Westmoreland supports bill that will gut local land use and zoning restrictions

Tue, 10/03/2006 - 4:13pm
By: Letters to the ...

U.S. Rep. Lynn Westmoreland has gained a lot of attention for his lack of intensity on solving the nation’s problems, meddling in local affairs with the TDK Extension, and for receiving campaign funding from the TDK landowners at the same time.

However, you will be even more surprised that Rep. Westmoreland is supporting the Private Property Rights Implementation Act of 2006 (H.R. 4772).

Now on the face of things, the name of this act implies something of a virtuous nature which protects the average citizen from government abuses. Nothing could be further from the truth.

Rep. Westmoreland, in the development business himself, is supporting a land speculation and development tumult, free of state and local regulations.

H.R. 4772 is designed to crush the ability of state and local governments to apply reasonable planning standards in their jurisdictions. The main supporters of this legislative perk are real estate developers and construction association advocates.

The measure is designed to eliminate local zoning power by bypassing local and state courts and going directly to the federal courts, thus circumventing any actions under the color of state law.

So much for “home rule” and allowing cities, counties and states to shape their communities in a manner deemed beneficial by their constituents at the local level.

House Report 109-658 states the need for the legislation as follows, “[H.R. 4772] would allow property owners raising solely federal takings claims to have their cases decided in federal court without first pursuing a litigation detour in State court.”

In laymen’s speak, this means local developers are having problems force-feeding their proposed developments (not meeting local planning standards) into local communities. Therefore, H.R. 4772 will dodge local planning and zoning standards predicated on local and state law, and federalize all such claims.

Why would anyone be in favor of bypassing local planning standards and creating a federal system to dictate the character and design of local communities?

Here is a possible H.R. 4772 scenario. A large developer wants to build a large industrial site on land (zoned for residential purposes) adjacent to a public school and some neighborhoods. The local government determines that the proposed use for development is not consistent with local planning standards and the comprehensive plan.

In an H.R. 4772 environment, the developer/landowner bypasses all local and state courts and files a “takings” claim in federal court. It is then left up to a federal court to impose a ruling upon the local jurisdiction without considering local or state law designed to promote reasonable use, adequate infrastructure and ordered future growth.

In the example, if the developer offered the landowner $20 million for his property and the federal courts rule in their favor, the local jurisdiction either has to allow them to build or pay them 20 million taxpayer dollars for the land.

Obviously, because of the costs associated with purchasing the land, the local government, most likely, would allow them to build whatever they wanted regardless of what is in the community’s best interests.

H.R. 4772 gives communities across the country a reason to worry. Please defend the ability of local communities to control their land planning without federal manipulation.

Write Rep. Westmoreland and tell him you don’t want a federal judge controlling the character of your community. (U.S. Representative Lynn Westmoreland; 1601-B East Highway 34; Newnan, Georgia 30265; fax: 770-683-2042.)

Federally dictated over development and traffic congestion is not the answer.

Steve Brown
Peachtree City, Ga.

Brown is the former mayor of Peachtree City. The Private Property Rights Implementation Act of 2006 has passed the House 231-181. Rep. Westmoreland voted in favor of the act.

login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by tonto707 on Sun, 10/29/2006 - 10:13pm.

Steve Brown, go to this website

http://www.smokersclubinc.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=3458

and read the real meaning of HR4772.

Sorry, Steve, you are way off base there. HR4772 deals with illegal takings by municipalities, counties or states without the property owner having redress in the federal courts.

This legislation guarantees that every citizen has access to the federal court without exhausting time and money in local and state courts before entering the federal court venue.

Spear Road Guy's picture
Submitted by Spear Road Guy on Sun, 10/08/2006 - 12:16pm.

... it that no one doubts he voted to trash our local zoning laws. No one doubts that Peachtree City Mayor Harold Logsdon lies about the issues, and no one doubts that U.S. Representative Lynn Westmoreland works for people other than his constituents.

The sadest part is that people will vote for Westmoreland because he is disguised as a Republican. Ladies and gentleman, look a little closer, that sheep has very sharp teeth and you had better be careful.

