Racial mistrust can change if commission embraces district voting

Tue, 03/04/2008 - 4:21pm
By: Letters to the ...

From Judith Moore, private citizen and resident of Fayette County: Many of us Southern ladies were instructed by our mamas never to talk about politics and religion because that would surely result in unpleasantness. They surely were right about the unpleasantness part. But following such advice leaves a vacuum to be filled by those who have no qualms about being unpleasant, as evidenced by many of the bloggers who visit The Citizen’s website.

There are no more important topics in a democracy than religion and politics. Religion is about values, and politics is about power. Democracy is inevitably messy because we humans get emotional about challenges to our values and to the relative power we have to shape the communities we live in. For democracy to work, we have to make compromises about what values we will share as a community and how we will allocate power.

Fayette County is in the midst of a conversation about how county commissioners shall be elected in the future. That conversation became very public on Feb. 28.

On its face, the issue is simple: Should all commissioners be elected by all the residents of the county or should different communities have their own commissioners answerable only to them on Election Day? Stated that simply, race and political party appear irrelevant.

However, we know this issue is anything but simple because it occurs against the historical backdrop of Southern history. Southern history is the story of race in America.

Southern political party allegiance reflects that story. After Lincoln and Reconstruction, the South was solidly Democratic. After Kennedy, Johnson, and the civil rights movement, the South became just as solidly Republican.

Fayette County mirrors this Southern history. The white citizens of this county used every legal and illegal means at its disposal to keep non-whites from voting. Fear and mistrust between the races is the inevitable result. This will not go away until those who still benefit from this history reach out to those who still suffer from its injustice.

One step in the right direction could be taken by the five white men who now serve as the Fayette County Commission. They could ask the Georgia General Assembly to act affirmatively on a local bill calling for district voting. This would completely deflate those on both sides of this issue who argue that party and race are the determining factors.

Why should any of the current commissioners fear district voting? If a current commissioner feels that he would lose his seat if he had to answer solely to the residents of his district, then perhaps he doesn’t really represent the interests of his district.

Much has been said about the role of white guilt on this subject. The issue is not guilt but responsibility.

The circumstances of my birth provided me privileges denied to others by race and class. I did not earn these privileges. They were a gift to me provided by those who lived before me. With those privileges, often purchased by others at great cost, come great responsibilities.

Because of my faith and my patriotism, I believe that I have a responsibility to join with others who want to build a community of mutual trust and equal opportunity in this land of the free.

Judith Moore

Fairburn (Fayette County), Ga.

[Moore is chair of the Fayette County Democratic Party and a member of the county’s Board of Elections.]

login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Denise Conner's picture
Submitted by Denise Conner on Wed, 03/05/2008 - 9:16pm.

Some of "us Southern ladies" were instructed by our daddies to talk about politics and religion often because these spheres of influence are so very important and not to let "unpleasantness" intimidate us in the least. Eye-wink

Yes, there are "those who have no qualms about being unpleasant." Would you like me to quote some of the many comments made by your fellow Democrats that would qualify as far more than "unpleasant"? Of course, both sides make personal attacks, but I'd say that your side has a much higher score and enjoy successful lives.

"Race and political party appear irrelevant."

Actions speak louder than words. Your own words and actions, as well as those of others, evidence that this issue is definitely about race (hence, your threat of "a federal lawsuit based on the Voting Rights Act") and political party power, no matter how much you try to deny it. You yourself said, “It’s about race, pure and simple.”

If “race and political party appear irrelevant,” then why did you say, “Fayette County mirrors this Southern history,” which you limit to “the story of race in America”?

You then pointed out the RACE issue when you say, “The white citizens of this county used every legal and illegal means at its disposal to keep non-whites from voting.”

Are you sure that there are no "non-white" citizens against district voting? If "non-whites" have been kept from voting, please provide evidence. If there have been illegal acts, what legal actions have been taken against the perpetrators?

