PTC settles tennis center lawsuits

Thu, 11/30/2006 - 10:59am
By: John Munford

The Peachtree City Council and the city’s development authority voted Wednesday night to settle two pending lawsuits over the city-owned tennis center for $920,000 and use a revenue bond to finance the settlement over 10 years.

City officials also revealed how they calculated how much was owed Peachtree National Bank out of the $1.5 million it was seeking in the suit.

Under the settlement, the city will pay Peachtree National Bank $714,000 instead of the $1.5 million sought by the bank in its suit. Also, the city will pay Foley and Group VI $206,407 of the $228,000 balance those companies sought in its suit. All told, both lawsuits sought $1.72 million in compensation.

The settlement agreements were not approved unanimously, with Councilwoman Judi-ann Rutherford the sole “no” vote. Immediately after the meeting, she declined to explain her opposition to the settlements and said she would support the majority decision of her fellow council members.

City Attorney Ted Meeker noted that the city took the entire amount of capital expenditures spent by the DAPC and subtracted the amount of those expenditures that were funded by the city, leaving a figure of $880,027 in capital expenditures which the authority was indebted for. A staff review of authority records determined that loans for those expenditures were paid down to $607, 179.

Also, Meeker noted that Peachtree National acquired an outstanding $205,000 loan that was given to the DAPC by Regions Bank, bringing the final total of DAPC outstanding capital indebtedness to $812,179, a figure the city negotiated down with the bank to the $714,000 settlement payment. The lower figure factors in a $107,000 settlement the city had previously reached with Regions Bank before Peachtree National purchased the loan, ostensibly to gain an advantage in the suit.

Council also approved a third contract that will require the city to pay $54,588 for Group VI and Foley to construct the grading and drainage improvements at the tennis center, which has flooded several times during rainstorms. The city is being allowed to withhold $32,605 of the $206,407 due Foley and Group VI from the settlement, pending completion of the drainage and grading improvements.

If the improvements aren’t completed, the city will be able to use the $32,605 to get the work done, explained City Attorney Ted Meeker. Council also unanimously entered a contract with Group VI and Foley Design Associates to make additional improvements at the tennis center for $54,588.

Rutherford said she didn’t want to release Group VI and Foley from the project before the drainage system could be tested with a good rain.

There was no direct opposition to the settlement at the council meeting, as former Mayor Steve Brown said he agreed the settlement was a “done deal” though he wants council to reconsider a recent change that would remove a council member from the board of the city’s Tourism Association, which now runs the tennis center and amphitheater.

Some citizens wondered how a similar problem could be prevented with the city’s current authorities in terms of making sure they don’t seek unapproved loans that would create city indebtedness. Meeker noted that the lawsuit has been an educational process that brought to light the problem, though there were no guarantees whether such a situation could occur again.

Rutherford noted that the DAPC situation was unique since a DAPC member was a bank president and therefore was able to secure the loans and “make things happen that wouldn’t have happened otherwise.

Councilwoman Cyndi Plunkett noted that council also reviews the minutes of each authority and commission meeting and can meet with those representatives if there are any questions.
City Manager Bernie McMullen noted that the tennis center and amphitheater have much more solid budgets now than in the past; city officials saw several problems with the way the DAPC formulated budgets for both facilities before it gave up operations in 2003.

One resident criticized council for releasing information about the settlement over the holidays. But Mayor Harold Logsdon said the city wanted to make sure the information was available a full week before the meeting, and it just happened that “Thanksgiving got in the way.”

The $1.5 million Peachtree National sought in the lawsuit included roughly $1 million that was financed for the expansion of the tennis center, plus another $200,000 loan that was initially made to DAPC by Regions Bank for finishing out the restaurant and the bottom floor of the tennis center, and interest. Peachtree National Bank acquired the Regions loan after Regions sought to acquire the authority’s assets to pay off the loan.

The $228,000 owed Group VI and Foley Design Associates stems from the change orders on the project, which former mayor Steve Brown said were never approved by Council. Those change orders were signed for by former DAPC executive director Virgil Christian, who resigned shortly after the DAPC relinquished facility operation back to the city.

The change orders involved finishing up the ground floor space in the tennis center clubhouse which later housed college classes offered by Clayton State University. Finishing the ground floor cost $54,000, while other items included changes to clubhouse lighting ($52,000), landscaping and irrigation design and installation ($21,000), and paving of the south parking area behind the indoor courts ($12,000).

The expanded facility opened in spring 2003. In December of that year, the authority relinquished operation of the tennis center and amphitheater back to the city, which owns both facilities. When that occurred, the city stopped making monthly $180,000 hotel-motel tax payments to the authority which previously were used to pay the monthly financing owed to the bank. Without those payments, the authority had no other funds to pay the debt, authority officials have said.

