Dick Hobbs, Hindenburg Editorializer

TruthinessUberAlles's picture

Dick, Dick, Dick,

I bought a 2007 Dicktionary the other day and your picture was in it under the new phrase Hindenburg Editorializer:

Hindenburg Editorializer : Def 1: A fascist who is generally wrong, loves bashing humanitarians like Jimmy Carter and does nothing to contribute to the overall wellbeing of humanity, is a racist disgrace to journalism and editorializing who cant find a better job than working for a 2bit conservative rag in one of the most heavily Republican districts in the country.

Def 2: An editorializer who is so full of gas that one day he will explode for no good reason.

Def 3: Someone with the insightfulness of a lobotomy.

TruthinessUberAlles's blog | login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
TruthinessUberAlles's picture
Submitted by TruthinessUberAlles on Mon, 06/04/2007 - 6:56pm.

I noticed that you had no response to my comments.... What does that say about you?

Rush Limbaugh claims to use only half of his brain to take on liberals, if he used the other half he'd become one.


Git Real's picture
Submitted by Git Real on Mon, 06/04/2007 - 8:29pm.

OK...I'll ignore the clown too!

________

"That man was Griffin Judicial Circuit District Attorney Scott Ballard".

CLICK HERE FOR THE REST OF THE STORY


Richard Hobbs's picture
Submitted by Richard Hobbs on Tue, 06/05/2007 - 8:28am.

I'm confused, what is it that you are going to ignore?

All I hear are the sounds of silence.

If you ever wrestle with a pig, then both of you will get dirty.
The pig doesn't mind. I just choose not to get dirty mucking around in the filth that some on this blog consider to be an open
discussion.

So, again, I'm not quite sure of what you want me to ignore.


Richard Hobbs's picture
Submitted by Richard Hobbs on Sat, 06/02/2007 - 12:11am.

"Well, the trouble with our liberal friends is not that they are ignorant, but that they know so much that isn't so."
Ronald Reagan

You know JeffC, you generally have a fairly intellectual blog and I enjoy your posts, however, some on this blog seem to behave a bit odd, would you say. Especially, whenever I even mention your father.

I believe you and I created a pact of some type. You'd willing accept an occaisonal dig against our "former",-thank god, president, and I'd try and not push it over the edge. I mean your old man is not so bad as long as he has a hammer in his hand instead of a microphone.

I think some of your friends on the left have yet to take it down a notch. Then again, I'm embarrassed by several on the right.

I think this fellow has got to be one of the tree huggers who have purchased the unedited version of broke back mounting er mountain, in HD and blue ray. I'd bet he was from Seattle or San Fran, but who knows, he might actually be from little five points.

Oh well, I think if we were to count the wackos on either side that participate on this board, your side would be winning 21 to 10. I count this poster double, because he is pretty out there. You know, "Cindy Sheehan" out there.

Oh well, I just love the level of discussions that some on the board seem to rise below. I'd say he's too far left to be a liberal. Probably one of the NAMBLA men. Otherwise, why is he carefully using the term for a male genitalia so often. Do you suppose he is used to typing that name onto chat lines with webhosts who have a web camera. I suppose if thats all he can ever hope for.. . . .

Oh good news for him, New Hampshire just approved Civil Unions. . . Delta is ready when you and your S.O. are.


JeffC's picture
Submitted by JeffC on Sat, 06/02/2007 - 10:40am.

I don't know him but he seems like a really nice guy!

Seriously though, please scan this editorial from Israel's largest paper and ignore its inflammatory title. It's not just here.

Talkbacks are for cowardly bigots


Richard Hobbs's picture
Submitted by Richard Hobbs on Sat, 06/02/2007 - 11:32am.

Now I can't find where you posted it.

Oh well, these "talkbacks" as the article described can get out of hand. Which is one reason that I choose to use my own name.

I find that sometimes I can let emotion and passion take over, and sometimes a bit of frivolity, and makes me pen some ignorant comment that should have just stayed in my head. Having my name exposed to some degree reminds me that my prejudices and bigotries, of which they are a few, seem rather juvenille when I type them and place my name next to them. Which then makes me re-examine what I am trying to communicate.

But it was an interesting article.

I will say this, some on this board tend to go over the top, some go over the top and down the other side. Am I guilty of that? Some might think so, and perhaps they may be right. But I find that generally, the discussion on these boards are civil and light hearted. That an occaisional idiot comes along and really begins to personalize it.

