I refuse to get into a scripture war. BTW- you must have not read that I do get the speck out of my eye daily.

Think what you think- what matters is I answer to God for myself- no one answers for me.

Reread what you wrote me- hummm what did you say. Judging- speck. Does that apply only to me? No it does not.

This has nothing to do with judging or speck- these are statements people made and what they stand for.

We are entitled to our different opinion. That's the good thing about living in the USA.

Wildcat you are a person of value - all people are!

Have a good evening.

_______________________________
We Will Stand

I thought she said she was "leaving."

Maybe she changed her mind. The more people we have the more interesting the conversation.

I'm glad she changed her mind.

I understand your point about different opinions. I only hoped to provoke some thought about the "kind of people" that our Lord and Saviour hung out with while on the earth. He came for the sinner. What happened was a terrible thing, devastating, wrong by moral law. But perhaps if we looked at the situation as God fearing people we would pray for everyone involved instead of condemn them. We wouldn't place blame on a young girl, or spit on a man that made a huge error in judgement that cost him his career, his integrity and the respect of everyone in the community. He who is without sin can cast the first stone. One thing that is for certain, it won't be me.

I am sorry, after I posted to you I realized that you were talking about a different situation.

You can read back at the situation I was talking about- it's about Obama church and Larry Elders, I had alot of comments coming at once, without looking closely like I should have - yours happen to be in above there and before thinking and looking I responded thinking your were talking to me- I saw yours which I though was about what the people on my links made their own statements about. I thought you were talking to me about the links.

I disagree about a different situation.

I happen to agree with everything you said above in your statement to me. Again I should have read more closely.

I was talking about a situation I had links to, the ones I had links to were making statements to which speak for them. If you read back- I had alot of people talking to me or at me. I had 3 at one time.

I have alot of questions for the ones I had links to myself and others don't get the answers from them. The ones I have links happen to think what they say is true- which myself and others disagree. We just want answers.

I have been praying about the situation you are talking about- I agree with you- believe me I am a mess up- you see what I did about the mix up - I need the Lord. I do pray for my faults daily thank the Lord he forgives me. The entire situation you are talking about is sad- believe me when I say I extend mercy when someone makes a mistake- God extends mercy to me and I do the same because I am thankful that the Lord extend mercy to me. Thank you advance for your understanding.

I want you to know your situation- it's sad- with everyone involved.

I want you to know I am sorry that I offended you- I know what the bible says about making peace. I have asked the Lord for forgiveness about the mix up.

Have a nice day.

Once again I am sorry for the mix up- I hope you accept my apology.

___________________________
We Will Stand

Hang in there. At least you were not banned for foul and vulgar comments and then came back as another blogger.
-------------------------------------------
Caution - The Surgeon General has determined that constant blogging is an addiction that can cause a sedentary life style.

"banned for foul and vulgar comments" -- Multiple offenses

"and then came back as another blogger" or 2 or 3 or ...

BPR hasn't ever been "foul and vulgar" like Sniffy. She wasn't ever

{{{{{{{{{{{{EDITED and BANNED}}}}}}}}}}}}

_______________________________

8-week fetus ("young one") -- Only 30-32 more weeks to go!

“Women who are experiencing an unplanned pregnancy also deserve unplanned joy.” (Feminists for Life)

Thank you! You know what for.
_______________________________
We Will Stand

Thank you Cyclist- you have a way to make me laugh and smile. I am glad you do that.

Gotta go out the door- meeting

Have a nice day!

_______________________________
We Will Stand

I think the Bible might also say something about not lusting after children. You think?

It's truly sad that this whole thing is being played out in public for the whole community to witness, but Mr. H. should have thought about that before lusting after a 9th grader, and continuing to lust after her. It would have saved himself, and his family, and the student, alot of trauma and embarassment.

Yep, that pesky old Biblical admonition about pre-judging others.

I wouldn't be surprised to hear about the "conservative" leadership of the Southern Baptist Convention editing that particular Scripture out of the Bible at their next convention.

It's so contrary to the Southern Baptist lifestyle.
_______________________________________________________
Truthsleuth Speaks!
Don't Click This Link, Denise!

