Red light cameras eyed for F’ville

Tue, 10/31/2006 - 4:40pm
By: Ben Nelms

Smile, Fayetteville: Red light cameras may be in your driving future.

The Fayetteville City Council wants to study possible placement of a traffic camera at an intersection that would photograph motorists who run red lights. Police Chief Steve Heaton presented details of the Redflex Camera System.

The council during its Oct. 26 annual retreat asked Heaton to pursue the matter by compiling data on the intersections with the largest number of traffic accidents.

Upon completion, Redflex representatives will conduct a live survey at the targeted intersection and report the findings to the council. If interested, the council will activate a public hearing process on the proposal.

City Manager Joe Morton said current Georgia law only provides for ticketing motorists that run red lights. Tickets are issued to the owner of the vehicle, he said.

Also on the retreat agenda was a discussion on upcoming plans to make traffic and pedestrian improvements to downtown and other areas.

Significant at the meeting was discussion of transportation projects around the city. Special Purpose Local Option Sales Tax (SPLOST) revenue collections began in April 2005 and are projected to total $4.2 million.

SPLOST funding includes projects such as Ga. Highway 85/Ga. Highway 314/Jeff Davis intersection improvements, design work for Jimmie Mayfield Boulevard and Ga. Highway 92 to South Jeff Davis, downtown pedestrian improvements and other sidewalk and multi-use trails projects.

Design and cost estimates for the widening on Jimmie Mayfield to four lanes between Jeff Davis and Hwy. 92 is expected by the end of December. With up to $3.5 million in county-approved funding, work on the project could proceed in January assuming the cost is acceptable and there are no Georgia Department of Transportation (DOT) delays.

Another street construction project, the addition of a left-turn lane from northbound Jeff Davis onto southbound Hwy. 85, could be let for bid by DOT in January. The city is providing the design with DOT agreeing to the construction. DOT is currently evaluating non-conforming conditions. Once begun, the project is expected to have an eight-month construction time.

Other upcoming projects include a pedestrian promenade between Hwy. 85 and Tiger Trail and sidewalk improvements on Hwy. 85 between Stonewall and Lafayette Avenue. Advertising for bids is expected in February 2007.

“I hope to see some of these projects come to fruition in the next calendar year,” said Mayor Ken Steele.

Currently in process is the Redwine multi-use path project. The $745,000 county-administered project will construct a 10-foot wide path from Grady Avenue to Long Lake Approach.

The projects are coming at a time of increasing traffic volume through Fayetteville. Vehicular traffic north of the square is listed at 37,000 vehicles per day, said City Engineer Don Easterbrook, with 5 percent annual increases in flow. Those continuing increases affirmed the council’s stated approach to explore all options when considering future transportation and pedestrian needs.

Council members gave the go-ahead to Chief Heaton to proceed with the budgeted appointment of an officer to join the Sheriff’s Drug Suppression Task Force. The appointment can be made once an agreement is reached and policy issues between Fayetteville Police and Fayette Sheriff’s Office have been addressed.

login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by r_u_clooless on Fri, 11/03/2006 - 2:37pm.

I've never commented here before, but I have a personal interest in this. I got a ticket at this intersection and all the cop wanted to do was write it. He didn't care that a tractor-trailer was to my left and coming into my lane or a car was tail gating me or that the light had just turned yellow 1 1/2 seconds before I entered the intersection. He didn't care that I couldn't slam on the brakes.

I went back to the intersection to time the light and found it had a 2 second yellow light. When I went to court, (and I didn't realize they had a paid attorney representing the city) he told the judge that we didn't know that was the case at the time of the traffic stop. And that I didn't have a certified timer or certified person running the equipment. So how to you expect to get you "fair" day in court when it is stacked against you from the start.

I went to the DOT and they advised me that a yellow light should be timed at about 1.2 seconds for every 10 mph. He said it should be about 4.5 seconds of a yellow light. They reset the yellow and someone reset it back to 2 seconds. After a second call to them, the DOT replaced the controlled and added remote monitoring.

So is the Red Light Camera for safety or to generate revenue?

As a side note, that was the first traffic ticket I received in my adult life.

Submitted by 30YearResident on Fri, 11/03/2006 - 8:57am.

"To Protect, Serve and Generate A Profit"

(Should be painted on their Police Cars)

Submitted by Jones on Thu, 11/02/2006 - 3:59pm.

We'll all agree that there are plenty of worthy things that need attention. Doing nothing like Congress, particularly Westmoreland, is not being accountable. If the guys in power are capable of doing more wrong than right, get'em out of there.

