County eyes redrawing voting districts; must get federal OK

Tue, 08/14/2007 - 4:50pm
By: John Thompson

The Fayette County Commission could soon be asking the U.S. Department of Justice to review new voting districts that would equal out population in the districts.

The issue came up at the county retreat Aug. 8 at Callaway Gardens and was spurred by the inequality of the size of the districts.

Executive Assistant Carol Chandler said the first district, represented by Robert Horgan, has 21,491 voters, while Commissioner Herb Frady’s district has 27,655 voters and Peter Pfeifer’s third district has 14,538 voters.

The county submitted new districts to the state’s reapportionment department, but received a new set of maps from the department.

“The state has to go on population from the last Census, which was 91,000,” she said.

The new districts contain populations of 31,115 in the first district, 29,799 in the second and 30,000 in the third.

Commissioner Peter Pfeifer wondered if sending these maps to the Justice Department might end up costing the county dearly.

“I just wonder if they’re going to say we have to have district voting,” he said.

But Commission Chairman Jack Smith said it was better to be proactive in dealing with the problem.

“We’re much better off acknowledging the situation than having a solution forced upon us,” he said.

The county commissioners poised Thursday night to send the maps to the state for approval, but Pfeifer objected.

“We talked about having things on our agenda and this was not. We need to have some public input,” he said.

Commissioner Eric Maxwell said Pfeifer had plenty of time to study the issue, but said the issue should be continued until the County Commission’s special called meeting Aug. 20 at 8:30 p.m.

“This is something that could possibly be challenged, so I’ll go along with tabling the issue until then,” he said.

login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by tonto707 on Tue, 08/14/2007 - 7:14pm.

they exist now are obviously disparate. I agree with Jack Smith that it makes more sense to correct it from inside than have the feds force district lines that would disenfranchise any voter.

Our system has been upheld by the courts in several cases (not Fayette County per se) and I see no threat that the JD would reverse themselves just because it's Fayette County.

Submitted by McDonoughDawg on Tue, 08/14/2007 - 6:46pm.

Fayette is unique in many ways, one of them is having County Wide elected Commissioners. Why mirror the other Counties and look to change to districts?

I'm with Peter, let sleeping dogs lie.

Submitted by Dalmation195 on Wed, 08/15/2007 - 7:31am.

McD Dawg,

Please inform yourself about the structure before you make some comment like that. The County Commission has three seperate districts that are represented by three different commissioners. Although they each are elected by the entire population of the county, they still represent their respective districts. They must live in that district in order to run for that specific seat.

The question is whether Fayette County goes to a system by which the Commissioner elected by a particular district is elected by only voter within that district, or are they elected by the population (voting) countywide.

We have resisted the district system for years. Please understand that Peter Pfiefer is only trying to be difficult since he is a lone island on the board. He is still a mouthpiece for Dunn and Wells. He has no independent thoughts of his own!

Let's get ahead of this in a proactive manner and make decisions before some Federal Judge makes them for us.

I realize that you understand the system, but let's have parity in the districts now rather than being forced to later.

Submitted by too bad on Tue, 08/14/2007 - 6:17pm.

mirror the ...School districts...ho ho ho...

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.