_
Sniffles- yuu don't know a thing about SBC- we don't edit scripture.

If you had gone to the sites I gave you = you would have seen that-

Hint there is someone you like that does do that. You will never guess who. Don't worry it's not a person on The Citizen. We know what Obama stand for with his church and it's not him.

Humm who could it be? I will let you think on that- you won't get it.
Because you don't know it. BTW don't give me the judging quote- it has nothing to do with judging. It's a fact. Big difference.

I will not reply to something that you don't know what SBC stands for.

I won't even answer questions and get into a scripture war fight.

Value Sniffles- you have value- that's the good thing.

______________________________
We Will Stand

It is God's right to judge, not ours. (James 4:12) "God alone, who gae the law, is the Judge. He alone has the power to save or destroy. So what right do you have to judge your neighbor?" I suggest that we pray for all of those involved in this unfortunate situation. I am sure that they are truly suffering.

Ever hear of the judicial system that's main function is to judge people? How about those people called JUDGES? Save or destroy? Like the death penalty perhaps? Throwing out biblical excerpts with little or no relevance to the context of the discussion is lame.

I hate to break it to you, but I have claimed the right to judge other people, places, and things as much as I feel is necessary to my survival and prosperity. Hurray for me!

DON'T TASE ME, BRO!!!

adjudicate legally, not morally. Who, on earth, has the right to judge others morally? That is what the scripture is saying. Keep the faith.

Democracy is not a spectator sport.

Sorry, but I'm not a follower of the Bible-god, so I can judge to my hearts content - and it feels terrific!

If you do the praying, then I'd be proud to do the judging.

He:

1) is a pervert
2) needs psychological help
3) his family and the student are the victims, not him
4) and he shouldn't be allowed to teach, coach, counsel, etc. children

Have a great night!

This molester wanna-be is solely responsible for his actions.

This young lady showed incredible maturity and excellent judgment and the "blame the victim' crowd is entirely out of order. She was insightful and wise to handle the situation the way she did.

Apparently, scum is adhesive because they sure love to stick together when they play 'blame the victim' in an attempt to obfuscate the assignment of personal responsibility.

Thanks for speaking out in her defense.
Sniffles05 The Plagiarizer in Chief
Sniffles05:Angry and often proven wrong.

If I am not mistaken, he didn't even have full certification. He only had a provisional certification. Stillions loves to hire people that do not even have teacher certification.

Would you mind telling to me why "young ladies," as you put it, are allowed to dress provocatively, act flirtish, and participate in ill-conceived conversations? Are they trained to do this to attract men?
I see no need, for instance, for a female to wear a tight dress or skirt, showing most of her thigh, or more, every time she sits or is active!
The wearing of blouses to show some cleavage is also common.
I won't even get into hair care and make-up and it's costs!

Are these things allowed by parents in order for the daughter to snag attention? If not, what else?

The flashing of decorated eyes and the accidental bumping of boys hands of rear ends, is of course always intentional.

Yet, when all that is taken as inviting sex, all hell breaks loose if caught.

The SM school teacher was still a young boy, in his mind, and he can't be excused no matter what---but most of these problems and pregnancies don't come from teachers!

First, it was WHS not SM.

Secondly, a woman can wear anything she wants and it is not an open invitation for sickos like you to ASSUME you are welcome to attempt a sexual molestation or take advantage of a position of power or authority by sexually harassing them.

I suppose all women should wear long dresses, no make up and speak when spoken to in your world. I'm sorry to bust your bubble Sage but women in America have the right to an opinion, a voice, and to dress and use make up as they deem appropriate - not as YOU do.

Thank God for Conservative, Open Minded, Intelligent, Beautiful, Well Spoken, Confident Women.

Sniffles05 The Plagiarizer in Chief
Sniffles05:Angry and often proven wrong.

Re: The flashing of decorated eyes and the accidental bumping of boys hands of rear ends, is of course always intentional.

If you wear eye make-up, you are inviting sex? If boys think eye make-up is an invitation to sex, their mothers and fathers need to clear that up for them.

Likewise, girls who attract this kind of attention ought to consider the messages they are sending.

UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHOULD WE HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT THE TEACHERS GETTING SIGNALS FROM STUDENTS. THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO KNOW BETTER!

I SAID WHAT YOU SAID, IN BIG OLD CAPS! Did you read it?

So, answer the question, please! Why do girls and women paint-up,show, and flip, if they aren't interested. Is that fair and balanced?
There ain't no show without sex eventually! It takes two to tango.

Are you for it?

I cut and pasted from your comment because I was mocking you.

Girls don't wear make up because they are interested in sex.

If you see a young lady in makeup and think she's trolling for sex you are the sick one.

Get some help. Your attitude problem is what's wrong with society. A girl thinks she's looking cute just for the sake of looking cute and leacherous men think it's a come on. Gross.

It is most definitely not fair and balanced that you can only view girls as sex objects and they should have to protect themselves from your kind by wearing a burkha.

Lots of good information regarding Educator Ethics on www.gapsc.com. I was relieved to find that resigning doesn't protect the teaching certificate.

FCBOE needs to move Greg out of there. Whatever he tried to create has failed miserably. There are some outstanding teachers at WHS and there are many teachers there that do not do their job. They are caught up in the "extracurricular" activities and do not focus on their primary job which is to teach!!!

I happen to grow up and go to jr. high/high school where the now WHS Administrator and his old friends were teaching and coaching when they first got out of college. (late 70's/early 80's) NOT much has changed! No surprise that Hienz was allowed to resign...when the person in charge has always known, approved and covered up this type of behavior. He is still friends with some of these teachers/coaches that had MANY relationships and extra marital affairs with students. A couple of his friends even married the studen(s) and later divorced. Another one of the teachers from that time frame is now a FCBOE Leader. I'm sure they all still cover for each other.

It's no surprise that favortism is showed when one is part of the "click" or "inner social circle"...that hasn't changed either!

AS far as Hienz...I'm sure he is an inmature, selfish 28 year old idiot and I have no doubt that he would have eventually coherced this girl into a sexual relationship. (yes, he is a Clinton "want to be"...he tried to use his little bit of power for personal gain.)

As for the teenage girl, I'm sure she is probably somewhat guilty-even if she didn't realize she was leading him on...all this publicity is hopefully enough punishment for her to learn from.

The real victim is Hienz's wife. She seems to be a wonderful person that didn't deserve to be put in this situation! I hope she's not a Hilary!

I was reading your post, with a great deal of interest, until you added the references to the Clinton's.

What's more important to you? Getting that story off your chest about the unethical leaders in the FCBOE - OR - Bill and Hillary?

Your post would have been taken more seriously, without the reference to the Clinton's. That topic could have been posted on a thread all its own, where many bloggers would flock to immediately (Conservative red meat).

Anyway, if what you posted in the first paragraph is indeed accurate, and not heresay, this is rather disturbing, and reinforces my belief that those in a position of authority, over our children, need to be carefully scrutinized, on a consistent basis.

I can see why she posted this following the lines of clinton

power , and wants anything in a skirt

your stupid to even comment about what was said or posted

the clintons are both a blight on our country
him for what it did and the lies he has told his entire adult life
and her for staying with him , you know they are two peas in a pod
wake up idiot

shadowalker

Are you a human or someone's pet that has been taught to use a keyboard? The lack of coherence of this is pure comedy

Kevin "Hack" King

This struck me even more than the "what about Bill" part:

"As for the teenage girl, I'm sure she is probably somewhat guilty-even if she didn't realize she was leading him on"

Why do we always try to blame and guilt the victim? Why?

cheers, hope to see you friday noonish to oneish at the Hwy 54 Star buck's. Come as sniffles just to keep it entertaining.

Kevin "Hack" King

Just a point of clarification . . . Both were wrong. The Adult and the Student. We are a WHS family and we 'know' both people. The student in this case is definately NO angel. As my son puts it - she knew Exactly what she was doing. But - - the adult is supposed to be just that - an adult . . . he should have known better, especially in today's society of leaving a trail with every text msg. It's a terrible shame and another black mark on human behavior.

"in loco parentis" - LOOK IT UP - it's a legal term.

