Maybe you need new specs since you're over 40 because BPR did acknowledge the source (Got Questions Ministries) at the very beginning of her post.

You & $nif surely do worry about others' perceived indiscretions. Perhaps he's explained to you why he plagiarized Jeff, one of those indiscretions that's supposed to cause someone to be banned by Cal. But then he consistently breaks Cal's rule "No personal attacks on private persons" and gets away with it, doesn't he?

Jeff C: “I believe we are owed an explanation of some kind.”

Just who is “Sniffles”?

attempt to score some sort of points. Below, BPR typed that it's done, and that she forgot. She typed that because she went back and fixed her blog, as I would have if it had been me. Notice I didn't scold her or say something stupid about her age. I just pointed something out and she fixed it.

Denise, am I your obsession du jure? Oh, that's right. It's "du jour." You corrected that for me last time.

If you need a new military man to follow around on the blogs, I know a HIGHLY educated, highly decorated, 30 year veteran triathlete whom, like you, is never able to admit wrong. Consider me The Citizen's "Match.com" guy for frustrated and repressed conservatives.

Good luck getting him to meet you though. He gets kind of shy when coaxed from behind a keyboard.

Kevin "Hack" King
(anyone want two dogs???)

I was not up to 2:30 like some people.

What did I fix.

The link where I got my information? gotquestionministries.org

A simple mistake, other than than mistake, I haven't changed anything.

Your main friend did respond to it very odd.

_______________________________
We Will Stand

Did you ADD (EDIT) "Got Questions Ministries" to your blog post (not the comment that you added later) AFTER it was posted and Hack told you were plagiarizing?

Hack & the $niffy Gang are soooooo quick to point out others' indiscretions while excusing and ignoring their own. Hypocrites who cry "Hypocrite" and much worse (such as D's mom resorting to racial slurs)

"No personal attacks on private persons" is supposed to be the standard here.

Excuse me - racial slur?

Isn't that what "Mr. Charley" is? Or stating as a fact (actually lying) that Beaver is friends with David Duke? Or calling OldBeachBear "Ms. Charley"?

I almost never use slang or contrived names; so, maybe I misunderstood (truly, not like Hillary). However, in the context, of your dialogue with Beaver, I concluded that that's what "blacks" call "whites" who they feel are acting "superior" (I believe that's the word you used) to them. If I'm mistaken, please clarify & post your clarification also where you were using this name.

Is the name derogatory, like a "white" calling a "black" that disparaging corruption of the word negro? Wouldn't a "white" PERSON feel similar feelings to what a "black" PERSON would feel when called n*? Is "Mr. Charlie" synonymous with "honky" (honkie, honkey, etc.)?

___________________________________

Note the spelling

Mr. Charlie – Offensive Slang – A white person or white people considered as a group

[not INDIVIDUALS with unique characteristics -- much more than physical differences -- that make each and every one of us valuable]

Sorry. Never heard the term Ms. Charley - let alone used it. I doubt if anyone in Fayetteville or Peachtree City even heard the term Mr. Charley. Never saw it written with 'ie. If you had to look it up to find out if it was offensive or not - then you know it does not have the same affect as the N word. Have a nice night.

But you used "Ms. Charley" right here in one of your posts:

Old beach bear
Submitted by Davids mom on Fri, 09/07/2007 - 7:35pm.

You don't even realize how sad you sound.

Hang on to your 'white' pride Ms. Charley.

...................................................

"Never heard" of it -- "let alone used it"????

...................................................

Just because I hadn't heard the slur makes it no less offensive -- which is exactly how you meant it. The "blacks" that I associate with don't call me or "whites" names, and I don't use such language myself. I wouldn't expect them to tolerate such behavior (including cursing) from me either.

And it does have "the same affect" [*e*ffect, actually], which is exactly how you meant it. Children result to name-calling when they are unable to respond factually and logically to another's argument, but adults should know better and be able to apologize when they have done wrong.

Again I ask, Is "Mr. Charlie / Charley" derogatory OFFENSIVE SLANG, or is the dictionary wrong?

Is "Mr. Charlie / Charley" synonymous with "honky" (honkie, honkey, etc.)?

These are 'code' words used since the days of slavery for 'white' people or 'master'. Not necessarily negative - sometime used as a term of affection (like the N word). {Please don't say the N word was/is not used as a term of affection - we've heard it too many times in sentences like "I love my N...s" and our N . . s would never 'march'.} Back in September I obviously used Ms. Charley because I didn't think the reader would 'understand' Miss Anne. There are 'code' words used by all Americans when it comes to 'race relations'. That's a whole 'nuther' subject.