Vote Republican (except Westmoreland)


Git Real's picture
Submitted by Git Real on Sun, 10/08/2006 - 12:24pm.

With this kind of frustration and resentment toward an incumbent Republican Congressman maybe there's hope of us (the little people) grassroot type conservatives taking the party back.

I would be ready to play in that environment.

Vote Conservative (except Westmoreland)


Submitted by skyspy on Wed, 10/04/2006 - 7:23am.

Along with Mark Pedophile ooopps, I mean Foley.(and a gay pedophile to top it off) Republicans have done so much for us lately. The true beliefs and values of the party are finally showing.

Git Real's picture
Submitted by Git Real on Wed, 10/04/2006 - 9:29am.

The true beliefs and values of the party are finally showing.

Do you really believe that the Republican party is the party of gay peodphiles? I think that's the Democratic party that has stood up and fought for those casuses over the years. Come to think of it Foley might fit in real good on your side. Smiling What committee or staff could you see Barney Fag and Foley sitting on? Eye-wink


Submitted by skyspy on Wed, 10/04/2006 - 11:12am.

WEAR IT!!!!!!! Sorry but actions speak more loudly than words. Me thinks the republican party doth protests too much. They obviously love gays and pedophiles or this would not be harbored and protected, nor would it be tolerated.

Many people appear to have been aware of these complaints, and have done nothing to put a stop to it.

Git Real's picture
Submitted by Git Real on Wed, 10/04/2006 - 12:53pm.

The Republican Party is the party of the gays. Gosh...I guess that's why they get so much support from them.

Nope Sky...That shoe don't fit.


ManofGreatLogic's picture
Submitted by ManofGreatLogic on Wed, 10/04/2006 - 7:01pm.

The myth is that most gays are happy, funny guys, like we see on television.

My experience shows them as aggressive, mean-spirited people. That's just my experience.

And most I met are dedicated Republicans.


Submitted by McDonoughDawg on Wed, 10/04/2006 - 8:49pm.

Most that I know live in VERY nice homes In-town in Atlanta. Are good folks, and are not anything like you say.

It's not for me, but for that they are glad. I'm not their type either. Smiling

bad_ptc's picture
Submitted by bad_ptc on Wed, 10/04/2006 - 8:38pm.

Most of the gay people that I know have better houses than mine, cook better than I do and are some of the most giving people that I’ve ever met.

BTW, the gay lifestyle is not for me.

Judging someone simply because they’re gay is like judging someone because their Christian or from Georgia.

Try judging people by their deeds, not by the lifestyle or color of their skin or the type of car they drive.


Git Real's picture
Submitted by Git Real on Wed, 10/04/2006 - 8:22pm.

It is really hilarious to read all this crap. All a sudden the Democrats are trying to act like the are Republicans and the Republicans are accused of being like the Democrats. All because of one sick {{{{I CAN'T SAY}}} on the Republican side.

Either all this is real silly or are the differences between the two parties really disappearing after all?


Submitted by Sweet Honesty on Wed, 10/04/2006 - 7:16am.

So, Westmoreland supports bills that can help ruin the people's way of life that put him in office, so what. No matter what he does or how it hurts us, I think we should all vote for him anyway, after all he is a Republican. (HA!). I know this seems a little extreme, but it looks like to me that's what a lot of these blogs are saying. How very cool is that????

Submitted by Jones on Wed, 10/04/2006 - 12:02am.

You can endanger lives with hazardous chemicals and a slap on the wrist is just fine.

You can build TDK and cram our roads full of traffic while, at the same time, you are stuffing your pockets full of campaign contributions from the landowners.

And you can vote in favor of federal legislation that ruins our ability to maintain a planned community if you sneak your vote under the radar.

I have never wanted to vote for a Democrat so bad in all my life (McGraw has my vote). Rep. Lynn Westmoreland and Rep. Mark Foley need to get out of Congress and leave everyone alone! Stop the carnage!