Again you mention RACE: “the five white men who now serve as the Fayette County Commission”

You demean the intelligence of the county commissioners when you say that they "fear district voting” and one or more fear losing their seats. You're concluding that the basis for being against district voting is emotional rather than rational.

Again you bring RACE into the discussion when you say, “The circumstances of my birth [i.e, being born 'white'] provided me privileges denied to others by race and class.”

You were born 60+ years ago, if I'm not mistaken, but you fail to see the significant progress that has been made and the opportunities for all Americans available as of 2008.

How is your guilt relevant to the equal opportunities that all Americans have today? For another perspective, maybe you should read "No Country for Old Bigots."

Fear and mistrust between the races is the inevitable result. This will not go away until those who still benefit from this history reach out to those who still suffer from its injustice.”

Exactly when will the "reaching out" ever be enough? Some people will always feel "fear and mistrust," no matter what efforts are made.

Also, since Democrats loudly cry “separation of church and state,” why do you mention your faith?

Do you "applaud," along with Vice-Chair (?) of the Fay. Co. Democrats Peter Lewin, comments such as "the basic tenets of conservatism [are] incompatible with Christianity"?

There are conservatives and moderates who vote Republican who could also talk about their faith and patriotism and sense of responsibility to various causes, but how would that affect the fact that in the 21st Century there is “equal opportunity in this land of the free,” whether some believe it or not? There will never be a utopia, but America comes closer than almost any place on earth. That’s why so many want to emigrate here.

This is a political issue, and, as you say, “Politics is about power.” And the district voting bill sponsored by Rep. Virgil Fludd (D) is a not so subtly veiled Democratic grab for power.


“District Voting Bill Reeks of Secrecy”

See ADDITIONAL COMMENTS to Mrs. Moore's letter posted under "Nearly 200 Pack Commission Chambers to Discuss District Voting."

_______________________

"The lady doth protest too much, methinks." – From Hamlet (III, ii, 239), spoken by Queen Gertrude


Submitted by surferdude on Wed, 03/05/2008 - 9:56pm.

Rep. Fludd immediately threw down the race card by bringing up the Civil Rights act. He spoke as if minorities in Fayette County are being denied the right to vote. He also brought up the fact that minority (black) businesses have not been awarded very many county work contracts. He didn't offer any facts as to whether or not there were any qualified minority businesses bidding on the contracts or if there were enough workers working for the businesses that were bidding on the contracts. No, Rep Fludd seemed more interested in having the contracts awarded based on racial quotas rather than experience and expertise. That suggestion, in and of itself, is racist and he should be ashamed of himself for bringing it up.

The FCC (Fayette County Crackpot) Alice Jones stood in front of 5 County Representatives (who represent her) and implied that she was not being represented. ("I want someone who represents ME", pointing to herself.) The implication, in my opinion, was that she was not going to be satisfied until someone with her skin color was elected.
These folks didn't offer up any qualified candidates for the post; it seems that they just want a Democrat voted in for power's sake and because they are a bunch of racists hell bent on turning our beautiful county into another cesspool like Clayton County.

Submitted by localyocal on Thu, 03/06/2008 - 8:53am.

Maybe we could let them take over the BOE, I understand Clayton County will have some unemployed Board Members.... One step closer to Clayette County.

promprinces's picture
Submitted by promprinces on Thu, 03/06/2008 - 7:24am.

"Rep. Fludd immediately threw down the race card by bringing up the race".

"Elmer Fudd" using the race card is a Jessie and Al deal. But you guys brought it on yourselves, Georgia and Atlanta especially. If they threaten to sue, you guys act like the boogie man is coming rather than stand up to them. If they don't get their way in a fair election, then the election is no good and they are going to FORCE one of their own down your throat. How stupid is that! It is ludicrous that you give them attention on this. The equal rights deal was created with the idea in mind that if 2 people had equal qualifications, the black would get the job. The way you are letting them interpret the law is a joke, currently, if 2 people show up, one is qualified and white, one is black and not, you give it to the black! Same with your kids, you are letting them get away with adding 20points on to college entrance if you are black. That is insane, the only way this should/could be justified is if you can prove the black IQ, on a whole 20 points lower than a whites! If you can't, then why the Hell give them 20 points and knock your kid out of college? I'm telling you, Georgia and Atlanta disgust me, you have no fighting spirit and will not stand up for what is right! That being not letting them walk all over you and yours.