I choose to ignore those posters and not to get drawn back into a discussion about their comments. They are nothing more than 3rd party bloggers, high schooler, Brokeback Mountaineers that have so much anger in their soul that they can't be expected to have an intellectual discourse.

So I would encourage others not to give some from the right and the left any attention whatsoever. When you ignore them as the insignificant morons that they are, then they usually will spit a few more vile comments and then walk away, cursing my name by using a derogatory name for it. (Although my best friend in High School back in Bristol Virginia, will never let a conversation end, without saying "goodbye Dick") That is however, used as a term of juvenille endearment, and I wouldn't have it any other way. Gees, to be 17 again, and to know all that I know now!

Oh well, thanks Jeff for the article. You sure do surf a lot. I think I'll blog Peggy Noonan's article. That should cause some interesting debate.


JeffC's picture
Submitted by JeffC on Sat, 06/02/2007 - 11:46am.

I read this wonderful article in Rising Hegemon about her. I’ve been meaning to pass it along.

So Much To Savor


Paul Perkins's picture
Submitted by Paul Perkins on Sat, 06/02/2007 - 11:58am.

Been following this thread with interest. It seemed you'll were arguing facts until the reference to the Noonan article. It has nothing to do with the previous facts discussed. Ms.Noonan is liked by some and disliked by some.

Maybe I missed it, but what in the world does this link have to do with anything discussed?


JeffC's picture
Submitted by JeffC on Sat, 06/02/2007 - 12:39pm.

It was a premptive strike against my friend Richard's threatening to post her articles. Right above my post was Richard saying: "I think I'll blog Peggy Noonan's article. That should cause some interesting debate."

I thought directing him to Rising Hegemon would infuriate him on a Saturday.


Mixer's picture
Submitted by Mixer on Sat, 06/02/2007 - 10:52am.

'TruthinessUberAlles' is not blogging nicely, neither is 'realcat'. Don;t encourage it by calling them nice guys. Smiling

You and I disagree often but we are always civil (I think?).

It makes for a much better discussion and helps us to understand the other point of view.

Please don't encourage those who are vile, sophomoric, emotive or angry.

You know that we (you and I) agree on about 90% of our real life philosophy, and we really want the same things. It's just politics where you are so very, very, VERY wrong Eye-wink (I'm kidding about being wrong...well, sort of.)

Promote an intellectually elevated blog!

Democrats on Iraq before the polls changed


TruthinessUberAlles's picture
Submitted by TruthinessUberAlles on Sat, 06/02/2007 - 9:34am.

"Now can we get on to something important, like when your dad is going to apply for the Job of Cuban Dictator once Castro's body stinks up the palace so much that his brother can't handle it anymore?" What would Raygun say about that? He probably would have had a good chuckle and then taken a nap.

"You'd willing accept an occaisonal dig against our "former",-thank god, president, and I'd try and not push it over the edge." Occassional dig? In your arguement about Valerie Plame I would say that it was absolutely necessary to allude to Jimmy Carter being third in line for the Cuban Dictatorship. Sweet dig by the way, it really raised the level of intelectual discussion on the board, it was as intellectually nourishing as a kick in the nuts.

I'm from Milwaukee, the bastion of homosexual-treehugging-brokeback mountain watching and the home of NAMBLA's national headquarters, you caught me.

Rush Limbaugh claims to use only half of his brain to take on liberals, if he used the other half he'd become one.


Submitted by onlyrealcat on Fri, 06/01/2007 - 7:30pm.

First you bash my friends in PTC then you bash people on here you don't know. Go back to ClayCo and take your chrome 22's with you. Punk.

The only real cat in town

TruthinessUberAlles's picture
Submitted by TruthinessUberAlles on Fri, 06/01/2007 - 7:43pm.

My chrome 22s are on Trek Roadbike with the 24K gold inlay. Panthers suck.

Rush Limbaugh claims to use only half of his brain to take on liberals, if he used the other half he'd become one.


Submitted by onlyrealcat on Fri, 06/01/2007 - 8:01pm.

The only trek you have is star trek you pointy eared sissy and you are all the proof needed that bike riders are gay.

Tell your mom I can't make it this weekend that I am sending The only real cat in town's brother from Starr's Mill if he is home from FSU football camp.