Back in September I obviously used Ms. Charley because I didn't think the reader would 'understand' Miss Anne. There are 'code' words used by all Americans when it comes to 'race relations'.

Why would you use a term that you stated yesterday that you had never heard of(or used)? This sounds like a good answer for Hillary Clinton to try when she gets caught spinning a wild lie, but I don't know if it works here.

What you just said obviously means not only are you familiar with the term and what it means, you were also last October when you used it. You wanted to use some code word and did, along with the bit about "white pride" like it's "bad" to feel pride about your own race.

The truth does not matter here. You don't seem to understand. The only thing that matters is that Denise and Beaver disagree with Mrs. David's Mom. This, by default, makes them racist klan members. It is obvious that compared to these standards; you are a racist too. Now remove your spikey klan hood, repent, make a fist and salute Mr. Obama. Your unity candidate for POTUS.

BUSTED! Score one for Denise.

The more she speaks, the less of uniter she pans out to be.

So if if David's Illiberal Mother is representitive of Obama's unification movement...... then indeed we have some very tumultuous times in front of us in regards to race relations.

I've said it once and I'll say it again. The black community, for the most part, doesn't desire equality. They have a deep rooted hatred and desire to 'put us in our place'. What little hope we have these days......

________

"That man was Griffin Judicial Circuit District Attorney Scott Ballard".

CLICK HERE FOR THE REST OF THE STORY

That's the second time this week that DM had denied using the term 'Ms. Charley'. I pointed it out to her a few days ago when she used in on oldbeachbear, and never heard back. Now she denies it again??

By the way DM, not ALL Americans use code words when it comes to race relations, as you state. Only the racist ones like you do.

===============
If Barack Wins, America Loses

You two and Sky and my husband are my only friends on here. My husband does not post.

I am so so so sad.

Oh, I am happy again, there Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity & Larry Elders.

Have a good day and try and find me some more friends:-) Decent and sane ones please.

I have to go to work.

Some one posted this I think SOF.

_______________________________
We Will Stand

"My husband does not post," but he is my friend on here! How be that?
"so so so sad, Oh I am happy there Glenn Beck, etc. What means?

"decent and sane friends," is open to opinion!

"Some one posted this I think SOF." About you going to work?

I confuzed!

Dude, you really need to lay off of the spiff and stick with the herb.

Barack Obama is the personification of a wolf in sheep's clothing.

The Perverse Worship of a man

You have made fun of my age.

_______________________________
We Will Stand

It's done. Sorry, I forgot-

______________________________
We Will Stand

Beepo "borrowed" (i.e. stole) the above commentary from a site called "www.gotquestions.org".

It's a fascinating place that has the answers to many vexing questions of the day. Some examples:

1. The Earth is only 6000 years old.
2. Man and dinosaurs co-existed. (Dinosaurs are sometimes refer to as "Jesus Horses" by Southern Baptists).
3. The proper response by a Christian to someone complaining of racism is to tell them to "get over it! God has seen far worse!"
4. Noah was into race-mixing big time, all his sons married women of different races.
5. Before his fall, Satan was in charge of music in Heaven
6. Satan has been cast from Heaven but still has visitation rights when he and God need to confer.

Accusing BPR of plagiarism (when she acknowledged the source at the very beginning of her blog) is the height of hypocrisy when you plagiarized Jeff (C or c, whichever blogger it was) and refused to address your theft.

Jeff C: “I believe we are owed an explanation of some kind.”

Just who is “Sniffles”?

You said, "Dinosaurs are sometimes refer to as 'Jesus Horses' by Southern Baptists."

("www.gotquestions.org" attributes "Jesus Horses" to the SBC? GQ actually uses the term "Jesus Horses"?)

"The proper response by a Christian to someone complaining of racism is to tell them to 'get over it! God has seen far worse!'"

"Satan has been cast from Heaven but still has visitation rights when he and God need to confer."

(GQ actually says that God "needs" Satan's help?)

What's your SOURCE for those little $niffli$ms? Surely you aren't misrepresenting (LYING) what "www.gotquestions.org" has said, are you?

1 John 4:20-21
If anyone says, "I love God," yet hates his brother, he is a liar. For anyone who does not love his brother, whom he has seen, cannot love God, whom he has not seen. And he has given us this command: Whoever loves God must also love his brother.

1 Corinthians 6:9-10
Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived.

Slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.

I noticed someone said that you were out of work. I do know of someone that is hiring. Are you interested?

BTW, you put in the wrong thing it's gotquestionministries.org

Yeah, thanks for making fun of my mom and sister, you always reap what you sow.

