A Brief for Whitey

"The "white community," said Barack, must start "acknowledging that what ails the African-American community does not just exist in the minds of black people; that the legacy of discrimination -- and current incidents of discrimination, while less overt than in the past -- are real and must be addressed. Not just with words, but with deeds ... ."

And what deeds must we perform to heal ourselves and our country?

The "white community" must invest more money in black schools and communities, enforce civil rights laws, ensure fairness in the criminal justice system and provide this generation of blacks with "ladders of opportunity" that were "unavailable" to Barack's and the Rev. Wright's generations.

What is wrong with Barack's prognosis and Barack's cure?"

A Brief for Whitey

Great article from Buchanan

thebeaver's blog | login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by Davids mom on Sat, 03/22/2008 - 7:30am.

Please point out to me where Obama makes the following prognosis:

The "white community" must invest more money in black schools and communities, enforce civil rights laws, ensure fairness in the criminal justice system and provide this generation of blacks with "ladders of opportunity" that were "unavailable" to Barack's and the Rev. Wright's generations.

Take the time to read Obama's speech for yourself - and not another's interpretation of his words.

"We the people, in order to form a more perfect union."

Two hundred and twenty one years ago, in a hall that still stands across the street, a group of men gathered and, with these simple words, launched America's improbable experiment in democracy. Farmers and scholars; statesmen and patriots who had traveled across an ocean to escape tyranny and persecution finally made real their declaration of independence at a Philadelphia convention that lasted through the spring of 1787.

The document they produced was eventually signed but ultimately unfinished. It was stained by this nation's original sin of slavery, a question that divided the colonies and brought the convention to a stalemate until the founders chose to allow the slave trade to continue for at least twenty more years, and to leave any final resolution to future generations.

Of course, the answer to the slavery question was already embedded within our Constitution - a Constitution that had at is very core the ideal of equal citizenship under the law; a Constitution that promised its people liberty, and justice, and a union that could be and should be perfected over time.

And yet words on a parchment would not be enough to deliver slaves from bondage, or provide men and women of every color and creed their full rights and obligations as citizens of the United States. What would be needed were Americans in successive generations who were willing to do their part - through protests and struggle, on the streets and in the courts, through a civil war and civil disobedience and always at great risk - to narrow that gap between the promise of our ideals and the reality of their time.

This was one of the tasks we set forth at the beginning of this campaign - to continue the long march of those who came before us, a march for a more just, more equal, more free, more caring and more prosperous America. I chose to run for the presidency at this moment in history because I believe deeply that we cannot solve the challenges of our time unless we solve them together - unless we perfect our union by understanding that we may have different stories, but we hold common hopes; that we may not look the same and we may not have come from the same place, but we all want to move in the same direction - towards a better future for of children and our grandchildren.

This belief comes from my unyielding faith in the decency and generosity of the American people. But it also comes from my own American story.

I am the son of a black man from Kenya and a white woman from Kansas. I was raised with the help of a white grandfather who survived a Depression to serve in Patton's Army during World War II and a white grandmother who worked on a bomber assembly line at Fort Leavenworth while he was overseas. I've gone to some of the best schools in America and lived in one of the world's poorest nations. I am married to a black American who carries within her the blood of slaves and slaveowners - an inheritance we pass on to our two precious daughters. I have brothers, sisters, nieces, nephews, uncles and cousins, of every race and every hue, scattered across three continents, and for as long as I live, I will never forget that in no other country on Earth is my story even possible.

It's a story that hasn't made me the most conventional candidate. But it is a story that has seared into my genetic makeup the idea that this nation is more than the sum of its parts - that out of many, we are truly one.

Throughout the first year of this campaign, against all predictions to the contrary, we saw how hungry the American people were for this message of unity. Despite the temptation to view my candidacy through a purely racial lens, we won commanding victories in states with some of the whitest populations in the country. In South Carolina, where the Confederate Flag still flies, we built a powerful coalition of African Americans and white Americans.

This is not to say that race has not been an issue in the campaign. At various stages in the campaign, some commentators have deemed me either "too black" or "not black enough." We saw racial tensions bubble to the surface during the week before the South Carolina primary. The press has scoured every exit poll for the latest evidence of racial polarization, not just in terms of white and black, but black and brown as well.

And yet, it has only been in the last couple of weeks that the discussion of race in this campaign has taken a particularly divisive turn.

On one end of the spectrum, we've heard the implication that my candidacy is somehow an exercise in affirmative action; that it's based solely on the desire of wide-eyed liberals to purchase racial reconciliation on the cheap. On the other end, we've heard my former pastor, Reverend Jeremiah Wright, use incendiary language to express views that have the potential not only to widen the racial divide, but views that denigrate both the greatness and the goodness of our nation; that rightly offend white and black alike.

I have already condemned, in unequivocal terms, the statements of Reverend Wright that have caused such controversy. For some, nagging questions remain. Did I know him to be an occasionally fierce critic of American domestic and foreign policy? Of course. Did I ever hear him make remarks that could be considered controversial while I sat in church? Yes. Did I strongly disagree with many of his political views? Absolutely - just as I'm sure many of you have heard remarks from your pastors, priests, or rabbis with which you strongly disagreed.