Although the city later created a tourism association to run both facilities, that entity did not resume making the payments to the bank. Also left hanging in the air were the outstanding bills owed to Group VI and Foley Design Associates for the tennis center expansion.

login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by johenry on Thu, 11/30/2006 - 12:19pm.

I took my daughter to the special city meeting on Wednesday so she could get some school credit. Her non-political observation in the car was: "Everybody seemed so sad at the meeting." It was truly depressing. It was the same feeling I had when someone broke into my car in the theater parking lot in Fayetteville. We are the hapless victims being FORCED to pay their stupid debts.

The city council’s brilliant solution was to sell our tennis center and amphitheater for a pittance to the development authority and then buy it back for one million bucks to reimburse the advances from Peachtree National Bank. We’re paying for the same assets twice. What a terrific rip off. Why didn’t they just pursue the lawsuit and save us a fortune?

Submitted by loanarranger707 on Sat, 12/02/2006 - 8:36am.

The trick in all of this is to wear down both sides to the point where they “settle.” The judges conspire in all of this by allowing cases to drag on forever. (Aren’t they lawyers too?)

Now we have everyone (or almost) thinking that the Peachtree City taxpayers are paying $920,000 to settle the lawsuit. In fact, the PTC taxpayers are paying that PLUS their attorneys’ fees (undisclosed), so the taxpayers might be a lot worse off than they know. But there’s no denying we’ve been entertained by all this chicanery, and one must pay for one’s entertainment.

ptctaxpayer's picture
Submitted by ptctaxpayer on Sat, 12/02/2006 - 8:42am.

Huh....Didn't you forget about the loan fees? So we as taxpayers get a loan to pay this over 10 years and the loan is free ? No interest? No more broker fees? No more attorneys fees? Does Loan Arranger make a fee?

If you are a "Loan Arranger", what are the costs of this loan besides the million that is going in these local yokels pockets?

WHAT IS THE REAL TOTAL WE ARE PAYING ???


Git Real's picture
Submitted by Git Real on Thu, 11/30/2006 - 12:41pm.

Why didn't they just pursue the lawsuit and save us a fortune?

Had Logsdon and the other Chicken Squats performed their elected duties to the PTC Taxpayers this case would have went to trial and easily won by the city. Instead a payoff was made or either the perpetrators have pics of Logsdon and the spineless council goons in compromising positions. So much for the term "Guardians Of The Public Trust".

Sorry Johenry that your daughter had to learn so early how corrupt our government has become. How do you try to instill an attitude of hope and optimism to a young person with such open corruption in government rampaging through our country?


nuk's picture
Submitted by nuk on Thu, 11/30/2006 - 8:26pm.

:Had Logsdon and the other Chicken Squats performed their
:elected duties to the PTC Taxpayers this case would
:have went to trial and easily won by the city.

And you know this to be a FACT exactly how? Or is it just your uninformed and highly ignorant OPINION the city would have "won easily?"

:Instead a payoff was made or either the perpetrators have
: pics of Logsdon and the spineless council goons in
:compromising positions

When you cannot debate an issue with anything resembling "intelligence" or "reason," I guess this is the kind of 3rd grade stupidity that you fall back on: accuse people of accepting bribes(that u have no proof whatsoever about) or immoral conduct. Congrats....I'm seriously questioning my pro-life values.

I know it's easy for a lot of idiots who have never in their life done anything but gripe, moan and whine to get on here and do some more griping, moaning and whining, but you make yourselves look like why the state of GA is a laughingstock in education. You can't express an opinion or viewpoint in anything resembling "articulate" or "thought-out." It's "someone got paid off! or "personal gain!" EVERYBODY PANIC!!!!

Thank God the everyday Joe and Jane of PTC is not near as pathetically brain-dead as some of the readers here. When I see houses being foreclosed on in PTC, I have a good idea what the owners were doing: sitting around here whining incessantly.

NUK


cogitoergofay's picture
Submitted by cogitoergofay on Fri, 12/01/2006 - 11:53am.

While I might not employ the incendiary rhetoric that has elevated on line blogger Git Real to near “Pop Icon” status, I agree with his conclusions over the PTC Tennis debacle, resulting in a budget hike of more than 1 million dollars. The facts back up what he said. Congratulations on your first foray in to PTC politics. What we have witnessed is a fairly substantial abdication of duty by the Mayor and Council. They chose not to submit the dispute to a referendum. They chose not to submit the dispute to a jury. If you examine the 4 paragraph press release sent by PTC Mayor to the newspaper the afternoon before Thanksgiving (as I did) you will see that City Hall attached 142 pages of complicated legal documents apparently fully negotiated and resolved in advance. Years of negotiation, stacks of legal documents and no public input and no public hearings. All the taxpayer got was a Special Called, dinner hour meeting to tell us “You will now be paying $10,000 a month for ten years.” The City Hall documents (withheld until Thanksgiving eve) included full construction contracts (p. 21); negotiated dollar amount settlements (Group VI- $180,195 p.7; Peachtree National Bank $714,000 p. 45, etc.); a bond financing company pre-approved p. 133 and yet nothing to the public until the last minute deal was announced. How can it be that separate law firms from Newnan, Peachtree City, Stockbridge, Union City and 2 from Atlanta know all about this deal and the taxpayers be told nothing until the day before Thanksgiving for a Special Meeting? And “no”, Skyspy, this is not the end. We can expect much more of the same. When Mayor Logsdon said that “Thanksgiving got in the way” what he meant was that nothing- not public service or honor or values of any kind- would get in the way of his serving special interests.


