Board of Education orders hearing to close East Fayette this fall

Tue, 01/29/2008 - 5:02pm
By: John Thompson

By the end of May, the last students to ever attend East Fayette Elementary School could be bidding the structure a farewell.

In a dramatic turn of events Monday night, the Fayette County Board of Education instructed Superintendent of Education John DeCotis to schedule public hearings in February for closing East Fayette Elementary by this coming August.

Originally, the school was being considered for closure in the 2009-2010 school year. DeCotis said the system’s facilities plan shows the system with a surplus of elementary units and said the state will once again be cutting funding for education.

The dire financial predictions led to a discussion that could see Fayette’s oldest school building closed, so the system can reap the savings from closing it this year. The campus is set back from Ga. Highway 54 in Fayetteville, just east of the Jeff Davis Drive intersection.

The issue was discussed after Director of Facility Services Mike Satterfield explained the system was working on a new five-year facilities plan with state officials. State education officials predict the system will grow by 414 students, for a total of 2,070 new students in five years.

He explained the system would have 190 surplus instruction units, and if East Fayette was repurposed, the number would drop to 154. With the excess units, the system would not have to consider a new elementary school with in the parameters of this facility plan.

DeCotis added that the system was again looking at huge budget cuts from the state, and closing East Fayette a year early could save the system between $644,000 and $800,000 in staffing costs, since the administration at East Fayette would move to the new Inman Elementary.

The board wondered if there was enough time to close the school and DeCotis said the decision would have to be done by the time of the system’s Feb. 19 winter break, in order to meet staffing requirements.

Since the item was not an action item, DeCotis said he would need consensus of the board to set up public hearings to discuss the closing of the school. The board agreed to tentative dates of Feb. 11 and Feb. 13 at the county office at 7 p.m. to get the public’s opinion on the proposal.

Board member Lee Wright said he didn’t want to rush the process of deciding what to do with the property if it’s closed, since he believed it could also be sold.

On Dec. 17, the board approved the latest set of elementary school boundaries and left East Fayette Elementary School open for the 2008-2009 school year.

On Monday night, the board did not discuss any boundaries, but if East Fayette closes this year, the board could turn to the map that was drawn up for the 2009-2010 school year.

That map features students at Lakeside and Lakemont subdivisions on Redwine Road southwest of Fayetteville leaving Spring Hill Elementary School and moving to Minter Elementary.

The influx of East Fayette students would push Spring Hill’s population to nearly 700 students, if the board uses the 2009 students.

East Fayette was originally built in 1955 when schools were segregated by race. It served as the main campus for black students in grades one through 12 and was known as the Fayette County Training School.

After integration, the buildings were repurposed as a junior high school and later as an elementary school.

login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by DJS on Thu, 01/31/2008 - 9:18pm.

As a resident south of Lakeside and Lakemont subdivisions, I am very upset. I have also heard from others that are not pleased with the backdooring we have received regarding the maps. I went to the FCBOE and the Welcome Center yesterday and requested the map that was approved regarding the East Fayette closure (repurpose) and no was able to help me. They told me I should attend next months meetings. I then emailed FCBOE and finally received the map that I was requesting. Prior to seeing the map, I assumed if Lakeside and Lakemont would be moved to Minter the residents south of those subdivisions would also move to Minter, BUT NO! We have been leaped frogged with no notification for us to voice our opinion. The new map was never published for us to give our opinion. Why didn't you go with one of the maps that had been advertised. I believe the FCBOE will hear from us at the next meeting. We are not happy about being backdoored.

Submitted by hopeful on Fri, 02/01/2008 - 6:42am.

Where are you located south of Lakemont and Lakeside? I have contacted board members and requested that they remain at SpringHill and move most of the East Fayette kids to Inman, only to be told that there is not enough people that have this request. Contact the board by email, attend the meeting and have everyone you know contact the board by email or at the meeting that has this request.

Submitted by Lakey on Sat, 02/02/2008 - 4:54pm.

We need to look at the big picture in our school zones. The Fayette County Board of Education has a feeder program for all schools where elementary schools feed into certain middle schools and middle schools feed into certain high schoools. At the present time there are six middle schools feeding five high schools. Bennett's Mill is the "extra" school without an exclusive alignment to a high school. We in Lakemont current have Spring Hill, Bennett's Mill, and Whitewater HS as our trace. If you complain about Minter vs Spring Hill you risk losing Whitewater HS as Lakemont's high school. Until a sixth high school is built it would be easy to say that all of Spring Hill should feed into Fayette Middle and Fayette County HS. I want Whitewater HS for our neighborhood rather than Fayette County HS. When the FCBOE placed us in Minter it all but insured that we will remain aligned to Whitewater HS. Would you still want Spring Hill for Lakemont if it also meant Fayette County HS? I think Lakemont did great on the elementary school realignment! Minter is a new school and will be even better with the active, concerned parents from Lakemont and Lakeside. Let's stop complaining about being assigned to Minter.

Submitted by hopeful on Sat, 02/02/2008 - 7:07pm.

If they are moving 180 out of SpringHill just to move 180 plus another 100 in, why not just move one set of kids, the ones at East Fayette have to be moved. It was said from the beginning of this process move as few kids as possible, does that not still stand.

Submitted by sageadvice on Sat, 02/02/2008 - 7:35pm.

the Super? You aren't allowed to make suggestions!

