The White and Black Trees

What makes a tree "white" or "black?" It seems that Mississippi schools have such trees.
However they are not the only places who have such places. It isn't always a tree that makes the separation---sometimes it is a neighborhood, or a bar, or an emergency room.
I have come to the conclusion that who can sit under the tree has to do with whether you have been invited or not! Jaylo went to black trees for a drink but she isn't normally thought of as a black tree sitter-underwear!
However she was invited until someone got shot at anyway.
What does one have to do to "get invited?"
Well, maybe one has to make friends with the black or white tree sitters and then you will be invited. Could that be it?
If you don't want to be friends with the other color trees, then one can't expect to be invited to sit!
Now me, I am Polynesian-Hawaiian-White Moroccan. I have no tree, and if I want to sit under one I have to make friends because I can't find many of my heritage.

Nitpickers's blog | login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by tiredofit on Sun, 09/30/2007 - 6:46pm.

I am, how do they say it?, "from that neck of the woods." I am really tired of this Jena 6 fiasco. The fact of the matter is that in that area, people keep to their own kind. Not because they are prejudice, but because they are devoted to their own families and friends. Social culture has alot to do with it as well. White people sat under the "white" tree because that's where their brothers, fathers, mothers, aunts, and uncles sat. There is no doubt in my mind that not one of those kids sat under that tree because no black people were allowed, they did so because that's where they all sat for years. I'm sure not one of them even asked themselves, "hum..why do we all sit under this tree?". They did it because that's the way it has always been done. I would really like to know if the kids who hung the nooses from the tree, were actually ones who sat under the tree, or just 3 dorks looking to be thought of as cool. At any rate those students were dealt with accordingly. It was a far cry from hanging nooses in a tree to beating the crap out of someone. I know how things are in that area, and i'd find it hard to believe that the kid who got beat was actually running his mouth at the time he got his beating. One white boy, on the steps with more than 6 black guys running his mouth? Hum...nope, you can't make me believe that. Let's just say that CNN, OMG...I can't believe i'm saying this, but let's just say that CNN reports were correct, and the tree was meant for "white people only." What's so bad about that. Aren't we all allowed a place of our own? For some reason blacks are free to have the NAACP, American Negro College Fund, Black Colleges, BET, and oh yeah lets not forget the black movie channel that plays movies that have predominately black characters. Can white people have anything of their own? They are not even allowed a tree. If we started a college for white people only, a college fund for white people only, or a white people only music channel we would suffer a wrath equal to if not greater than Jena did. If the situation was reversed, and 6 white boys beat up 1 black kid, and got off with minor sentences (that's what Jackson and Sharpton want for the Jena 6) all hell would have broken loose. White people don't have a Jesse Jackson, or an Al Sharpton. Heck CNN wouldn't have even taken the time to send anyone out to cover that. One of the mothers of the accused said, "attempted murder for a school fight? I can't believe this is happening?" A school fight???? 6 boys beat the hell out of one boy putting him in the hospital. The kid was bleeding from his ears from repeated blows to the head, and this woman wants us to believe it was just a school fight? The principal was white yet no one has given him credit for what he tried to do. He is the one that told the black kids they can sit anywhere they want. He's the one that expelled the noose hangers to start off with. Of course since he's white, we can't hear about that. We can only hear about the negative anti black messages that are floating around Jena, and now all over the world. Not all white people are prejudice in Podunk, Louisiana. Look at me, I'm white and I'm having trouble spelling noose. One thing I do know, there is a definite division between the races, but it's not because of what one race is doing to the other, it's because of what race is doing to themselves. That's not just in Louisiana either. If you watched the CNN report you would have noticed the difference in the housing and neighborhoods that the whites/verses the blacks lived in. The blacks were all sitting outside of the house, with broken down cars in the yard sitting on old dinning room chairs wearing beaters, while the white people are shown well dressed in restaurants, standing on street corners walking their dogs, and so on. Even the way they spoke was different. They are taught by the same English teachers yet I was sitting there listening to the black people talk on the television and could barely understand what they were saying. Why is it? Because that's the way it has always been, that's why. Because black people in that area seem to be content with sitting outside the house, with broken down cars in the driveway, wearing beaters and talking a language that no one but them can understand. They do it because their brothers, fathers, mothers, sisters, aunts, and uncles always did. I bet they never asked themselves why. They just do it, because it's always been done. Kind of like the "white tree" incident. Of course when they finally decide they want more than what they have, instead of creating it, or earning it, they just as soon take it from someone else. That's what happened with the tree. They decided that their place to stand wasn't good enough, they wanted to take someone else's place to stand. That right there, is the difference between the races.