Submitted by dollaradayandfound on Fri, 12/01/2006 - 1:32pm.

Is it possible that all of the hundreds of lawyer pages concerning paying out one million bucks was researched and printed real quick after the vote by council?
Anybody seen the lawyer fees in total? Who paid them?
Apparently the head pro at the old tennis authority was authorized not only to make huge loans, but to modify them while in progress.
I hope the new administration waited long enough for the smoke to clear to get away with this! If they don't go to jail and the old development authority don't go to jail, and the bank don't get fined by the examiners, then who did screw up?
One more question: who ends up paying for it all? Guess?

Git Real's picture
Submitted by Git Real on Thu, 11/30/2006 - 9:14pm.

And you know this to be a FACT exactly how? Or is it just your uninformed and highly ignorant OPINION the city would have "won easily?"

Bottom line dude is that if I told you then I would have to kill you. I know far more than you could ever imagine and the fact are undeniable. Which player are you since you got so defensive in defending these clowns?

accuse people of accepting bribes(that u have no proof whatsoever about) or immoral conduct.

Silly man. I merely asked the question? You're right. I don't have proof that a bribe was the motive. I'm asking who owes who what? What other reasons would this character have to go against the citizens of Peachtree City and those of Fayette County in ALL his recent actions.

When I see houses being foreclosed on in PTC, I have a good idea what the owners were doing: sitting around here whining incessantly.

Hmmmmm...somehow I don't think the concerned bloggers here are those that are failing their financial obligations. Some of us could retire tomorrow without hitting another lick. I'd put my paycheck up against 98% of the people in this county so bite me on that one.

Metal head...let me say that my motives are not that of an anti-development mentality. My motives are to see business performed in a way that would reflect honor and integrity. Obviously those are traits in which you could care less.

Perhaps you're right. Maybe some of us should stop whining and git a rope.


Git Real's picture
Submitted by Git Real on Thu, 11/30/2006 - 10:16pm.

For those who would like to know more but do not know where to find information regarding the Tennis Center Rip Off here is some well documented history of what transpired. This ain't made stuff.

More Factual Tennis Center Documentation & History

Research this issue and just leave the emotion (Steve Brown) out of it. The fact is the PTC Taxpayers have been illegally screwed.


Robert W. Morgan's picture
Submitted by Robert W. Morgan on Thu, 11/30/2006 - 8:04pm.

Git Real, do you have any idea how "pursuing the lawsuit" would have turned out? $500k for the lawyers and then full amount of $1,700,000 for the plantiff's. Maybe even a penalty for being stupid in trying to defend the indefensible.


Submitted by dollaradayandfound on Fri, 12/01/2006 - 2:19pm.

Mr. Morgan, dead in 1998, yet alive here!
If what you just said from your grave is true, then why pay them just part of the bill?
Are you sure the lawyers didn't alread get $500,000?

Git Real's picture
Submitted by Git Real on Thu, 11/30/2006 - 8:52pm.

Sir I would rather spend $100K to beat the vulturistic plaintiffs in this case than pay out way over a million after bond fees and interest expenses. With a little intestinal fortitude the city could have easily made those that are preying on the taxpayers pay dearly. Any half wit lawyer could have beat them. Just think what could have happened if PTC had an attorney with a little fortitude. Those clowns could have easily been sent packing with their coyote tails between their legs along with a much needed spanking.

Oh well. No guts... no glory. No principles...no ethics. I wish the politicians would bail me out for the bad debts I've incurred on government projects and had to write off due to the corrupt contractors and players such as those involved here. Actually I'd like to see the government hold these fraudulent predators accountable. It's amazing the cycle of corruption these guys perpetuate over and over. It's time to stop these crooks. Oh well....won't be this time will it?


Submitted by swmbo on Fri, 12/01/2006 - 10:00pm.

What disincentive is there to some current or future politician doing the very same thing? After all, they know the collective public memory is short-lived. Sure, we'll gripe for a bit and then it will be replaced with some new irritation. The bill will get paid. Your taxes will go up (it'll just happen in some surreptitious way that either reduces services or puts the blame on some unrelated thing). But it will happen again because it never cost them a thing. No one went to jail. No one lost their home, professional license or life savings. There was absolutely NO consequence to any of the people involved.