But the remarks that have caused this recent firestorm weren't simply controversial. They weren't simply a religious leader's effort to speak out against perceived injustice. Instead, they expressed a profoundly distorted view of this country - a view that sees white racism as endemic, and that elevates what is wrong with America above all that we know is right with America; a view that sees the conflicts in the Middle East as rooted primarily in the actions of stalwart allies like Israel, instead of emanating from the perverse and hateful ideologies of radical Islam.

As such, Reverend Wright's comments were not only wrong but divisive, divisive at a time when we need unity; racially charged at a time when we need to come together to solve a set of monumental problems - two wars, a terrorist threat, a falling economy, a chronic health care crisis and potentially devastating climate change; problems that are neither black or white or Latino or Asian, but rather problems that confront us all.

Given my background, my politics, and my professed values and ideals, there will no doubt be those for whom my statements of condemnation are not enough. Why associate myself with Reverend Wright in the first place, they may ask? Why not join another church? And I confess that if all that I knew of Reverend Wright were the snippets of those sermons that have run in an endless loop on the television and You Tube, or if Trinity United Church of Christ conformed to the caricatures being peddled by some commentators, there is no doubt that I would react in much the same way

But the truth is, that isn't all that I know of the man. The man I met more than twenty years ago is a man who helped introduce me to my Christian faith, a man who spoke to me about our obligations to love one another; to care for the sick and lift up the poor. He is a man who served his country as a U.S. Marine; who has studied and lectured at some of the finest universities and seminaries in the country, and who for over thirty years led a church that serves the community by doing God's work here on Earth - by housing the homeless, ministering to the needy, providing day care services and scholarships and prison ministries, and reaching out to those suffering from HIV/AIDS.

In my first book, Dreams From My Father, I described the experience of my first service at Trinity:

"People began to shout, to rise from their seats and clap and cry out, a forceful wind carrying the reverend's voice up into the rafters....And in that single note - hope! - I heard something else; at the foot of that cross, inside the thousands of churches across the city, I imagined the stories of ordinary black people merging with the stories of David and Goliath, Moses and Pharaoh, the Christians in the lion's den, Ezekiel's field of dry bones. Those stories - of survival, and freedom, and hope - became our story, my story; the blood that had spilled was our blood, the tears our tears; until this black church, on this bright day, seemed once more a vessel carrying the story of a people into future generations and into a larger world. Our trials and triumphs became at once unique and universal, black and more than black; in chronicling our journey, the stories and songs gave us a means to reclaim memories that we didn't need to feel shame about...memories that all people might study and cherish - and with which we could start to rebuild."

That has been my experience at Trinity. Like other predominantly black churches across the country, Trinity embodies the black community in its entirety - the doctor and the welfare mom, the model student and the former gang-banger. Like other black churches, Trinity's services are full of raucous laughter and sometimes bawdy humor. They are full of dancing, clapping, screaming and shouting that may seem jarring to the untrained ear. The church contains in full the kindness and cruelty, the fierce intelligence and the shocking ignorance, the struggles and successes, the love and yes, the bitterness and bias that make up the black experience in America.

And this helps explain, perhaps, my relationship with Reverend Wright. As imperfect as he may be, he has been like family to me. He strengthened my faith, officiated my wedding, and baptized my children. Not once in my conversations with him have I heard him talk about any ethnic group in derogatory terms, or treat whites with whom he interacted with anything but courtesy and respect. He contains within him the contradictions - the good and the bad - of the community that he has served diligently for so many years.

I can no more disown him than I can disown the black community. I can no more disown him than I can my white grandmother - a woman who helped raise me, a woman who sacrificed again and again for me, a woman who loves me as much as she loves anything in this world, but a woman who once confessed her fear of black men who passed by her on the street, and who on more than one occasion has uttered racial or ethnic stereotypes that made me cringe.

These people are a part of me. And they are a part of America, this country that I love.

Some will see this as an attempt to justify or excuse comments that are simply inexcusable. I can assure you it is not. I suppose the politically safe thing would be to move on from this episode and just hope that it fades into the woodwork. We can dismiss Reverend Wright as a crank or a demagogue, just as some have dismissed Geraldine Ferraro, in the aftermath of her recent statements, as harboring some deep-seated racial bias.

But race is an issue that I believe this nation cannot afford to ignore right now. We would be making the same mistake that Reverend Wright made in his offending sermons about America - to simplify and stereotype and amplify the negative to the point that it distorts reality.

The fact is that the comments that have been made and the issues that have surfaced over the last few weeks reflect the complexities of race in this country that we've never really worked through - a part of our union that we have yet to perfect. And if we walk away now, if we simply retreat into our respective corners, we will never be able to come together and solve challenges like health care, or education, or the need to find good jobs for every American.