This guy is bad news and the girl is a victim - NO MATTER WHAT YOU THINK OF HER.

When you are charged with the care, safety, and supervision of a person - using them as a sex toy is NEVER acceptable.

BOTH were NOT wrong and you should be ashamed to spread such garbage.

Sniffles05 The Plagiarizer in Chief
Sniffles05:Angry and often proven wrong.

As it is she was victimized by this clown.

BOTH were NOT wrong and you should be ashamed to spread such garbage.

Sniffles05 The Plagiarizer in Chief
Sniffles05:Angry and often proven wrong.

This did happen at SMHS except the teacher was a female and it went much farther than text messaging. I can't remember exactly when it happened....early 2000s?? I guess it happens everywhere. Scary, huh?

deleted

Here's the answer to your question: It's a system that's stacked against the victims. And we all know how soft Ballard is with sexual "misconduct" crimes. Exactly what were the charges and why were they dropped? Is this another example of Scotty making another deal with perverts?

According to the 11/02/2007 Citizen article, Heintz was "arrested for one felony count of sexual exploitation of a minor," but he "was not immediately arrested because 'the complaint is seemingly a school misconduct issue.'" Sounds like the school made a deal with Heintz for him to "resign." (I wonder if this incident is on his employment record, especially since the charges were dropped.) Were charges brought only after the parents found out about Heintz’s plans to slip away quietly, most likely to another school?

How old was the girl? I think at age 16 there's no crime. He says that he'd been watching her since 9th grade.

Ga. Code 16-6-5

GCA § 26-2020: Enticing a child for indecent purposes

"A person commits the offense of enticing a child for indecent purposes when he or she solicits, entices, or takes any child under the age of 16 to any place whatsoever for the purpose of child molestation or indecent acts." Effective July 1, 1995

CHAPTER 6. SEXUAL OFFENSES -- See Title 16, Chapter 6

"What Is Online Enticement of Children for Sexual Acts" (There's no mention of text-messaging.)

"AP: Sexual Misconduct Plagues U.S. Schools" Excerpts

"Most of the abuse never gets reported. Those cases reported often end with no action. Cases investigated sometimes can’t be proven, and many abusers have several victims."

"Passing the trash"

"Too often, problem teachers are allowed to leave quietly. That can mean future abuse for another student and another school district.

"'School administrators make behind-the-scenes deals to avoid lawsuits and other trouble. And in state capitals and Congress, lawmakers shy from tough state punishments or any cohesive national policy for fear of disparaging a vital profession."

"It’s a dynamic so common it has its own nicknames — 'passing the trash' or the 'mobile molester.'"

"And no one — not the schools, not the courts, not the state or federal governments — has found a surefire way to keep molesting teachers out of classrooms."

"Beyond the horror of individual crimes, the larger shame is that the institutions that govern education have only sporadically addressed a problem that’s been apparent for years."

"The AP investigation found efforts to stop individual offenders but, overall, a deeply entrenched resistance toward recognizing and fighting abuse."

"Loopholes Keep Teacher Misconduct Secret"

"School Sex Scandals - The Dark Side of Teacher-Student Relations"

Robert Stacy McCain, a former assistant national editor for The Washington Times, has some interesting comments on the movement to de-stigmatize "adult-non-adult" sex.

!

This "teacher" never grew up!
He is still a hot young 14-16 year old traveler, looking at all the pretty and fresh girls! Most of them dress for guys like him.

He should not be a teacher or work with young girls. A construction worker would fit better.

I don't know what the girls and their parents can expect, other than what happened, when you fool around on the Internet with such conversations! She should never have discussed with him any involvement since she knew he was a teacher and was married!

However, nothing justifies such conduct by a teacher. Apparently, good teachers are just as hard to find as for any form of work anymore!

And you are correct about the punishment for him: a record should be made so that a probation could be exercised. I don't believe in "blackballing" but the record should be there.

The Missy should also get a little probation in case she gets desperate again and tries something else with inappropriate people.

My understanding is that she is a woman!

"Hi, I'm Chris Hanson, have a seat...."