Submitted by FayetteFirst on Mon, 10/30/2006 - 1:17am.

lin WASTEMORON was the first person to break the Fayette County Land use plan, he did it in 1986.
I'll vote for WASTEMORON when he pays the BRIBE money back to the "Beer, Wine and Liquor lobby"
I'll vote for WASTEMORELAND when he pays back the money he took from the TDK Developers.
I'll vote for WASTEMORON when he really cares for us and closes the Poision Plant.
I guess I can't vote for WASTEMORON.
WASTEMORELAND or WASTEMORON represents the DEVELOPERS.

Submitted by yousaidwhat on Sun, 10/29/2006 - 11:02pm.

Get real. Westmoreland has more intelligence and sense in his smallest finger than certain individuals who post blogs and do not understand that without them Fayette County would not have a lot of problems that exist because those moving through must bring their garbage with them and have so much clutter that no one can exist. If you ever met a real "town" you wouldn't know it.

Submitted by skyspy on Mon, 10/30/2006 - 6:20am.

Huh? thanks for helping McGraw with that runon sentence. Awesome.

Submitted by swmbo on Tue, 10/03/2006 - 11:09pm.

If you have had enough of Lynn Westmoron then, on November 7th, you know what to do. Give him an involuntary career change. He deserves a break from all of the nothing he does for us and we need a break from him.

Elect MIKE MCGRAW, District 3, US House of Representatives.

GO MCGRAW GO!
GO MCGRAW GO!
GO MCGRAW GO!

-------------------------------
If you and I are always in agreement, one of us is likely armed and dangerous.

Submitted by airtraffic on Mon, 10/30/2006 - 4:40am.

Ya know, I consider myself informed about the upcoming elections on the major issues. And, I like many Americans would like to think I vote for the person not the party line. I want what is best for my community, state, country and family. But after much thought and discussion with many of my friends, I felt the need to speak out about the upcoming District 3 Congressional race. I'm supporting Mike McGraw for this highly visible campaign. The reasons are clear. I've had enough of the "do-nothing" that is going on in congress right now! It is my belief that Mike McGraw possesses the desire to clean up main stream government and actually do something about issues like energy, education and social security reform. The fact that Mr. McGraw is willing to reach across the isle right off the bat is an encouraging statement. The idea that helping middle class Americans can help strengthen our social and economic values are something that I find refreshing as well. And as I have been researching the issues and candidates, I couldn't believe what I saw when I viewed Lynn Westmoreland on the Colbert Report. In case you don't know what I'm talking about, here is a link from Mr. McGraw's web site.

http://www.mikemcgrawforcongress.com/media3.html

Now, I don't know about you, but after seeing this, I was highly embarrassed and disgusted. This made me furious about how Mr. Westmoreland looked as he represented me, our district and our state!! I ask you, how can we in our right mind keep someone in the United States Congress who acts like Westmoreland? That is why I'm pledging my support to Mike McGraw.

Submitted by skyspy on Mon, 10/30/2006 - 6:17am.

Mike seems like the best choice we have.
We need tougher EPA laws in this state so we can get rid of the poison plant and never get another plant like it here.

Do you think Mike will help push the FAA to follow their own guidelines for safety? Things like staffing? Things like how many hours controllers work? Controller fatigue? Will he push the current administrator to replace the controllers who will retire this year? I have heard that not even the controllers that retired last year have been replaced,....what gives? I hope he pushes the FAA hard so that we don't see another Lexington.

Submitted by dollaradayandfound on Mon, 10/30/2006 - 7:28am.

More, more, more? We need to enforce what laws we have concerning the OSHA and EPA rules, and also the air traffic control situation. If there is only one controller in the tower, shut down the airport until a second one gets there! If a plant doesn't send in reports that can be checked for contaminants, shut them down until they do, and give the President of the company 60 days on the road trash pickup crew! More and more money and people flowing into something unsupervised with no penalties is a total waste, except to provide some more jobs for the party. Nobody cared about only one controller and no control over waste contamination, noone, including you. Pilots are just as likely to screw up as anyone due to the amount of times they are at risk--they need someone to remind them often. Factories will pollute if noone cares---it is cheaper!

Submitted by skyspy on Mon, 10/30/2006 - 9:48am.

dollarday the state of GA has the weakest laws on the books regarding waste recycling plants. That is how we got stuck with the one we have. Even Alabama has tougher restrictions than our state.