Come play with us high school boys- we like bald fat gay guys that ride bicycles. We play rugby each weekend- come get some homo.

TruthinessUberAlles's picture
Submitted by TruthinessUberAlles on Fri, 06/01/2007 - 8:07pm.

You go play with the high school boys, I prefer the cheerleaders.

Panthers suck.

Rush Limbaugh claims to use only half of his brain to take on liberals, if he used the other half he'd become one.


Enigma's picture
Submitted by Enigma on Fri, 06/01/2007 - 8:15pm.

Girls that are 14-17? I think we need to have some intervention here by the Citizen and the FCBOE and law enforcement. Pedophiles that work in education at the FCBOE where you say you work are a police matter.

Please get help!


Git Real's picture
Submitted by Git Real on Fri, 06/01/2007 - 8:21pm.

If you get in trouble with those cheerleaders all you have to do is cozy up to our DA. Click the link below. I'm sure he'll get you off. Eye-wink

________

"That man was Griffin Judicial Circuit District Attorney Scott Ballard".

CLICK HERE FOR THE REST OF THE STORY


TruthinessUberAlles's picture
Submitted by TruthinessUberAlles on Fri, 06/01/2007 - 8:23pm.

17 is legal in Georgia son.... Your daughter knows all about it.

Rush Limbaugh claims to use only half of his brain to take on liberals, if he used the other half he'd become one.


Mixer's picture
Submitted by Mixer on Fri, 06/01/2007 - 8:39pm.

What is your problem with the 'Panthers' and 'realcat' and why the anger toward everyone(Richard et al.)?

Relax man. You have used some language that will probably be edited. Are you sure you worked for the Fayette Board of Education??

Calm down and elevate the discussion. Ignore the onlyrealcat - that's a Whitewater Wildcat anyway - Starr's Mill is the Panthers and McIntosh are the Chiefs. All good schools. It seems if you worked for the FCBOE you would know that.

By the way, I too have been told that Renee Ellis, the speaker at McIntosh, was a speech teacher in APS and does not have a speech impediment.

Relax- take a deep breath- 'realcat' is an idiot and a kid - be the grown up.

Ballard for Prez? I don't think Scott wants to run- have you asked him - besides- his daughter is a Starr's Mill Panther and we all see what you think of them Eye-wink I like Scott. I have known him for years, but I hate he got suckered.

Democrats on Iraq before the polls changed


hutch866's picture
Submitted by hutch866 on Sat, 06/02/2007 - 12:16am.

I've worked at the Ballards house several times over the last few years and all of them have been nothing but nice and cordial to me.
I won't venture an opinion as to his success at his job, the law makes you do things you don't feel are right, as anyone who has served on jury duty can testify too. I like Scott as a person and his family too, it's a thankless job in my opinion and why anyone would want it is beyond me.

I yam what I yam...Popeye


TruthinessUberAlles's picture
Submitted by TruthinessUberAlles on Fri, 06/01/2007 - 9:00pm.

#1 My use of language that will probably edited is satirical in nature, and if it is edited I will wipe away my tears with the 1st Ammendment.

#2 I'll elivate the discussion when Dick Hobbs stops taking cheap shots at Jimmy Carter in one post and then, in an act of unbelievable consistancey, says that the office of the presidency diserves respect.

#3 realcat is going to grow up to become a rapist.

#4 I was talking about David Ballard not Scott.

Rush Limbaugh claims to use only half of his brain to take on liberals, if he used the other half he'd become one.


Mixer's picture
Submitted by Mixer on Sat, 06/02/2007 - 9:01am.

Mixer was a 'nick' I picked up in the military. I dusted it off and used it here for anonymity purposes. I am a non-drinker and I am not now, nor have I ever been a bartender.

1) "My use of language that will probably edited..."(sic) Satirical? Arguments with immature moronic teens using profanity and sexual innuendo are considered satirical? Why would you get on his level? Whenever you cry about the first amendment being under attack - remember your attack on Richard Hobbs for exercising his first amendment rights.

2) I was referring to your 'discussion' with 'realcat' not with Richard Hobbs.

3) At what age will 'realcat' commit his first rape? Should we go ahead and arrest him for a thought crime? What will you grow up to be?

4) Your response to Git Real's comments about Scott Ballard was "Ballard for President" but you meant 'David'. Gotcha... my mistake.

Democrats on Iraq before the polls changed


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.