Fudd and his type are bullies and you are silly to treat them as anything else.

This very thing has me scared if Obama gets elected. I think this country will be ruined and we will look something like the movie "Blood Diamonds". There are nice blacks, those aren't the ones you are dealing with here!


AF A-10's picture
Submitted by AF A-10 on Thu, 03/06/2008 - 11:54am.

"This very thing has me scared if Obama gets elected. I think this country will be ruined and we will look something like the movie "Blood Diamonds". There are nice blacks, those aren't the ones you are dealing with here!"

Let me very sincerely tell you that in your world, if you are honest with yourself, a good black most likely doesn't exist. How dare this elected representative fight for a cause they believe in? The black guy will turn this great nation into the western horn of Africa?! What a pathetic and ignorant comment to make. Yet it is your right as an American to make it. Wow!

Kevin "Hack" King


Submitted by skyspy on Thu, 03/06/2008 - 8:12am.

Do college/school officials actually add 20 to a college application or test if the person claims to be black??

Why?

Are college officials saying or implying that a black persons IQ is twenty points lower than any other race??

I hope this is something you just made up, and that this is not actual practice.

promprinces's picture
Submitted by promprinces on Thu, 03/06/2008 - 8:46am.

this is a school up north I googled just now to show you, Ga has the same deal.

Racial diversity at college

1.27.2001 00:23

The Providence Journal

A federal district court judge in Detroit last month approved the University of Michigan's admissions policy, which, to achieve diversity, grants explicit preferences to applicants from specified racial and ethnic groups. Judge Patrick Duggan's ruling regarding public universities seems to counter a 1996 appeals court judgment, in the Hopwood case, that the race-based admissions preferences aimed at achieving diversity at the University of Texas law school were unconstitutional. The U.S. Supreme Court probably will have to resolve the matter.

A 23-year-old white woman, Jennifer Gratz, on applying for admission, was denied entrance in 1995 into what is generaly considered the university's flagship campus, in Ann Arbor. (She subsequently attended the less prestigious campus in Dearborn.) She appealed her rejection from Ann Arbor on the basis that the state was denying her the equal protection of the laws required by the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Candidates are rated on a 150-point scale.

While mainly judged on their academic background, like all others, applicants from what are considered "underrepresented minorities" -- specifically blacks, Hispanics and American Indians -- are automatically given 20 bonus points on account of their racial/ethnic origins. (By the way, this intentionally leaves out Asian-American applicants, even though they are an obvious racial minority.

Evidently, sufficient numbers of them -- whatever that means -- qualify for admission without needing bonus points for their racial origins.) Applicants can also receive bonus points for a variety of other factors: e.g., those from poor families, 20 points; recruited athletes, 20 points; Michigan residents, 10 points; children of alumni, 4 points; those with special personal achievements, 3 points.

However, these factors are not based on racial or ethnic background. A recruited athlete, say, gets the extra 20 points regardless of race or ethnicity -- although, obviously, recruits for the basketball team are more likely to be black than white, and vice versa for hockey recruits. As a result, the only aspect of the bonus system challenged on constitutional grounds was its explicit use of racial and ethnic categories to grant -- or withhold -- extra points.

In upholding the University of Michigan's admissions system, Judge Duggan emphasized what he considered the decisive benefits, for all concerned, of a racially and ethnically diverse student body. We believe that such purported benefits are real, although vastly exaggerated. And we believe that diversity can be measured in many ways, perhaps most importantly by diversity of ideas and interests, rather than confining it, in a rather condescending way, to skin color and/or ethnic affiliation.

