Dense redevelopment on PTC’s Robinson Rd. criticized

Tue, 10/09/2007 - 3:40pm
By: John Munford

A proposal to replace three homes on 14 acres with a 46-home cluster subdivision off Robinson Road in Peachtree City drew significant criticism from a number of neighbors Monday night in a workshop before the city’s planning commission.

The three tracts are located in between Spear Road and the Peachtree City United Methodist Church. They currently are zoned estate residential, and the parcels are earmarked for low density single family development on the city’s land use plan.

About 20 people stuck around until the end of the meeting when the issue was raised, and only one person spoke in favor of the project ... and it happened to be one of the landowners who plans to sell his property to the developer for the project.

Several citizens argued that moving from three homes to 46 would ruin the character of the area. Many homes on the west side of Robinson Road are zoned for minimum lot sizes of one acre. Homes on Spear Road behind the proposed development are zoned estate residential, which calls for a minimum lot size of three acres.

The density was also questioned by several planning commissioners, and Chairman Marty Mullin said he couldn’t support the density. Another issue was the lack of greenspace opportunities on the site.

The developer, William Gibson Jr. of Georgia Classic Homes, said he was looking to repeat the success of the Ashton Park subdivision in south Peachtree City, and he noted that all of the homes would be custom built. The homes would be priced at $400,000 and up and would be targeted at empty nesters, Gibson said.

The subdivision would have little to no impact on the school system, Gibson added.

The matter will be considered by the planning commission at a public hearing Oct. 22 before it will go before the City Council for a final decision.

City Planner David Rast said that with very little developable residential land left in the city, more and more developers will be coming forward with redevelopment proposals.

Gibson said it wouldn’t work financially to develop the subdivision with one-acre lots in part because it will cost $250,000 to put in a pump station for sewer service. The lots are currently served by septic tanks.

Several neighbors vowed to attend every city meeting in which the issue would be discussed in an effort to defeat Gibson’s plan.

login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
All Smiles's picture
Submitted by All Smiles on Sat, 10/13/2007 - 8:16am.

This is Bull SH*%!!!! This area of Peachtree City is one of the only areas which is zoned as estate residential within the city limits and someone wants to let that go?? Come on!! Too bad there is very little developable residential land left with in the city limits. I hope the City Council or someone steps up to the plate with some balls and tells these developers its just too bad, they are too late, its all gone. None of this redevelopment game. No means no. Just like I tell my own children!!!
Furthermore, Ashton Park has families with children who attend the schools. I know of two familes with children who reside in that neighborhood. YOUR WRONG MR GIBSON, GEORGIA CLASSIC HOMES!!!!!


Submitted by McDonoughDawg on Tue, 10/09/2007 - 3:37pm.

I'm not sure calling it "junk" is accomplishing anything here.

No need to throw darts at other subdivisions/Ptc Citizens homes to prove your point. I've ridden through Ashton Park, and those are nice houses.

This is a totally different animal, redevelopment to a much denser zoning. It's not needed in this location.

yellowjax1212's picture
Submitted by yellowjax1212 on Tue, 10/09/2007 - 1:25pm.

Redevelopment. This is a topic that has been circulating among the city power brokers for a while. In fact its was tossed out to the candidates that were running to fill the vacated council seat of Judi Ann Rutherford (Mike Harmon won that seat). While I think that some redeveolpment needs to be done in PTC, it should not be done in this area and not at this density. Why should this part of town look like Ashton Park? Whats wrong with the way it looks now? The diversity is what makes PTC so attractive. And if I want a home built on less than a third of an acre I can find those too.
If we seriously want to talk about redevelopment why not begin with offering homeowners (and landlords)in the older parts of the city, where the homes are beginning to look dated and run down, some low interest, "City Backed" construction loans or property tax credits to be used only for home and property upgrades? Now how to best arrange and oversee this program is another topic but I'm sure it could done and the benefits to the area property values would allow for better assesments and ultimately higher tax revenues for the city. You would be amazed at what a new roof, new siding, a new deck or landscaping would do for some of these properties. The time is rapidly approaching where we can not build anymore homes so it is imperative that the keep up the ones that we have.


yellowjax1212's picture
Submitted by yellowjax1212 on Tue, 10/09/2007 - 1:26pm.

Sorry for the long comment. I haven't posted for a while and had a lot to say.


cruiserman's picture
Submitted by cruiserman on Tue, 10/09/2007 - 11:40am.

other thing. Just went to the city website to check out the plan. This is not proposed for a 14 acre tract, but 11.5 acres.


Submitted by Tombo100 on Wed, 10/10/2007 - 10:44am.

While not wanting to deny a man the right to use his property as he see's fit, the zoning on these properties and those along Robinson Road that are for sale have been in place for a long time and for a good reason.

If all of a sudden zoning changes are made then there has to be a good reason to do so, not just so a couple of people can make a little more money. The zoning changes should be done to provide a positive impact for the community that has invested in the area based upon the present zoning restrictions.

Submitted by McDonoughDawg on Tue, 10/09/2007 - 9:07am.

and move on. No need to even consider a zoning change in this area.

poipendicular's picture
Submitted by poipendicular on Tue, 10/09/2007 - 8:10am.

Am I misunderstanding something? I thought we had hit capacity. Final build out and all that. 35,000 residences for the city. So if we have the maximum amount of housing, knocking down 3 houses on 14 acres to build 45 new homes? How about individual homeowners remodel their homes and bring values up that way, instead of knocking down very nice homes to build cookie cutter new ones? Build character and interest in the older homes. How much bigger does PTC need to be? There are many homes on the market in town as it is. Work on relocating solid businesses to Fayette county, so we don't have to commute to Atlanta or higher to afford our homes and lifestyle choices. Better for the kids too if mom and dad are closer to home to hopefully keep an eye on them. Yea, I'm talking about those Kedron kids.


cruiserman's picture
Submitted by cruiserman on Tue, 10/09/2007 - 7:49am.

...


Submitted by skyspy on Mon, 10/08/2007 - 10:17pm.

The water will come from where???

Replace 3 homes with 45?? Oh yeah, that is the best idea for conserving water I have heard yet.

My trees are thristy.....have to go, before your cluster home people waste water my trees need.

mudcat's picture
Submitted by mudcat on Tue, 10/09/2007 - 4:23am.

The last thing we need to do is open this particular door. This is the type of thing they call "redevelopment" when they do it to an existing subdivision by tearing down a 30 year old house on 5 acres and replace it with 5 or even 10 cluster homes. Be very careful Camp Creek Trail, Bradford Estates, Robinson Woods Estates and especially Carraige Way. It happens in other places, so don't pretend it can't happen here.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.