As for air traffic, do you have any idea how many problems it would cause to shut down an airport, because they haven't replaced retiring controllers? I'm a pilot, those guys save my life all of the time. We experience delays now everyday, because of congestion in the sky. These people are vital to our security and safety in the air, we can't afford to be short handed.

bad_ptc's picture
Submitted by bad_ptc on Mon, 10/30/2006 - 11:37am.

I’ve been waiting for this topic to come back around.

Remember just before 9/11 the FAA was being blasted for not modernizing the existing air traffic control system? There were hearings after hearings on the hill on this. The same thing was happening with not replacing retiring controllers fast enough.

This situation had been forced onto the back burner for the last six years. Now it’s coming back after a few hundred billion has been spent/wasted on HLS.

Don’t look for any major improvements in the near future. All the planning that was previously done is now so far out of date that the process will have to start all over again.

And cost 4 to 5 times as much.


mudcat's picture
Submitted by mudcat on Wed, 10/04/2006 - 5:55am.

He's a Democrat for crying out loud!
Why would we in Fayette County want to be represented by the party of sodomy, aetheism and abortion? A bad Republican is better than a medium Democrat (there are no good Democrats anymore after Zell Miller and Joe Lieberman).

Got a personal problem with Westmoreland? Run against him next time, but don't give us a Democratic leader in what is certain to be a Republican-domonated House and Senate. Even Lynn can bring home some goodies for Fayette County in that enviornment. A rookie Dem can't do that.
meow


Submitted by HarrisCountyGeorgia on Wed, 10/04/2006 - 1:22pm.

Right there in your community, there is probably a knee-jerk liberal who says, "Better a bad Democrat than a moderate Republican!" They have got both of you right where they want you. You are both like the fool who says, "I'd rather push a _____ than drive a ______ !"
(Insert car brand-names)

Basmati's picture
Submitted by Basmati on Wed, 10/04/2006 - 7:42am.

A bad Republican is better than a medium Democrat

Comments like that...and people like you, Mudcat... are the prime reason that pedophiles like disgraced Congressman Mark Foley got away with molesting boys for so long.


Robert W. Morgan's picture
Submitted by Robert W. Morgan on Mon, 10/30/2006 - 6:31am.

It is several giant steps from "Bad Republican" to "Child Molester" In case you didn't know it from the liberal press, Foley resigned immediately and is yesterday's news - even though the Dem's joyfully bring his name up hoping the less informed among us will have a knee-jerk reaction and automatically vote Democrat. Sure, there are plently of uninformed morons out there who may remember to get out of bed on election day and vote on their way to or from buying Lotto tickets and beer, and Democratic they will vote for sure.


ArmyMAJretired's picture
Submitted by ArmyMAJretired on Wed, 10/04/2006 - 9:43am.

Backing Democrats will lead to manythings that Fayette County does not support.

For the record, I belive ex-congressman Foley should be punished to the fullest extent of the law. Good riddence to a vile warped disgusting individual. I want to know who held the 2003 disgusting IMs (not the e-mails) for 3 years ENDANGERING every page. I want PROOF that any GOP member knew and ingored actionable info.

Now, basmati can you absolutely guarentee us that there is NOT ONE Democratic representative that does not have a similar skeleton in their closet? We already know the dems have a manslaughterer (Mary Jo), a former Klansman, and who knows what else in their mix.

No, I think dems are playing politics as usual and the dirtier the better.


Basmati's picture
Submitted by Basmati on Wed, 10/04/2006 - 10:11am.

Still trying to turn this into a referendum on Democrats, eh, Herr Major?

Let's face facts: more than anyone else on this board (Mudcat excepted) you are a "Dennis Hastert Republican", meaning you are more than willing to overlook malfeasance from the likes of the Lynn Westmorelands and the Mark Foleys of the Congress. You're not aghast that Foley raped those boys, you're aghast that he got caught and it might jeopardize the Republican majority in the House.

More and more pages are coming forward with Mark Foley stories...and as Brian Ross said on ABC last night, they are ALL Republican pages (Foley seems to have been a tad selective). Maybe as many as 5 boys in the past 11 years.