Submitted by skyspy on Mon, 10/01/2007 - 7:09am.

I think I hear what you are saying.

In this time in our history, we should not have anything that exclusively panders to one race.

The exclusive tree thing is a weird idea. The links from several interviews and news stories suggest that this was not a white tree at all. It was a tree used by everyone. This whole idea of "white" tree was a story cooked up by famous jobless al and jessie.

That being said we should not have a tree set aside for any race.

We should not in my opinion have any college, scholarship fund, churches, beauty contest, movie channels, etc. dedicated to only one race.

When we have all of these special groups it looks as though blacks are saying in America do as I say, not as I do. They want to have their cake and eat it too.

The fact that so many people from that town both black and white say the tree was for everyone to sit under, discredits the false cry of racism.

I have seen some of this in my own workplace. A few years ago 3 different black employees claimed that they had recieved letters laced with vicious racial slurs. Through handwriting analysis, and security cameras,and finger prints it was proven that these indidviduals wrote and placed the letters to themselves. All 3 were probabtionary employees who were not doing well or performing up to standard.

How many more years will this continue? How many more years will blacks continue to segregate themselves via black only colleges, churches, contests etc?.

I have to ask this question: What would happen if we established a whites only college??? What if whites followed the black lead and created their own college and or university?

Submitted by tiredofit on Mon, 10/01/2007 - 8:02am.

Finally, someone who understands. Thanks for stating it so much better than I ever could.

Submitted by Nitpickers on Mon, 10/01/2007 - 6:38am.

I have little to say about that since you did a pretty good job of making an ass of yourself.
I would only ask you to elaborate about how many "kinds" do you estimate that there are?

AF A-10's picture
Submitted by AF A-10 on Sun, 09/30/2007 - 7:41pm.

I read your entire post while, somehow, holding down my dinner. I have no doubt whatsoever that you are actually very familiar with that neck of the woods. I'll just sample one of your very memorable comments:

"Let's just say that CNN, OMG...I can't believe i'm saying this, but let's just say that CNN reports were correct, and the tree was meant for "white people only." What's so bad about that. Aren't we all allowed a place of our own?"

Short answer Mr. old south: No. On a public school campus, you are most certainly not allowed all black or all white trees. This is because we are a nation of free people Mr. tired, and when you try to restrict the movements of people due to skin color, sex, or religion, you strip away the freedoms that people like myself, Hutch, Mixer, Maximus, Gump, Armymajretired, and many others have fought for. You have much growing to do. And the fact that a white tree somehow seems reasonable to you does not give me very much hope. White trees are wrong. Beating people for reasons other than self defense or defense of others is wrong. And good old fashioned segregationist thinking is wrong .... and sad.

Kevin "Hack" King


Submitted by thebeaver on Mon, 10/01/2007 - 11:41am.

Hack,

You wrote "You have much growing to do. And the fact that a white tree somehow seems reasonable to you does not give me very much hope. White trees are wrong. Beating people for reasons other than self defense or defense of others is wrong. And good old fashioned segregationist thinking is wrong .... and sad."

I agree with everything in your comment. Wouldn't you also agree, then, that BET, the Black Caucus, Miss Black America, etc, etc, etc are wrong because the are exclusive?

