-->
Search the ArchivesNavigationContact InformationThe Citizen Newspapers For Advertising Information Email us your news! For technical difficulties |
Tyrone's Tale of Two ChartersOn January 24 the “new group” held a special called meeting for changing the charter of Tyrone. At that meeting according to The Citizen News the new Town Barrister (at his hourly rate using a common term like attorney is not fitting) Dennis Davenport said “The Town has functioned both previously and still today under a WEAK Mayor model of government.” At that meeting Mayor Rehwaldt stated that it was appropriate for the Town Manger and Police Chief to have hiring and firing responsibility in their respective departments. The Town has now posted a proposed charter on its web site. The charter on the web is a STRONG Mayor model of government. This charter gives the Mayor all the authority and responsibility for running the Town. With these two charters being sooooo different it brings two questions. First why are these charters so different. There are two plausible answers; either these new high priced barristers did not do their job in researching the existing charter and provided incorrect information or this “new group” is continuing their practice of secret meetings. Could be a combination of both. If the barristers provided inaccurate information to the council then they should be held accountable and not soak the taxpayers by submitting a bill their research time (wasn’t accountability one of this “new groups” commitment to the public). However, the most troubling question remains when did the “new group” get together to make the changes proposed on charter posted on the web? Since it was not the one discussed at the public meeting did they secretly gather at someone’s house; maybe it was done by a telephone conference; could have been done by email; no matter how they came up with these changes it was done without the public having access to their deliberations. The “new group” apparently is continuing to hold secret meetings and are violating State Law (they are now sworn in and are holding office so their old excuse won’t work). It is obvious that this “new group’s” campaign promise of open government was simply something they never intended. Based on what has gone on in January, it is clear that this “new group” is going to push through whatever changes they want and as far open government and accountability, don’t count on it. Shaquita's blog | login to post comments |