Is that why you are so negative and bitter all the time?

You have alot to be thankful for.

_______________________________
We Will Stand

sniffles, you're right. They believe:

"Here at GotQuestions.org we believe in a young earth interpretation and accept that dinosaurs and man coexisted. We believe that dinosaurs died out sometime after the Flood due to a combination of dramatic environmental shifts and the fact that they were relentlessly hunted to extinction by man."

Why does bpr keep posting garbage from these junk websites??

You can mock all you want. But the plain facts are right in front of you.

Consider Fred Flintstone's pet, Dino. That was no dachsund. Dino was a dinosaur! And do you recall the "machinery" that Fred and his fellow-workers at the Bedrock Quarries "drove"? These were quite clearly dinosaurs.

Humans and dinosaurs DID coexist!

Thanks muddle. I can always count on you for spiritual guidance

Yeah, well I can hear you saying under your breath, "The Flintstones was just a cartoon. It isn't real. THAT'S NOT EVIDENCE!"

Want REAL evidence?

Then go to the new Creation Museum in Northern Kentucky (just outside Cincy). They have displays that show people hanging out with dinosaurs. I hear it is very impressive and convincing (though the latter may depend upon other things that are already true of those who wind up "convinced.")

And if that fails to convince you, there is always this:

Tracks

I may have to drive the kids out to KY to see this wacky museum this summer, because you really CAN saddle-up a dino:

"They can saddle up on our triceratops and have their picture taken with a dinosaur."

And this sounds like loads of fun:

"Walk through the Cave of Sorrows and see the horrific effects of the Fall of man. Sounds of a sin-ravaged world echo through the room. Finally, see the sacrificial Lamb on the cross, and the hope of redemption."

LINK - CREATION MUSEUM

Wow, more fun than Six-Flags!

Make us proud???????

Your response will be what I think you will say.

_______________________________
We Will Stand

Your "Tracks" link is to a museum in Texas, not KY.

What do mean by "though the latter may depend upon other things that are already true of those who wind up 'convinced'"?

Your Ph.D. is in philosophy, isn't it, not one of the sciences such as a
Ph.D. in cell biology from Brown University or physics or biochemistry or geology? I do wonder how you are in a position to judge someone who earned one of these degrees as being "harebrained" and having "an IQ equivalent to your average room temperature."

I cannot let this go by. I personally feel completely competent to call this scientific nonsense. A Ph.D from Brown University is no guarantee that your brain has not since become addled. Who brings these people in when it starts to rain? Having a high IQ is one thing, applying it in a logic way is another. OMG, you are doing children a major disservice by presenting these exibits as scientific facts.

Interestingly, Ken Ham, of the Creation Museum rejects Intelligent Design Theory because he thinks it makes too many concessions to Darwinian naturalism.

He openly concedes that he (and everyone involved there) begins with the axiomatic assumption that a literal reading of Genesis is our guide to understanding the relevant sciences. And so we have a young earth (fewer than 10,000 years), which means that the Big Bang is yet another naturalistic myth. And, of course, the age of the dinosaurs must overlap the age of homo sapiens. So many species; so little time!

(Ham also argues that, unless one takes a rigidly literal reading of the early chapters of Genesis, all of the rest of the Bible is in doubt. In this, he apparently fails to recognize that one may take the Bible to be inerrant without thereby taking this literalist reading of all passages. This would be equivalent to some of the humorless bloggers here taking offense at good-natured jokes because of an overly-literal interpretation of what was never intended to be serious.)[**see note below**]

Intelligent Design advocates do not proceed with any such assumption. Thus, ID is open to the apparent deliverances of contemporary cosmology, which suggest a universe between 15 and 20 billion years of age. And Michael Behe has recently clarified his own stand on common descent. He thinks that the DNA evidence for such is particularly compelling. (Behe thus appears to be a theistic evolutionist.)

Ham and the Young Earth Creationists (a good band name?) thus cut themselves off from at least two potentially compelling theistic arguments. Standard Big Bang theory is "philosophically repugnant" to atheists who were naturally drawn to the older Steady State Theory. As Robert Jastrow once put it in a celebrated essay,

"This is an exceedingly strange development, unexpected by all but the theologians. They have always accepted the word of the Bible: "In the beginning God created heaven and earth." ... [But] for the scientist who has lived by his faith in the power of reason, the story ends like a bad dream. He has scaled the mountains of ignorance; he is about to conquer the highest peak; [and] as he pulls himself over the final rock, he is greeted by a band of theologians who have been sitting there for centuries."

