PTC Council cans TDK project

Thu, 06/07/2007 - 7:40pm
By: John Munford

Allows county to use money on other projects

The Peachtree City Council voted unanimously tonight to put the controversial TDK extension on hold indefinitely.

Councilman Stuart Kourajian made the motion, suggesting that the city could once again consider building the extension in the future once Coweta County enhances its own access to Interstate 85.

The controversy about the road hit earlier this year when Coweta County officials approved a 3,100 home subdivision that would link with TDK just across the county line. Peachtree City residents have said they worry that since TDK links with Ga. Highway 74, the extension of TDK might allow the new mega-subdivision, McIntosh Village to flood Hwy. 74 with traffic.

“We got blindsided by the developer and Coweta County,” said Councilman Steve Boone.

Kourajian said he couldn’t support construction of the TDK extension because he doesn’t think Coweta’s traffic needs to be routed through Peachtree City or Fayette County.

With its decision, the city is unofficially giving a nod to the Fayette County Commission that it will not be expected to fund the road construction at this time, several officials indicated.

The matter was on the agenda at the behest of Councilwoman Judi-ann Rutherford, who indicated there was no need for the city to wait for a court decision on a lawsuit the city filed against the Georgia Regional Transportation Authority relating to the road project.

The city is challenging GRTA’s requirement for the bridge over Line Creek to be four lanes wide instead of two lanes. The city only has enough right-of-way on its side for two lanes and doesn’t intend to make it four lanes, several officials have said recently.

Mayor Harold Logsdon said he’d rather council postpone the vote until after the upcoming July 6 hearing in the suit occurs. The suit was filed in Fulton County Superior Court.

The motion does not affect the city’s pending lawsuit against GRTA, said City Attorney Ted Meeker. The motion could also be reversed by the current council or a future city council at a later date, Meeker confirmed.

The city has until December 2009 to build the road or the right-of-way it currently has for a portion of the project reverts back to the ownership of its previous owner, a subsidiary of Pathway Communities.

login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by jackyldo on Sat, 06/09/2007 - 9:32am.

They certainly can not make you build a road you do not want or need.

While there was an idea this road would help people get in and out of the industrial park, 3100 homes x 2 cars each using it for a short cut to 74, is not what we as citizens of Peachtree City want or deserve.
Make access through Coweta to 54 and 34 and Dr. Fischer Road.

What happens to the FAA Money ?

John Munford's picture
Submitted by John Munford on Sun, 06/10/2007 - 10:41pm.

The land has already been acquired (i.e. money spent) for the FAA grant. BTW that was to add to the airport's safety area by increasing the "protected" land under the airport's ownership.

In other words, that deal was done a while ago and the land is in the airport's hands now.


Submitted by McDonoughDawg on Fri, 06/08/2007 - 7:57am.

The best decision, I think, for the Citizens of PTC.

Thanks Council.

Submitted by localpatriot on Sat, 06/09/2007 - 3:45pm.

Most of the east side of Coweta is against the huge McIntosh development as well. Thank goodness this has gotten blocked!! Looking forward though, a better access to Hwy. 85 would be to widen Hwy. 154 - where of course the Coweta Commission just okay'd another Wal-Mart- ugh.
Fischer Rd. isn't a great choice because it is a 10 mile hike, more residental right at the road side, and a lot more widening then Hwy. 154. Of course this would go right past Commissioner Paul Poole's cattle ranch and home....hmmmmmm.....

Submitted by tikigod on Thu, 06/07/2007 - 10:24pm.

This is great news for the entire city. I made a serious double take when I first read the headline.

GOOD JOB PEACHTREE CITY COUNCIL!

Submitted by tonto707 on Thu, 06/07/2007 - 8:08pm.

a smart vote by PTC council, and I commend you.

I, like Stuart, have been saying all along that Coweta BOC should
develop their own plan for arteries to I 85, GA 74 is busy enough taking care of Fayette residents.

Frankly, I thought Sonny Perdue would have abolished GRTA by now.
King Roi Barnes foisted that crap on the citizens of the state with strong arm tactics and it was that kind of behavior that cost him the governor's office.

Git Real's picture
Submitted by Git Real on Thu, 06/07/2007 - 9:26pm.

For ALL of Fayette County.

The answer to why Sonny Perdue hasn't canned King Roy's Democrat created GRTA is because he loves big government programs and the control they wield. What do you expect from a re-hashed & re-labeled Democrat political hack?

Did I sound like Bas? Smiling

Seriously... all I can say is Yippee!

________

"That man was Griffin Judicial Circuit District Attorney Scott Ballard".

CLICK HERE FOR THE REST OF THE STORY


Voice of Fayette Future's picture
Submitted by Voice of Fayett... on Fri, 06/08/2007 - 9:25am.

Sen. Seabaugh to the rescue? I ain't buying that this is over. Rutherford did the right thing, yes. Logsdon couldn't stop the road cancellation so he voted no, so as not to be the only obvious developer supporter (which is what he is). Robemudcat Morgan would cheer Harold if he hit his hindquarters with both hands.