Understanding this reality requires a reminder of how we arrived at this point. As William Faulkner once wrote, "The past isn't dead and buried. In fact, it isn't even past." We do not need to recite here the history of racial injustice in this country. But we do need to remind ourselves that so many of the disparities that exist in the African-American community today can be directly traced to inequalities passed on from an earlier generation that suffered under the brutal legacy of slavery and Jim Crow.

Segregated schools were, and are, inferior schools; we still haven't fixed them, fifty years after Brown v. Board of Education, and the inferior education they provided, then and now, helps explain the pervasive achievement gap between today's black and white students.

Legalized discrimination - where blacks were prevented, often through violence, from owning property, or loans were not granted to African-American business owners, or black homeowners could not access FHA mortgages, or blacks were excluded from unions, or the police force, or fire departments - meant that black families could not amass any meaningful wealth to bequeath to future generations. That history helps explain the wealth and income gap between black and white, and the concentrated pockets of poverty that persists in so many of today's urban and rural communities.

A lack of economic opportunity among black men, and the shame and frustration that came from not being able to provide for one's family, contributed to the erosion of black families - a problem that welfare policies for many years may have worsened. And the lack of basic services in so many urban black neighborhoods - parks for kids to play in, police walking the beat, regular garbage pick-up and building code enforcement - all helped create a cycle of violence, blight and neglect that continue to haunt us.

This is the reality in which Reverend Wright and other African-Americans of his generation grew up. They came of age in the late fifties and early sixties, a time when segregation was still the law of the land and opportunity was systematically constricted. What's remarkable is not how many failed in the face of discrimination, but rather how many men and women overcame the odds; how many were able to make a way out of no way for those like me who would come after them.

But for all those who scratched and clawed their way to get a piece of the American Dream, there were many who didn't make it - those who were ultimately defeated, in one way or another, by discrimination. That legacy of defeat was passed on to future generations - those young men and increasingly young women who we see standing on street corners or languishing in our prisons, without hope or prospects for the future. Even for those blacks who did make it, questions of race, and racism, continue to define their worldview in fundamental ways. For the men and women of Reverend Wright's generation, the memories of humiliation and doubt and fear have not gone away; nor has the anger and the bitterness of those years. That anger may not get expressed in public, in front of white co-workers or white friends. But it does find voice in the barbershop or around the kitchen table. At times, that anger is exploited by politicians, to gin up votes along racial lines, or to make up for a politician's own failings.

And occasionally it finds voice in the church on Sunday morning, in the pulpit and in the pews. The fact that so many people are surprised to hear that anger in some of Reverend Wright's sermons simply reminds us of the old truism that the most segregated hour in American life occurs on Sunday morning. That anger is not always productive; indeed, all too often it distracts attention from solving real problems; it keeps us from squarely facing our own complicity in our condition, and prevents the African-American community from forging the alliances it needs to bring about real change. But the anger is real; it is powerful; and to simply wish it away, to condemn it without understanding its roots, only serves to widen the chasm of misunderstanding that exists between the races.

In fact, a similar anger exists within segments of the white community. Most working- and middle-class white Americans don't feel that they have been particularly privileged by their race. Their experience is the immigrant experience - as far as they're concerned, no one's handed them anything, they've built it from scratch. They've worked hard all their lives, many times only to see their jobs shipped overseas or their pension dumped after a lifetime of labor. They are anxious about their futures, and feel their dreams slipping away; in an era of stagnant wages and global competition, opportunity comes to be seen as a zero sum game, in which your dreams come at my expense. So when they are told to bus their children to a school across town; when they hear that an African American is getting an advantage in landing a good job or a spot in a good college because of an injustice that they themselves never committed; when they're told that their fears about crime in urban neighborhoods are somehow prejudiced, resentment builds over time.

Like the anger within the black community, these resentments aren't always expressed in polite company. But they have helped shape the political landscape for at least a generation. Anger over welfare and affirmative action helped forge the Reagan Coalition. Politicians routinely exploited fears of crime for their own electoral ends. Talk show hosts and conservative commentators built entire careers unmasking bogus claims of racism while dismissing legitimate discussions of racial injustice and inequality as mere political correctness or reverse racism.

Just as black anger often proved counterproductive, so have these white resentments distracted attention from the real culprits of the middle class squeeze - a corporate culture rife with inside dealing, questionable accounting practices, and short-term greed; a Washington dominated by lobbyists and special interests; economic policies that favor the few over the many. And yet, to wish away the resentments of white Americans, to label them as misguided or even racist, without recognizing they are grounded in legitimate concerns - this too widens the racial divide, and blocks the path to understanding.

This is where we are right now. It's a racial stalemate we've been stuck in for years. Contrary to the claims of some of my critics, black and white, I have never been so naïve as to believe that we can get beyond our racial divisions in a single election cycle, or with a single candidacy - particularly a candidacy as imperfect as my own.

But I have asserted a firm conviction - a conviction rooted in my faith in God and my faith in the American people - that working together we can move beyond some of our old racial wounds, and that in fact we have no choice is we are to continue on the path of a more perfect union.