Yes, one can spend a lot of money to prove a point but sometimes it's just the right thing to do. This is one of those times.

-------------------------------
If you and I are always in agreement, one of us is likely armed and dangerous.

cogitoergofay's picture
Submitted by cogitoergofay on Fri, 12/01/2006 - 10:15pm.

Let me add my concurrence to this sentiment. The real failing of this whole resolution is that it is undeserving of public trust.

Were a jury to say that we the taxpayers owe it, I would gladly oblige. But this whole notion of "Thanksgiving got in the way" does nothing but earn contempt.

You are right, SWMBO, this is one of those instances in which the good fight should have been fought. Regrettably, we were not given an input on either whether or not to fight nor on how to surrender.

"WHEN BAD MEN COMBINE, THE GOOD MUST ASSOCIATE; ELSE THEY WILL FALL, ONE BY ONE, AN UNPITIED SACRIFICE IN A CONTEMPTIBLE STRUGGLE."
Edmund Burke, Irish Philosopher; 1792, after the French Revolution... this has been widely paraphrased as "All that is necessary for evil to prevail, is for a few good men to do nothing."


Submitted by dollaradayandfound on Sat, 12/02/2006 - 6:41am.

Are you suggesting that there are "evil" men, or women) at work right here in River City---I mean Peachtree City (where there isn't one Peachtree)?
The degfinition of evil has changed. It is nearly impossible to be evil anymore. A better way to describe evil might be to list what IS evil, rather than what is not evil; all other things other than this list are NOT EVIL: Never split your voting ticket if you are republican; back the republican in power no matter what he does or doesn't do; if there is a chance to make lots more profit off a deal but it might harm others, and you DON'T do it--that is evil; don't ever make yourself totally clear---leave a way out; do one thing, tell your kids another at church. Get drunk every Friday.
Everything else is not evil.

Robert W. Morgan's picture
Submitted by Robert W. Morgan on Fri, 12/01/2006 - 8:28pm.

So we differ. I would not want to spend $100,000 of the taxpayer's money to prove a point.

If indeed any half-wit lawyer could have won this case - why did not he come forward and convince city councl to fight - instead of "cut and run?"


Git Real's picture
Submitted by Git Real on Fri, 12/01/2006 - 9:49pm.

So we differ. I would not want to spend $100,000 of the taxpayer's money to prove a point.

I would spend another $100,000 to prevent the city from having to pay over $1,000,000.00. Easy decision based on the facts of this case.

If indeed any half-wit lawyer could have won this case - why did not he come forward and convince city council to fight - instead of "cut and run?"

Bob, has it occurred to you that perhaps the city attorney could have advised the mayor and his minions that they had a winnable case if allowed to go to trial?

Why are you so defensive anyways? Is this a case of a hit dog barking?


Submitted by Waterboy on Thu, 11/30/2006 - 2:59pm.

I apologize for not knowing all the history behind these problems - but what I'd like to know is why is the City of Peachtree City running businesses that are open to only paying patrons and not the general citizens of Peachtree City. The baseball parks, open tennis parks, swimming pools, library, etc. are all available at no or minimal cost to the citizens of Peachtree City. This is not the case with events at the Ampitheater and Tennis Center - Why?

Submitted by McDonoughDawg on Thu, 11/30/2006 - 3:29pm.

But I will say, nobody ever moved to PTC because it was exactly like other Cities. Offhand, I know of a few Counties/Cities in the Metro Atlanta Area that run Amphitheaters. I know these facilities charge admission, just like our Amphitheater. Cobb County has one, along with the city of Fayetteville.

Submitted by dollaradayandfound on Thu, 11/30/2006 - 7:31pm.

I havent been since Chuck Berry, Glenn Campbell, KC & Sunshine, Smothers Brothers, Helen Reddy, and "the big Indian, Mr. Las Vegas" stopped coming. Gues the tennis center needed more cash out of the Amphitheater?

Submitted by dollaradayandfound on Thu, 11/30/2006 - 7:31pm.

I havent been since Chuck Berry, Glenn Campbell, KC & Sunshine, Smothers Brothers, Helen Reddy, and "the big Indian, Mr. Las Vegas" stopped coming. Gues the tennis center needed more cash out of the Amphitheater?

Submitted by dollaradayandfound on Thu, 11/30/2006 - 7:27pm.

I havent been since Chuck Berry, Glenn Campbell, KC & Sunshine, Smothers Brothers, Helen Reddy, and "the big Indian, Mr. Las Vegas" stopped coming. Gues the tennis center needed more cash out of the Amphitheater?

Submitted by McDonoughDawg on Thu, 11/30/2006 - 9:04pm.

Smiling

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.