I think if he had met with her he could have been busted but I guess the texts are like internet talk, I suppose.

Plus, he resigned, not fired!??

This was not his first rodeo and she wasn't his first cowgirl. Keep an ear to the ground and an eye open ... you will hear more.

Sniffles05 The Plagiarizer in Chief
Sniffles05:Angry and often proven wrong.

resigned, not fired.

This is exactly what Bill Clinton did and you supported him ... what's the problem? No law was broken, both are adults in the eyes of the law ... he was honest and Clinton lied ... he's one up on Bill...why the double standard from you?

Sniffles05 The Plagiarizer in Chief
Sniffles05:Angry and often proven wrong.

Mr. Heintz has been added to the BadBadTeacher.com website. I invite both you and denise to post your comments and support of his actions, on their blog as well:

TEACHER WEBSITE

Glad to know that you consider any sexual activity "absolutely sickening" or to be "lewd behavior" and that you'd label this MALE (maybe that's the reason: your Beserkley feminist background) "perverted" and "sicko." We actually have something in common (not the feminist part), besides preferring plain coffee to lattés.

Skyspy -- Teachers' Sexual "Misconduct," Submitted by Denise Conner on Wed, 03/05/2008 - 5:10am.

That's 2 hours, 36 minutes BEFORE your post.

See the LINK "School Sex Scandals - The Dark Side of Teacher-Student Relations" at that post, as well as others, or GO HERE.

Now, how did your twisted logic, or was it pure emotionalism, come up with my "supporting his actions" in any way whatsoever? Who's being "dense" here?

Is this post your latest impersonation of Sniffy, or does he impersonate you, as well as JeffC & $? It can be so very confusing!

"The student replied:

“a OK i dont think your wierd i think its normal and i think you can have deep attraction to someone at first sight. But like I thought you and your wife were close and stuff.”

Several messages later and Heintz explains:

“That it is not about her ... I was not even married when I net (sic) you”

A high school student is being compared to Monica Lewinsky so that you can try to score political points against Main stream? And you call this guy "honest?!"

Good Lord, man! Is there no limit to the depths you will go to to make a political point? As a father , this is deeply, deeply disturbing that it took the judgment of this HIGH SCHOOL girl to prevent a very bad situation from happening. Mudcat says he has "needs?" I have to say that your attitudes are very disturbing. This man is a cancer praying on a vulnerable youth; a girl not even old enough to vote, buy a drink, or a cigarette. Yet she was able to make a decision to not be a victim; and the DA's office has FAILED to protect her. And YOU and MUDCAT have become cheerleading enablers!

Shameful!

Kevin "Hack" King

What I am thinking is that it angers you liberals when you are called on your hypocrisy. When your daughter is 22 and her powerful supervisor / boss of 50 something is having her in to the office for cigars you too will realize that it is every bit as sick and immoral as a teacher of 28 approaching a student of 17.

The truth of the matter is they are both sick predators that need to be castrated. The difference between you and me on this issue is that I am consistent about my outrage and you are selective based on political affiliation.

As for your comment: "Is there no limit to the depths you will go to to make a political point? It seems I have read plenty of your bashing of the republicans like Craig, Foley, and others that did not fit your political bent while they and their families suffered through humility from a sexual deviancy. For God's sake man - show some consistency!

The biggest difference between this fine young lady and Lewinski is this young girl was more mature, showed better judgment, was concerned about the morality and exposed the predator and did not fall victim to this harassment. Lewinski on the other hand WAS a democrat.

Sniffles05 The Plagiarizer in Chief
Sniffles05:Angry and often proven wrong.

This man is a huge cancer on society. I do not understand how he got off.

He was watching her since 9th grade?? What kind of whack job is looking at girls in 9th grade??

Now that he got off he will do it again, somewhere else. We will see this rabid scumball roach, on dateline in no time. I wish we could bury people like him under the jail.

Clinton was a scum bag

But at least he wasn’t trying to get into the pants of a 17year old high school girl.

This despicable piece of trash and poor excuse of a teacher should never be allowed to teach again.

Thank God, this young lady took the appropriate steps to put a stop to this scum bag’s plans.

She should be commended.