For the African-American community, that path means embracing the burdens of our past without becoming victims of our past. It means continuing to insist on a full measure of justice in every aspect of American life. But it also means binding our particular grievances - for better health care, and better schools, and better jobs - to the larger aspirations of all Americans -- the white woman struggling to break the glass ceiling, the white man whose been laid off, the immigrant trying to feed his family. And it means taking full responsibility for own lives - by demanding more from our fathers, and spending more time with our children, and reading to them, and teaching them that while they may face challenges and discrimination in their own lives, they must never succumb to despair or cynicism; they must always believe that they can write their own destiny.

Ironically, this quintessentially American - and yes, conservative - notion of self-help found frequent expression in Reverend Wright's sermons. But what my former pastor too often failed to understand is that embarking on a program of self-help also requires a belief that society can change.

The profound mistake of Reverend Wright's sermons is not that he spoke about racism in our society. It's that he spoke as if our society was static; as if no progress has been made; as if this country - a country that has made it possible for one of his own members to run for the highest office in the land and build a coalition of white and black; Latino and Asian, rich and poor, young and old -- is still irrevocably bound to a tragic past. But what we know -- what we have seen - is that America can change. That is true genius of this nation. What we have already achieved gives us hope - the audacity to hope - for what we can and must achieve tomorrow.

In the white community, the path to a more perfect union means acknowledging that what ails the African-American community does not just exist in the minds of black people; that the legacy of discrimination - and current incidents of discrimination, while less overt than in the past - are real and must be addressed. Not just with words, but with deeds - by investing in our schools and our communities; by enforcing our civil rights laws and ensuring fairness in our criminal justice system; by providing this generation with ladders of opportunity that were unavailable for previous generations. It requires all Americans to realize that your dreams do not have to come at the expense of my dreams; that investing in the health, welfare, and education of black and brown and white children will ultimately help all of America prosper.

In the end, then, what is called for is nothing more, and nothing less, than what all the world's great religions demand - that we do unto others as we would have them do unto us. Let us be our brother's keeper, Scripture tells us. Let us be our sister's keeper. Let us find that common stake we all have in one another, and let our politics reflect that spirit as well.

For we have a choice in this country. We can accept a politics that breeds division, and conflict, and cynicism. We can tackle race only as spectacle - as we did in the OJ trial - or in the wake of tragedy, as we did in the aftermath of Katrina - or as fodder for the nightly news. We can play Reverend Wright's sermons on every channel, every day and talk about them from now until the election, and make the only question in this campaign whether or not the American people think that I somehow believe or sympathize with his most offensive words. We can pounce on some gaffe by a Hillary supporter as evidence that she's playing the race card, or we can speculate on whether white men will all flock to John McCain in the general election regardless of his policies.

We can do that.

But if we do, I can tell you that in the next election, we'll be talking about some other distraction. And then another one. And then another one. And nothing will change.

That is one option. Or, at this moment, in this election, we can come together and say, "Not this time." This time we want to talk about the crumbling schools that are stealing the future of black children and white children and Asian children and Hispanic children and Native American children. This time we want to reject the cynicism that tells us that these kids can't learn; that those kids who don't look like us are somebody else's problem. The children of America are not those kids, they are our kids, and we will not let them fall behind in a 21st century economy. Not this time.

This time we want to talk about how the lines in the Emergency Room are filled with whites and blacks and Hispanics who do not have health care; who don't have the power on their own to overcome the special interests in Washington, but who can take them on if we do it together.

This time we want to talk about the shuttered mills that once provided a decent life for men and women of every race, and the homes for sale that once belonged to Americans from every religion, every region, every walk of life. This time we want to talk about the fact that the real problem is not that someone who doesn't look like you might take your job; it's that the corporation you work for will ship it overseas for nothing more than a profit.

This time we want to talk about the men and women of every color and creed who serve together, and fight together, and bleed together under the same proud flag. We want to talk about how to bring them home from a war that never should've been authorized and never should've been waged, and we want to talk about how we'll show our patriotism by caring for them, and their families, and giving them the benefits they have earned.

I would not be running for President if I didn't believe with all my heart that this is what the vast majority of Americans want for this country. This union may never be perfect, but generation after generation has shown that it can always be perfected. And today, whenever I find myself feeling doubtful or cynical about this possibility, what gives me the most hope is the next generation - the young people whose attitudes and beliefs and openness to change have already made history in this election.

There is one story in particularly that I'd like to leave you with today - a story I told when I had the great honor of speaking on Dr. King's birthday at his home church, Ebenezer Baptist, in Atlanta.

There is a young, twenty-three year old white woman named Ashley Baia who organized for our campaign in Florence, South Carolina. She had been working to organize a mostly African-American community since the beginning of this campaign, and one day she was at a roundtable discussion where everyone went around telling their story and why they were there.

And Ashley said that when she was nine years old, her mother got cancer. And because she had to miss days of work, she was let go and lost her health care. They had to file for bankruptcy, and that's when Ashley decided that she had to do something to help her mom.

