Group VI sued for tennis center problems

Thu, 10/19/2006 - 3:27pm
By: John Munford

Battle with PTC over unpaid bills slated for January

The Peachtree City Council has filed a counterclaim against Group VI, claiming shoddy construction work led to drainage problems that ultimately caused the bottom floor of the tennis center to flood on several occasions.

The city did not specify any damages it is seeking in conjunction with that claim, which alleges that Group Vi breached its contract for the project. The initial suit was filed by Group VI and Foley Design Associates, which claims they are still owed $228,000 in unpaid bills stemming from the expansion of the tennis center.

The $2.2 million construction contract was with the Development Authority of Peachtree City, which no longer operates the tennis center and no longer receives hotel-motel tax funds to operate the tennis center.

This is a separate lawsuit from the action filed by Peachtree National Bank which claims the city should pay the bank for $1.5 million in outstanding loans that were taken out previously by the development authority to fund improvement at the tennis center and the city’s amphitheater in addition to providing working capital.

Group VI and Foley claim the city, which owns the tennis center complex, is ultimately responsible for the outstanding construction bills. The additional $228,000 in charges comes from change orders on the project, part of which involved finishing up the ground floor space in the tennis center clubhouse which later housed college classes offered by Clayton State University.

Finishing that floor cost $54,000, while other items including changes to clubhouse lighting ($52,000), landscaping and irrigation design and installation ($21,000), and paving of the south parking area behind the indoor courts ($12,000).

The change orders were signed for by former DAPC executive director Virgil Christian. The expanded facility opened in spring 2003.

A trial in the suit is tentatively scheduled for sometime in January.

login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by johenry on Mon, 10/23/2006 - 3:16pm.

As ptctaxpayer mentioned below, Group VI did a horrible job on the airport terminal at Falcon Field too. Everytime we went to an airport authority meeting, it looked like the ceiling was going to fall down. Group VI didn't pay to fix the problems at the airport.

Mayor Brown was right about Group VI and the development authority.

KraftyFla's picture
Submitted by KraftyFla on Mon, 10/23/2006 - 7:40pm.

Only with Government Contracting...can a bunch of yokels be the highest cost and poorest quality and still get awarded the jobs. The only one who saw it was Steve Brown.


mudcat's picture
Submitted by mudcat on Mon, 10/23/2006 - 7:48pm.

We all saw it and made a choice to look away because things were so good (growth-wise) and we didn't want to upset the gravy train. Brown was way out of the mainstream, certainly not on the gravy train and a bit jealous of achievers - who were smart enough to get on the gravy train in the first place.

After all, back then some of us in non-pilot households had to make a living as well.

It is true - you could look it up.

meow


Submitted by Hardtack on Thu, 10/19/2006 - 6:28pm.

Something here doesn't seem just right. G-Vl sued the city for payment, then the city said they didn't owe the money that the old development authority owed G-Vl. I smell a deal that has already been worked out---the building wil be fixed and the city will pay G-Vl! Now if they (I don't know who) can just find a way to pay Peachtree (Synovus now) Bank the million and a half, I now believe it is up to, and I'm sure plus much interest and lawyer fees, then this problem will be resolved, won't it?
The city does not owe the money folks! If the bank wants to takeover the tennis center for the debt, let them have it. If that isn't legal, which I doubt, then it is not owed. Heck, people make bad loans--and this is one.

valleygirl's picture
Submitted by valleygirl on Sat, 10/21/2006 - 10:37am.

Come on now folks. I confess that I haven't followed the tennis center mess but if Group VI was hired to build it and they did and the center is owned by the city and it's citizens then we should pay for it. Why should it be any different than the aquatic center, ampitheater, or the soccer fields for that matter? We as citizens use the facility and we should take responsiblity and pay for it! It seems to me that everyone wants something for nothing around here. Well guess what, there are no free lunches and the bad debts being written off by banks are part of the problem with the economy in this country. We as citizens need to do what is right in this situation. Drainage problems? Has the city ever approached the builder to ask if those problems could be addressed? Or has this come up as a result of the advise of a good attorney who has advised the city council that this may be the only way to dodge the pay up bullet? I don't know, but at first blush it looks like a typical legal move and one that may or may not work. Personally, I think not paying for the tennis center is the same as shop lifting and I don't like being associated with thieves. I'm sure what ever workmanship problems there may be with the center if they were properly addressed and the builder were properly paid, they would all be handled with professionalism instead of court battles.