----------------------------------------------
“...the term “democrat” originated as an epithet and referred to ‘one who panders to the crude and mindless whims of the masses.’”

AF A-10's picture
Submitted by AF A-10 on Mon, 10/01/2007 - 5:26pm.

But realize the Miss Black America and NAACP organizations are a once bitten twice shy type of reaction. Blacks have not been playing Agusta or Sugar loaf very long. Republican candidates still are reluctant to attend debates held at traditionally black universities. Alot of blacks are slow to trust that all Americans are colorblind. But I do long for a country where color factions don't exist. But imagine if the DNC and the RNC melded. Would that make sense? Do we turn women loose on Augusta now, as divisions using race and gender seem quaint and unfair? I don't know how we'll make that leap. But we can start with reasonable discussions, like this one!

Cheers,

Kevin "Hack" King


Submitted by thebeaver on Mon, 10/01/2007 - 7:34pm.

The question was, is it wrong to have separatist groups like the Black Caucus, Miss Black America, etc. etc., not if we need to move toward "normalization". You can't fight racism with more racism.

Well Hack, Right or Wrong? It should be easy. Pick one.

-----------------------------
“...the term “democrat” originated as an epithet and referred to ‘one who panders to the crude and mindless whims of the masses.’”

Denise Conner's picture
Submitted by Denise Conner on Tue, 10/09/2007 - 3:03am.

What about it? "Is it wrong to have separatist groups like the Black Caucus, Miss Black America, etc. etc."?

What about "‘black bleachers’ where honkies dare not tread”?

"Any modern movement needs to be focused inward, on what blacks are doing to themselves or what we're failing to pragmatically respond to.

"If you want to stick it to the man, let's police our own neighborhoods. Let's snitch. A lot. Let's make our schools so good they're suing us to get in. Let's take care of ourselves . . . . Any one of these will do more for us than a thousand Jenas."

"The Jena 6: Right Problem, Wrong Protest" by Debra Dickerson -- Blog post at Mother Jones (objectionable language)

__________________________________

Excerpt from Debra Dickerson's An American Story

"It was clear to me that black people chose not to work very hard in the military. Why else would so few number among the linguists, the commandos, the pilots, the officers, the academy grads?"

"I was embarrassed to be one of so few linguists and I was embarrassed by the sharecropper intonations and low-class lack of home training."

"There was an assumption of familiarity that made me uncomfortable. I was sure they'd want to 'talk black,' make fun of whites, scoff at the Air Force. Then there were the liberties black males felt free to take with me. Sotto voce, they called me 'baby' and wanted to know when they were going to get 'some of that sugar.' When I refused to respond to their vulgarities, I was menacingly called 'sister,' a word often used to extract behavioral concessions from someone you hope will be too afraid of group disapproval not to back down. It means: 'Don't forget you're black; act right or I'll call you a Tom.' I got called 'Tom' a lot."

"The 'Head Negroes' (self-designated arbiters of all things sufficiently or insufficiently black) tried every form of negative reinforcement to make us behave. There's a Head Negro anywhere there are African-Americans."

__________________________________

In The End of Blackness: Returning the Souls of Black Folk to Their Rightful Owners, Debra Dickerson "challenges black Americans to stop obsessing about racism and start focusing on problems they can fix. The way out of the ghetto, she asserts, is to take a good, hard look in the mirror. Get angry, Dickerson says, but use that anger to fuel excellence and civic participation rather than crime or drug addiction . . . . She urges blacks to let go of the past and claim their full freedom. It’s only by shaping their own future, she argues, that blacks will finally abolish the myth of white superiority."


Paul Perkins's picture
Submitted by Paul Perkins on Mon, 10/01/2007 - 4:29pm.

we're free to attend but not to participate?


