Fungus is plaguing air traffic controllers

Tue, 10/02/2007 - 3:15pm
By: Ben Nelms

Passengers and crews of commercial aircraft flying high in the skies over a large portion of the southeastern United States are kept safe by air traffic controllers at the Atlanta Air Route Traffic Control Center in Hampton. But the safety of those keeping the public safe is being compromised. A majority of those employed at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) facility in Hampton have experienced one or more symptoms and illnesses that have plagued the control room for years. Many air traffic controllers believe the cause of so much illness is a fungus called Scopulariopsis and many of the Hampton staff live in Fayette County.

Recent fungal samples taken at the facility and tested by Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. showed that the areas where the air traffic controllers work indicated the highest level of contamination. National Air Traffic Controllers Association (NATCA) local chapter President Calvin Phillips said the Scopulariopsis-laden mold was found under the elevated floor, in the duct work overhead and in the walls of the control room. Referred to as “loaded” in the analytical report that measured the mold spore count in a range from “rare” to “loaded,” the control room’s spore count for the fungus Scopulariopsis totaled 1,700 spores per cubic meter.

“The rampant growth of the mold was finally revealed. We are basically surrounded by this highly toxic fungus,” Phillips said. “For years we have been complaining of health issues and have suspected our sick building was to blame.”

FAA Southern Region External Communications Manager Kathleen Bergen said Tuesday the mold or fungus was located in the cooling system area under the elevated floor of the 40-plus year-old building and that interim measures have been taken to prohibit the growth by lowering the temperature and air flow to reduce humidity. Access to the area under the floor has also been restricted, Bergen said. FAA is finalizing a plan to obtain the services of a contractor to abate the mold, she said, noting that air sampling in September registered negative results.

“The health and safety of employees is of primary concern,” Bergen said, explaining that FAA is reaching out to the public health service to help address the mold issue and to work with employees on a case by case basis to address individual health concerns.

But why would such significant amounts of Scopulariopsis be present at the Hampton facility? The answer is easy, said Phillips. It is the moisture, and plenty of it. Rain water enters through the control room ceiling in such volume that air traffic controllers sometimes place trash cans next to their work stations to catch the water. Others have resorted to holding umbrellas over their heads and radar scopes to keep water from reaching the equipment, he said.

Bergen took an different view of the use of umbrellas to ward off rain water from a leaking roof. The issue had surfaced several months ago during Congressional testimony, she said. The use of an umbrella was a singular event, one that was isolated and amounted to a humorous attempt to make a point about concerns at the Atlanta Center. Bergen said she would inquire about the use of trash cans to catch rain water running through the control room ceiling.

In addition to concerns with the building, the physical affects on air traffic controllers, trainees and contractors is demonstrable, Phillips said.

“A majority of controllers at this facility complain of one or more symptoms like headaches, congestion and allergy problems. Many past and present suffer from upper respiratory issues,” said Phillips. “Out of 396 union members at the Atlanta Center, 120 live in Fayetteville or Peachtree City. I’m sure that would be a representative number for those employees who are not NATCA members. All of the union members are air traffic controllers who work in the control room where the very high concentrations of mold were found. The FAA has known that the roof was leaking for years and didn’t fix the problem. They put in many patches that just moved the leaks to new locations. The dampness is what caused the mold to flourish.”

Phillips said reports of headaches, coughing, congestion and allergies among Hampton staff are common. Others have had more debilitating experiences, such as one controller who had to be taken straight to a local emergency room after manifesting symptoms at work. He had to be transferred to another work facility, Phillips said. Another controller has been diagnosed with brain lesions. Still others in significant numbers report that their symptoms disappear when off work for a few days, only to reappear when the return to work.

Phillips said NACTA wants to obtain a thorough and definitive ruling of the exact circumstances of the health and safety issues that have long plagued the Hampton facility.

Scopulariopsis has been cited as causing invasive sinusitis, keratitis, endophthalmitis, endocarditis, pneumonia, brain abscess and pulmonary infections, according to environmental science consultants such as Aerotech P&K. Excessive moisture in building materials supports microbial growth, according to a study reported in the August 1998 edition of Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by tibuan on Mon, 01/05/2009 - 3:51am.

The government has its own fund for this problem. I guess this is not that big to eliminate.
New Homes Tampa

Submitted by WaitingonPayDay on Thu, 10/04/2007 - 12:52pm.

FAA can spend $70K (yes, that's right!!) for new sod outside the run down mold infested building to keep up the appearances for the public, but they can't afford to have someone come in and fix the leaking water problem that is causing the mold. Something is seriously wrong with our government.

I'm glad someone finally is willing to stand up to the FAA and fight for their rights. Most of the new controllers are not making $155K like stated earlier. They are making $30K starting out and training for years with the possibilty of making $80K. Yes, that's right, the days of making $155K is over. Still think the jobs great? Wow, I really want an over worked, underpaid controller making calls on my flight. No thanks, give them more money, fix the leaks and upgrade the building.

Generator, sounds like your jealous. Why don't you try going to training for 4 months away from home, then train for another 2-3 years and then transfer your family to other states because that's where your needed. Work 6 days a week, on position for 6 hours out of 8, overtime monthly, no weekends like real folks have Sat/Sun but off during the week so they can't spend time with their families. The list goes on and on. Still sounds like a cushion job? I dare you to try it!