Submitted by hopeful on Sat, 02/02/2008 - 8:25pm.

What are you saying?

Submitted by heatjam on Fri, 02/01/2008 - 4:09pm.

Out of curiosity - If you are saying to basically move all of East fayette to Inman and leave Spring Hill as is, what about the kids that are at Minter this year but are being rezoned to Inman? Many of them live closer to Inman than to Minter. Should they stay at Minter or go to Inman? If you say Inman, then Minter will still have very low #'s. If you say stay at Minter then how do you explain to the taxpayers when more fuel is used to bus kids to schools further away than a closer school? Don't get me wrong, I want all of the kids at Minter to stay where they are, but I am also a tax payer/voter in this community.
Please explain. Thanks!

Submitted by hopeful on Fri, 02/01/2008 - 7:17pm.

Busing Lakeside and Lakemont to Minter is a greater distance then busing them to SpringHill, so now another problem more fuel cost there. What is the solution to that maybe move some of the areas that are more south of Lakeside and Lakemont to Minter and leave these neighborhoods at SpringHill. So if Minter needs kids to fill the school once the kids are pulled and moved to Inman move the areas that are closer to Minter, why should a bus drive right by other neighborhoods to just give Lakemont and Lakeside what they want, they don't even feed in Whitewater Middle School. Is there a right or wrong answer no, but there is something that smells with this whole process when you look at the map and there is a area not even connected to the rest of the area going to Minter. The board probably should have looked at all of these issues when they started building Inman, way a minute the bond did not say they were closing a school at that time, so now the back tracking begins.

Submitted by Gagirl on Fri, 02/01/2008 - 3:53pm.

Hopeful, as a parent of a student at E. Fayette, I have that request. They need to move all of E. Fayette to Inman, problem solved!!! No other students would have to be disrupted. If they are worried that students who live too far North would not want to travel the distance, give them the choice. I guarantee you that the majority of the parents will choose Inman b/c it's a brand new school and will have the best resources!!! We need to flood the board of education with emails. Does anyone have an email address?

Submitted by heatjam on Sat, 02/02/2008 - 1:23pm.

The school will come with probably 1 teacher and 1 student computer, more electrical outlets than at East Fayette, possibly smart boards and a small playground. (Oh, and desks, chairs...) It's really the parents/PTO that give the school the "best resources". Oh and of course the Admin/Staff. In other words a building is a building, it's the people that make it "the best". If the parents don't get involved with both their time and money then it won't have "the best resources". Admin/Staff work extremely hard and are wonderful, but they can only do so much with the little funding that they get.

zoes's picture
Submitted by zoes on Fri, 02/01/2008 - 9:45am.

Please post the meeting date, time and location.

I'll be there if I can!


Submitted by hopeful on Fri, 02/01/2008 - 10:13am.

The public hearing are tentatively scheduled for February 11th at 7PM and February 13th at 7PM at the school board regular board room at the Central Office. I would continue to check the fcboe.org website and the Citizen to make sure it does not get changed since it is TENTATIVELY scheduled for these dates.

Submitted by DJS on Fri, 02/01/2008 - 6:53am.

We live on Cherokee Place which is behind the ballpark off Redwine.

Submitted by hopeful on Fri, 02/01/2008 - 9:10am.

Based on the numbers I have heard it makes more sense to ask the board to leave Lakeside and Lakemont put at SpringHill and move the kids from East Fayette to Inman. I heard 180 something moved out 280 something moved in to SpringHill, so take the 180 something and move to Inman and the other 100 something split between the two school and still leaves space open at both. If the maps are studied it could work. As for Minter I'm not sure what there numbers look like with the change?

Submitted by Gagirl on Tue, 01/29/2008 - 5:53pm.

Why move kids from Spring Hill to Minter?? Why not send all of E. Fayette to Inman?? Why move another group of kids? Wait, could it be b/c the fine residents of Redwine Road want to get the heck outta Dodge? I smell someone's personal agenda and CANNOT wait for the meetings next month!

Submitted by concerned SHME ... on Wed, 01/30/2008 - 10:48am.

Hey GAgirl, I totally agree. I have no problem with East Fayette closing. If conditions are bad there, I would not want my child going there, therefore, I wouldn't want any other child to have to go there, either. Close East Fayette and move the entire school to Inman . . . staff and students. Don't move anybody else from any other school. That's all parents want at all the schools. We want our children to be able to stay at their school, with their friends and their teachers that they have grown up with. And, as parents, we want our children to stay at the school that we have put so much time, effort, and money into. Keep the students and staff at Minter together at Minter. Keep the students and staff at Spring Hill together at Spring Hill. Keep the students and staff at East Fayette together at Inman. You can even change the name of the school from Inman to East Fayette - it is on the east side of the county. This will truly "disrupt the fewest number of students possible.

Submitted by hopeful on Wed, 01/30/2008 - 12:12pm.

I think your idea would be great, didn't the committee ask over and over again, keep the staff from East Fayette together, why not the students too?

yardman5508's picture
Submitted by yardman5508 on Wed, 01/30/2008 - 10:59am.

you would have students living closer to Spring Hill who would be "trucked" out to Inman to go to school. We, as citizens, can't have that. Neighborhood schools, walk to school, go to school with our friends...that is what we are after. Do not bother me with cost, reason, or common sense. Keep the faith

Democracy is not a spectator sport.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.