Submitted by tiredofit on Sun, 09/30/2007 - 11:18pm.

ah ha, the old "F" word. Freedom also belongs to the people who are saying things you don't want to hear. If I thought you were the kind of person that would listen to reason, I'd elaborate.
Really? You fought for freedom?? Uh, cuz I see you are in the Air Force. Oh yeah, you were support for the fight of freedom, I guess that counts.

hutch866's picture
Submitted by hutch866 on Mon, 10/01/2007 - 10:25am.

In one post you both attack and defend the same principle,{one race having something all to themselves, seems a little confusing to me, which side are you for? If you were a regular on this site and not just a person with a whole day under your belt, and maybe had read more of Hack's posts you would know that he is a fair person. If you make a legitimate point he'll concede to it. Before you denigrate someone's service let's hear about yours, are you a vet? Have you fought for freedom? What constitutes fighting, what makes one branch of the sevice better then another? Lets hear more of your wonderfull ideas before we change your name from tiredofit to fullofit.

I yam what I yam...Popeye


AF A-10's picture
Submitted by AF A-10 on Mon, 10/01/2007 - 5:18pm.

I was having an internal debate on whether to even justify such a hollow critique of my military service with a response. A person who is not even worthy to judge the kiwi on my boots has to have alot of nerve to even "go there." But Hutch and Tug, you've given him an example of what having someone's back means. We don't ask if a slighted person is republican, democrat, lib or conservative. When someone says something soooo stupid, we all roll in to give a spot correction. Hutch, this isn't the first time you've checked someone into the boards. I wish we could have served together... honestly!

Kevin "Hack" King


hutch866's picture
Submitted by hutch866 on Mon, 10/01/2007 - 6:01pm.

I might not defend your politics but I'll always defend your service.

I yam what I yam...Popeye


Tug13's picture
Submitted by Tug13 on Mon, 10/01/2007 - 10:48am.

I don't always agree with Hack, but I don't always agree with anyone else either. Smiling

Hack is a fair person, a good man with a good heart, I have a lot of respect for him.

I think fullofit fits. Smiling


hutch866's picture
Submitted by hutch866 on Mon, 10/01/2007 - 11:33am.

Thanks Tug, Hack's a more forgiving person then I am, or ever will be.
I expect to see you at the next home game, we only have two more this year. You have to see this half-time show, it's great and Tommy Webb has this team cooking this year. For $7.00 you won't find better entertainment or more excitement.

I yam what I yam...Popeye


Submitted by d.smith700 on Sun, 09/30/2007 - 5:09am.

What is a "your not?"
I know what a knot is, but not a not!
Could it be my knot?

Paul Perkins's picture
Submitted by Paul Perkins on Mon, 10/01/2007 - 4:34pm.

Some folks have no sense, but 100 cents sure make a dollar.

Welcome back,Kotter--I mean dollar.


Submitted by Concerned Citizen on Sat, 09/29/2007 - 3:04pm.

This is obviously a blog written by our friend dollaraday. I thought he was gone.

Submitted by Nitpickers on Sat, 09/29/2007 - 6:12pm.

What does dollaraday mean?

Submitted by wrkhrd4it on Sat, 09/29/2007 - 4:38pm.

Nitpicker is Dollar! Maybe I just " smoked him out". No one writes quite like 'da Dollar! The constant negativity is also his trademark. Now for positive confirmation, we'll just have to sit back and wait for him to start blog threads and then answer his own questions.

Git Real's picture
Submitted by Git Real on Sat, 09/29/2007 - 5:04pm.

Doesn't Cal have a rule about bloggers having multiple monikers on here? I remember this guy named Get Real and his side kick the Agressive Progressive. Remember when Cal made an example of that scofflaw?

I've got a feeling ole Dollar's gonna outwit ole Cal on this one. Eye-wink

**** GIT REAL TOUGH ON CRIME ****

"That man was Griffin Judicial Circuit District Attorney Scott Ballard".

CLICK HERE FOR THE REST OF THE STORY


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.