Submitted by Nitpickers on Thu, 10/04/2007 - 3:14pm.

$70,000 for sod! I guess a roof would cost $500,000 on that basis just to cover the fed paperwork?
You got better hours than the 200,000 soldiers and 160,000 American civilians in Iraq! Pays a little better also than their skilled technicians!

Submitted by taters on Thu, 10/04/2007 - 10:57am.

The excuse from the FAA is typical of this agency. They are grossly underfunded and the Peachtree City facility is just one shining example of how the air traffic control system in this country is in shambles. If GWB would spend our tax dollars where they were needed, instead of on his private little war all this could be fixed. The american public has been bammboozled and shown a smoke & mirrors show to justify the terrrible waste in Iraq. I, for one, hate GWB and don't really care who gets elected, just so long as we get out of Iraq, bring out troops home, and spend our tax dollars on our problems, not the rest of the world!

Submitted by susieq on Thu, 10/04/2007 - 11:17am.

Those people earn every dime they make. Do you know the stress that goes along with their jobs?

The FAA was underfunded before GWB and before Iraq. If we don't fight in Iraq, we will have to fight somewhere else, and it could be here on USA soil.

Submitted by skyspy on Thu, 10/04/2007 - 4:04pm.

Yes it is stressful. Sounds like generator is one of the 98% that washout.

Submitted by generator on Thu, 10/04/2007 - 9:23am.

The fact is, per the article the FAA building is 40 years old and is in poor shape, as are other 40 year old building. The funding to keep up with the normal needs of a 40+ year old complex may have been consumed by the $155,000.00 plus salaries of folks that only work 4 hours day. Surely the FAA must be doing everything possible to keep up the issues and protect their employees. Must be the FAA is doing something right as fatal commercial aircraft accidents have dropped by 65% over the past 10 years as reported today on CNN. It is a shame that the Union appears to take every opportunity to find political gain from difficult situations that they offer no real solutions for, and at times contribute to. As previously reported the recent contract with FAA/NATCA brings the salaries, work rules, compliance, and work ethic back to what is reasonable and acceptable in the real aviation business world. Now maybe the FAA can afford to pay for needed repairs of their buildings, one would hope so without raising our taxes or airline ticket fees. Lastly, wished Fayette Citizen would be more balanced in the coverage of such situations. Guess that would sell not newspapers.

Submitted by mdofatc on Thu, 10/04/2007 - 10:24am.

The comments made by the generator are sad and factualy wrong. I suppose because we make a good living we deserve to be poisoned. The same point of view was also many times the reason women got raped, they shouldnt dress that way. That was back before educated people straightened ignorant idiots like the generator out. As I said before, I believe it is reasonable for anyone regardless of how much money they make to be able to go to work and not be exposed to a highly fatal toxin. We usually work close to 6 hours a day "on position" (actually working airplanes). We get breaks depending on our staffing and the volume of traffic for that day. The fact is that Congress has allocated, each of the last three years, millions of dollars more than requested by the FAA for building upkeep and maintanece only to be unused. I really dont understand the irrational dislike many feel for people in my profession. Lastly if you think anyone other than the controllers, that obviously you have contempt for, are responsible for the 65% reduction in aircraft accidents you are delusional. Have a nice flight.

Submitted by WaitingonPayDay on Wed, 10/03/2007 - 12:39pm.

I've visited the center and I can tell you that I was shocked! The building stinks like crazy, it's old-very old and smells like it. Thinking back, it was most likely the mold! It's like walking back in time to the 50's with low ceilings, cement block walls and beat up school lockers for the controllers to keep their stuff in. The cafeteria, no way I would eat there. Yes, they make a lot of money but what does that have to do with how the government provides a safe environment for them to work in? How would you like to go to work everyday and come home sick? I'm sure you wouldn't. To the person that said they make a lot of money, sounds like your jealous. Why don't you go work there for a few months and see how you like being sick everyday. Guess your not REALLY concerned about your air safety when flying.

Submitted by skyspy on Tue, 10/02/2007 - 5:45pm.

"The health and safety of employees is of primary concern"?????

Submitted by Flydecajon on Wed, 10/03/2007 - 5:45am.

Sounds like something else these guys need to complain about....They have great jobs good benifits, is there proof of this so called fungus?

Submitted by mdofatc on Wed, 10/03/2007 - 6:24pm.

It sounds to me like flydecajon must be a disgruntled FAA desk jockey. The FAA provided the report indicating the high levels of mold. The mold is in the building regardless if it rains or not. This specific fungus requires lots of moisture to thrive and is very uncommon indoors because of the need for a damp enviornment, so when it rains it basically is like pouring gas on a fire. The controllers and NATCA have been pushing for years to get an answer for the extrordinary high number of sick employees with many of the same symptoms. Some people may call it complaining, but I think it is reasonable to expect to go to work and be free from "highly fatal" toxins.

Submitted by NumbersRGr8 on Wed, 10/03/2007 - 7:25am.

Did you even read this article?

Submitted by Flydecajon on Wed, 10/03/2007 - 9:25am.

Said due to rain , WOW WE HAVE HAD A LOT OF THAT LATLEY CHIEF!!

SLUF's picture
Submitted by SLUF on Wed, 10/03/2007 - 10:52am.

It's raining right now, Hoss. If you're a pilot you shouldn't want your controllers to be under the weather when you're out there getting vectored around.

quit whining


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.