1 on Mon, 05/12/2008 - 11:18am.

The AJC isn't the greatest paper ever, but their editorial page at least has commentators that provide different points of view on subjects. I'm sure you think the AJC is one big liberal lie because they don't call liberals names on every page and bash every non-Republican politician in every opinion piece they print on politics. So I guess you think having a single prospective, on an opinion page in a paper, is consistant with journalistic ethics?


Silence Dogood's picture
Submitted by Silence Dogood on Mon, 05/12/2008 - 11:49am.

Indeed Mr. Jim Wooten is one of yours. Sir, why would you even ask that question.


carbonunit52's picture
Submitted by carbonunit52 on Mon, 05/12/2008 - 8:05am.

Meat ain't the only thing that gets chewed on around here. A hide like a rino's comes in handy.


Submitted by skyspy on Mon, 05/12/2008 - 5:19am.

Larry Elder also contributes here. He is very interesting and informative.

BPR's picture
Submitted by BPR on Mon, 05/12/2008 - 6:49am.

I think Larry Elder should run for President. He knows alot more than Obama. He is fair to all regardless of race etc. If everyone would read his book they would know this. I would vote for him.Smiling

_______________________________
We Will Stand


Submitted by thebeaver on Mon, 05/12/2008 - 7:33am.

I like Larry as well, but think Herman Cain would make a better POTUS.

I wish he would run for Senate again.

---------------------------------------------------
If Barack wins, America loses

Submitted by USArmybrat on Mon, 05/12/2008 - 9:26am.

I would vote for him with pleasure before any of the other three wannabees! It would be great to have someone in the race about whom I could get excited. --SIGHHHH---

Submitted by sageadvice on Mon, 05/12/2008 - 8:29am.

Who are these people: Elder and Cain?

Do you think Presidents grow on trees?

Git Real's picture
Submitted by Git Real on Mon, 05/12/2008 - 7:42am.

I'm with you all the way buddy. But then again we'd have 'ageist' like Main Stream attacking him in regards to his age. Eye-wink

________

"That man was Griffin Judicial Circuit District Attorney Scott Ballard".

CLICK HERE FOR THE REST OF THE STORY


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.