Annexation without proper representation?

Tue, 04/24/2007 - 3:59pm
By: Letters to the ...

I can hardly keep up with everything that is being shoved down our throats these days with shopping centers we don’t want, road extensions we don’t want, and now the West Village annexation and its potential impact on our city.

For those of you who have not attended all the meetings required to keep up with the development in this town, let me tell you my view of the proposed annexation of the West Village that the City Council will vote on Thursday, May 3.

What is done?

On April 9, the Planning Commission voted 4-0 to annex the West Village into PTC and to add 699 55-and-older homes, and 495 single family homes in an area now zoned for one house per every two acres.

In exchange for annexation at this density the developers (Wieland, and Levitt and Sons) will build MacDuff Parkway’s extension and bridge to align with Kedron Drive North.

The developers will also have to agree to pay a proposed impact fee to include monies for a West Village fire station, and subsidiary funds (11 percent of total cost) for the planned BSC expansion. A financial impact study was presented that made financial “guesstimations” from construction to 80 years from now.

What is not done?

No water/sewer impact study was presented. No data as to the effect all of this added sewage will have on the already taxed Line Creek was presented. No school impact study was presented. No traffic (residential mixed with cut-through) impact studies were presented, with respect to Ga. Highway 74 and North Kedron Drive, and the proposed newly extended MacDuff Parkway. Very little golf cart access is planned.

I am aware that this issue has been on the table and off the table so many times over the last 10 years or so. Maybe we thought it would just go away again. But folks, its time is here. It is not going away this time.

There were a handful of citizens in the planning commission meeting on April 9; three or four of us stood up and voiced our objection to annexation at this density. Two or three members of Centennial stood up as advocates of the MacDuff parkway extension for their community. That was it.

Where is everyone? This is a big deal, and once we annex and approve this onslaught of density, there is no going back. There are no do-overs. If we do not hold Council accountable for the impact annexing this property at this density will have on our quality of life, we will reap what we don’t sow.

The list of “What is not done?” above is my list, and I am sure it is not complete. This entire list would be less necessary if council required a lower density of homes in this annexed area. I believe annexation at this density is a recipe for disaster. It adds approximately 1,200 new homes where it is now zoned only for 430; 2,400 additional drivers; and the potential for a conservative 1,000 new children into our school system, all sandwiched between both highways 54 and 74, with a nice new road to connect it all. Yikes!

Make no mistake about it: Everyone will be impacted by this annexation if it is approved as planned. Anyone who lives in PTC, shops here, commutes through here, and goes to school here will feel it. We have to stand up and let it be known why we object to this plan.

Represent your interest in keeping PTC great. Come to the meeting on May 3, 7 p.m. at City Hall and urge the council to send this plan back to the planning commission asking for lower density before they vote.

Don’t let Council approve this plan as it is. They are hoping that you will be too distracted by TDK, big boxes and the looming Coweta County development and let this one slide by. Don’t let that happen.

The real representatives of Peachtree City are its citizens. Show yourselves.

Beth Pullias

Peachtree City, Ga.

login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by dkinser on Wed, 05/02/2007 - 8:30am.

Beth,

The questions of water and sewer and the traffic were indeed addressed. Prior to going before council with this, the developers had to approach Georgia Regional Transportation Agency, GRTA; and Atlanta Regional Commission, ARC; for approval. Traffic impact studies were done, and prior to giving approval for phase 1 annexation, the city chose its own consulting company to provide the data.

That information was reviewed at the state level prior to GRTA and ARC approving this development.

WASA has stated previously that there is sufficient capacity put into that area so that is probably why you did not hear that brought up again.

I agree with you on the turnout issue, it would be nice for more to show up, some simply can't; but groups on both sides of the debate hav submitted petitions both for and against. I don't recall the number of signatures opposed, but I do recall it was not a huge number. 650 signatures supporting this annexation have now been submitted in favor of it. Keep in mind that these signatures are from city residents, some of whom happen to live in the West Village, but city residents none the less. Those that signed both petitions do this so city council hears their voices that way.

Dana Kinser

Submitted by skyspy on Wed, 05/02/2007 - 6:46am.

This is our free ticket to ignore the water restrictions. If we have enough water for cluster homes, then we definitly have enough for all of my plants and lawn.
It is hard to take officials seriously regarding the drought and water restrictions, when they refuse to put a moratorium on building.

Robert W. Morgan's picture
Submitted by Robert W. Morgan on Wed, 05/02/2007 - 6:09am.

Our elected officials - all but Judi elected specifically because they promised to consider annexation rather than rejecting it completely as their opponents did. The 600+ who signed the petition supporting the annexation many of whom live in the immediate area are represented perfectly by our elected officials. This will pass Thursday night - probably 4-1, maybe 5-0 as it should. The developer handouts are significant and adding over 1000 household to the population at the price range indicated is a very good thing. In fact over 1/2 of these will be seniors with no kids and fewere car trips each day.


Spear Road Guy's picture
Submitted by Spear Road Guy on Fri, 05/04/2007 - 2:45pm.

Anyone who thinks the annexation plan passed by the city council was a good one, you need to get your head examined.

This annexation was about as good as the freebie Group VI got at 74 and Redwine at a taxpayer loss. The don't have a clue what they're doing. The developers always win.

Vote Republican


nuk's picture
Submitted by nuk on Wed, 05/02/2007 - 7:16am.

There are actually people who live, work and breathe in PTC who are in favor the annexation of the Westside under the proper conditions. The election results showed that very clearly.

NUK


Submitted by skyspy on Wed, 05/02/2007 - 7:23am.

The only thing I remember harold squealing about was a balanced budget and controlled spending.

Submitted by MIKEK on Wed, 05/02/2007 - 9:22am.

As a twenty year resident of our fair city, I would offer that this annexation was best for all concerns as no retail malls, nail salons, or big boxes are part of it. What I do object to is the many retail induced traffic congestion we now face. We still have ordinances against "big box" ventures but it seems we have had and currently have a City Council that is all to anxious to amend what the original city charter specified. Did we really need a Home Depot or Wal-Mart when we could have traveled to either Newnan or Fayetteville in the same amount of time it currently takes to do the same thing.
We now have an impending traffic nightmare on Highway 74--TDK or not, just ask a resident whose deck and back yard now overlook the construction that is soon to be Logsdon or Brown Parkway.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.