As far as you little misdirection ploy about wanting me to "guarentee" (sic) no Democratic skeletons, no, I can't do that and furthermore that's beside the point: Two wrongs don't make a right, Herr Major, a point your steamfitter Daddy obviously never taught you.

It's interesting how men I consider to be REAL conservatives, men like Richard Viguerie and Joseph Farah, have declared the current Republican party as unworthy of further support in 2006. Jackdaws like you, though, still reflexively support the Republicans, right or wrong.

Do I support a woman's right to choose? I do. My motto: Don't want an abortion? Don't have one!
Do I support same-sex marriage? Nope, but I do support same-sex civil unions (government has no bidness regulating religion).
Do I support raising taxes? I support a sane tax policy that will curtail Uncle Sam's credit card spending that will force our children to pay for our extravagances.

But unlike you, I don't support, encourage or enable party-specific pedophilia.


mainframecpu's picture
Submitted by mainframecpu on Sun, 10/29/2006 - 6:08pm.

Major dude didn't say he supported the child molester man ... he said he hoped the sicko got what was coming to him.

Then you attacked his dad man - his dad! Even if his dad was an idiot who cleaned vomit up at the fair - it's an honest living - why attack a man's family?

Why do you do stuff like that? You don't have to be rude and crass to make your points. I saw some old posts by you and they were even worse to some OldDude.

As a liberal who enjoys good clean debate, I am embarrassed by your behavior! You need drugs man!

MainFrame


Submitted by Hardtack on Wed, 10/04/2006 - 2:19pm.

No, not an enabler, but the heritage is there. It is a law that no General, or Commander, in the military can publicly criticize his superiors, including the civilian, the President. This is considered good, since we don't want inferior officers jacking up the troops. However, there is nothing to say that a senior officer can't resign his position and then say what he thinks! It is being done as we speak by a FEW. I am really disappointed in our current officer corps for that reason. Their pension and career mean more to many of them than their sworn duty. Don't talk to me about "on the battlefield" arguing, that is not the case here.

muddle's picture
Submitted by muddle on Wed, 10/04/2006 - 12:20pm.

You wrote:

"Do I support a woman's right to choose? I do. My motto: Don't want an abortion? Don't have one!"

You have to know that this is a red herring.

"Don't like slavery? Don't have slaves."
"Don't like pedophilia? Don't molest children"

If person A objects to person B's treatment of person C, it is obviously inadequate to reply that A is free to refrain from treating C as B treats C.

You must argue that B's treatment of C is morally permissible, either because the treatment is morally neutral or because, though morally significant, there is some justifying consideration, or, perhaps, on the grounds that "person C" is not a "person" after all).

Your "motto" leaves the real issue untouched.

--

Photo: Cocoa Beach, Sept. '06


cogitoergofay's picture
Submitted by cogitoergofay on Wed, 10/04/2006 - 1:21pm.

Excellent Syllogistic Analysis !

Without commenting on the value quotients, Muddle does a fine job analyzing the logical structure of Basmati's argument.

Your tuition for Symbolic Logic was well spent. Bravo !


ArmyMAJretired's picture
Submitted by ArmyMAJretired on Wed, 10/04/2006 - 10:43am.

First of all, my steamfitter father was a better man than you will hope to be, let's keep him out of this and I will keep your mother out of it, she obviously should have CHOSEN differently!

FACT ONE: As a father of two boys, I despise Foley for his sick perverted actions. When you say "You're not aghast that Foley raped those boys, you're aghast that he got caught and it" you make yourself look more stupid than you already sound.

I do agree with you that two wrongs do not make a right, however where was the democratic leadership when Democrats were caught with pages in the 80s, hell Mass even reelected the pervert, which party stands for pedophilia? Lets ask Bary Frank, no never mind he likes them older, my bad.

Oh and if I have to reelect Lynn to prevent Pelosi from screwing up the house, I can sleep at night knowing our troops will still get funding.


Git Real's picture
Submitted by Git Real on Wed, 10/04/2006 - 8:53am.

