Some minor thoughts on some major local issues

Cal Beverly's picture

Having chicken pox revisit one a half century later — albeit under the innocuous name of shingles — provides one some involuntary leisure time.

So, having taken a few days off from the daily fray, I offer some opinions about some local issues of more or less importance to everyday folks in Fayette, the ones who don’t attend every meeting of every governing body in the county. (Yes, other than reporters and a few who get paid to attend, there really are a few who warrant having their own personalized stacking chairs at local assemblies.)

Requiem for an attorney: Let’s deal with the least important first — the sacking of long-time County Attorney Bill McNally.

Adjacent to this column you’ll find a remarkable letter signed by a half-dozen former county commission chairmen — some from as far back as the mid-1980s — criticizing the current county commission for voting 4-1 to hire an in-house attorney to handle routine legal matters.

I must tell you I think that is an amazing blast of hot air. I have been telling whichever county commission candidates who would give me a moment of their pre-election time that their first act should be to bid McNally and Co. a final farewell. Obviously, they all thought otherwise after election.

He truly became the sixth — though unelected — commissioner. He has had the back-room ears of commissioners since the very early 1980s, from the first surge on Lake McIntosh (which fizzled) through the very latest county water department revenue bond issued.

I point out the uncontested fact that every lake and dam project in Fayette County over the last quarter-century, just about every county public building project, every last inch of water line extensions, every single water bond issuance, has involved McNally’s law firm and — on construction projects — a single engineering firm.

That’s Lake Kedron, Lake Horton and the reincarnated Lake McIntosh. And the new Taj Mahal Justice Center.

No competing bids were ever taken for those legal services. Not one. Not ever. If there was ever an unelected official who needed term limits, it was he.

I want to take pains to point out that I am neither implying nor insinuating that any hanky-panky ever took place. But that was a sweet ride on the taxpayers for a very long time. It is decades past time for a change to a more accountable system.

Annexing times: Peachtree City takes a big gulp and a future tax deficit in West Village, while Fayetteville nibbles its way southwest toward PTC.

Bad idea for PTC, I think, but it’s time to give that new village some Scottish-sounding moniker and then to begin to tabulate how much that economy version of the original West Village is going to cost us city taxpayers across future generations.

Hint: Whatever the West Village is named, it will never pay its own way in tax revenue and will be a continuing drain on city services. That’s what all residential development — sans commercial and industrial — does all the time, but all in positions of power are shy about revealing that little detail.

Fayetteville, on the other hand, has annexed so much territory in recent years that its most recent land grab makes some sense. Medical offices near the county’s major medical facility need sewer, and Fayetteville loves to say, “Come on in!” and hook up.

TDK impasse, or is it? Do you get the feeling that the players are moving across the development stage to their preassigned places, reciting their predetermined speeches and trying not to wink at one another about the carefully considered conclusion that is unknown only to the audience — that is, the taxpayers of Peachtree City?

Big PTC bond for big ballfields and big senior center: Good grief!

When will the adults step in and patiently define the differences between luxuries and necessities? At least we get to vote on these ludicrous luxuries. The only question is how many adults actually vote in Peachtree City?

PTC build-out is upon us? Don’t you believe it for a second!

There’s more coming and you aren’t expecting from which direction.

login to post comments | Cal Beverly's blog

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by Doug on Thu, 07/19/2007 - 8:27am.

Cal Beverly makes it sound like TDK is going happen. What's the deal? I thought Logsdon said "never" when it came to four-lanes.

Submitted by McDonoughDawg on Thu, 07/19/2007 - 8:48am.

It's hot air. He went off a while back about how this Council would approve anything related to a big box, how TDK was a done deal. So far, he's been DEAD wrong on both counts.

Remember, controversy sells.

Submitted by johenry on Fri, 07/20/2007 - 8:56am.

Just because TDK hasn't been built and there haven't been any big box stores doesn't mean Harold Logsdon hasn't been trying. That's for darn sure!

Submitted by McDonoughDawg on Fri, 07/20/2007 - 9:23am.

Just because it isn't, doesn't mean it is. I can't compete with that one.

Submitted by dollaradayandfound on Thu, 07/19/2007 - 10:23am.

