The Democrat counterrevolution, Cal Thomas 11-10-06

Cal's editorial has some truth and fact to it, at least in the first paragraph. Beyond that, let's try to remember the last time this country had a balanced budget. Let's try to remember the last time this country was admired by the rest of the world as a power of good, vs. greed.

I'm a military veteran and I have 24 years of federal service. And I have voted for leaders on both sides of the isle. The Bush administration has all but completely destroyed what good every administration before it has been able to achieve. And the media induced mass ignorance gave the administration an additional four years to run America further into the ground.

I hope someone will unplug the Fox News network and give the brainwashed in this state a chance to think based on fact. It is important to have a balance of Democrats and Republicans in Congress. However, what is more important is not being blind to the point of voting Democrat or Republican by unbending loyalty or flat out ignorance (i.e.. "I don't vote democrat because they raise taxes to pay for those minorities that don't work.") If that isn't bad enough it's reinforced by the media spin that caters to what they think their audience wants to hear, or what their corporate clients want spun. The result of voting blind will potentially give us another administration that is corrupt, acting above the law, and incapable of representing the will and rightful image of the American people.

Speaking of media induced.., The Citizen leans so far to the right, that by itself it often slides off my kitchen table right into the trash.

Tim Leonard
Peachtree City, GA
BigSky4ATL@aol.com

Tim Leonard's blog | login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by AMDG on Wed, 11/15/2006 - 8:39am.

Tim,
This is the kind of hyberbole that makes it hard for me to take folks like you seriously.
You complain about Fox and the Citizen, but have no problem with all network news divisions, CNN, MSNBC, the NY Times, the Wash Post, and most professors in academia being liberal?
Talk about people being lead to vote blindly! Those centers of thought control nearly completely dominated the American landscape for 50 years, and now that there is some competition, people like you do nothing but cry and complain about it.
To me it seems you are saying you only want one voice heard in the U.S. and will not tolerate dissent.
Sounds awfully totalitarian to me, but that shouldn't be a surprise since totalitarians are primarily from the Left anyway (remember, Fascists were just socialists with militaristic nationalism thrown in and Communists, well, enough said).
And what is this carping about people having voted Republicans in office? Granted, the Republicans became drunk with power and violated the public trust, but are you claiming Democrats are invulnerable to such temptations when in power? How about William Jefferson (takes $90k and doesn't even apologize and then goes on to get re-elected!)? Talk about "blind" voters.
But unlike you, I still respect the will of the people, even if I don't like it. Of course, that is another trait of Democrats/liberals these days: scorn for the will of the people. That's why when they lose elections they go around complaining about vote fraud and resort to using the courts to get their way rather than the legislature or popular vote. (Have you heard anything near the outcry about voting fraud in the many close elections where Democrats won?... I think not. Republicans have showed their inherent respect for law and the process by honoring the results even though they were so close and certainly worthy of scrutiny. This contrasts mightily to the Democrats who still complain about 2000 and 2004! Or how about the 2004 Wash. governor race, when the Democrats called for multiple recounts until finally, voila, the Democrat came out on top!).
So, quit your whining and start debating the issues on their merits so you don't need to depend on absolute liberal media control in order to manipulate the public into voting the way you like.

Submitted by dollaradayandfound on Wed, 11/15/2006 - 9:35am.

Since when must a newspaper be all conservative or all liberal or all moderate?
It is impossible to be objective with anything in the paper if you must satisfy your own personal politics, or those of your ad buyers!
The NY Times reports all of the news, it is just that many of their opinions are prejudiced.

AF A-10's picture
Submitted by AF A-10 on Mon, 11/13/2006 - 8:56pm.

Tim, I believe that papers such as this one and news outlets like Fox feel that the "mass media" is liberally biased and thus they must lean right to "balance" the playing field. Unfortunately The Citizen and Fox tend to ignore the "sins" of their own to highlight the "liberal" view. The cartoons in the Citizen tend to be the biggest culprits.
The most glaring and recent examples are the ways Fox and The Citizen portray "liberals" as being weak on immigration when the Head of the Republican party who is also our President has the weakest stance on immigration in Washington. I found it comical when Fox showed Rep Mark Foley as a democrat. Great journalists there.
But every now and then the Citizen will surprise you. They have stood up against unbridaled growth and Mr. Westmoreland. But remember the political landscape here in Fayette County. They have to serve their base, even when the base is a bit off base. Cheers, thanks for the counterpoint, and stay in the fight!

Kevin "Hack" King


Submitted by myword_mark on Tue, 11/14/2006 - 1:46pm.

Supply and demand gentleman. Ad revenue. The almighty dollar. The viewership of Fox news is greater (and therefore the ad revenue is larger) than that of CNN and MSNBC combined.

You can no more fault a local news paper for reflecting the desires of it's community than you can condemn capitalism itself. There exists no "higher calling" among journalists - they all work for companies that must show a profit.

Liberal cities = liberal papers. Conservative cities = conservative papers. Large cities can usually support both - but not always.

AF A-10's picture
Submitted by AF A-10 on Tue, 11/14/2006 - 2:14pm.

And heck, they give me this paper for FREE 3 X a week! I've got a guinnea pig, three dogs, and military boots to shine, so I am nothing but grateful to an ad revenue that allows free paper distribution. God Bless Capitalism.... I mean, America!

Hack


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.