By the way, how do you know Bill wasn't trying to get in to the pants of a 17 year old high school girl?

We can agree the girl was the mature and responsible person in this attempted molestation.

Can we agree both 'men' (I use the term loosely) are disgusting perverts that deserve castration?

Seems several on here have defended Bill in the past with great fervor.

Sniffles05 The Plagiarizer in Chief
Sniffles05:Angry and often proven wrong.

did you have an opportunity to purchase that book I recommended to you a few weeks back? That gentleman will be giving a talk at the Carter Center later this month (3/19) if you are interested. Keep the faith.

Democracy is not a spectator sport.

OK, maybe I can see how the teacher is not acting properly, but at age 28 he has needs, you know.

The other crime here is that a teacher can't spell, construct grammatically correct sentences and uses "i" instead of "I". The "i" thing bothers me most of all. How can you pretend to be a stud and be interested in a girl if you use a small "i"?

Throw him away and lock up the key or throw a book at him - a dictionary maybe.

And you too tsloth. For the windows into your minds. Now after seeing how you think, I think I'll go take a bath.

He has needs

Right,

Let him go out and find a woman to take care of his “needs” and leave the high school girls alone.

The guy was just trying to pull a Bill Clinton...geez...since when did emulating the President of the United States become so awful!?! It would absolutely be HYPOCRITICAL for a Clinton supporter to have a problem with this.

On another more serious note: Do the world a favor and castrate him ... and this teacher too!

Sniffles05 The Plagiarizer in Chief
Sniffles05:Angry and often proven wrong.

Truly pathetic obfuscation of a very serious local situation. Perhaps one day you may awaken to realize that 17 is not 22. In the eyes of the law, the maturity levels and legal abilities afforded are vastly different. What exactly does the "truth" part of truthsleuth mean?

Kevin "Hack" King

Actually, in the "eyes of the law" they are treated the same for, crimes, both misdemeanor and felonies and for the purpose of sexual consent at the age of 17 and 22.

More importantly, 28 is not the same as a 50 something year old President of the United States.

Selective moral outrage - the signature of your party.

Craig = Bad, Frank = Good , Bush alcohol use = Bad, Obama drug use = 'growing experience' .... you still have a quite a way to grow there Hack.

Be consistent King.

Sniffles05 The Plagiarizer in Chief
Sniffles05:Angry and often proven wrong.

The difference here is the 17 year old is a minor, and if it was my daughter involved the cops would have to put him in protective custody or one of us would be in jail for manslaughter. This is once more a mistake by our DA, there had to be something to convict this clown on, I would rather the DA try and lose then not try at all.

I yam what I yam....Popeye

But the age of consent in Georgia is 16. Regardless, as a student she is under the direct control and supervision of this sicko and that ALONE would make it immoral, irresponsible and reprehensible. Personally and professionally, I believe that it IS possible to prosecute him.

This young lady is a victim regardless, of a 'would be' predator and was (thankfully) intelligent and mature enough to make the right decision.

As for Miss Lewinski: if there is a man in America who thinks that Monika Lewinski would have even taken a second look at Bill Clinton if he was a garbage man .... then they have a lot to learn. He used his position and power to victimize Lewinski IMHO.

Again, my opinion is that they were BOTH victims of a predator and for the third time - they should both be castrated.

Obviously some here feel otherwise. I personally don't like blaming victims for the actions of predators.

Sniffles05 The Plagiarizer in Chief
Sniffles05:Angry and often proven wrong.

I am a student at whitewater and i personally know this "victim." She's not as innocent as you think. This happenening to her isn't a surprise to me at all. It takes two to have an affair.

Hutch, I agree with you that I'd like to have seen this guy go to trial.

I think Ballard overplayed his hand. This guy wasn't a pseudo-gangbanger that he could railroad on felony charges into jail. He was charged with something pertaining to his official duties as a teacher, so wouldn't the county pick up his legal bill?

Secondly, if he was indeed found "not guilty" because there wasn't enough evidence to convict him of a felony, wouldn't Heintz then have recourse to sue to get his job back and/or demand a cash settlement. I don't know...I am not a lawyer and don't pretend to be one (unlike some folks here)
_______________________________________________________
Truthsleuth Speaks!
Don't Click This Link, Denise!