Philosopher William Lane Craig is known widely for his contemporary development of the so-called Kalam Cosmological Argument, originally developed by medieval Islamic philosophers. Craig is also an expert on contemporary cosmology, and appeals to Big Bang Theory in support of his premise that the universe had a beginning.

Big Bang Theory is also presupposed by the so-called "anthropic coincidences"--the observation that the fundamental constants of the universe were "fine-tuned" at its inception, and that it is astonishingly improbable that this should have been so. The fine-tuning is probable on theism and highly improbable on naturalism.

But if you're a Young Earther like the people running this museum, none of this is open to you.

**A recent CNN headline read, "1000 Tourists Stranded on Cruise Ship." I clicked on the link to the article and discoveredc that the actual number of stranded tourists was 987. Now, 987 is not 1000. Should I suppose that the headline was in error? Did it mislead? Of course not. Whether the claim is accurate depends in part upon what the author hopes to accomplish in making the assertion. In this context, saying that there were 1000 people is sufficient for the task. On the other hand, the difference between 1000 and 987 is significant to the guy who is charged with adding up the fare collected from passengers.

I Kings 7:23 relates the dimensions of a "molten sea" that the Israelites created: it was 10 cubits in diameter and 30 cubits in circumference. But this is clearly in violation of the formula: C=pi times the radius squared. So have we an error in the Bible? Only if we think that we must take a rigidly literal reading of all passages--as if it is a passage written by engineers in a peer-reviewed engineering journal. I suggest that those who follow Ham's strategy are committing a similar error.

What makes you qualified (I don't care about your feelings) -- "completely competent" -- to determine the science or the theology or the reasonableness (sanity) of people that you don't even know? They don't need anyone to bring them in out of the rain. Do you need help?

BTW, it's EXHIBIT, not "exibits" and LOGICAL, not "in a logic way."

and I still feel competent. Feelings, what else is there? My only suggestion is to change the name of the museum to "Believing is Seeing" to better explain the process used to create this wonder.

Thank you for the corrections, I was ranting at the time, and I apologize for the errors.

LINK

A lot of fun

I will just have to make the trip with my friend and their child and see.

The good thing I will get to see Dr. Stephen Hooks again. I think I will see if I can sit in on one of his classes. I loved Rich, Dr. Stephen Hooks is the Professor Rich admired. I will be looking forward to it.

_______________________________
We Will Stand

You never did answer me about ACC. I have some friends looking into it, and they have two colleges picked out. They just want to make sure the school goes by the rules. Do they?

You didn't give me any joke about the other demonations? You were good at that.

How is your wife?

_______________________________
We Will Stand

"demonations"

While some may feel that Christians are "demons," the correct spelling is de-nom-i-na-tion.

(from the Latin denominare, "to name," from de- "completely" + nominare "to name")

Nom de plume (French) = pen name, i.e., a pseudonym under which a writer's work is published, as Marian Evans's novels appeared under the name of "George Eliot"

Thank you, what would I do without you.

Have a nice evening.

I had better watch it or I will be spelling like the Main friend.

______________________________
We Will Stand

I know what a Phe-nom is (a young basketball player) and of course a demon, and a senonnie (or is that suname?) Latin is a dead language by the way, except for doctors.

"Latin is a dead language by the way, except for doctors."

That's so true. You forgot to mention lawyers.

Could you help Sage out, he is worse than me with spelling. He didn't have any trouble spelling demon, strange huh?

______________________________
We Will Stand

Exodus 20:7
You shall not misuse the name of the LORD your God, for the LORD will not hold anyone guiltless who misuses his name.

You seem a bit scary and threatening....you aren't planning any weird interventions like bombing abortionists or anything are you?

Welcome - you will get some abuse, get ready. If you say the word God they will slam you, well they don't slam Hack. Wonder why?

They need to listen to my song- our world would be such a happier place if we did what the song says.

_______________________________
We Will Stand

Hebrews 4:12-13
For the word of God is living and active. Sharper than any double-edged sword, it penetrates even to dividing soul and spirit, joints and marrow; it judges the thoughts and attitudes of the heart.

Nothing in all creation is hidden from God's sight. Everything is uncovered and laid bare before the eyes of him to whom we must give account.

We do give an account.

_____________________________
We Will Stand

What do you know, go hug a tree.

_______________________________
We Will Stand

"...go hug a tree."

Gladly!

I prefer trees, over Jesus Horses.

Georgia's Village Sentinel Live Oak

I'll have to go visit that tree. I didn't know it was here in GA.