She knew that food was one of their most expensive costs, and so Ashley convinced her mother that what she really liked and really wanted to eat more than anything else was mustard and relish sandwiches. Because that was the cheapest way to eat.

She did this for a year until her mom got better, and she told everyone at the roundtable that the reason she joined our campaign was so that she could help the millions of other children in the country who want and need to help their parents too.

Now Ashley might have made a different choice. Perhaps somebody told her along the way that the source of her mother's problems were blacks who were on welfare and too lazy to work, or Hispanics who were coming into the country illegally. But she didn't. She sought out allies in her fight against injustice.

Anyway, Ashley finishes her story and then goes around the room and asks everyone else why they're supporting the campaign. They all have different stories and reasons. Many bring up a specific issue. And finally they come to this elderly black man who's been sitting there quietly the entire time. And Ashley asks him why he's there. And he does not bring up a specific issue. He does not say health care or the economy. He does not say education or the war. He does not say that he was there because of Barack Obama. He simply says to everyone in the room, "I am here because of Ashley."

"I'm here because of Ashley." By itself, that single moment of recognition between that young white girl and that old black man is not enough. It is not enough to give health care to the sick, or jobs to the jobless, or education to our children.

But it is where we start. It is where our union grows stronger. And as so many generations have come to realize over the course of the two-hundred and twenty one years since a band of patriots signed that document in Philadelphia, that is where the perfection begins.

Submitted by thebeaver on Sat, 03/22/2008 - 11:21am.

Right here -

"In the white community, the path to a more perfect union means acknowledging that what ails the African-American community does not just exist in the minds of black people; that the legacy of discrimination - and current incidents of discrimination, while less overt than in the past - are real and must be addressed. Not just with words, but with deeds - by investing in our schools and our communities; by enforcing our civil rights laws and ensuring fairness in our criminal justice system; by providing this generation with ladders of opportunity that were unavailable for previous generations. It requires all Americans to realize that your dreams do not have to come at the expense of my dreams; that investing in the health, welfare, and education of black and brown and white children will ultimately help all of America prosper."

It's the same old, same old. We have been "investing" government schools, welfare mothers, affirmitive action (legalized descrimination) for decades. What are the results? Nothing, nada.
No amount of money thrown at government programs will ever be enough for the black community.
You know, the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over, and over again and expecting a different result. Obama must be insane if he thinks that throwing money at it through income re-distribution will make a difference. It just doesn't work.

========================================================
Barack Obama is a human featherball -- a slick, smiling, substance-free empty suit who excites gullible dimwits by repeating the words “change,” “unity,” and “hope” over and over --

Submitted by Davids mom on Sat, 03/22/2008 - 9:38pm.

It requires all Americans to realize that your dreams do not have to come at the expense of my dreams; that investing in the health, welfare, and education of black and brown and white children will ultimately help all of America prosper."

Typical of Beaver to leave out the rest of Obama's statement. All Americans means just that - not just 'white' people. We, as citizens of this country cannot invest only for 'our own group' - but for all citizens - Americans. How convenient for Beaver to ignore this statement in order to justify his own spin of hatred. The result of this investment is that we have a Harvard graduate, US Senator, articulate human being - who happens to be a person of color qualified to run for the highest office in the land - and has the support at this time of the majority of the citizens of this country.

AF A-10's picture
Submitted by AF A-10 on Sun, 03/23/2008 - 1:58pm.

I don't. I, at the advisement of white friends on this blog, stopped acknowledging this guy. he will drown in his hatred of those not like him.

How 'bout that Bill Richardson? He must not have received the memo that Barack is an "empty suit" and "featherball." It's comical seeing the inarticulate attempt to beat Barack by twisting his words or using others' words. General McPeak obviously hasn't received the "hate Barack" memos either. You gotta love these GOP surrogates frantically scrambling to try and derail the Obama freight train. I love it. I proudly drive through town with "Obama 08" on both of the cars I drive. I'm very happy with the man I support and his positive ideas. Our political foes still have "Bush/Cheney" stickers. I'm more than happy to wage this battle of ideals with the American people. Where are all the "McCain 08" stickers? Where is this guy's support? When do these new agents of "tolerance" begin to ask why McCain doesn't distance himself from Hagey's and Parsley's endorsements? Here are some of McCain's "friends":

The many friends of McCain

Cheers to you, DAVID'S MOM!

Kevin "Hack" King


Submitted by Davids mom on Mon, 03/24/2008 - 7:14am.

thebeaver is drowning in his own hatred. Your friends are right. He's an embarrassment to human kind. The more he comments - the sadder he appears. On to discussing 'race' with those who have the intelligence to be civil.

Cheers to you Hack!!

Submitted by thebeaver on Sun, 03/23/2008 - 4:07pm.

Hack has Obama '08 stickers on not one, but both of his cars. Obama and his Uncle Wright, Pastor and Mentor of 20 years have the market cornered on hate.