The question is not so much the state's allegedly "compelling interest" in promoting diversity at Ann Arbor but its constitutional duty to grant applicants -- such as, in this case, Jennifer Gratz -- the equal protection of the laws. Michigan's approach comes down to this: giving some applicants an automatic 20-point bonus (more than 10 percent of the 150-point entrance scale) simply because they have the favored racial or ethnic characteristics, and thereby forcing the rejection of some other applicants -- whites and Asians -- because they don't come from favored racial or ethnic groups.

That does not sound to us like equal protection of the laws.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

News and Announcements | AAD Home Page

Carl Gutiérrez-Jones,
Department of English
University of California
Santa Barbara, CA 93106
E-mail: carlgj@humanitas.ucsb.edu


sniffles5's picture
Submitted by sniffles5 on Thu, 03/06/2008 - 9:37am.

this is a school up north I googled just now to show you, Ga has the same deal.

Might want to do a bit more investigating, promprincess. Your information is from 2001. In 2003, five years ago, the US Supreme Court declared the automatic 20-point minority bonus to be unconstitutional.

So Georgia does NOT have "the same deal".
_______________________________________________________
Truthsleuth Speaks!
Don't Click This Link, Denise!


promprinces's picture
Submitted by promprinces on Thu, 03/06/2008 - 12:05pm.

I just got in. I didn't make it up. I copied the web site complete with the guys address. I didn't know that rule had been struck down. I thought it was still in efect. I didn't check the dates.


Submitted by skyspy on Thu, 03/06/2008 - 8:57am.

That is racism out of control. So school officials assume that blacks, hispanics, and American Indians, are not capable of competing with other students based on merit? Wow.

Not only is this reverse racism, but it is racist to say that any race of people are not competent enough to compete on an even playing field. This is America 2008!

AF A-10's picture
Submitted by AF A-10 on Thu, 03/06/2008 - 12:00pm.

Someone types some manure up, serves it on a plate, and because it portrays us minorities negatively you are more than willing to consume it. If I didn't care about your opinions, if I thought there was no hope, I wouldn't bother to engage you. Don't believe every bad thing offered by those grinding axes, and discredit every good that comes from brown, calloused hands

Kevin "Hack" King


promprinces's picture
Submitted by promprinces on Thu, 03/06/2008 - 1:51pm.

I didn't know it had been taken off the books. It WAS the law and a very bad one at that.

I don't care if you like or dislike what I say because it is my opinion just as you are entitled to yours.

I feel this district voting is motivated by race and Elmer Fudd has his own agenda. I feel its wrong to give preferential treatment to one group because of something that happened 200 years ago.

Every group has taken their knocks. I feel it is like saying this group can't make it any other way.

If you feel district voting is right, I'm sure you wouldn't have played the race card like Fudd did. He and Jessie and Al are making a career out of this and it is BS.


Submitted by skyspy on Thu, 03/06/2008 - 12:54pm.

I'm also glad this practice was declared unconstitutional in 2003.

Larry Elder's book deals with the topic of myths surrounding all races. I wish he had picked a different title, which is frankly very offensive. I think because of the title most people won't read it. He actually provides sources or footnotes for his theories presented.

Anyway, Hack I do value your opinion. Even though many times we have to agree to disagree, you do provide an interesting informative perspective.

I hope you heal quickly, now get out and enjoy this day. It is beautiful. Have a good one.

Denise Conner's picture
Submitted by Denise Conner on Fri, 03/07/2008 - 10:09am.

Maybe the title was designed to parody Michael Moore's book STUPID WHITE MEN?


AF A-10's picture
Submitted by AF A-10 on Thu, 03/06/2008 - 3:14pm.

I appreciate the well wishes! What a beauty of a day. We all could use a little relaxation out under this clear, sunny sky. Enjoy the day!

Kevin "Hack" King


BPR's picture
Submitted by BPR on Thu, 03/06/2008 - 2:19pm.

_

I saw your comment about Larry Elders, I think I will buy the book= look at this:

click here- very interesting.

Thanks Sky!

