Don't you see the handwriting on the wall? Negative ads like the 'Jesse Jackson, Jr. comment - which was creatively misinterpreted, are decreasing Hillary's lead. We'll see what happens on Tuesday. I'm not a Hillary hater - but amazed that such astute politicians are allowing the mismanagement of her campaign to this degree - and not stopping the 'audience/unsubstantiated/creative misiterpretations such as has been posted on Itube. Remember - she did not endorse these interpretations. The OJ analogy is perceived by the person listening/reading - as has the entire OJ mess and the tragic death of two people has been/and will be a race divider.

I agree David's Mom. Obama Haters who voice opposition to the ideas of Obama and his swooners must immediately be persecuted.... I mean prosecuted with some sort of Hate Crimes Law. How dare anyone disagree with the messiah of BLT. Let's start with BPR.... she is the most hateful of the haters.
________

The Sissy And The Word Defined

of the "Obama had gay sex" story? I guess we should have all kept it zipped. Or how about the "Obama is a Muslim" story? Or how about the "Obama went to a terrorist school" story? Git, if it wasn't for us Obama supporters, conservatives would still be the most uninformed voters on the continent....Wait a minute..... Oh, sorry; they still are

Kevin "Hack" King
(anyone want two dogs???)

Your savior is running for president. No one really knew anything about this character until a few mere months ago. Getting these stories out helps the truth rise to the top. Because of this I no longer think Obama is a Muslim and I really don't think the dude is a queer. Terrorist school? I do think he is a Marxist, so doesn't his affinity for Marxist studies somewhat qualify him as having attended a terrorist school?

But what we have found out from these stories is that your Librul Idol appears not to be the race uniter as we were all tricked into thinking during the onset of his campaign. I have to admit that in the beginning I fell for that one and originally respected the guy for the "hope" I had that a black leader was rising up from the hate of BLT. Now I find out he's no different that his counterparts at Kenny's Koffee Klatch or the African American Syndicate that now runs Clayton County.

Git, if it wasn't for us Obama supporters, conservatives would still be the most uninformed voters on the continent....

Hack, if wasn't for us conservatives questioning the Dem candidates there would be 'nothing' to report on in this campaign because you guys could care less if your candidate was Attila the Hun or Mao who was running as long as they called themselves Dems. So... if Barry does indeed turn out to be Christ incarnate, then at least you can thank us uninformed conservative voters for doing our due diligence in performing the proper background checks on Oprah's latest god.

________

The Sissy And The Word Defined

Did you receive your flyer from Westmoreland about the drought. A big waste of "franking" privileges. What a joke.
-------------------------------------------
Caution - The Surgeon General has determined that constant blogging is an addiction that can cause a sedentary life style.

It ticked me off big time. I'm looking at scanning it, posting it on Fayette Forum, and linking to it so it can be properly exposed, mocked and tarred 'n' feathered.

Wastemoreland.... what an appropriate title.

________

The Sissy And The Word Defined

"It's so easy to find, keep up the good work."

Now if he could just help you find universal healthcare info.

Kevin "Hack" King
(anyone want two dogs???)

I doubt Beaver wants Obama garbage in his email. To bad Obama has to get your email to send you garbage to try and vote for him.

_______________________________
We Will Stand

Everytime someone posts a factually accurate blog that in some way, smears your boy toy, you reply by mockingly saying that this is a good thing.

If only you were running his campaign.

I know some people say, there is no such thing is bad press, but I'd say that one shouldn't pay attention to every cliche.

No News is Good News for your boy toy. Why? Because if he can just keep his mouth shut long enough for Hillary to finally fizzle out, then he would have the nomination rapped up. But instead, the true Obama is sneaking out for all America to see.

America doesn't know Obama. Mainly because Obama hasn't done anything. So we have to measure our opinions of him, by not what he has accomplished, but by who his friends are.