We took our kids to one of the redwood forests in Washington state several years ago, and they were amazed at the size of those gorgeous trees. Those forests are so magical and spiritual....a place where a person can truly connect with god/God.

There is a terrific book, 'The Wild Trees', that I read last year about this group of scientists who studied the ecosystem that lives and thrives in the very tippy tops of those huge redwoods out west.

It is fascinating, and a book would I recommend:

THE WILD TREES

I'll leave that up to you and Main Friends tree huggers. Me, I thank God for the beauty of it all. God created it.

_______________________________
We Will Stand

It is written:

"'As surely as I live,' says the Lord,
'every knee will bow before me;
every tongue will confess to God.'"

So then, each of us will give an account of himself to God.

Romans 14:11-12

I do know why you won't meet me.

______________________________
We Will Stand

You always avoid the question about not meeting me, should I tell? Don't worry I won't.

_______________________________
We Will Stand

"...should I tell?"

I've met several bloggers already so I'm not quite sure what weird secret you think you are hiding?? I'm curious so go ahead and spill yer beans.

" I have here in my hand a list of people in the State Department who are now agents of the Communist Party"

Even a dead fish can go with the flow.

Why would they tell your their main friend. I do know.

______________________________
We Will Stand

Come on already....let us in on what you "know". It really shouldn't take you more than a minute or so.

Ask my editor, I have an appointment tomorrow with work. Then I will tell you whatever you want to know.

My editor is the best in the country, she could help you out with knowledge.

_______________________________
We Will Stand

but I thought sniffles was their main friend. Now you say I am their main friend.... ohhhhhh, I think I get it now. You think sniffles and I are the same person, right?

uh, okay. Good luck with that....

You are kinda calm today. Tell me about it, how did you get so calm?

You usually rip people you don't like.

Are you upset trying to find out who the main friend is, well sorry your guess was wrong. Try again.

_____________________________
We Will Stand

"...how did you get so calm?

It must be all that tree hugging I do...

....or:

ZEN

I don't dislike you. I just find you odd. And I don't think a meeting between us would be a good thing.

I like having a preconceived idea of you, and I don't want that shattered. If you meet Hack, I'll get the low-down on you, from him.

Cheers. It's martini hour....

If I were to meet Hack, I know his main friend would be close by.

______________________________
We Will Stand

I don't want to speak for Hack but he could also give you the low-down on me. He met my whole family recently!

I don't want you to continue with this delusion, so I hope you two meet up and resolve your 'main friend' mystery.

I already know.

_______________________________
We Will Stand

If I were to meet you how would you know who I am?

Plus your main friend has already said you would give them the low down.

I know your main friend would be close by.

Did you think I was born yesterday.

Now, I know what you look like, how would you know me?

______________________________
We Will Stand

You hacked me so much today, where are my answers?

Gotta check with the main friend?

_______________________________
We Will Stand

Please..... Get.... Help......

"Hack"

Hack is a little upset that Obama didn't win Indiana.

Another insult Hack?

Oh, I insulted your Main friend.

All you do is throw insults to Denise, Beaver and me.

Your not as high up as you think you are. People who go around insulting people all the time are insecure. Quiet a few do it on here.

Yeah, you didn't respond to the post of where you knock Denise dad?

Where's that meeting place, oh I scare you.

Insults mean insecurity. Do you and all of your Main friend, make fun of people all the time?

I have a two places in my class, you need to sign up to learn respect and how to be civil. That's what I teach my kids at school. Better hurry they go fast, before the year is out the class will be full.

Hope you teach your kids respect and how to be civil, they are our future generation.

Didn't your parents teach you and your Main friends how to have respect and civil to people. It doesn't sound like it, the way you talk to Denise, Beaver and myself.

BTW your what you think is charm did not work.

You say you can take my gentleman's word, I won't give out your phone number. Yeah, and pigs fly. Your mad because I didn't fall down at your feet and give it to you.

Hack I forgot to tell you I am not fond of arrogant men.

Hack take your dang pill. If your out Yardman has some.

I don't take dang pills and Denise and Beaver we don't have to.

Your mad, putting down Denise dad was mean, Sniffles putting my sister and mom that was mean.

I don't worry, you reap what you sow.

_______________________________
We Will Stand

If I were to meet Hack, I know his main friend would be close by.

______________________________
We Will Stand

As the famous author muddle says, whatever. Who knows what I mean?

_____________________________
We Will Stand

really? Gosh, I learn something new everyday.

One question: Can you put a saddle on a dino?

Proverbs 13:20
He who walks with the wise grows wise, but a companion of fools suffers harm.