______________________________
We Will Stand


Submitted by skyspy on Thu, 03/06/2008 - 11:47pm.

You little search engine you....good job. I have just recently started to read his book. He does provide links to to back up his statments and make his points.

He is like a breath of fresh air, when it comes to dealing with race relations in America.

Most American blacks don't seem to want to hear his message. I'm reading his recent book "Stupid Black Men" the title is very offensive, even to me and I'm not a black male. He makes some very valid points one is that minorities are being exploited by the very people who claim to be helping them. He sites many examples to prove his point.

This guy is refreshingly honest.

AF A-10's picture
Submitted by AF A-10 on Thu, 03/06/2008 - 8:08pm.

and I must say that once again I'm concerned for you. Do you know how foolish the arguments put forth here were? When Alan makes someone look so foolish for judging the faith of a man he has never met, judging a church he has never visited, and attributing a church website to its most famous member, you know you have a weak argument. BPR, this, I must say, was a pathetic showing. Stick to the "present" votes if you want to damage Barack.

Kevin "Hack" King


Submitted by skyspy on Fri, 03/07/2008 - 12:01am.

BPR provided some very valid links. BPR is not the only one who is asking these questions.

I have voted Democrat for the 16yrs. and I'm sad to say I don't think I can do that this time. obama's affiliation with this church is very concerning. Hitler went to church too. He also used the bible to justify his actions against Jewish people. obama listens to a minister who has been repeatedly heard calling white people the "blue-eyed devil", if I remeber one interview correctly. One of his sermons was titled "Death to White America" How do you justify that???
ANY racism is BAD and WRONG and very very DANGEROUS!!! obama is listening to this filth every Sunday. Not good no matter how you try to slice it.

If we do not learn from history we are DOOMED to repeat it.!

I'm not voting Democrat this time for several reasons, one of which I don't want my hard earned money shared with people who don't want to work. No neither clinton or obama has said they will raise taxes. However with all of the freebies they want to promise the American people, that is the only way I can see to pay for any of their "programs". They have not offered one viable idea as to how they are going to pay for their big ideas for "change". Yes they want change, but who is going to pay for it???

BPR's picture
Submitted by BPR on Thu, 03/06/2008 - 10:12pm.

You don't have to be concerned about me.

We see things different.

You saw my links different than what I saw them, that is fine.

Again- the church web page speaks for itself-

The Pastor speaks for himself on the link-

We see it different- that is okay to disagree.

Hope you are feeling better Smiling

______________________________
We Will Stand


AF A-10's picture
Submitted by AF A-10 on Fri, 03/07/2008 - 12:35am.

But is BPR linking us to HONEST criticism?

First we have a man that questions Obama's very faith; questions whether or not Obama is a Christian. Turns out he has never talked to Obama. He has NEVER visited the Church. He went to a web site and then declared himself an expert on Barack's salvation. Is that Biblical?

Next we have a fringe professor whom I've never heard of in my life. Yet, because I didn't protest words I did not know he said I've given silent approval to his message? Is that an intellectually honest argument? And Skyspy, you are going to ignore John McCain's embracing an endorsement from a man who thinks the Catholic Church is a "prostitute" without scrutiny? Sorry buddy, the only one who can judge a man's faith in my concept of reality is God. I'm comfortable with that. If a man proclaims Christ, I will not put myself in line to face God's wrath by supposing to know his soul. I think you've shaken some sense into me if Hillary is the nominee. I had a McCain moment of weakness, but you've scared me back to my witts.

Kevin "Hack" King


Submitted by skyspy on Fri, 03/07/2008 - 8:05am.

I am not questioning his faith. I question what he being taught to believe about white people in the "name of God" and there is a difference.

When hannity interviewed the minister of Trinity un-united church. He admitted to several stunning mission statements.

He says his church is committed to "black" family values, the promotion of "black" run buisnesses, dedicated to the development and support of africa, the support of "black" education.