Really, how do we know that police officer was doing a good job? Are we going to take Harold Logsdon's word for it?

Submitted by 1BravesFan on Wed, 11/01/2006 - 4:06pm.

Coming from a west coast city that had these cameras a few years back, I can tell you this is a much needed and excellent solution for the blatent lack of respect many drivers have for vehicular laws around here. It's quite obvious that many motorists (many who have out of county plates) don't really give a damn about the safety and well being of fellow motorists. It's all about them ... them getting in front of you, them getting to where they're going sooner, them trying to edge you out so they can get in front of the line.

Think about it, it's pretty bad when people no longer speed up and run through yellow lights as many have done in the past. People now approach the light as it turns red and feel entitled to keep going through the RED LIGHT because the opposing traffic that now has GREEN has yet to move forward! This is WRONG people, wake up! No way are you entitled to run a red light.

The best way to change the bad behavior of adults is through their pocketbook. The sooner the better as far as I'm concerned.

bad_ptc's picture
Submitted by bad_ptc on Wed, 11/01/2006 - 12:45pm.

What red light cameras, and most police officers, don’t take into consideration is the time and distance required to safely stop a car.

Click Here to see the basic formulas.

I have always wondered why there isn’t some form of marker on the side of the road that if you had already passed it, before the light turned yellow, you would be legally allowed to proceed through the intersection because otherwise would require you to attempt to make an unsafe stop.

Do the math, if you’re going 45 mph, assuming all conditions are satisfactory, and the light in front of you changes to yellow for 4.5 seconds, how far back do you need to be to stop safely? How many seconds will it take you?

The answer isn’t 4.5 sec.


Submitted by McDonoughDawg on Wed, 11/01/2006 - 1:13pm.

Makes a difference. Fact is, folks should know how long it takes them to stop. You won't get a ticket for going through when it's yellow.

bad_ptc's picture
Submitted by bad_ptc on Wed, 11/01/2006 - 5:42pm.

You're not supposed to "enter" the intersection if the light is yollow. It's not a matter of being out of it before the light turns red.


cowtipn's picture
Submitted by cowtipn on Wed, 11/01/2006 - 10:04am.

I wouldn't expect anything less from these people. Nothing more than another tax collection scheme. Don't be suprised when the yellow light time changes from 4.0 seconds to 3.5. What's next?


Submitted by bobarms on Tue, 10/31/2006 - 5:05pm.

I think this is an awesome idea that should have been implemented long ago. Maybe this will slow down some of those fools always in a rush or squeezing through, while bringing extra revenue for improvements for our community. My only concern will be ensuring the money is used within Fayetteville, and not other communities. Perhaps a little selfish?

Submitted by Red Jim on Tue, 10/31/2006 - 11:27pm.

One alternative to cameras is to lengthen the yellow light. A 2004 paper (fn. 2) showed a 69% decrease in violations when a yellow was increased from 4.0 seconds, to 4.5 seconds. There are many other studies (fn. 1) with similar results.

Lengthening the yellow also reduces severe accidents. A 2004 study (fn. 3) by the Texas Transportation Institute found, "…an increase in the yellow duration of 1.0 second is associated with an MF [crash frequency] of about 0.6, which corresponds to a 40 percent reduction in crashes."

A second alternative to cameras is to improve street markings. 2005 research (fn. 4) sponsored by Florida's Department of Transportation concluded that improving street markings near intersections reduced red light running by up to 74 percent without increasing the likelihood of rear end collisions.

For additional safety improvement, increase the size of all the lights, to 12" diameter. I don't have a study to cite for that, but it is known to have an effect.

I hope that the City will try alternatives before installing cameras.

Red Jim

Footnotes:

1. http://thenewspaper.com/news/04/430.asp (Red Light Camera Studies Roundup)

2. http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-06242004-230619/unrestricted/Thesis_3.pdf at page 67

3. http://thenewspaper.com/rlc/docs/04-alternatives.pdf at page 2-20

4. http://thenewspaper.com/rlc/docs/05-simulator.pdf at page 69

Submitted by McDonoughDawg on Wed, 11/01/2006 - 10:18am.

My thoughts are if you rear-end someone, you are following too close. You should ALWAYS be able to stop without hitting the car in front of you. Am I wrong with this thinking?

I realize accidents do happen, but following too close isn't an accident.