This story is far from over. There is too much big money in support of this to take one council vote lying down. State Sen. Mitch Seabaugh is well connected to the Coweta developers. So is Congressman Westmoreland. Westmoreland wants to be Governor. Mitch wants to go to Congress. Mitch has been mental about making this road happen. The developers have millions of dollars. All of these good ole boys love each other. If they get the most powerful agency in the state (DOT) behind this, the PTC Council will be forced to say "Sorry folks we fought the good fight but we lost. Re-elect us anyway." Remember when the PTC Council voted on the Dev Auth issue and then State Rep. Westmoreland ignored it and passed local legislation to trump the council vote ? This party is far from over.


Robert W. Morgan's picture
Submitted by Robert W. Morgan on Thu, 06/07/2007 - 8:04pm.

I think not. How do those of you who have been relentness in your opposition to the Mayor and Council - suggesting they are tools of the developers react to this vote?

How about those who said Pathways' contribution to Logsdon's campaign helped Mitchell gain untoward influence?

This is absolutely the right thing to do - meaning the vote. The lawsuit could go either way, but winning that would be icing on the cake. Naturally, the risk of GRTA retribution is possible, but at this point - who cares? Tell them to buzz off.

I guess the naysayers about Logsdon will have to eat a little crow. It will be interesting to see how they do or do not eat that crow.

Congratulations City Council on doing the right thing.


Submitted by johenry on Tue, 06/12/2007 - 4:42pm.

Don't believe the hype from RobeMudcat W. Morgan on TDK. I believe they said the road is on "hold" which means it can come back at any time. I love the part about the city council "unofficially" signaling the Fayette County Commission (oh how weak). Why wouldn't the city officially tell the county commission?? This is another smoke screen! Coweta County will make all kinds of promises and then everyone will jump back into action building the extension.

The Direct PAC guys are claiming that Mayor Logsdon is not in the developers' back pockets and the TDK vote proves it - give us all break! He tried to hold the vote up. The mayor’s fondness of lying means we shouldn’t believe a word the guy says (Do the Direct PAC guys remember “I will reduce the budget and roll back taxes,” I sure do.)

This is just an election ploy by by Direct PAC on behalf of Stuart Kourajian and Judy Rutherford to get the voters to believe they mean no harm. If they want us to believe them, they ought to kill the project. No votes for Stuart and Judy until they officially kill the TDK project.

Robert W. Morgan's picture
Submitted by Robert W. Morgan on Tue, 06/12/2007 - 6:52pm.

The question was how the lunatic fringe would respond to a 5-0 vote against TDK. Good answer and totally in keeping with your character. Good job and thank you for your contribution to a high-minded debate.


Submitted by McDonoughDawg on Fri, 06/08/2007 - 8:02am.

This Council has been ripped to shreds on here for this very issue. The facts came out about Coweta's intentions, and they acted.

One other thing this article doesn't mention, how will this impact Lowes and it's "want" to be at the TDK and 74 area? I would think from Lowes thinking, that interchange just became less inviting.

Submitted by skyspy on Fri, 06/08/2007 - 6:57am.

Our city council did the right thing because of the scathing letters and e-mails they recieved. For a change they listened to the "little people".

Submitted by McDonoughDawg on Fri, 06/08/2007 - 8:04am.

Listen to the people. They did.

bad_ptc's picture
Submitted by bad_ptc on Thu, 06/07/2007 - 9:08pm.

Dead guy.

Mayor Logsdon didn't want a vote taken at tonights meeting. He had wanted to wait for the court to make a decision first. On that note I'm inclined to agree with him.

Credit, if credit is due, should go to Mrs. Rutherford for her persistence in wanting to put an end to this ordeal.

Actually her motion was much more succinct than Mr. Kourajians'. Mrs. Rutherford simply said something to the effect that, "Peachtree City has no intention of pursuing the TDK extension at this time."

Two points of interest. First Mr. Kourajians' motion includes language that stipulates action on the part of Coweta County; "Adequate road improvements be made to I-85". Secondly, it was stated that construction of the road must "start" by some date in 2009.

As I don't have a copy of the actual closing documents I don't know the answer to this but I was under the impression that the road construction to the Pathways property had to be completed by a certain date in 2009.

If anyone has the 'dirt' (pun intended), please provide answer.


John Munford's picture
Submitted by John Munford on Sun, 06/10/2007 - 10:47pm.

Don't have it in front of me but I'm awfully SURE the contract for the TDK Right of Way from (insert your own Pathway subsidiary here) calls for the land to revert if the road is not complete.

I'll see if I can remember to look it up tomorrow. I've got a copy of that contract laying 'round somewhere.

Also, I'm certain that someone said the Pathway subsidiary could build a driveway to TDK even if the city/county doesn't extend TDK. So that much-rumored convention center, whatever it is could still conceivably happen, much as the long-awaited Lake McIntosh could conceivably happen.


Robert W. Morgan's picture
Submitted by Robert W. Morgan on Fri, 06/08/2007 - 6:19am.

Appreciate the insight. A court decision would be better then PTC could possibly dodge the GRETA bullet that is sure to come.
Nevertheless the story did say the vote was 5-0 and that means something. Congrats to all of you.

The Pathways deadline is Dec - moved from October, but that is meaningless. All Mitchell wants is a free road to his hotel on lake McIntosh and will do anything - including extending the deadline to get it.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.