If any other church in America said they were dedicated to the support of "white" family values, supporting "white" owned buisnesses, support of "white" education. ....the country would be on a rampage to stop it and rightly so. I think more people are becoming concerned since the interview on hannity.

Hack what is a "black" family value?

No, I'm not happy with a knucklehead who thinks the catholic religion is a prostitiute. If McCains church was preaching support of just one race of people I would be very concerned and I would vote for Nader, I might do that anyway.

Again if we do not learn from history we are DOOMED to repeat it!!

American is a big melting pot, and I don't think God sees race. I don't know of any bible verse that condones racism. Some of our churchy people will have to help us out with that one.

Have a good day. Read a book or something, enjoy listening to the rain.

yardman5508's picture
Submitted by yardman5508 on Fri, 03/07/2008 - 8:29am.

you might want to take a look at this one {hope the link works, my first atttempt} Keep the faith.

http://www.religioustolerance.org/wcotc1.htm

Democracy is not a spectator sport.


Submitted by skyspy on Fri, 03/07/2008 - 8:33am.

The link didn't work, but I'll just type in the address.

yardman5508's picture
Submitted by yardman5508 on Fri, 03/07/2008 - 8:45am.

strike another blow for technological illiteracy LOL. Keep the faith.

Democracy is not a spectator sport.


BPR's picture
Submitted by BPR on Fri, 03/07/2008 - 8:21am.

You are correct with your comments about faith. Smiling As a matter of fact your are correct with all that you had on your post about this subject.

I have a meeting I have to drive to North Atlanta to- so later.

Have a nice day.

_______________________________
We Will Stand


Submitted by skyspy on Fri, 03/07/2008 - 8:31am.

Have a good day.

BPR's picture
Submitted by BPR on Fri, 03/07/2008 - 8:30am.

Thanks for the information about Larry Elders- I am going to buy his book- Smiling Again, from what I see and have read on Larry Elders he has done his research and knows what he is talking about- and I am thankful he's does not care what anyone says.

Gotta go- or I will be late-

Sky- I'm staying.Smiling

_______________________________
We Will Stand


sniffles5's picture
Submitted by sniffles5 on Thu, 03/06/2008 - 2:29pm.

Wow BPR, yet another one of your attacks on a Christian church (this time via Sean Hannity).

You sure seem to dislike some Christians.
_______________________________________________________
Truthsleuth Speaks!
Don't Click This Link, Denise!


BPR's picture
Submitted by BPR on Thu, 03/06/2008 - 3:08pm.

Please define what a Christian is? Read Obama's church homepage- everyone I see or ask has a problem with it - btw I have friends of different race- they have problems with it.

I love Christians and ALL people- they don't have to be a Christian.
People are valuable- just because you disagree with a church belief does not mean you hate and attack them- you have questions-BTW- which Hannity tried to ask Obama's Pastor which kept on ranting and would not even answer them. I just want him to answer Hannity's and my questions. I put it up the other day, I am sure you saw it.

Say what you want- you just did not like what I put up both times. That's okay you are entitled to your opinion.

Have a nice evening- it is a nice day.Smiling
______________________________
We Will Stand


TruthSleuth1958's picture
Submitted by TruthSleuth1958 on Thu, 03/06/2008 - 3:10pm.

Are you losing your mind too!!!??? besides, she is signed on as MainExtreme right now and is talking to herself.

Sniffles05 The Plagiarizer in Chief
Sniffles05:Angry and often proven wrong.


AF A-10's picture
Submitted by AF A-10 on Thu, 03/06/2008 - 8:22pm.

Judge not lest ye be judged. Let's start there. Oh, and there are also some things having to do with speaking false words aka lying.

Kevin "Hack" King


Denise Conner's picture
Submitted by Denise Conner on Fri, 03/07/2008 - 8:53pm.

Actually, the context is critical: "In the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure [the standard] you use, it will be measured to you."

"Then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother's eye." (The action of "removing," which is an act of compassion, is required after judging yourself.)

"Do not judge according to appearance, but judge with righteous judgment."