Great comment my dear nemesis. How about you and I git a rope and string us up a couple of thems pole cats? What da ya say? And while we're at it we'll string up your buddy standing behind our President George W Bush.


cogitoergofay's picture
Submitted by cogitoergofay on Wed, 10/04/2006 - 9:05am.

"Boy, I would never vote for a Democrat"...... Those are words that lead to the "enabling" of a Mark Foley. Basmati is absolutely right.
When we vote for a party label and when the party label is meaningless, then it has no more significance that a flag lapel pin. That doesn't mean you truly love your country or that you would sacrifice for your country.

First of all, let's understand why Foley resigned---only because he wants to avoid federal prison time for federal pornography crimes. If he had done this in Fayette County, Chief Murray would have him sitting in the jail. The strategy will be "he has suffered enough; let him go." Protect the incumbents; protect the pensions. That is what you will hear in Congress. Until we vote character and until we punish deceit and debauchery, we will continue to have "The People's House" filled with reprobates like Foley, Westmoreland and Cynthia McKinney.

Just this week someone asked me--- "Would you have voted for Harry Truman? " Yes, I would have. Democrat, yes, but a man of high character. We need to tell our politicians that character counts or before your know it we will be virtually indistinguisable from France and Germany and those cultures.


tortugaocho's picture
Submitted by tortugaocho on Wed, 10/04/2006 - 7:39am.

Mudcat continues the trash talk calling Quick Draw McGraw (heaven forbid) a Democrat. Instead, Mudcat says that "a bad Republican is better than a medium Democrat".

Well, let's look at Mudcat's definition of a "Reagan Republican":
(1) vote with the President (2) spout the party line and (3) the most disturbing ---"bring home some goodies". I suppose Mudcat believes that graft is in the eye of the beholder (or recipient).

Passing the Mudcat Republican test with flying colors are Lynn Westmoreland and Mark Foley. Both voted with President Bush; both talked the talk (and no more than that); both brought home huge barrels of pork, trashing on other districts for wasteful spending. Foley's big claim to fame was big bucks for the Everglades.

No, thanks, Mudcat. Box up Foley and Westmoreland and send them home. I'll take Republicans like John McCain, Tom Coburn or Tom Ridge.

Final comment--- as a lifelong Republican I will continue to maintain the same view--- I will vote for an honest Democrat long before I vote for a crooked Republican.


Git Real's picture
Submitted by Git Real on Wed, 10/04/2006 - 9:06am.

Do you think we can yank Wastemoreland out of the race and find a Contract With America Rebpublican to slap in his place? They did it with Foley.

Theoretically it should work. Foley tried or maybe succeeded in "having his way" with some young boys and Westmoreland likes "having his way" with his constituents.


Submitted by HarrisCountyGeorgia on Wed, 10/04/2006 - 1:38pm.

It was a real disappointment that no one opposed Wastemoreland in the primary. Like you said in an earlier post, both Parties have the attitude, "He's OUR bad guy, so we'll keep him." This makes for TERRIBLE government. No wonder so many people don't vote or keep an eye on their (s)elected officials.

Submitted by FayetteFirst on Tue, 10/03/2006 - 10:17pm.

lin WasteMoreLand.
No Thanks for all you do for us.
You use your position for yourself and your friends.
We don't need anymore ideas like that from you.

mostconsiderate's picture
Submitted by mostconsiderate on Sun, 10/29/2006 - 2:00pm.

When Neo-cons spend more money than any govt. in history, they aren't working for me; they work for the Military Industrial Complex. People are fibally rediscovering that Southern Democrats were never liberal and they are returning to the party. That's what I did!


Git Real's picture
Submitted by Git Real on Sun, 10/29/2006 - 3:07pm.

People are fibally rediscovering that Southern Democrats were never liberal and they are returning to the party. That's what I did!

First of all you clown "Southern Liberals that were never liberal" don't play with ying yangs. Secondly they don't accuse moderates or conservatives of working for the Military Industrial Complex nor do they use the term Neo-cons. You are nothing more than a freaking liberal campaign hack who is supporting McGraw not because of his views but because he would empower your liberal cause.

Again...get the hell out of here and campaign in your own backyard.

And once again....NO...I'm not voting for Westmoreland. You hurt McGraw far more than you help him.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.