Perhaps Truthsloth is devoted to "truth" the way the Fox Nutwork is devoted to "fair and balanced" reporting.

You can't help but smile and wonder how anyone with an IQ over room temperature could ever take their factually inaccurate blather seriously!
_______________________________________________________
Truthsleuth Speaks!
Don't Click This Link, Denise!

What I am thinking is that it angers you liberals when you are called on your hypocrisy. When your daughter is 22 and her powerful supervisor / boss of 50 something is having her in to the office for cigars you too will realize that it is every bit as sick and immoral as a teacher of 28 approaching a student of 17.

The truth of the matter is they are both sick predators that need to be castrated. The difference between you and me on this issue is that I am consistent about my outrage and you are selective based on political affiliation.

Sniffles05 The Plagiarizer in Chief
Sniffles05:Angry and often proven wrong.

You forgot to log in as Mainly Extreme, or are you plagiarizing her, too?

Submitted by Main Stream: "truthsloth....are you back?"

Is this another example of your "original thought"?

Just who is “Sniffles”?

I'm pleased that Sniffles and Hack both answered for me, as I was not even about to address truthsloth's sickening post and his subtle approval of pedophilia.

Yes, I coined the name 'Truthsloth' and I'm happy Sniffles borrows the name when posting... it's so appropriate!

Did you get flushed when Denise caught you in your womens mode?

Condemn Clinton in the same terms you condemned this freak or admit you are a hypocrite ... it's simple- like you.

Sniffles05 The Plagiarizer in Chief
Sniffles05:Angry and often proven wrong.

Yeah, yeah, we know. Lose your argument, try and turn it into a referendum on Bill Clinton. *yawn*

Tell you what, tsloth, scroll down to Nuk1's "Consistent Outrage" post and read the first two paragraphs. I couldn't have said it any better.
_______________________________________________________
Truthsleuth Speaks!
Don't Click This Link, Denise!

Call me James Frey or Margaret Jones, but based on this last post defending a child predator, I feel Truthsloth is quite appropriate

cheers, Main, and realize that as long as this breed of cat is attacking you, you are doing something right, like condemning pedophiles.

Kevin "Hack" King

Be man enough to be consistent when you see a male predator.

Without someone willing to call people like you on your absurd defense of Clinton you would continue to bask in your selective self-righteous indignation. Again: The truth of the matter is they are both sick predators that need to be castrated. The difference between you and me on this issue is that I am consistent about my outrage and you are selective based on political affiliation.

If you are not smart enough to read the entire blog and know how I feel about the issue - try blogging to Sage.

Sniffles05 The Plagiarizer in Chief
Sniffles05:Angry and often proven wrong.

There is only one victim in this discussion, and that's a 17 year old in HS. Monica Lewinsky was an adult and 22, legally and seemingly capable of making moral decisions on her own. She wasn't a MINOR. It's easy to say that Bill Clinton is serious slime because he is, but that situation was between two consenting ADULTS. Last I checked, he was impeached due to that, disgraced,lost his license to practice law, had his previous lies about Gennifer Flowers exposed, had to pay off another skank, etc. I don't think he went unpunished and the extent of the punishment wasn't decided by Clinton...it was decided by other Dems,Repubs, and a judicial system who didn't think further punishment was necessary. That's the way the process works.

In this case, the teacher gets humiliation and is allowed to resign. Not fired, not jailed, not even at this point accused of a crime. Besides the fact that a lot of people now know he's a freak in Fayette, he's free to roam around elsewhere and there's a pretty good chance he'll escape attention wherever he winds up.

The outrage I see is that nationwide there are numerous stories like this loser's and the punishment is hardly ever commensurate to their acts. Many a female teacher has been busted for having sex with her minor pupils who were well below even the age of consent and received nothing more than a lost job and a probated sentence. The fact that a male teacher gets the same type of nothing punishment DOES surprise me, but I guess the fact that he never had a chance to follow through with his intentions and it was just text messages some how "saved" him from further punishment. Disgusting.