Search the ArchivesNavigation Contact InformationThe Citizen Newspapers For Advertising Information Email us your news! For technical difficulties |
Why Liberals Hate Ann Coulter Liberals believe that they are intellectually superior to conservatives. When they cannot substantiate this irrational explanation for the conservative thought process, they attack the individual as cruel, short sighted, or racist. If anyone blogging here who is personally attacking Ms. Coulter can match Ann's resume' I will welcome your criticism: A brief history of Ann Coulter on Wikipedia As an undergraduate at Cornell, Coulter helped found The Cornell Review,[7] and was a member of the Delta Gamma national women's fraternity.[8] She graduated cum laude from Cornell in 1984, and received her law degree from the University of Michigan Law School, where she achieved membership in the Order of the Coif and was an editor of the Michigan Law Review.[9] At Michigan, Coulter founded a local chapter of the Federalist Society and was trained at the National Journalism Center.[10][11] After law school, Coulter served as a law clerk for Pasco Bowman II of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in Kansas City.[12] After a short time working in New York City in private practice, where she specialized in corporate law, Coulter left to work for the United States Senate Judiciary Committee after the Republican Party took control of Congress in 1994. She handled crime and immigration issues for Senator Spencer Abraham of Michigan, and helped craft legislation that made it easier to deport aliens convicted of felonies.[13] She later became a litigator with the Center For Individual Rights. Coulter is the author of five books. All have appeared on The New York Times Best Seller list. Now, tell us all about your resume and background if you think she's so shallow, ignorant and misguided. Establish yourself as being on her intellectual footing before you discount her as irrational and ignorant. This 'Gumpian' logic permeates every one of the liberal's hypocritical and overly simplistic passive aggressive attacks that I read regarding Coulter. Simply stated, Liberals want problems solved and people helped, by a group or an organization at the taxpayers expense. Conservatives want people to solve their own problems but are willing to help personally. The best analogy I have seen is this one: If you give a man a fish, you feed him for a day. (Liberal philosophy.) If you teach a man to fish, you feed him for a lifetime. (Conservative philosophy.) Ann Coulter scares liberals because she has the courage and intellectual integrity to say what needs to be said without fear of the usual liberal criticisms, personal attacks or the race baiting(like we read about in blogs here)accusations that are the mainstay of the liberal tool chest. Ironically, Ted "the swimmer" Kennedy, "champion of women's rights" and Hillary Clinton, the co-defendant, err, the co-dependent philandering facilitator ("I am not some little stand by your man woman") are what liberals hold up as 'how American women should be represented' while they simultaneously attack Ann Coulter (Michelle Malkin, et al.). As usual, anyone not in lock-step with the liberal ideals (Joe Lieberman for example) are criticized and ostracized. Of course, blacks are not immune from this same persecution. Star Parker, Jesse Peterson, Niger Innis, and Alveda King, Larry Elder, Herman Cain, Micheal Steele, Armstrong Williams and Clarance Thomas are but a few who have suffered the wrath of liberal hatred for daring to think for themselves. Conclusion: As usual, the hypocrisy and personal attacks of the left are the results of FEAR and the inability to rationalize an intellecually superior argument. Mixer's blog | login to post comments
|
Copyright 2010 - Fayette Publishing, Inc. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use Policy
Server 4