As I've said here many times, I can judge a person more by the friends he keeps than by any other single thing. Obama's friends are avowed terrorists, (Ayers), avowed Racists, (Wright)avowed communists (Frank), and cowards, (Kerry). Hell, his own wife was ashamed of America until Barack started winning elections. Having these people around you will cause their opinions to rub off on him, or, they are drawn to him, since their share the same opinions. I believe this to be the case.

The other evening, ABC ran an expose on Randy Paush. He is a professor dying of pancreatic cancer, and he has given his "Last Lecture." Its inspiring what this man has to say, and I'll suggest to you Hack, --and to the other hypnotized liberals on this blog, to listen to what Randy had to say to own his daughter who is now only 2, for when she is dating boys. (This applies to you Obamaniacs, since you have fallen head over heals for him, like little school girls do to rock stars.)

Randy left a message for his daughter that if she wants to find a boy that will treat her right and is worth keeping, he said, "Pay no attention to what he says, pay only your attention to what he does!"

Thats good advice for a young teenager, and its good advice for the American Electorate. Pay no attention to what Obama says, or for that matter, how well he says it. Instead, pay attention to what he does. Who does he associate with, who does he consider his mentors. What kind of people gravitate toward him?

Thats good advice Hack, that I suspect you will tell your own daughter. Now if only you could see beyond your own little school girl infatuation with Barack, and give an honest assessment of him, rather than to give us your constant campaign rhetoric.

"Yes We Can!" and "Change", work well with an electorate that has the short attention span represented in 30 second commericials, but that also plays against Barack, since this election cycle is longer than any in history, and EVERYONE is getting tired of hearing about Barack and his many newly discovered "mentors" that in some way are supposed to not matter.

The More We Know about Barack, the More We Know About Barack. New News is Good News. . . . for America. Because we are learning about the REAL Barack, and what we are learning, ain't a pretty picture.

Cheers

When I relate to you polls like the one I just saw this morning, showing Barack has his LARGEST LEAD YET over Hillary, you and your "scared of Obama" boys and girls say, "polls shmolls!" I love it when people give Barack reasons to talk; accusations to address. The real Barack comes off much better than the representations offered up by conservative sites and outlets. Oh, and Richard, you've overused that graveyard analogy, dontcha think?

Cheers, and I've got your dogs

Kevin "Hack" King
(anyone want two dogs???)

I don't know Hack, but the graveyard analogy, sounds more appropriate for what you are doing. That is, to amuse yourself with a this blogging distraction while your boy toy's history is being dug up.

Barack hasn't been vetted. Hillary has held back as much as she could. There is more dirt on your boy toy than one can ever imagine. And fortunately, several 527 organizations are going to be waiting with their commericals.

So keep whistlin' or blogging, as it were, because, just like a dead corpse rising up from the grave is going to scare the heebie jeebie's our of you, so also will the real truth about Barack and his "experiences".

I'd really be enjoying this campaign, if Barack were white. Unfortunately, a uniter Barack will not be. Once the real campaign in the summer and fall begins, race relations will be tested by mettle and I question whether we will be stronger for it.

In fact, when every charge against Barack is met with racists retorts, then America will finally have had enough, and people will become vocally upset with the double standards that have allowed Barack to get a pass from the media.

Its gonna happen. Mark my words. . . . and post them here on November 5th.

Some people just don't get it. What is this real truth that we are supposed to be made aware of concerning Barack Obama? If you can't find dirt on the guy, just hate him because he's black? As far as getting a pass from the media, he has been raked for the past 3 or 4 weeks because of the comments made by that idiot pastor, but yet he gets a pass? It is amazing that since now it appears that there MAY be a viable candidate for the office of president of the United States who happens to be black, every closeted bigot in the country wants to attack him for being too optimistic, not having experience, being too cerebral. It seems that that we have a president now who is none of those things and look at the mess(es) we have gotten ourselves into.

I would never consider Barry as "cerebral"

Stupid, yes.

------------------------------------------
The Beav -
Just a typical gun totin', bible thumpin' white person.