If you really think we have seen the last of the big boxes, and I don't think you do, then you would simply be foolish!
As to TDK, it IS a done deal. It is just a matter of a gimmick to get it done and exactly when. Of course, it will ruin the PTC traffic when it occurs, but who cares?
New council and Mayor might delay it a few years. Coweta will go ahead and put in a two-lane and then we will get to do the four-lane---a must then!
Not everyone is a fool around here.

Submitted by McDonoughDawg on Thu, 07/19/2007 - 11:23am.

It does need to be delayed. It has been delayed so far. I think making Coweta address traffic problems on their side is a good first step. Eventually, it probably will have to be built, I could see 54 coming from Coweta being a total nightmare without it.

As far as big boxes, I realize they aren't through, but hopefully, the Council can help guide them to better places than right across the street from Nice Residential areas. Even the corner of Crosstown/TDK/74 is better than Holly Grove/74. I feel this way even though it is much closer to my house. Just better access there. I don't see how the lawsuit will fail, with all the commercial that has been allowed through the years in the "industrial" areas. It certainly didn't start with this Council. It's been going on for a long time.

Spear Road Guy's picture
Submitted by Spear Road Guy on Thu, 07/19/2007 - 9:07pm.

McDonoughDawg's wishy-washiness is showing. Which way is the wind blowing big guy?

Dawg rags on Cal Beverly because, in Dawg's opinion, Cal said the "Council would approve anything related to a big box" and inferred "TDK was a done deal." But when Dollaradayandfound calls Dawg to the carpet, he starts back peddling (above).

Exactly what is a "Nice Residential area" opposed to an un-nice residential area. This is starting to sound like class warfare. Some people don't deserve to be bothered with big boxes, but it's ok to dump on others.

As far as the commercial in the industrial area, don't we still have a big box ordinance on the books? Why does everyone, including the city council, overlook this? That fact it's retail is immaterial.

Vote Republican


Submitted by McDonoughDawg on Fri, 07/20/2007 - 9:17am.

I spoke of the lawsuit that I assume is still pending for the property at the Crosstown/74 interchange. Exactly where is the residential near this interchange? Especially when compared to the proximity of it near the Holly Grove/74 Interchange? For years we've had Councils ignore the "industrial" zoning in the Dividend area, and it's going to come back and bite us big time. What do you call all the shops just off of Kelly Drive? I say we lose this lawsuit based on the last 30 years.

I still don't think TDK is dead, I've never said it was. It wouldn't even been dreamed up by this point if our own City hadn't been pushing it for 30 years. It's not just this Council's idea.

You guys need to get over thinking that everyone is out to get you. I just don't think they are. People approach the City all the time with proposals, they must be looked at. They don't have to be recommended or approved. I must have missed all the big boxes this council has approved so far. Fill me in, all you PTC Gurus, as to where they are? It was started with K-Mart years ago, so blaming this Council for not approving any is kind of hollow. Are you guys disappointed?

Exactly what in my original comments on this thread isn't true? This should be interesting. You guys seem to run and hide when posed with direct questions.

Submitted by lawaboveall on Tue, 07/17/2007 - 6:45pm.

Minor indeed!

Cal, what does it tell you when every county commissioner elected for the last 25 years thinks that McNally has, in the main, done a good job. Are you saying that your opinion and those of the current commission (Frady, Maxwell and thier lapdog, Horgan) carries more weight? Did occur to you that your opinion then and now, may not matter?

Submitted by dollaradayandfound on Thu, 07/19/2007 - 6:37am.

I don't know whether better job could have been done for the last umpteen years or not.
What I'm hearing is just how much tax money has this man gathered in all those years? Has he bought and sold property while being a semi-commissioner?
Just answer those questions and all will either be well, or bad

mudcat's picture
Submitted by mudcat on Thu, 07/19/2007 - 5:52am.

Cal's opinion does not matter, but that does not ever cross his mind. He has the bully pulpit of a minor league newspaper and a fair to middlin' web organ and he loves every minute of it.

He's wrong on McNally and very wrong on annexation. Why he thinks politicians are going to make decisions based upon economics is beyond me. Sure it costs $7,000 per kid per year in public school and the most expensive house around here may have a $5,000 tax bill - and only 60% of that goes to the school board, but using that logic we shouldn't allow any houses to be built - just commercial because they pay more than they consume. Now how's that going to work - commercial without houses?

So, do you like my new picture? meow


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.