Voice of Fayette Future's picture
Submitted by Voice of Fayett... on Sat, 10/21/2006 - 3:25pm.

Thank you Bad PTC….Valley Girl is admittedly uniformed and just another Good Ole Boy cheerleader. Perhaps each of these ladies are realtor/tennis players. Yup, that Independent Counsel report produced a huge spike upward in the revenue of local criminal lawyers. Did you see the Airport blog on that bad roof--- can Group VI even build a roof for a dog house ?

The City is not liable for the Debts. Lenox/Brooks/Pace/The Banks did not want to have to obey the law and follow the rules, which is why they did this clever “Authority” plan. They deliberately put it outside the City to avoid the following: [(1) Having their finances reviewed by the city auditors (2) Having the citizens vote on referendum (3) Not having to do the accounting that all of them including the Bank do daily (4) Not having to have Open Meetings]. This is why they set it up this way.

No, Group VI is like a 16 year old walking in to Kroger to buy beer through his friend, the clerk, and then complaining that he doesn’t get his change back. When you are engaged in a series of illegal activities, bad things happen.

Several questions which have been unanswered speak volumes: (1) If this was legitimate, why didn’t Lenox have the CITY do the entire deal and what were the ulterior motives; (2) If these people were so honorable, why did they keep no financial records, make decisions in closed meetings with lawyers admitting it and why did several of them move out of state in the middle of the night?

As Michael Douglas said in Wall Street: “It’s all about the money, kid. The rest is just conversation.”


abeautifulday4us's picture
Submitted by abeautifulday4us on Thu, 10/19/2006 - 4:22pm.

Three contractors were touring the PTC Tennis Center on the same day guided by a board member of the PTC Development Authority.

Of the three contractors, one was from Atlanta, another from Coweta, and the third was Group VI Construction. At the end of the tour, the Development Authority Board member asked all of them what they did for a living. When they each replied that they were contractors, the Development Authority Board member said, "Hey we need the roof redone. Why don't you guys take a look at it and give me your bids."

First the Atlanta contractor took out his tape measure and pencils, did some measuring and said, "I figure the job will run about $90,000 - $40,000 for materials, $40,000 for my crew, and $10,000 profit for me."

Next was the Coweta contractor. He also took out his tape measure and pencil, did some quick calculations and said, "Looks like I can do this job for $70,000 - $30,000 for materials, $30,000 for my crew, and $10,000 profit for me."

Finally, the Development Authority Board member asks Group VI Construction for their bid. Without batting an eye, Group VI says, "$270,000."

The Development Authority Board member, grins from ear to ear and says, "Come on , you didn't even measure like the other guys or check the roof! How did you come up with such a high figure?"

"Easy," says Group VI Construction, "$100,000 for me, $100,000 for you, we hire the guy from Coweta and we get the City to fund it."


Submitted by skyspy on Fri, 10/20/2006 - 9:38pm.

I would, except that it sounds like it's true, not fiction.

These snakes make Leo Mullen and Ken Lay look like choir boys.

I wish we could make business dealings like this a capital crime. Could I be on the firing squad?

muddle's picture
Submitted by muddle on Fri, 10/20/2006 - 3:11pm.

This is actually really good. If you put this together from scratch you should have your own late night show!

Photo: College antics, circa 1978.


ptctaxpayer's picture
Submitted by ptctaxpayer on Fri, 10/20/2006 - 8:38pm.

PTC Aviation Authority Meeting Minutes: April 16, 2003

“2. Aviation Center Roof Leaks. We will be meeting with the engineers from Williamson and Associates; Bill Foley, the architect who designed the building; and Jim Pace of Group VI who built the building; at 10:00 a.m., on April 22nd to review Williamson's recommendations and to determine what (if any) participation we can expect from the other two companies to help correct the many roof leaks, some of which have existed since day one.”

www.kffc.org/minutes041603.doc


muddle's picture
Submitted by muddle on Fri, 10/20/2006 - 3:11pm.