You will find, if you have not been following this blog and already know this, that the quality of the analysis that thebeaver shows when he considers a magna cum laude Harvard graduate and Constitutional professor who was the president of the Harvard Law Review to be "stupid" is typical of his reasoning abilities.

---------
It is one thing to show a man that he is in an error, and another to put him in possession of the truth. John Locke

Welcome!!

You will find that those who ummm.....ehhh.... "support" John McCain will NEVER show this support by telling you why to vote FOR McCain. Knowing that he is, in essence, McSame, they have little to go on. Soooo, they say "don't vote for the guy you like because...." Also, I am always amused by the accusation that those of us who respond to claims of racism are the ones who bring race up. But, as is always the case, here is how it works. I will repeat the ORIGINAL claims of race playing a roll on this thread:

"I'd really be enjoying this campaign, if Barack were white. Unfortunately, a uniter Barack will not be. Once the real campaign in the summer and fall begins, race relations will be tested by mettle and I question whether we will be stronger for it.

In fact, when every charge against Barack is met with racists retorts, then America will finally have had enough, and people will become vocally upset with the double standards that have allowed Barack to get a pass from the media."

WHO SAID THESE WORDS?????

Well, Richard, of course. Because you responded, Manouchehr, Richard will come back and tell you you prove his point. My suggestion is to just agree with him and let the voters decide. I like being motivated by my candidate. I feel their pain in not being motivated at all.

Cheers, and please hang around for a while. We can use the balance.

Kevin "Hack" King
(anyone want two dogs???)

I though "matey" was strictly nautical and that AF types are forbidden from using it.

-------------------------------------------
Caution - The Surgeon General has determined that constant blogging is an addiction that can cause a sedentary life style.

This Larry Sinclair character may very well be some homosexual crank looking for attention or money. This is how he is portrayed by Obama supporters who have paid any attention to him.

But I find it odd that his allegations are utterly ignored by the major news outlets. They certainly did not ignore very similar allegations made by a homosexual who claimed to have had gay sex with televangelist Ted Haggard. Reporters were all over that story before the allegations were confirmed as true.

On the face of it, I've seen no inherent reason for thinking that Sinclair is any less credible than the gay man in the Haggard case. So why is he ignored? Only far right wing news sources, such as World Net Daily are reporting the allegations.

Sinclair Story

Have we some reason to know in advance that Sinclair's claims are false and thus not worthy of further investigation, whereas the claims of the gay guy in the Haggard case did invite a look see? I simply cannot find any relevant difference between the two cases. Have I missed some evidence somewhere?

Actually, given the approach that Sinclair has taken--including filing suit in a district court, with allegations of intimidation from Obama's staff, offering to take a polygraph test (which either will occur or has occurred)--I think he has some prima facie plausibility.

Hillary's campaign won't want to come anywhere near this, as it would be the worst of the worst in smear campaigns. But if it turned out to be true it would be all over.

"Only far right wing news sources, such as World Net Daily are reporting the allegations."

I do feel there is a reason you and the "far right fringes" see validity in this story. Heck, if all you need is a well placed allegation, we could really get a news hurricane going with some of each candidate's past aquaintences. Anyhow, here is the three-pronged attack:

BPR will continue to attack Barrack's faith via BLT tangential attack.

Beaver will push the "Barack thinks he's better than us" angle through the Elitism campaign.

Here's where you come in: You'll lead the "Obama Oh Crap" brigade by attacking his very sexuality. Your task will be to give the "right fringe" credibility by pushing, and pushing, and pushing this story until folks finally see its validity and importance.

I expect, at that point, when the sum total of these attacks finally take hold....... President Obama will have some splainin ta doooo!

Cheers, and I've got some dogs for you
Kevin "Hack" King
(anyone want two dogs???)

Whats BLT? I'm trying to keep up.

---------
It is one thing to show a man that he is in an error, and another to put him in possession of the truth. John Locke

I've personally never experienced it, but it seems to scare alot of people round these here parts.

cheers,

Kevin "Hack" King
(anyone want two dogs???)