2ndly my thoughts on the cameras...If they will put more officers patrolling shopping centers/neighborhoods instead of revenue producing, I'm all for it. But keep in mind, I don't run red lights. Smiling

cowtipn's picture
Submitted by cowtipn on Wed, 11/01/2006 - 10:33am.

I don't run red lights either; in fact, it angers me when people do. If our officials were concerned about safety, they'd be out there at this very minute watching a ticketing people for running one. As soon as the lower courts held that these tickets can be written to the owner of the vehicle despite proof that they were driving they have been chomping at the bits to get these installed. I can't wait to see what's coming next: perhaps speeding cameras or GPS microchips for our elderly? Glad to see Fayette County has the time to focus on these issues having solved that crime problem.


Submitted by McDonoughDawg on Wed, 11/01/2006 - 11:52am.

I can live with it.

There have been cameras for speeding in other jurisdictions.

Are you for hiring more cops to patrol the intersections or letting a camera nail a few folks in a hurry?

cowtipn's picture
Submitted by cowtipn on Wed, 11/01/2006 - 12:08pm.

We need more cops doing their jobs rather than sitting in parking lots talking to each other or sneaking up on inmates' back porches and shooting thier dogs.


Submitted by skyspy on Wed, 11/01/2006 - 1:05pm.

Hopefull the revenue from the red light camera's will pay for them. The first year they put camer's for red lights in Cobb county they made a cool 2 million. We need that money here.
Those cameras catch more than just Fayette residents, we will make money off of everyone who comes here. If we want to keep crimedale.....ooppps I mean Riverdale out; we need these cameras at both of the entrances to the car theftavilion ooppps I mean the Pavilion. If we hit these out of town "guests" hard enough with fines maybe they will stay away.

Submitted by dollaradayandfound on Wed, 11/01/2006 - 5:26pm.

If we take in 2 million dollars here as Cobb County did with the cameras, I think we should immediately put one in at each and every traffic light and also at every four way stop and also at every stop sign in the county, and in the cities.
What with us paying up to maybe ten million dollars with such a setup, everyone would then be so ticked off they would then really hate the cops worser. Yeah, have them stop everyone they see for eight hours per shift and issue a ticket for just about anything---if nothing can be found, beat out their taillight with a wand.
Let's lease ten helicopters and pilots with cameras and lasers. We could zap the electronic system in offender's cars and land and write many, many tickets. Do we really have people in these positions who have no leeway or judgement? Controlling crime doesn't come from tickets. Take the license sooner and teach driving in school.

Submitted by McDonoughDawg on Wed, 11/01/2006 - 12:17pm.

Go up and let'em know. You can't tell me that at some point during the day you don't need a break..

I think they do a good job myself.

Submitted by Jones on Thu, 11/02/2006 - 3:38pm.

What office are you running for McDonoughDawg? You support do-nothing government and no accountability. If you start talking about a pay raise too, we'll know your Harold Logsdon.

Submitted by McDonoughDawg on Thu, 11/02/2006 - 3:39pm.

Where have I supported no accountability? Are you suggesting our Police "do nothing" all day long? I think for the most part, they do a very good job.

As far as running for office, I couldn't afford the pay cut. I hear being a Lobbyists pays much better.

cowtipn's picture
Submitted by cowtipn on Wed, 11/01/2006 - 12:28pm.

They do a great job when they get around to it. And I'll make it a point next time I see them chilling to go up and ask them to stop wasting my money, I'm sure they'll appreciate that.


Submitted by skyspy on Wed, 11/01/2006 - 1:21pm.

You don't know any cops do you? Right now the police depts and the sheriff's office are short staffed. They wouldn't have to work 10-12 hours days if they weren't. This county isn't the little "Mayberry" you think it is. On an average shift they only get a 15 min. lunch break, if they get one at all.

You are so out of touch with what is really going on here.
Is it painfull for you to be dumber than the rocks in my backyard? Just curious.....Are you related to the mouth-breathing idiot who was complaining about the sheriff's dept. helicopter last week? The one who thought it was so outrageous that they used the helicopter to track armed bank robbers. What is the world coming to, if armed bank robbers can't get away?

mainframecpu's picture
Submitted by mainframecpu on Wed, 11/01/2006 - 2:33pm.

SkyDude - you sound like Basmati - the other rude guy with the mouth breathing comments.

Why all the hostility? You guys so need to relax. You'll die young from heart issues if you don't!

Just calming the public -
MainFrame


Submitted by IMNSHO on Wed, 11/01/2006 - 12:39pm.

