As of Thursday 74% say NO to the land swap motivated by the Hooter's threat. Representing the people would seem to require a no vote by council, Is that too simple?

Back to my old picture, so I can say "I don't have a dog in this fight" with real feelings.

His letter to the editor was pathetic. We don't have any choice ... cry-cry ... dump the big box ordinance ... tremble-tremble ... the developer man who beat us with a club is really a nice guy.

I can usually hold my temper on these posts, but Lyden belongs at Disney World.

By gosh they had better not sell the idiot Kohls developer our taxpayer owned property.

How many times do the residents of Peachtree City have to show up at meetings, write letters etc. to remind the City Council that we don't want big boxes? In addition to a moratorium on big box construction, maybe we need to add a law banning exceptions to that law? Sort of a legal "No, and we mean it!" ??

i'm really upset at the fact that this is probably going to happen because we all know how peachtree city is. how the hell are we going to "preserve" our city when we're constantly building it up. next thing you know it'll turn into fayetteville given a few years. The problem is IT IS NOT NECESSARY FOR A KOHLS!!! Especially not in that location and especially not in proximity of LINE CREEK, a massive nature area that apparently no one cares about. I'm 21, just moved back to peachtree city from Atlanta and already I find myself wondering if it's going to be the city I grew up in and have come to love. =\

Weren't they blackmailed into liking it?

"I'm NOT John Munford"

"I don't give a rats buttocks because PTC is not the only city in Fayette county".

"The memories of a man in his old age, are the deeds of a man in his prime.You shuffle in the gloom of the sick room,and talk to yourself as you die."
(R. Waters)

Hopefully the chatty style of the poll questions will be ignored by the Planning Commission and City Council.

The neighbors liking something is not the reason to vote yes on this question. The reason to vote yes is that it is a good plan and it conforms with all the restrictions in place.

Or you should vote no - but not because you are afraid of setting a precedent. Vote no if it is a bad plan and it does not conform to the existing standards.

Pretty simple. Whoever it is that writes these questions is trying to be cute and may or may not have an agenda, but in the future, maybe you could play it straight without trying to influence the answer by the wording of the question.

By the way, I voted no because it is a bad plan - and that should set the only precendent we care about - all bad plans get voted down.