John McCain: The Geraldo Rivera Republican

Michelle Malkin's picture

After spearheading a disastrous, security-undermining illegal alien amnesty bill last year with Teddy Kennedy, “straight-talking” GOP Sen. John McCain claims he has seen the light.

In TV appearances, he vows to put immigration enforcement first. On the campaign trail, he offers a perfunctory promise to strengthen border security and emphasizes the need to restore Americans’ trust in their government’s ability to defend the homeland.

“I got the message,” he told voters in South Carolina. “We will secure the borders first.”

But how can McCain cure citizens’ distrust when his own credibility on the issue remains fatally damaged? He doesn’t believe his own election-year spin. And he knows we know it. This is cynicism on steroids with a speedball chaser.

Not all of us have forgotten how the short-fused Arizona senator cursed good-faith opponents in his own party (“F**k you!” and “Chickensh*t” were the choice words he had for Texas GOP Sen. John Cornyn during a spat over enforcement provisions).

Not all of us have forgotten that he voted against barring felons from receiving amnesty benefits under his plan. Not all of us have forgotten the underhanded, debate-sabotaging manner in which McCain/Kennedy/Lindsey Graham/Harry Reid conspired to ram their package down voters’ throats.

His admission of the shamnesty failure is grudging and bitter. While he now tells conservative voters what they want to hear about the need to build the southern border fence, he takes a contemptuous tone toward physical barriers when talking to businessmen. “By the way, I think the fence is least effective,” he told executives in Milwaukee, according to a recent Vanity Fair profile. “But I’ll build the goddamned fence if they want it.” Straight talk? Try hate talk.

For all his supposed newfound enlightenment about what most Americans want — protection against invasion, commitment to the rule of law, meaningful employer sanctions, an end to sanctuary cities, enforcement-by-attrition plus deportation reform, and an end to special illegal alien benefits that invite more law-breaking — The Maverick remains a Geraldo Rivera Republican.

Like the ethnocentric cable TV host who can’t string a sentence about immigration together without drowning in demagoguery, McCain naturally resorts to open-borders platitudes when pressed for enforcement specifics.

Instead of emphasizing the need for local and state cooperation with federal immigration authorities to prevent the release of illegal alien criminals or discussing 100 percent preventable crimes by illegal alien thugs who should never have been on American soil in the first place, McCain harps on open-borders sob stories.

Several times over the past year, in response to citizen questioners who have expressed frustration with the lack of accountability for immigration law-breakers, McCain has responded: “I am not going to call up a soldier and tell him I am deporting his mother. ... I’m not going to do it. You can do it.”

But what if that mother had stolen an American citizen’s Social Security number to work here illegally? What if she had been previously deported, re-entered illegally, and had been convicted of previous crimes? What if she were part of a human smuggling ring? What if she had been working in a sensitive area — airport security, a military base, a port? Would he still refuse to abide by his constitutional obligation to provide for the common defense and secure the blessings of liberty for law-abiding Americans?

If McCain refuses to enforce immigration law against illegal alien parents of soldiers, what about illegal alien soldiers who used stolen or fake identification to get into the military? And why only illegal alien parents of soldiers? Why not illegal alien parents of police officers, teachers, doctors and store owners? McCain’s selective enforcement policy is the exact recipe for immigration anarchy that we have today.

The hothead has succeeded in intimidating voters and eluding tough questions from the press by playing his rhetorical violin. There is a reason so many liberals in the media and the Democratic Party want John McCain to be the GOP presidential nominee. He gives them cover to continue smearing grassroots conservatives.

In Michigan, the illegal alien parent-of-a-soldier story was met with boos. McCain’s cheerleaders at The New York Times and other press outlets attempted to depict the detractors as insensitive and racist boors — just as they did during last year’s ill-fated shamnesty campaign.

McCain has learned nothing. What about us?


login to post comments | Michelle Malkin's blog

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by mandala0302 on Tue, 01/29/2008 - 1:15pm.

I think Michelle is too nice on 'ol Johhny Boy. If you want real change, he is not our man. If he gets the nomination, I will not (nor will any other true conservatives I know) vote Republican in 2008. Visit for a side-by-side comparison of the candidates.

sniffles5's picture
Submitted by sniffles5 on Mon, 01/28/2008 - 10:44am.

"F**k you!” and “Chickensh*t"? "goddamned fence"?

Didn't Sofa King get banned for using this sort of language?

Holy Double Standards, Batman!

muddle's picture
Submitted by muddle on Mon, 01/28/2008 - 11:33am.

Tough call. It seems to me that there are occasions when the language--or, at least, the language appropriately disg**sed--should be permitted. The article above includes it in the context of a quote, and the force of the author's point depended upon making it clear what was said.

I wrote something a while back that involved quoting a black comedian who said, "I was arrested once for being
a ni&&er at night!" I guess that was permitted to stand. I was reluctant to use the original word itself, but probably should have been permitted given that context. It would have been very different had I been hurling a racial slur at one of our black neighbors or the like. Then I would deserve the boot even if I bothered to disguise the word.

It should be left to the discretion of the editor and owner of the site, and we can only hope that his discretion is good.

TruthSleuth1958's picture
Submitted by TruthSleuth1958 on Mon, 01/28/2008 - 11:20am.

“I got the message,” he told voters in South Carolina. “We will secure the borders first.”

Gee John, is that growth, reaction to your constituents or flip-flopping?

better yet, who gets to decide?

Submitted by sageadvice on Mon, 01/28/2008 - 12:10pm.

I totally agree with McCain!

Say it like it is. No one on either side is going to "secure" the border. So, if you can't "secure" the border FIRST, as he says, then nothing else will happen either with those already here.
Drop this farce or get serious about it!

It will be like Iraq if you get serious and it also will fail!

Stop hiring them if you want them to go home!

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.