The audacity of Obama

Cal Thomas's picture

We’ve heard about Barack Obama’s hope from his bestselling book “The Audacity of Hope.” Now we are getting a glimpse of his audacity.

As the Christian Broadcasting Network’s David Brody first reported on Friday, Obama has decided to go after two constituencies that have mostly voted Republican in recent years — Roman Catholics and Protestant Evangelicals — and take up an issue that the GOP and conservative Christians have owned in recent election cycles — pro-life.

The Obama campaign has formed the “National Catholic Advisory Council,” co-chaired by Democratic Senator Bob Casey of Pennsylvania and former Democratic Congressman Tim Roemer of Indiana, both Roman Catholics.

Casey’s late father, Gov. Bob Casey, always claimed he was barred from speaking to the 1992 Democratic National Convention because of his strong pro-life views. Obama has said he wants to change his party’s antipathy toward pro-lifers, though not its pro-choice position.

This is a crafty political move on Obama’s part. It could not only strike at the heart of the Republican base, but it will reveal how seriously politicians are when they claim to favor legal protection for the unborn, but act as if they are pro-choicers.

Obama has said that while he strongly favors “a woman’s right to choose,” he is open to hearing other opinions. That’s nice, but hearing and acting are two different things.

And why are two pro-life Catholics giving moral cover to Obama who, when he had the chance, did not even join with several of his Democratic Senate colleagues in voting to ban the horrid practice of partial-birth abortion, in which the brains of a fully developed baby are extracted as the child emerges from the womb?

How can a Catholic in good standing and good conscience endorse someone who violates a basic tenet of the Catholic Church?

The lust for power and position, apparently, has become so strong that some people are willing to sell not only their own souls, but also the beating hearts and souls of unborn children to the highest political bidder.

Obama compounded his insult to Catholics, ahead of next week’s primary in heavily Catholic Pennsylvania, when he said small-town Americans are “bitter and cling to guns and religion as symptoms of frustration.”

That remark brought a quick rebuke from Hillary Clinton and John McCain. “Pennsylvania doesn’t need a president who looks down on them,” said Sen. Clinton. “They need a president who stands up for them, who fights for them, who works hard for your futures, your jobs, your families.”

McCain spokesman Steve Schmidt said Obama’s initial remarks, made at a fund-raiser in San Francisco, “shows an elitism and condescension towards hardworking Americans that is nothing short of breathtaking.”

Obama also wants to repeal the military’s carefully crafted compromise “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy, which allows homosexuals to serve in the military, as long as they don’t reveal their sexual orientation.

And Obama favors same-sex “unions.” Though he might call them something other than marriage, he would allow all of the benefits government conveys on heterosexual married couples to be given to same-sex partners. This, too, runs afoul of Catholic Church doctrine.

How much more cynical can politics get? Obama knows he would never have a prayer of getting the nomination were he anything but pro-choice, but he makes nice with a couple of pro-lifers who ought to know they have zero chance in moving Obama from his radical position.

They apparently are so enamored by political power they are willing to use their pro-life “credentials” to help Obama get elected, though he has no plan — other than more “sex education” — for reducing the abortion carnage that has already taken the lives of nearly 50 million unborn children since 1973.

Leaders of the Catholic Church, perhaps beginning with Pope Benedict XVI during his visit to America this week, ought to condemn this kind of cynical politics and content-less religion and remind Catholics that just because a Catholic politician endorses another politician, it does not mean the Catholic Church is giving its blessing to the endorsers or the endorsee.

[Email Cal Thomas at] ©2008 TRIBUNE MEDIA SERVICES, INC.

login to post comments | Cal Thomas's blog

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
yardman5508's picture
Submitted by yardman5508 on Wed, 04/16/2008 - 7:33pm.

Let me preface this by saying that Mr. Obama was NOT my first choice as a presidential candidate, nor was he my second choice. But since he has gained the majority of support from the Democratic Party in GA he has, generally, gain my support. That does not mean that I agree totally with what he represents, but then the Republicans have their problems with Mr. McCain, too.

That being said, Cal sort of misses the boat here with his understanding of Obama's position. The thing that has characterized politics in recent times is the increasing polarization of the electorate. That is a very unfortunate development, since it leaves moderates sort of hanging out on a limb. When Obama talks of "change", the sort of change that can be envisioned is an actual dialog between those groups with different views. In order for our government to work effectively, it must find a way of steering a course between those who advocate abortion upon demand and those who refer to pro-choice folks as "baby-killers". That sort of polarization cannot be dealt with in a democracy of any form.

Obama advocates allowing folks who might disagree with him to have a seat at the table. Where was that sort openness over the past seven years (or the past 15 years for that matter)? For too long we have viewed elections as "winner take all". "I won the damned thing and I will rule like I want, the devil with talking to the other side". What a refreshing view, and a much needed one.

I am sure the "wingnuts" will sharpen their knives, but isn't it time that we sat down and tried to search for solutions instead of digging in our heels?

As for St. Cal Thomas, "Defender of the Faith", are Catholics really Christians anyway? Don't they worship the Pope? Or are they only "ours" when it is convenient for our political agenda? Keep the faith

Democracy is not a spectator sport.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.