"Speak up for those who cannot speak for themselves,
for the rights of all who are destitute.
Speak up and judge fairly;
defend the rights of the poor and needy."

To judge means to bring to issue the reasoning or deliberations of the mind; to compare facts or ideas, and perceive their agreement or disagreement, and thus to distinguish truth from falsehood. A judge should be one capable of making rational, dispassionate, and wise decisions.


TruthSleuth1958's picture
Submitted by TruthSleuth1958 on Fri, 03/07/2008 - 11:11am.

If so, please restate whatever it is you are trying to say to me. You completely lost me.

Sniffles05 The Plagiarizer in Chief
Sniffles05:Angry and often proven wrong.


BPR's picture
Submitted by BPR on Thu, 03/06/2008 - 10:19pm.

__

We See things different. There's alot of scripture I could give you, but I choose not to do that.

It's all about our opinion-

Have a nice evening.

_____________________________
We Will Stand


BPR's picture
Submitted by BPR on Thu, 03/06/2008 - 3:20pm.

I'm not loosing my mind- just had to ask- to see what kind of answer I would get this time around - I already know what kind I will get. It changes all the time. I know that- let's see what they say.

It's always different every time I read it on here with the definition of what they believe.

Have a good day.

_______________________________
We Will Stand


Main Stream's picture
Submitted by Main Stream on Thu, 03/06/2008 - 3:01pm.

"You sure seem to dislike some Christians."

LOL... (another score for Sniffles)


BPR's picture
Submitted by BPR on Thu, 03/06/2008 - 7:44pm.

I think the Larry Elders interview got to some people not to all but to some - plus the questions Hannity asked Obama's pastor??????

I do have some questions for Obama's pastor just like Hannity that he would not answer. All he had to do was answer the questions.

BTW- Remember if you had read carefully you would have read I love all Christians and people who are not Christians. All people have value.

Again all people have value. Smiling

click here Ebony and Ivory- how about not on a piano but in life everyday ?????

Love has no color.

I can't say Laughing out loud if when I think everyone has value.Smiling

Everyone has their right to their opinion.

Have a nice evening- it is really nice out tonight.

______________________________
We Will Stand


TruthSleuth1958's picture
Submitted by TruthSleuth1958 on Thu, 03/06/2008 - 3:08pm.

You both just returned the same ping in the same amount of time from the same location. Signing off as one and back on as the other isn't helping your cause any.

You have some serious personality disorder and you should seek help immediately - Code 93 - ASAP - NOW!

(Oh, tell Locke hi while you are there too.)

Sniffles05 The Plagiarizer in Chief
Sniffles05:Angry and often proven wrong.


sniffles5's picture
Submitted by sniffles5 on Thu, 03/06/2008 - 6:08pm.

You have no way of knowing what my IP address is, Tsloth.

I'll prove it the next time you and I are online together, too.

I'll take a screen shot with a time/date stamp on it and load it up to flicker.

Then you can post "my" IP address for all to see.

I'll then give everyone the URL for my IP address photo.

They won't match. I guarantee you.

And I will have made you look stupid.

Once again.

You are a liar, plain and simple. Small wonder you washed out of law enforcement.
_______________________________________________________
Truthsleuth Speaks!
Don't Click This Link, Denise!


Locke's picture
Submitted by Locke on Thu, 03/06/2008 - 6:30pm.

Same thing I said. No way he is pinging me like he claimed because I know way more about computers than he obviously does. However, I had him pegged for a teenager or maybe a little older based on the level of his comments. Do you know for a fact that he is an adult and was up for a real job? I may owe him an apology.


River's picture
Submitted by River on Thu, 03/06/2008 - 7:36pm.

The fact that he is trying to sniff out other blogger's IP addresses is pathetic on the face of it. Just a small-town bully trying to intimidate other people.

It doesn't really matter who we really are, it's the truth or falsehood of what we say that matters. I think it was Muddle that said that a few months ago.

Well, TruthSleuth need to do a lot more sleuthing, because he is certainly missing the truth at present.


