Looney democrats & selfish republicans

The facts are that republicans think that
everyone who isn't making it in this country is caused by them being lazy.
The fact that most republicans make money without doing any hard work (the sweaty kind) is not important.
Anyway, most of the "lazy" people aren't affiliated with any political party and actually do perform sweaty work. There is just no money in sweaty work.
Now the "loons," or anyone not a republican, are those ungrateful people who won't play "uncle Tom" to the non-loons--the republicans.
Many of these "loons," actually are on welfare of one sort or another and that gripes the hell out of those non-loons, the republicans. These "loons" can actually survive on the $8-10,000 per year they scrounge off of the government (the non-loons).
It matters not that the non-loons are fortunate enough by their "hard-work." to have an income between $60,000 and $150,000 as a median. They also want their share of the welfare the loons get, which when calculated by the percentage getting it, could amount to maybe another thousand or so into their paycheck--before taxes!
The republican theory is that if we don't supply a minimum amount (any amount for that matter) to anyone, then they will begin to be smarter and work harder and eventually eliminate any poor sorry loons. However, what these loons then earn has to come from somewhere, so I suppose the non-loons will have to share their additional thousand, from no welfare, with the old "loons."

All this crap simply indicates that generalizations of any group, like saying that all non-loons, are selfish people, hedge fund crooks, bank schemers, and hypocrites, is just simple selfishness.

sageadvice's blog | login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by 1bighammer on Thu, 04/03/2008 - 10:57am.

that help themselves. To say that Republicans think any one that is on welfare are lazy is just a downright LIE!

The republican theory is that if we don't supply a minimum amount (any amount for that matter) to anyone, then they will begin to be smarter and work harder and eventually eliminate any poor sorry loons.

That's not it at all. The point is if you continue to give to someone for nothing, they have no incentive to do any better. You have whole families in some areas that where generation after generation have survived on welfare. They don't want to get a job, why should they, they know from the others that the Welfare check will keep coming.

Submitted by sageadvice on Thu, 04/03/2008 - 1:40pm.

Ok, go ahead and help those who are helping themselves!

Most Wal-Mart, K-Mart, restaurant help, etc., could use some extra cash from you since they are trying to help themselves!

A big industry in this country is the unmarried people who have several children, maybe of unknown fatherhood. These ladies would maybe have a job at WalMart if they hadn't gotten pregnant at 14 and couldn't finish high-school. The gentlemen involved only want sex and couldn't pay for a family if they wanted to do so.

Our only solution seems to be to preach abstinence to them and to disallow abortions.

Let's offer every one of these people (at 14) a "job" which you say they don't want, and close to Marta so they can get to work, and see what happens!
How many jobs can you offer?

Submitted by 1bighammer on Thu, 04/03/2008 - 2:46pm.

So let me get this straight. The men /boys wanted sex....so the girls had to give it to them. They couldn't say no? Were they all raped?

ABSTINENCE works....you can't get pregnant if you don't have sex!!!

Like I said before I don't mind helping those who help themselves.

Main Stream's picture
Submitted by Main Stream on Thu, 04/03/2008 - 3:01pm.

"you can't get pregnant if you don't have sex!!!"

But if those raging hormones take over, and they will, and 14 yr. olds DO have sex and end up pregnant, they have a choice!

Thank you Roe v. Wade!


Mike King's picture
Submitted by Mike King on Thu, 04/03/2008 - 10:32am.

your premise of "loons",(your term), can get by on $8-$10k annually and those of us who actually provide it want "our share", (your term),lends me to believe you view the money as an entitlement.

Dear friend, should this be true, just where do I go to list all the "loons" for 1099 purposes? You do pay taxes, don't you?


Submitted by sageadvice on Thu, 04/03/2008 - 1:28pm.

I think Cal named the "looney" democrats when he declared his political loyalty! As a democrat/independent, I don't plan to buy any ads in the Citizen!
Of course I'm sure he meant just some democrats are looney and possibly a very few republicans who have deserted the : no federal help wanted, no abortions, no welfare, family values, and strict budget control philosophy, along with constant unlimited cost wars.

Protection of the oil companies, the hedge-hog banks, the polluters, and the un-regulated business area ( except where it is to the advantage of the business) is also needed, except of course where national security exists---then we can abort all laws for building fences and snooping on citizens!

As to entitlements, they are only for "dribble down" purposes.

TonyF's picture
Submitted by TonyF on Thu, 04/03/2008 - 10:03am.

Hey idiot boy, do you have a problem with people who do "sweaty work"? Those of us who choose to make a honest living do so in order for you to be able to sit on your sorry ass all day and pick your nose. You are just about the most ignorant (read that as uneducated) piece of human refuse (read that as fecal matter) it has ever been my displeasure to encounter. You sir (or madam or whatever combination of the two you may be) are a piece of poop.

O wad some Power the giftie gie us,To see oursels as ithers see us!
(R. Burns)
If we could see ourselves as others see us, we would vanish on the spot.
(E. M. Cioran)


AF A-10's picture
Submitted by AF A-10 on Thu, 04/03/2008 - 1:54pm.

You know sage. Sage is no surprise. Over the last few weeks, the four letter words have been flying like crazy, dog (as Randy Jackson would say). You and Beav are kicking the lard-@###$ in their butts. 1bighammer has an incredibly offensive "half honkey" permanently affixed to him or herself, Richard is blowing his top with a myriad of expletives, and every conservative that mentions Bill Clinton throws in a reference for a certain sexual act that I wouldn't care to repeat. I find it curious, especially since we have so much to be happy about: Conservatives have their candidate for POTUS well before the convention, FAYCO won't have CLAYCO students shoved down our systems, and we are all beginning to admit we are in a recession (and you know admitting the problem is the beginning of the solution). I've told Muddle before, I do know how nice it is to vent. My son and I blow off steam by watching tires torn to shreds on the Speed Channel show "Pinks," or by watching the nicest guys in the world try to tear eachother apart nightly on "UFC Unleashed." Try those two pills, and blog me in the morning if they don't help.

Smiling

Cheers

Kevin "Hack" King


yardman5508's picture
Submitted by yardman5508 on Thu, 04/03/2008 - 10:10am.

that is sure to raise the level of discussion here on the blogs. Keep the faith.

Democracy is not a spectator sport.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.