-->
Search the ArchivesNavigationContact InformationThe Citizen Newspapers For Advertising Information Email us your news! For technical difficulties |
Is PTC Council really representing citizens?Tue, 10/31/2006 - 5:06pm
By: Letters to the ...
Who is representing the citizens of Peachtree City? We’ve all seen movies in which local politicians and chambers of commerce are portrayed as the bad guys. In movies like “Jaws” we watched as the mayor and head of the chamber of commerce greedily put business interests first, above the welfare of the community. How exaggerated, we thought. Last month, at a meeting about the TDK Extension, we heard the chamber of commerce and business owners argue in favor of traffic, which they believe will bring them more business, with little regard for the impact that this massive amount of traffic will have on the entire city. We cannot blame the chamber for putting business first, as promoting business is their mandate, although one would wish that, as members of the community, at least those who live here would care about the impact on their neighbors. Our mayor and city council, however, have as their mandate the health and welfare of the people of Peachtree City. They are supposed to represent the interests of the entire city, and anyone who is sincerely doing so would be hard-pressed to find any advantage for the citizens of Peachtree City to invite tens of thousands of cars into and through our city. The argument was made that having multiple thousands of cars traverse Crosstown Road would help the Braelinn shopping center merchants. That is questionable, but whether that is the case or not, we should not be making decisions based on some perceived benefit to one shopping center. Our planned city documents, the land use and comprehensive plans, state that our shopping centers were to be developed to serve the villages of Peachtree City, not the city to serve them. It has become obvious that the extension of this road into a now-rural part of Coweta County is the catalyst that has motivated the exaggeratedly dense developments being planned for that area. Yes, development will eventually arrive there, but it is doubtful that it would be the magnitude of development inspired by and contingent upon the connection of this road. Why else would the airport deal be held hostage to the road being built? Why else do you think the DOT intends to six-lane that part of Ga. Highway 74? Whether it is or not, why would we want to bring all those cars into and through Peachtree City? Without TDK the onus would be on Coweta to handle the traffic and hopefully to be more selective in what they approve. Which leads me back to my original concern: Who is representing the citizens of Peachtree City? Add to the tens of thousands of trips from Coweta those from the extra 1,000 or more homes above current zoning that is being proposed contingent upon annexation into Peachtree City, and one can only be led to wonder, who are our representatives representing? The public’s reaction to the traffic debacle on the 54/74 intersection made it evident how the public feels about increasing traffic. Part of that was temporary. This traffic nightmare to come would be permanent and growing. It can be headed off by disallowing the TDK Extension and allowing no more density than current zoning if annexing land on the west side. We are waiting for our representatives’ decisions on these important issues to find out who it is they represent. Phyllis Aguayo |