The average response time for Fayetteville and PTC police is 5 minutes. Longer for the Sheriff's deputies, but they have larger territories to cover. When they're not responding to calls, they are patroling their beats, as a visible force *is* a deterrant to crime. If you ever see a car just sitting (and I don't mean when they're sitting running radar), you can bet that they are writing reports from calls they've already been on.

Just chilling? Doing nothing? Not the officers I know.

Submitted by IMNSHO on Wed, 11/01/2006 - 12:36am.

I think a longer yellow light at certain intersections, like around the old courthouse, would increase the likelihood of opposite-direction traffic being blocked, because drivers do not have the common-sense to not pull into an intersection when there is not room to get out of it (you see this at the 54/74 intersection ALL the time).

Git Real's picture
Submitted by Git Real on Tue, 10/31/2006 - 11:33pm.

Welcome to the board.

I have to ask....are you being silly or what? Do you think our politicians are really concerned about safety? If they cared about safety they would, as you say, lengthen the yellow light time. This is all about the massive revenues these cameras would bring to the city.

PS..I don't think you're silly. I just don't believe our politicos are as noble as portrayed with this safety issue.


Submitted by DT on Wed, 11/01/2006 - 11:21am.

Yes, I have to believe there is a concern for safety! I sit at a light waiting for it to change and it scares me to see how many will run the other light. Around here, drivers seem to think "red" means "two or three more" instead of "stop". Down deep, the problem is there is little respect for the law and the lawbreakers are passing their terrible example along to the next generations. Local communities SHOULD be collecting revenue from the people who refuse to abide by the law. You might call it "the law of consequences".

cowtipn's picture
Submitted by cowtipn on Wed, 11/01/2006 - 11:32am.

We already have a law prohibiting people from running red lights with "consequences." The issue here is that a red light camera is controversial as local governments treat them as infallible tools of enforcement when clearly they are not.


Submitted by DT on Wed, 11/01/2006 - 12:58pm.

That's right, we already have the law. The problem is that it's unenforceable because we can't have a traffic cop at each intersection 24 hours a day. So why not use some technology? Any controversy created takes back seat to safety and law enforcement.

Submitted by skyspy on Wed, 11/01/2006 - 1:10pm.

Security cameras don't lie. They will send you your picture with the ticket. When you see the flash just smile and wave....they got you.
It's sad that I know this.

bad_ptc's picture
Submitted by bad_ptc on Wed, 11/01/2006 - 6:09pm.

According to the article the "Tickets are issued to the owner of the vehicle" not necessarily the person that was driving the vehicle.

Seriously, just a question.

Ok all you lawyers, pony up.


Submitted by pldoolittle on Thu, 11/02/2006 - 1:58pm.

Our legal system guarantees us the right to face and cross examine our accusers. Red light cameras deny us that right. Supporters of red light cameras would gladly jeprodize our entire legal system just to make a few bucks. I will personally contribute time and money to the the opponents of ANY politician who supports such an attrocious violation of our due process rights.

And for you politicians making the preposterous claims that the ticket was issued to the vehicle.

1) Calling a turnip a rose, does not make it one.
2) Your constituents are not so stupid as to not realize that.
3) It takes someone extremely self-absorbed to make such a preposterous statement *and* actually think everyone else is just dumb enought enough not to realize just how absurd it is.

That said, I'll play along with your little charade: Since my car received the violation, you will need to coordinate with it about paying the fine. As it's legal representative, I can tell you that my car suffers from a severe mental disability that renders it unable to care for itself, and is unable to perform meaningful work without a full time caretaker. As a result, my car has been unemployed for many years and receives no substantial income. To that end, I will be filing a petition to have the fine waved as my client is clearly indigent. You may elect to assign my car community service in lieu of the fine, but be aware that you will need to provide transportation and a caretaker for my car during the duration of the community service period. And be warned, should my car be neglected or receive injury while under your supervision, I will be filing a lawsuit seeking actual damages, pain & suffering, and punitive damages.

Sound ridiculous? No more so than issuing a citation to an inanimate object. What a bunch of nitwits we have elected...

Submitted by McDonoughDawg on Thu, 11/02/2006 - 2:00pm.

The more they do, the more trouble they cause. I said on this forum elsewhere, that our elected Representatives do too much.

Your post makes way too much sense for Politicians.

Git Real's picture
Submitted by Git Real on Thu, 11/02/2006 - 2:59pm.

What you're saying is Westmoreland may actually be our best congressman because he is the biggest do-nothing-er of all. Which means the less they legislate the better off we are?


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.