Jury comes up empty

Thu, 03/22/2007 - 4:56pm
By: John Munford

A north Fayette man accused of trying to take a deputy’s weapon during a scuffle in August walked away from court a free man Wednesday.

A jury was unable to agree on whether Wayne Marshall Williams, 52, was guilty or not of the criminal charge, which is a felony. The jury deliberated for roughly four hours before the foreman told Superior Court Judge Paschal A. English they were unlikely to resolve the issue.

The last vote taken was 8-3 with one juror undecided, the jury foreman said, although he was not asked to say whether the majority was inclined to vote guilty or innocent.

Despite the mistrial, Williams can be retried on the charges if the Fayette County District Attorney’s office chooses to do so.

The incident occurred at Williams’s home on Kite Lake Road just after noon Aug. 25. According to the arrest warrant filed in the case, Williams fought with Dep. James Pitts while Pitts attempted to arrest him for obstruction of a police officer.

In the warrant, Pitts stated that Williams “attempted to pull the weapon” from his holster during the struggle. At one point, Pitts had to push Williams on the ground before he could be successfully handcuffed, the warrant stated.

Moments before declaring the mistrial, the jury had sent Judge English a note asking if they could review a copy of the deputy’s reports connected to the case. But English told him the law doesn’t allow for that to occur.

English then inquired as to the jury’s progress and was informed of the lack of progression in terms of coming to a unanimous vote. At the time, he noted that the jury had deliberated for nearly half as long as the actual trial took.

login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by RuKiddin on Sat, 03/24/2007 - 1:34am.

I agree with some of the comments that have been stated here. When an offender is accused of attempting to take a Law Enforcement Officer's weapon, we need to give this type of incident as much time as we can for the jury to make a decision.
They aren't kidding when they say it takes someone to die for people to pay attention. When someone attempts to take a weapon, ESPECIALLY a gun, from a cop, that should send up a red flag. There is only one reason why a person would do this, and that is to Kill the Officer and anyone else that gets in their way.
I am not saying that the offender that attempted to do this is guilty. But please, if nothing else, allow the jury a chance to decide. We still own this county. The criminal doesn't.
Lets not throw in the towel just yet.

Submitted by fay79isus on Sat, 03/24/2007 - 6:58am.

The Fayette Criminal system is lost. No question. Was this man innocent or guilty ? Rukiddin is right--- Would the courthouse gang been more willing to break a sweat if the cop had been killed? Heck, yeah, because then all those clowns would have a parking lot full of television trucks and they would have stretched this case out forever like that Brian Nichols case in Fulton. I agree “… a mistrial after a jury deliberates for only four hours on a felony charge is anemic jurisprudence.” Heck, yeah, Fayette is lost. The Judge and the DA and whoever were just too busy to be bothered. Last weekend friends were complaining about politics and politicians and somebody said “I am so tired or our legal system.” Go back to your TIVO and your American Idol. We have gotten what we deserve.

secret squirrel's picture
Submitted by secret squirrel on Fri, 03/23/2007 - 6:22am.

English calls a hung jury after only four hours??!? The length of the case itself is wholly irrelevant. Calling a mistrial after a jury deliberates for only four hours on a felony charge is anemic jurisprudence.

I'm beginning to wonder why judges in the Fayette County area seem to surrender their spines before taking the bench.


Submitted by fay79isus on Fri, 03/23/2007 - 8:22am.

We are no longer Fayettenam. I don't know how we got that nickname but I do remember it was about our court system way back when. Anybody know?

What heppened in this case? I agree. The judge was lazy. 4 hours? Surely the judge could say "Give us a full day's work." Maybe he could have given them evidence again or just done something. It just sounds like the judge and the DA were too lazy to make the case stick. Or, the deputies who made the case made a mistake. I doubt it. I think the cops were right and the court people were lazy. And exactly why did the Judge just get a $30,000 raise?

Munford-- you are wrong. The jury did not come up empty--- the bureaucrats did.

Submitted by skyspy on Thu, 03/22/2007 - 11:43pm.

The jury can't figure out if they should s_ _ _ or go sailing, the DA,?(who knows) and this happened in English panseys courtroom again??

What?

This worthless garbage attacked one of our deputies, and these bedwetter, pansey, milktoast garbage jurors can't figure out what to do??

Ok, the claytonCRIME FOOLS are already here.

This is a sad day for Fayette.

Voice of Fayette Future's picture
Submitted by Voice of Fayett... on Mon, 03/26/2007 - 2:23pm.

Did they say if they are going to do this case a second time ?


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.