The Duplicity of Hope: The Amazing Allegiance of Obama’s Believers

"I’ve got to confess: I’m envious of Obama’s oglers. Yes, I am green over their amazing level of faith in their leader who, when caught red-handed hanging out for last 20 years with one of the most vile race baiters in our nation, could cleverly deny sharing his sentiments, even though he’d been volitionally and intimately under his tutelage for that past 7,300 days.

Yes, the inhabitants of Obamaville believe that their sage, Obama Almighty, can lie with dogs and not rise with fleas. Unlike us ordinary plebeians, Obama the Great is not to be known by the company he keeps, and the biblical maxim that “bad company corrupts good morals,” well . . . that crap doesn’t apply to Barack. (BTW: the New Black Panther Party just endorsed Barack. But that doesn’t mean anything)."

----------------------------------------------------------
Barack Obama is a human featherball -- a slick, smiling, substance-free empty suit who excites gullible dimwits by repeating the words “change,” “unity,” and “hope” over and over --

Submitted by thebeaver on Sun, 03/23/2008 - 2:35pm.

It's interesting that all the people clamoring about John McCain's ties to lobbyists (don't you love those ambiguous weasel words), haven't said a peep about Barack Obama's friendship with the two most notorious and unrepentant terrorists of the '60s and '70s? Bernardine Dohrn praised the Manson Family in 1969. Bill Ayers bombed the Pentagon the next year. A generation later, they're intimates of the man who would be president. "In 1997, Obama cited Ayers' critique of the juvenile justice system in a Chicago Tribune article on what prominent Chicagoans were reading," writer Ben Smith notes. "He and Ayers served together on the board of the Woods Fund of Chicago for three years starting in 1999. In 2001, Ayers also gave $200 to Obama?s state senate reelection campaign." To judge by the piece, the former Weathermen gave Obama a political coming out party of sorts to local donors. If these were, say, neo-Nazis instead of bomb-touting communists, if his name were John McCain instead of Barack Obama, this would derail his candidacy. But it's the Weathermen and he's Barack Obama, and being a leftist means never having to account for the past.

Barack Obama is a human featherball -- a slick, smiling, substance-free empty suit who excites gullible dimwits by repeating the words “change,” “unity,” and “hope” over and over --

Locke's picture
Submitted by Locke on Sun, 03/23/2008 - 3:45pm.

I once knew a girl whose cousin dated Uri Geller but I still can’t bend a spoon with my mind. Do you have anything about Obama that Obama actually did or said hisonself? All this stuff about Obama going to a charity board meeting and someone else was also at the meeting is really pretty thin even for you. Obama was what, maybe 9 years old when the Weathermen were active?

I read that article by Ben Smith in Politico. Smith said that he heard a doctor once describe Obama and Ayers as friends but went on to write, “…but there’s no evidence their (Obama and Ayers) relationship is more than the casual friendship of two men who occupy overlapping Chicago political circles and who served together on the board of a Chicago foundation.”

---------------------------------------------------------------
Why does Obama excite the beaver so much if he thinks he’s a featherball?


AF A-10's picture
Submitted by AF A-10 on Sun, 03/23/2008 - 3:00pm.

Submitted by thebeaver on Sun, 03/23/2008 - 4:21pm.

As I've said before, I'm no big fan of McCain either. However, in this presidential race, we are going to have to pick the lesser of 2 evils.

McCain will do far less damage to this country that the plans that Hillary or B-Ho have in store for us.

Barack is very dangerous. He has been under the tutelage of his hate-filled, anti-American Uncle Jeremiah for the past 20 years and won't disavow the relationship or quit that Racist, Venom-Filled, Anti-Christian Cult.

Barack is very very dangerous to this country.

Locke's picture
Submitted by Locke on Sun, 03/23/2008 - 5:30pm.

Thinks(?) that Obama is dangerous to the country!

Well, that settles it for me, for sure, for sure. I mean who could possibly be a better judge of a man than our very own beav.

Oh Wait! How about General Merrill "Tony" McPeak the four star general who served as Chief of Staff of the United States Air Force during Operation Desert Storm and who endorsed Obama last week.

Now let me weigh the decision. Who am I going to go with? General McPeak, the former Chief of Staff of the United States Air Force, or an anonymous rodent on the internet?

Hmmmm.

Hard to decide.

Then, Admiral Robert "William" Williamson endorsed Obama and Brigadier General James Smith endorsed Obama and Admiral John B. Nathman endorsed Obama and Admiral Don Guter endorsed Obama.

Sorry beav but I have to tell ya that the scales are tipping against the old rodent a little at this point.

Then Major General Ralph Wooten endorsed Obama and Brigadier General David McGinnis endorsed Obama and Brigadier General Larry Gillespie endorsed Obama and Major General Scott Gration endorsed Obama.

At this point beav I’m really wondering if you really know exactly what it is that you’re talking about here.

And I have decided.

I’m going with the flag officers of United States Army, Navy and Air Force. You can think I’m crazy beav but for me their opinions carry a little more weight than yours.

