PTC mayors’ past not inspiring story

Wed, 12/07/2005 - 9:24am
By: Letters to the ...

The giant full-page ad from the past mayors of Peachtree City was shameful. Imagine that bunch of losers accusing anyone of lacking integrity or responsibility. Most people don’t know what went on in the old days.

I spent most of my youth in Fayette County and later in Peachtree City. After four years of college, getting married and having our first child, I returned home.

Even while I was away, my holiday discussions with family always centered around what was going on in Peachtree City. It’s hard to believe now but there was a time when traffic signals did not exist and restaurants were almost nonexistent.

Steve Brown was a breath of fresh air for me when he took office. For once, the old controlling interests couldn’t push the city around with its little finger. Government cared about people for a change. I fumed when the past mayors flexed their egos in the newspaper fighting to get their old system back.

Joel Cowan started the whole thing by being the mayor-developer. Cowan’s vision (or lack of it) was to plaster the city with somewhere around 90,000 residents and concrete extending from end-to-end.

To this day, he keeps selling property in the area and raking in the cash. Cowan shamelessly takes credit today for many of the good things in the city that came long after he was mayor.

Herb Frady and Ralph Jones controlled the city during the almost visionless years with nothing happening. Unless you liked playing in the woods and climbing trees, being a child in Peachtree City was monotonous during those years.

No one in my family can clearly remember anything that Chip Conner did as mayor. Conner and Cowan are part of the chosen elite that can have a boat on Lake Peachtree.

Fred Brown was always PCDC’s man. No one had been so closely connected to the development industry since Cowan. It was during Fred Brown’s terms in office that growth really took off and the sleepy town began to change. Some of the changes were welcome and others caused panic.

He lost every election he entered after being mayor. He was viewed as a sellout to developers. It is no wonder that he strongly opposes Steve Brown.

The most risky and controlling mayor in history has to be Bob Lenox. Many of Lenox’s dealings had to be investigated by the Georgia Bureau of Investigation.

The GBI was called in on the sewer arrangement and the development authority. The GBI was also summoned one time regarding Lenox’s relationship with PCDC. Fred Brown could be a domineering presence but he was nothing compared to Lenox. Both of them were simply gaudy and if you weren’t in their circle, you didn’t count.

Everyone admits Steve Brown wasn’t in office to further his own self-interest. It was totally rude of the past mayors to say that the city has declined during the last four years. Those remarks reek of envy and resentment.

Steve Brown challenged people to think and I truly believe that’s what makes him so disliked by the past mayors. His legacy will be one of caring for our school children and his courage to take on the wayward influence peddlers.

I really like Cyndi Plunkett and I think she conveys the personal attention to families that Steve Brown has in the past four years. Cyndi has a mind of her own, which is important. She has the support of many of our local moms and we wish her the best.

Thank you, Mayor Brown, for enduring the horrible remarks of the past mayors on our behalf. You are the definition of “public servant” in Peachtree City.

CeCe Jensen
Peachtree City, Ga.

login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by historybuff on Thu, 12/08/2005 - 12:00am.

What is shameful is Steve Brown's four years in office. Never, never has there been a more psychotic person in any office anywhere. The damage he has done to PTC is really the shame. But, we will recover in time, now that he is gone. Look for some real vicious grandstanding on the way out.

Submitted by BZMommy on Wed, 12/07/2005 - 1:11pm.

Brown stated in the paper yesterday that "I am most proud of getting rid of government corruption..." I don't recall anyone going to jail...if we had corruption then there should be some people serving jail time...sounds like more garbage from Brown. Thank goodness the citizens of PTC can read between the lines. What a classless guy!! Hey does anyone know if in the history of PTC any mayor ran for re-election and lost...and if so...was it by such a landslide?

ArmyMAJretired's picture
Submitted by ArmyMAJretired on Wed, 12/07/2005 - 1:32pm.

I do remember a bit of a scandal (theft of services) or something down at the Public Works department.

Can anybody help me out with details?

Nothing else comes to mind except the "city clerk" pay off. Again I do not remember the details other than a big cushy settlement to leave and go back to school.


mudcat's picture
Submitted by mudcat on Wed, 12/07/2005 - 12:08pm.

Wow! Are you out of touch. Jealous that someone has power boat rights? Get a life - its not important. But if you have to write - at least be accurate. The GBI was called and they found no evidence of wrongdoing or any violation of the law. More than you can say about your President Clinton.
meow


Robert W. Morgan's picture
Submitted by Robert W. Morgan on Wed, 12/07/2005 - 12:15pm.

Of greater importance than boat rights in CeCe's letter and the one that discredits everything she says is;

"Everyone admits Steve Brown wasn’t in office to further his own self-interest. It was totally rude of the past mayors to say that the city has declined during the last four years. Those remarks reek of envy and resentment".

How many things are wrong with that? The king of self-interest is the only title Steve Brown will take away from our city - and the operative word there is "away" hopefully far, far, away.

And the thought that those fine former mayors are "envious" of a lowlife like Brown is laughable. Ha, Ha.


Submitted by BZMommy on Wed, 12/07/2005 - 12:58pm.

Who is CeCe's everyone? I think the people that care about PTC spoke out yesterday when "we" voted!!!

ManofGreatLogic's picture
Submitted by ManofGreatLogic on Sat, 12/10/2005 - 12:01am.

The Westside village WILL be annexed. That's Logsdon's will and some of the new City Counsel members.

They told me themselves.

Get ready for 900 more developed acres.

You WILL get the government you deserve. That is a fact.


mudcat's picture
Submitted by mudcat on Tue, 12/13/2005 - 10:16am.

So what if the entire west village is annexed? Don't you live in one of the other villages? Is it so bad? Get a gripon this annexation thing - it is very simple. Do it if it looks and feels like the rest of PTC. Don't do it if what is proposed doesn't fit in.

You can't be for or against annexation in general - that's simply foolish. Look at what is planned then make up your mind. I know that takes hard work and study - something most in PTC can't or won't do, but that is real life.
meow


PTC Guy's picture
Submitted by PTC Guy on Sat, 12/10/2005 - 12:06am.

I agree.

Did they give any indicators of density and composition?


Robert W. Morgan's picture
Submitted by Robert W. Morgan on Thu, 12/15/2005 - 10:51am.

No indications of density or composition because the city is under an annexation moratorium - which Brown willingly and openly violated when he approached Wieland on his mini-annexation plan.

The proper way to do this is to lift the moratorium, get city staff to spearhead the planning process with the developers, landowners and neighbors and create a plan that the public can comment on and the planning commission and city council can vote on - either for or against or send it back for tweaking.

When it comes to the dreaded "density " word, be aware most of Peachtree City lives on 1/3 to 1/2 acre lots. Fewer than 5% of the population lives on 2+ acre lots and more importantly, less than that actually want to maintain a 2 acre lot.

Manage the density - don't be afraid of it and don't be one of those idiots that thinks density is bad - look at your own neighborhood first before you start telling the professionals how to build and develop. And yes, its about money - this is still a free economy and landowners have property rights. Managing density captures a lot of that money/developer profit for the city.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.