This is actually really good. If you put this together from scratch you should have your own late night show!

Photo: College antics, circa 1978.


Submitted by knowsthefactsaboutit on Thu, 10/19/2006 - 4:36pm.

Yep, sounds just like Group VI...except you forgot the part about them sending certain female agents to you for certain favors to help sway your mind & eventually get them what they want out of a deal!

tortugaocho's picture
Submitted by tortugaocho on Thu, 10/19/2006 - 7:50pm.

Hey, hey, hey….Where are Mudcat, Stinson, Rex Green and the Developer crowd cheerleaders? You need to jump to the defense of Group VI. Counting...5---4---3---…

“They are honorable people”

“They have given so much to the community”

“Steve Brown is the cause of all problems including malaria and printer cartridge failure.”

If these guys do own a Congressman, State Senator and a Mayor, I’m worried about the judge. Who is the judge?


mudcat's picture
Submitted by mudcat on Thu, 10/19/2006 - 8:15pm.

No one has been a "Developer" cheerleader. Supporting "Development" and growth is one thing. Cheerleading for the "Developer" is something else.

Group VI is a builder, by the way - not a developer.

If it turns out they were a bad builder, then they should be ordered to pay damages or reimburse their client - assuming the judge and jury do that instead of some moron with a keyboard.
meow


valleygirl's picture
Submitted by valleygirl on Sat, 10/21/2006 - 10:48am.

Hey Mudcat do you have an extra dredger I could barrow? The mud is getting pretty deep here and I afraid my hip boots or waders won't be sufficent to keep from drowning in it. I agree with you to a point. Has the city asked Group VI to fix the drainage problem? Has the city paid the builder for there work? Would anyone out there like to be in their shoes and have built this center and not gotten paid for the work and then have to spend more of your money to fix it? I realize that they recieved some of the money owed but thats like going to a store and buying a shirt and dropping a free pair of jeans in your bag as you walk out. Then you come back and demand a full refund on those jeans later because you ripped them!
It's a shame this city has dissolved to this. There should be a way to work this out without tying up the courts time.


Submitted by skyspy on Sat, 10/21/2006 - 12:54pm.

Never pay a contractor for work that is not finished, or done poorly.

This is the advice consumer advocates give homeowners all of the time, and it fits for cities as well.

If anyone is looking for a "free lunch" it is the builders in this case.

secret squirrel's picture
Submitted by secret squirrel on Fri, 10/20/2006 - 12:55pm.

We've gone over this once before. Group VI is most certainly a developer.

Check their website: http://www.groupvi.com/RE%20Web%20Site/REFrames/REframe_dev%20serv2.html


Our development services can be summarized in one word: flexibility. Our philosophy is to assemble the necessary resources to achieve a tenant's or property owner's real estate or business objectives.

Our results oriented approach to development includes the following services or ownership structures:


Spear Road Guy's picture
Submitted by Spear Road Guy on Thu, 10/19/2006 - 8:43pm.

Foolish Mudcat, Group VI is a builder/developer. Gosh golly gee, you mean Jim Pace and Group VI might have to pay for their shoddy workmanship? How did they get the job anyway?

Not to worry, the Honorable Mayor Harold Logsdon will find some way to clear Group VI of any obligation. They did help his campaign after all.

How much you want to bet court documents read "The Suckers of Peachtree City v. Group VI, Inc."

Vote Republican (except Westmoreland)


ManofGreatLogic's picture
Submitted by ManofGreatLogic on Fri, 10/20/2006 - 3:22pm.

You constantly rail against conservatives. Are you sure you are a Republican?

Who do you really believe represents the middle class better? (not well, mind you, but better).

Tennis! I thought America outgrew it.

PS. Could someone PLEASE format these bulletin boards so that they actually go in order by date and time posted? That would actually make sense.


Submitted by fclassonly on Fri, 10/20/2006 - 4:57pm.

MOGL:
Look at the bottom of the page where it says:

Comment viewing options

and set up the board to read the way you want it to.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.