Ptc officals consider a bad idea

Father David Epps's picture

For the most part, I tend to stay out of local politics. This is not one of those times. I read recently that Peachtree City officials met in a workshop to look at the possibility of changing division directors and the city’s fire and police chiefs to an “at-will status.” If this is ever seriously considered, it is, in my opinion, a very, very bad idea.

Now in the interest of full disclosure, let me say that, for over 18 years, I have served as an unsalaried chaplain to the police department and as an assistant chaplain to the fire department. I also have a relative who works for the city who would be unaffected by any policy change of this nature. Further, prior to writing this article I spoke to no one in the employment of the city about this issue.

At the present time, the division directors and fire and police chiefs have the same rights and privileges as any other city employee. In a recent memo, an at-will employee was defined as an “employee-employer relationship with no definite period of employment specified which can be terminated …without cause or justification.” In other words, the chiefs and the division directors could be fired at any time for no reason at all—with no right of an appeal process, And this was thought by someone as a good idea---why?

In essence, the directors and chiefs would become political appointees subject to the changing whims of the city council, the mayor, the city manager, or whoever is determined to be able to make that decision. There are several other reasons I believe this idea, especially as it relates to the police department, should be permanently scrapped:

1) The mayor, city council members, their families, and whoever else is in power, would be above the law. If a council member is pulled over for DUI, do you think the chief, whose very livelihood is dependent on staying in his or her good graces would authorize an arrest? Of course not.

2) In the distant past, Peachtree City elected officials actually carried police radios and told police officers where to go and what to do. Amateurs should not have the ability to interfere with law enforcement.

3) The quality of directors and chiefs would go down. No chief worth his salt should submit himself to a position where, with the changing emotions of whoever happens to be elected, he could be fired for no reason at all.

4) Rather than remaining professional managers, the directors and chiefs would become politicians whose primary job would be to do whatever it takes to keep their job.

5) There would likely be a high turnover in chiefs, as is the case in little towns where the councils like to meddle with law enforcement.

6) If implemented it would look too much like a naked grab for additional political power.

7) As a pastor, I would never accept a position with a church where I could be removed simply because someone got up on the wrong side of the bed that day. In one denomination, a pastor is fired nearly every day somewhere and many of those firings are without cause. The pastor simply stepped on the wrong toes. Is this how managers would be expected to function?

8) Currently, the police department in Peachtree City can, for the most part, operate without fear or favor, enforcing the laws more or less equally, no matter who commits the offense. That would almost certainly change if an “at-will” policy were adopted.

If the directors and chiefs are not doing their jobs and there is legitimate cause, then, fine, fire them and get someone who will do the job. But if the men and women who occupy these stress-filled positions are competent and getting the work done, then they should be left alone. If something about the current system needs to be changed or adjusted then do it. But to implement a change that would fundamentally affect the way law enforcement and other services are administered is a bad idea. To their credit, city officials shot this idea down last Monday. It should stay that way. .

login to post comments | Father David Epps's blog

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Voice of Fayette Future's picture
Submitted by Voice of Fayett... on Sun, 10/07/2007 - 4:10pm.

Good opinion, David Epps....Good disclosure and compelling argument. I had to laugh at the part about preachers and congregations. How right you are.


Submitted by d.smith700 on Fri, 10/05/2007 - 6:08pm.

I spent fifty years working "at will" before I started my own business. I figured if they didn't want me, I didn't want to work there.
I tried to make sure they wanted me by working very hard, improving myself, obeying the law, and expecting no one to take care of me.
The very last place we need a union is in public, tax supported, service. Efficiency there is bad enough without having job protection.
I would also think a preacher would want to be wanted. However if you are suggesting that one person in a church can fire their pastor, then I would not want to work there either. That however can not be compared to public service. Apples and oranges.
If we have a City Manager that we know would fire someone without a good cause, then we need to fire the City Manager.
Having a Police department who can not be fired without a score of people saying so is a very bad long term problem. You never get rid of the 25% who should be let go.
That includes Chiefs!

Cyclist's picture
Submitted by Cyclist on Fri, 10/05/2007 - 7:54pm.

you must be one old goat?

"I spent fifty years working "at will" before I started my own business."

-------------------------------------------
Caution - The Surgeon General has determined that constant blogging is an addiction that can cause a sedentary life style.


Submitted by d.smith700 on Sun, 10/07/2007 - 8:32am.

I think Epps IS "one old goat." From TN, I think.
But I don't know what that has to do with "working at will."
Anyway, what has "$", whatever it is, got to do with EPPS and "at will?"
Talk about me being fuzzy!

What do you think about the Burma situation? (I like Rangoon). Should Bush and Rice go there before Iran? (I mean soldiers, not Bush and Rice).
Darfur also needs help to save millions from starving--maybe the Pentagon could do better against jungle soldiers who are 13-15!
I suppose we are letting Syria off the hook for now.
I would say China and Russia are our real enemies---most dangerous--and we are doing nothing there! It is about oil again!

Can you and Git and Skyspy and some others think about anything except guns, HS football, Tug, Denise, and of course Fayettedale!

ctkcec's picture
Submitted by ctkcec on Sun, 10/07/2007 - 4:13pm.

An "old goat?" Me? A goat maybe but surely not that old!

David Epps


Git Real's picture
Submitted by Git Real on Sun, 10/07/2007 - 4:53pm.

That was a very good and well reasoned blog. Thanks for supporting our law men against this political power grab. I'm know they appreciate it.

Ignore our friend Dollar. Speaking of an 'Old Goat' ole Dollar's got at least a hundred years on you. Get him to tell you about his adventures as a Pony Express rider some time. We actually think he was one of their first stable hands.

Great post. I'll take my Father Oops comments for now. Eye-wink

**** GIT REAL TOUGH ON CRIME ****

"That man was Griffin Judicial Circuit District Attorney Scott Ballard".

CLICK HERE FOR THE REST OF THE STORY


Cyclist's picture
Submitted by Cyclist on Sun, 10/07/2007 - 4:28pm.

Please pay no attention to our much loved $. He knows not what he speaks.
-------------------------------------------
Caution - The Surgeon General has determined that constant blogging is an addiction that can cause a sedentary life style.


Cyclist's picture
Submitted by Cyclist on Sun, 10/07/2007 - 9:58am.

Officially it’s the Union of Myanmar. As for the current situation, it’s my opinion that since the area has been fractionalized due to regional wars and invasions that goes back over a 1,000 years that more unrest will follow. The current situation will continue until it collapses and another form of government occurs. That is, unless the current government is propped up through external intervention. If that’s the case the unrest just keeps on going. The only solution that I see is one of unity among the populace and a form of government that respects that.

As for the rest of your rambling, what’s you astute observation?

-------------------------------------------
Caution - The Surgeon General has determined that constant blogging is an addiction that can cause a sedentary life style.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.