Obama Receives Endorsement of Flag Officers from Army, Navy and Air Force


Submitted by thebeaver on Sun, 03/23/2008 - 8:06pm.

Well, Locke -

The Black Panthers endorse him as well. Yep, another controversial black extremist party whose leaders are notorious for their racist statements and for leading anti-white activism endorses your boy Obama. I wonder if they are buddies with his Uncle Jeremiah as well - It wouldn't suprise me if they are since they have the same values.

Racists endorse Obama on candidate's website - New Black Panther Party condemns 'white men,' Jews, praises candidate

Besides, you left the (Ret.), which stands for "retired" from each of these Admirals and Generals on your list. What would they know about fighting an unconventional opponent like Al Qaeda? Now if you can provide us with the statistics on who the Soldiers who are actually fighting this war are endorsing, well then....

--------------------------------------------------
Barack Obama is a human featherball -- a slick, smiling, substance-free empty suit who excites gullible dimwits like Hack, Locke, and David's Mom by repeating the words “change,” “unity,” and “hope” over and over, and throws dear old Grandma under the bus...........

Locke's picture
Submitted by Locke on Mon, 03/24/2008 - 10:17am.

"Besides, you left the (Ret.), which stands for "retired" from each of these Admirals and Generals on your list. What would they know about fighting an unconventional opponent like Al Qaeda?"

Your insinuation that you know more about fighting al Qaeda than these Admirals and Generals is the funniest (and stupidest) thing you have ever written!

Oh, by the way, active military people do not endorse.

---------
It is one thing to show a man that he is in an error, and another to put him in possession of the truth. John Locke


Submitted by skyspy on Sun, 03/23/2008 - 8:09pm.

What a surprise! After farrakhan I figured this wouldn't be far behind.

Before anyone starts in on me, I'm just as disgusted with the kkk and other racist groups. Hate is never the answer.

bad_ptc's picture
Submitted by bad_ptc on Sun, 03/23/2008 - 4:07pm.

“I certainly do remember that trip to Bosnia, and as Togo said, there was a saying around the White House that if a place was too small, too poor, or too dangerous, the president couldn't go, so send the First Lady. That’s where we went. I remember landing under sniper fire. There was supposed to be some kind of a greeting ceremony at the airport, but instead we just ran with our heads down to get into the vehicles to get to our base.”

It’s a damn shame her arrival was filmed!

Maybe the camera is lying.


Submitted by thebeaver on Sat, 03/22/2008 - 9:47pm.

Typical of David's Mom to LIE. I did not leave that statement out.-
Look at my post again, it is in the quote, David's Mom.

It is understandable why she lies. Barack lied when he said that he had not heard anything hateful or out of line out of the Wrights mouth over the 20 years in the United Church of Hate. She is just upset that Barack got caught with his pants down.

The point was, Barack want to take more money out of our pockets and throw it at programs that don't work. Big government doesn't work, and Obama wants to make it bigger by taking from the productive and give it to the unproductive.

==================================================

Barack Obama is a human featherball -- a slick, smiling, substance-free empty suit who excites gullible dimwits by repeating the words “change,” “unity,” and “hope” over and over --

Submitted by Davids mom on Sun, 03/23/2008 - 1:20pm.

If that was the part of the statement which you were referring to - why didn't you 'bold' the entire statement? (Because you were hoping that others would take your spin - and not investigate for themselves.) Sticks and stones, sticks and stones - words (liar) can never hurt me. You are transparent Mr. Beaver - and a sad, sad human being. Keep posting - you're opening the eyes of many. Barack's statement regarding race goes far beyond a 'presidential candidates statement' - he has even those who will not vote for him entering the discussion for clarity and understanding.. . in a civil and honest manner.

Submitted by thebeaver on Sat, 03/22/2008 - 10:08pm.

Obama will raise our income taxes to the 52% level, while making sure that 10,000,000,000 Americans pay no income tax at all. How is that fair.

More on the Obama Tax plan from U.S. News & World Report:

Does Obama Want a Trillion-Dollar Global Tax?

And More...

Obama'splan to soak the rich

"Obama's Social Security tax proposal would raise the top marginal income tax rate to 45.8 percent. If the employer's share is included, which is the best way to understand the effect of Obama's proposal, the top rate would go to 52 percent.
In other words, he proposes to raise the top effective marginal tax rate in the United States by nearly 50 percent.
He would also increase the capital gains tax rate, currently 15 percent, to above the Clinton-era rate of 20 percent, and perhaps as high as 28 percent.
All this would have a devastating effect on investment capital in this country. It would be impossible to achieve a broad, bipartisan consensus on such a radical tax policy. It would, and should, engender a ferocious fight.
Obama would pursue protectionist trade policies and eliminate the right of American workers to cast a secret ballot on whether to be represented by a union. These are not things on which a broad, bipartisan consensus can be formed."

So much for reaching across the aisle.

