-->
Search the ArchivesNavigationContact InformationThe Citizen Newspapers For Advertising Information Email us your news! For technical difficulties |
‘Close E. Fayette, move students to Inman’Tue, 02/12/2008 - 5:32pm
By: Ben Nelms
Parents urge Board of Education to adopt new ‘3-way’ plan that would leave untouched both Spring Hill and Minter elementary schools; final public hearing Wed. night, Feb. 13 The message from parents to the Fayette County Board of Education was clear Monday night: Move all East Fayette Elementary School students to the unopened Inman school; leave Spring Hill and Minter students where they are; and do what you want with the county’s oldest campus. A large number of parents of Spring Hill and Minter elementary schools were joined by faculty and staff from East Fayette Elementary Monday night to present their views to Fayette County School Board. The stated purpose of the public hearing was to discuss the time-line and feasibility of re-purposing East Fayette Elementary, whose school boundaries were finalized in December. But more than 40 in the crowded meeting room took to the podium, with Spring Hill and Minter elementary parents advocating a recently unveiled three-way plan to address the relocation of hundreds of student to different schools while East Fayette teachers and staff unanimously requested that the entire student/staff population be moved to the new Inman Elementary. As with public hearings, the school board made no comment. Their assessment of the advocacy they heard will likely come after the final public hearing Wednesday night [Feb. 13]. First to the podium was Spring Hill PTO President Tom VanHoozer, who last week promoted a plan he and many others said accomplish all the school board’s goals while minimizing the disruption of 900 students from all three schools. “I’m in favor of closing East Fayette Elementary,” VanHoozer said. “There is no reason why our children’s learning environment should not be the best we can provide for them.” VanHoozer was recalling the December meeting where parents’ concerns over the deteriorated condition of the East Fayette facility was noted. “On Dec. 17 there was an open dialogue concerning the boundary lines of Spring Hill,” VanHoozer said. “We all at that meeting heard there would be some tweaking that would need to be done and that this issue would be addressed later since we have over a year to finalize this area.” VanHoozer said he respected the board’s decision in January to move the timetable forward. That move, he said, did not give Spring Hill parents sufficient opportunity to voice their opinions and concerns about the new map. He said a three-way winning plan would accomplish all the goals that need to be addressed for each school. “If you recall, map BA is the finished product from a committee comprised from each part of our schools’ PTOs where they took the combined efforts from Map A and Map B and attempted to draw the lines where you see them today,” said VanHoozer. “This was a great first step, but it should not be our last step. Following protocols, our representative from Spring Hill tried unsuccessfully to have what I am going to propose to you tonight. With this committee’s ‘majority rules’ philosophy, it was apparent that our voices were not going to be heard. But out of these meetings came a great idea that no one on the committee would listen to or was allowed to address. The common goal of the committee was not achieved in the manner that would lead to the disruption of the least number of students.” “I believe that now is the time for these voices to be heard,” VanHoozer continued. “So once again I propose what has been labeled as the three-way winning plan. It would close East Fayette and transfer those students to the new Inman Road (elementary), leave Lakeside and Lakemont in the Spring Hill community, leave the 140 students at Minter that would be transferred to Inman Road. The benefits to this are very real and would put the process back on track for the moved-up timetable. It eliminates the need to hire new staff and transfers to any other schools, established bus routes are easier to resolve, it gives one group of students (East Fayette) a brand new school and it keeps students and teachers together. It does not cause the disruption of three schools with a combined total of 900 students. By implementing the three-way win, a greater number of property values will remain the same as we currently know it. The down side, the transportation would have to be reconfigured. Some people will say (this plan) is too late. It is never too late. The numbers work.” A wealth of Spring Hill and Minter parents along with East Fayette teachers and staff followed VanHoozer at the podium. The consensus of the two groups could not have been more clear. Spring Hill and Minter parents advocated for their children to remain at their respective schools while East Fayette employees advocated for all students and staff to be relocated together to the new Inman. The comments of East Fayette Elementary teacher and parent Laurell Daye were representative of the numerous statements of the many East Fayette teachers and staff who referenced the school’s long-time accomplishments. Prevalent throughout the remarks was the school’s family-like atmosphere that encompasses families, students, teacher and staff. Many cited the outdated conditions of the facility that could be corrected with a complete move to the new Inman Road school. “I am here to ask that you not only recognize that the early re-purposing of East Fayette and the movement of our entire staff and (student) population to Inman Elementary and know that it is the right thing to do, but that it is also the fair thing to do,” Daye said. “It is necessary for our entire student body, our administration, teachers and staff for the upcoming 2008-2009 school year. For what reason, you might ask. To allow the school’s entire population to educate and be educated in an upgraded and safer environment. The time is now to re-purpose East Fayette, to allow all of us to have the opportunity to learn and work in a better environment at the new Inman Elementary School. It’s what’s right. It’s what’s fair. And above all, it’s what’s truly necessary.” Representing Kingswood subdivision, Spring Hill parent Janet Sexton mirrored the comments of the many parents that supported the three-way plan. In her remarks, Sexton made the case for a reconsideration of the final map that would send many Spring Hill and Minter students to Inman. “We have 175 homes and none of our homeowners are in favor of your final elementary boundary map,” said Sexton. “I think I speak not only for Kingswood, but for everyone here when I say this has been a very disconcerting process. Kingswood supported either of the preliminary maps that were presented for public review. However, the final map (has) never been presented for public comment. We ask you for a more equitable arrangement, as this will disrupt so many lives. I urge you to reconsider the elementary boundary map and we ask you to support the three-way win plan.” The final public hearing on the re-purposing of East Fayette will be held Wednesday night [Feb. 13] at 7 p.m. at the school board office at 210 Stonewall Avenue in Fayetteville. A vote on the issue is expected to follow the public hearing. login to post comments |