TruthSleuth1958's picture
Submitted by TruthSleuth1958 on Fri, 03/07/2008 - 7:23am.

{{{{{{{{EDITED & WARNED -- This poster has crossed the line from disagreement to bullying. Any more trackdowns of IP addresses and personal info that gets onto this site will result in the offending poster being banned.

-- Cal the censor}}}}}}}}

I have something much better in mind for basmati/Locke/sniffy whomever he is that day - Look for the public challenge coming soon!

Meanwhile - enjoy the sniffy/Locke/basmati plagiarisms by reading the links below:

Sniffles05 The Plagiarizer in Chief
Sniffles05:Angry and often proven wrong.


Main Stream's picture
Submitted by Main Stream on Thu, 03/06/2008 - 4:00pm.

"You both just returned the same ping in the same amount of time from the same location. Signing off as one and back on as the other isn't helping your cause any."

Wrong-o....buck-o

You are sounding as paranoid, and retarded, as dense-ise. Do you really spend your time checking 'pings' and sign-on locales?

YOU are the one with the disorder, wacko.


Locke's picture
Submitted by Locke on Thu, 03/06/2008 - 4:41pm.

He doesn’t spend his time doing either. He knows as much about computers as he does everything else. First of all, how is he possibly going to check sign-on locales? Preposterous. Secondly, saying he has pinged my computer proves his total ignorance of Internet Control Message Protocol.

Show me how good you are sloth; post my ip address that you claim to have been pinging.

I think what we have here is a young person who doesn’t know very much yet and understands considerably less than that.


BPR's picture
Submitted by BPR on Thu, 03/06/2008 - 3:00pm.

I suggest you listen again- Hannity is correct. You only listen to liberal part- Colmes.

BTW Hannity is a Christian. Is that why you made that remark- Hannity proves his point- just because he did not say what you wanted to hear listen to Colmes- he's more your style- that program is designed that way.

I think your angry about Larry Elders I put up.Eye-wink

We all have our opinions.Smiling

Have a nice day.

_____________________________
We Will Stand


mudcat's picture
Submitted by mudcat on Wed, 03/05/2008 - 8:28pm.

I think what I read in your diatribe was that since some currenty dead white men who I never met took away your black great, great grandfather's right to vote - and now because of that - my right to vote for all 5 county commisioners should be taken away.

Do you have any idea how stupid that sounds to me? Or any thinking American? What can you say that could possibly change anyones mind?

When you say that the current commissioners have a "fear" of district voting you are simply wrong. They don't "fear" district voting - nor do I. District voting is rejected by any thinking (and registered) Fayette County voter as a racist ploy to replace one or more of "the five white men who now serve as the Fayette County Commission" - that's your quote, lady.

If you and your clueless political party want to have a non-white candidate elected - great - go for it. Register, qualify, run for election, win. Easy, isn't it?

Or, instead of asking the "Georgia General Assembly" to decide this issue, why not ask the voters of Fayette County - you know, the people who are most affected by the final outcome. You up with that, Judith? Or is that a racist solution as well?


Main Stream's picture
Submitted by Main Stream on Thu, 03/06/2008 - 12:17am.

"....since some currenty dead white men who I never met, took away your black great, great grandfather's right to vote..."

Judith Moore is Caucasian. Just thought you might want to know, for future reference.

------------------------
HOW MUCH WE'VE SPENT ON THE IRAQ WAR SO FAR


promprinces's picture
Submitted by promprinces on Thu, 03/06/2008 - 7:32am.

but the concept under which they are going after the 'you owe me' is Black entitlement. The whole black entitlement is disgusting.


AF A-10's picture
Submitted by AF A-10 on Thu, 03/06/2008 - 12:05pm.

"Man, the fact this woman is white and you tried to paint her as the heir of slaves made you look like an absolute fool, Mudcat."

Or, you can explan to me what I feel I'm entitled to; a vote on district voting not actually being an entitlement.

Kevin "Hack" King


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.