Barack Obama is a human featherball -- a slick, smiling, substance-free empty suit who excites gullible dimwits by repeating the words “change,” “unity,” and “hope” over and over --

Locke's picture
Submitted by Locke on Sat, 03/22/2008 - 1:16pm.

Advocating investment in schools and communities. Wanting to enforce civil rights laws. Wanting to ensure fairness in the criminal justice system. Trying to provide opportunity for the next generation.

You are a truly dangerous extremist!!!

---------------------------------------------------------------

Why does Obama excite the beaver so much if he thinks he’s a featherball?


Submitted by thebeaver on Sat, 03/22/2008 - 10:14pm.

"Advocating investment in schools and communities." - Yeah, "investment" translates into higher taxes on hard working Americans.

"Wanting to enforce civil rights laws." - What civil rights laws, specifically, are not being enforced. Obama is doing nothing but setting up straw men.

"Wanting to ensure fairness in the criminal justice system." Again, where is the criminal justice system unfair?

"Trying to provide opportunity for the next generation." - How? Through "Affirmative Action" (legalized descrimination) and gubberment set-asides?

-----------------------------------------------------
Barack Obama is a human featherball -- a slick, smiling, substance-free empty suit who excites gullible dimwits by repeating the words “change,” “unity,” and “hope” over and over --

Locke's picture
Submitted by Locke on Sun, 03/23/2008 - 9:05am.

It was you who picked out those particular items to mock.

---------------------------------------------------------------

Why does Obama excite the beaver so much if he thinks he’s a featherball?


Submitted by skyspy on Sun, 03/23/2008 - 5:36am.

Through "affirmative action" programs we have set up a whole new generation of kids that have been discriminated against because of their color. Yes, for the last 25+yrs white kids have been discriminated against. What have they learned? Do you think they learned to hate?

Do you think they like the fact that for years (until 2003 when it was declared unconstitutional) even if they had the highest SAT scores they might not get into a top school because so many of the spots were saved for minorities. Do you think we have taught a whole new generation hate and resentment through "affirmative action"?

We have accomplished the complete opposite of what we wanted to achieve.

muddle's picture
Submitted by muddle on Sat, 03/22/2008 - 2:21pm.

I know that your "critique" is tongue-in-cheek.

But I operate from a base that regards the likes of David's Mom as among the angels, though I think that even an angel can be mistaken here and there.

I think that she is an example of the sort of person required to make it possible for people to meet in the middle and avoid the polarizing influences of today's politics and the culture war in which we are engaged.


Locke's picture
Submitted by Locke on Sat, 03/22/2008 - 3:58pm.

I’m proud of her for constantly standing up against thebeaver. I know his type. I can just imagine him long ago: “But, but, but, General Sherman sir; 40 acres AND a mule!”


muddle's picture
Submitted by muddle on Sat, 03/22/2008 - 4:07pm.

I have views that I'll attempt to articulate here. I know that DM will disagree. But I always have respect for her views as I trust that her basic orientation is truth-aimed.


Cyclist's picture
Submitted by Cyclist on Sat, 03/22/2008 - 4:33pm.

-------------------------------------------
Caution - The Surgeon General has determined that constant blogging is an addiction that can cause a sedentary life style.


Submitted by Davids mom on Sat, 03/22/2008 - 9:27pm.

I will rejoin the conversation, Busy preparing for family and guests to celebrate Easter! It's interesting that many pastors have stated that they will insert the need to follow Jesus' teachings - 'love one another' in their sermon tomorrow. Obama's speech regarding 'race' in America may be the opening we need to have a civil and honest discussion. Blessings to all.

Submitted by sageadvice on Sat, 03/22/2008 - 2:40pm.

Now here is a typical, "everybody wins," comment where everybody is also wrong.

"critique is tongue-in-cheek." (not offensive--just kidding)

"operate from a base...that regards...as among the angels." (bragging on the person, but saying they are wrong)

The last paragraph means: downsize most everyone in order to agree; polarizing politics and culture wars can be resolved by Neville Chamberlain!

In other words, I have no ideas except let us go along to get along!

muddle's picture
Submitted by muddle on Sat, 03/22/2008 - 3:51pm.

You really are a genuine, bona fide idiot.

Nothing tongue-in-cheek here. You are, quite simply, an idiot. Your comments tend to be of the sort that one might expect post-lobotomy.

If you cannot imagine how one might appreciate the intentions of a person whose views are radically different from one's own, then you simply live up to the anti-intellectual (i.e., anti "egghead") tradition that you have already established for yourself.


AF A-10's picture
Submitted by AF A-10 on Sun, 03/23/2008 - 2:17pm.

Happy Easter. Some folks just want to be grumpy and are unhappy when everyone else is not. I choose to be cheerful; one arm or two; with like-minded company or a room full of political foes; happiness and civility always trumps the nasty snipits. (but it DOES feel good to vent on occasion)

Cheers,

Kevin "Hack" King


Submitted by surferdude on Fri, 03/21/2008 - 6:57pm.

Good article, Beav. Thanks for sharing.

Jeff Spicoli

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.