-->
Search the ArchivesNavigationContact InformationThe Citizen Newspapers For Advertising Information Email us your news! For technical difficulties |
PTC’s beef with Chick-fil-A: ‘Keep your chicken planes out of our airport’Tue, 03/13/2007 - 4:43pm
By: John Munford
No big money fees, no big chick for Falcon Field. The Peachtree City Airport Authority has declined to approve the transfer of an airport access agreement that would allow Chick-fil-A’s corporate jets to relocate to a building adjacent to Falcon Field. But landing the big bird is still a possibility, according to Airport Manager John Crosby. Hunting Aviation, which owns a mothballed building adjacent to the airport, wanted the authority to transfer the agreement to Chick-fil-A, which is offering to buy the property. The authority voted unanimously Thursday night to deny transfer of the agreement, but Crosby indicated Monday that the authority is reaching out to Chick-fil-A officials in an attempt to broker a deal. Authority attorney Simon Bloom said Monday that the existing “through the fence” agreement for Hunting would provide no revenue for the authority based on Chick-fil-A’s current plans to use the property. Under Georgia case law, that change is enough to allow such contracts to be denied reassignment “as a commercially valid reason,” Bloom said. Hunting attorney David Monde disagreed with Bloom’s assessment, saying that the authority would receive a 5 cent per gallon fee for any fuel purchased by Chick-fil-A as called for in the existing Hunting contract. Although Chick-fil-A will not be running an aircraft repair facility such as Hunting formerly operated, the facility has enough room for Chick-fil-A to lease space to another business that could generate more revenue for the airport, Monde said. Monde said it is not clear yet if Hunting will file a lawsuit or if Hunting and Chick-fil-A will continue to negotiate with the airport authority. Monde said Hunting and Chick-fil-A would agree to increase the fees in the contract somewhat “but not at the exorbitant rates being demanded by the airport authority.” Because Hunting has not provided any revenue for seven years under the existing agreement, the authority could possibly consider the agreement to be in default status, Bloom noted. Bloom recalled that airport authority member Doug Fisher said in Thursday’s meeting that he couldn’t support assigning the current Hunting deal to Chick-fil-A because the Federal Aviation Administration frowns on airports giving better deals to off-airport property owners compared to those who lease property on the airport grounds. There is some concern that if the current access agreement is given to Chick-fil-A, it could endanger past and present federal aviation grants, Bloom said. The authority has relied on such grants to acquire a significant amount of property in the past several years, and the airport is also seeking a grant to locate an instrument landing system so planes can land even when inclement weather exists. Bloom said the authority has negotiated with Chick-fil-A in good faith, but any time progress is made the company’s attorneys have thwarted the progress. Monde contends that the authority has not negotiated in good faith because it refuses to honor the reassignment option in the existing contract with Hunting. A lawsuit filed against the authority by Hunting over a similar dispute over another potential property buyer is still pending in Fayette County Superior Court. login to post comments |