Locke...

at first, I thought this was BLT:

THE NON-POLITICAL BLT

but then found out it was Black Liberation Theology...

Oh, Geez, that made me hungry.

Hold the mayo.

Den$e was flogging the Larry Sinclair story two months ago. A Cleveland paper paid the $$ money Sinclair was asking for to take a polygraph and Sinclair failed it spectacularly.

Sinclair later admitted he made the whole thing up to scam the media for money because he was hopelessly in debt.

Sinclair fails Polygraph
___________
Diagnosing Denise

Yes. After I posted I thought to google "Sinclair polygraph." I found a Cleveland paper that discussed it. It reported that the failed test was administered by a known expert, and so anyone who would have been prepared to accept a passed test as evidence in support of his allegations should be equally prepared to accept this as a disproof.

Where is the news story that he admitted to cooking up the story?

Anyway, let's assume that Sinclair is a quack and put him to rest.

But that still does not answer my question (And, by the way, note that the following was the SOLE import of my post): Why has the media not picked up on and followed the story? I just don't see any prima facie difference between the cases. How was Sinclair any less credible than the other guy? Why the all-around "hands off" policy in the Obama case?

It's an honest question. Where was the difference? I've not seen it.

Well, I did a bit of research for you this afternoon and here is what I found:

1. Hagee's man-whore tried peddling his story to Channel 9 in Denver and the Denver newspaper as well. Both organizations asked for proof. The guy never came up with any.

2. Hagee's man-whore 2 months later went on hate radio, some guy who hates liberals AND conservatives, and repeated his unverified claims about an unnamed homo pastor at New Life church.

3. Channel 9 decided to "report on the controversy" and interviewed Ted Hagee, who denied everything. This was "newsworthy", Channel 9 claimed, because New Life was one of the most homophobic churches in the country.

4. The man-whore then contacted New Life's church board of deacons the next day and offered them his cell-phone records, claiming ole Ted Hagee was a regular customer. He CLAIMED (but later admitted he did not have) to have steamy voicemails from Ted Hagee.

5. The church board confronted Hagee less than 24 hours after the Channel 9 story aired and Hagee folded and admitted he liked men. He resigned on the spot.

6. 3 weeks later Hagee claimed he'd successfully prayed away his gay tendencies.

Long story short: Hagee owned up to his homosexual behavior less than 24 hours after the story broke. Nobody has ever seen or heard of Obama lusting after anyone other than his wife. But that doesn't stop your friends at WorldNutDaily from printing unverified rumors about Obama.

___________
Diagnosing Denise

They're all pretty much the same to me.

Please don't associate me with WND.

Are you also Sniffles?

Haggard is a dead duck, he admitted it. We despise truthful people! But Hagee is John McCain's friend. He also has a son who preaches with him and you can't tell them apart. His wife sings. Together they weigh one half ton, or more. It is not that I am prejudiced against over-weight people, but it is strange to see a complete family that way.
Wouldn't that be good evidence that over-weight is inherited?
I don't get it Muddle, aren't you religious? (or Sniffles).

I don't get it Muddle, aren't you religious?

Sure you do.

I simply despise stupidity in the name of religion.

That's why I'm drawn to religious satire.

Are you talking about Ted Haggard--not Hagee?

Maybe some 'writers' are taking the word 'journalist' seriously, and doing the research before printing a 'story'. The tabloids have had a heyday with this and other 'smear Obama' stories.

Barak is my pick of the current candidates. McCain would give us four more years of Bush policies, and Hillary is not electable even if no one else was running. Actually, there is a good chance that McCain would snatch away the title of "worst president ever" from George W Bush, which would be no small achievment. I am impressed by the tenacity of the present day conservatives, but not by their lack of the ability to connect to the most basic logics of human compassion, which is amply shown by their mean streak.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Fortunately, the workings of the universe do not depend on our beliefs.