Demoted deputy has familiar foe as lawyer

Tue, 09/19/2006 - 4:25pm
By: John Munford

Former Fayette County Sheriff’s Chief Detective Bruce Jordan is appealing his demotion and 10-day suspension and has hired noted criminal defense attorney Lee Sexton to represent him during the process.

Lt. Col. Jordan was removed from his position as director of investigations after an internal investigation revealed he violated department policy, Sheriff Randall Johnson said last week.

That determination came after the internal investigation which focused on allegations that Jordan ordered two detectives to work a four-day security detail in Tennessee for a Fayette County baseball team that Jordan’s son played on.

The detectives were paid with money from the sheriff’s office drug seizure fund, which come with strings attached on how the funds can be spent.

The matter is now the subject of a criminal inquiry headed by a special prosecutor.

Sexton said Jordan “has done absolutely nothing wrong” and is seeking a full hearing on the matter.

“How could he and two deputies be gone for four days without the sheriff noticing it?” Sexton asked.

Jordan has previously defended the security detail, saying that a coach on another team that was at the tournament had previously threatened the Fayette Bulldogs.

Ultimately Sheriff Johnson will have the final say on Jordan’s fate after the requested appeal hearing.

If necessary Jordan plans to file a federal civil rights lawsuit “to reinstate his position and his reputation.”

“There are allegations that he was stealing money and that’s absolutely not what happened,” Sexton said.

Sexton said Jordan was called into the office by the sheriff and told of the demotion and suspension without the opportunity to call witnesses and be represented by legal counsel.

Talk of a possible lawsuit between Jordan and Johnson is a bizarre turn for the sheriff’s office considering the two have been together for all of Johnson’s 27 years in office. Jordan started as a 19-year-old radio operator and worked his way up to director of investigations.

“Bruce is just devastated,” Sexton said, adding that his client wants to avoid suing Johnson if at all possible.

Jordan is hoping to be reinstated to his former position and to collect back pay, Sexton said.

The internal investigation ordered up by Johnson was conducted by three division directors and one assistant division director for the sheriff’s office, Johnson has said. The sheriff has declined to go into the details of what policy Jordan is accused of violating.

Jordan’s hiring of Sexton is more than a slight irony because the two clashed often during Jordan’s investigation into a disappeared south Fayette woman whose husband was ultimately convicted of her murder. The case, which was heard in Fulton County because that’s where Beverley Watson’s remains were found, resulted in the conviction of her husband, Jim Watson.

But Sexton said he and Jordan later agreed both acted professionally during the Watson case “even though other people might not think so.”

login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Submitted by angelas eyes on Sat, 09/23/2006 - 6:41pm.

What is her story? I'll bet she will say she was only doing what her then boss (Jordan) told her to do. Jordan said he knew nothing of it, because "I'm not in that loop...Dale," well...I beg to differ, because he does know everything!!! I don't care how clear he thinks his conscience is. Like I have heard many times, "if you keep doing something over and over it will eventually become a natural habit to you." Well, Jordan with your conscience cleared of the wrong you have done, how many times before have you done something that you may think was all right, but in the eyes of the law and taxpayers it wasn't?

Submitted by chill on Thu, 09/21/2006 - 9:34am.

This mess is about to get completely out of control. Ultimately, the Sheriff is responsible for what happens in his department. I cannot believe he was totally in the dark, and if he was, his time in that office should come to an end. This should never have gotten to the point that it is now. This "threat" was reported to Bruce by a player; one individual, a child, who may or may not have heard the "threat". It was an uncorroborated statement of an act that was not even criminal. What was allegedly said, "we'll see what happens when all these cops are not around" is not a threat. Any first year criminal law student can tell you that. Criminal or not, Jordan's actions go far beyond an error in judgement. They show his arrogance, ignorance and lack of respect for the law, and contempt of his boss. They also demonstrate that there are those in the department who feel they can do whatever they want. The time for change at the Fayette Co. SO is long overdue. I look forward to election time.

sweetpea8870's picture
Submitted by sweetpea8870 on Thu, 09/21/2006 - 8:15am.

I can't believe what i've been reading the last few days..Why would Bruce sue Randall when all he is doing is following guidlines for the investigation? Randall didn't know that the deputies went to TN because they were under Bruce's order to go. Randall was slapped in the face when the news crew showed up asking questions. After all Randall has been through with the commissioners office I know he would not let Bruce do something underhanded to get the sheriffs dept. in any trouble. I am starting to reconsider my feelings as far as backing Bruce!


Submitted by lawaboveall on Thu, 09/21/2006 - 10:12am.

Sweetpea,

Bruce and thinking, occurring in the same sentence, may be part of the problem. If Jordan had been thinking he would never have place himself in this position. He did it because he thought he could get away with abuse of his position, as he has so many times in the past.

It is also interesting that you should segregate Bruce from Randall. Do you truly believe that Randall did not know about this? You have got to be kidding! Bruce had to call Randall down at the lake house to let him know where he was for five days. Where would Bruce have learned to do the things he has done? Who was his mentor?

All the things that Randall has been through with the commissioners he brought on himself with the same arrogant disregard for the rules that his protege' now shows us is pervasive in the FCSO. The time for change is now, not the next election, and it starts at the top.

Submitted by angelas eyes on Wed, 09/20/2006 - 10:12pm.

Let the games begin!!!

Submitted by allend on Thu, 09/21/2006 - 10:43pm.

I'm a banker. The money trail always tells the trail. I wasn't aware the Sheriff went over 2 thousand in their budget. Where from?

Submitted by Cranky Princess on Wed, 09/20/2006 - 10:43am.

That's what sheriff Victor Hill in Clayton Co. thought when he fired the 27 employees on his first day in office. All employees had to be reinstated and the Ga. Supreme Court said they were all civil servants and had to go through due process to be fired. Since they are still in court battles it may be some time before we find out the answer to that question. So far it has cost Clayton Co. many millions of dollars. Is that the direction we need to go?

While I have never personally cared for Bruce, I feel he has done a good job for Fayette County and that should be considered in all the comments being made on this subject. I have always had great respect for Sheriff Johnson and I hesitate to think he would have had so much faith in someone not worthy of his trust.

Until this is worked out in the "system" all our observations don't mean a thing except a way to vent our frustration about a very unpleasant allegation. If it can be appealed that the show isn't over.

I sure wish it was.

Submitted by girlinformed on Wed, 09/20/2006 - 11:00am.

Clayton County was under a civil service contract. That is not the same as Fayette, Spalding, Coweta or any of the other full service departments.That being said those who work for a Sheriff's that is not under a civil service contract work at the WILL of the Sheriff. At any time Randall can just cut someone lose. However, he is a better man than that. He actually tries to see that punishments are fair and just. I personally think he was to nice to Bruce.

Submitted by aztec1 on Wed, 09/20/2006 - 7:05am.

If Bruce Jordan is not careful, he may appeal himself right out of a job. If I am not mistaken, Bruce and all other employees of the Sheriff serve at the pleasure of the Sheriff, and he can hire and fire at-will. Fortunately, Sheriff Johnson does not seem to abuse that privledge. Mr. Jordan knew the detailed and public scrutiny that spending from the drug seizure accounts were under by the now un-elected commissioners Wells and Dunn that he worked so hard to oppose. Then, after playing a large part in getting them un-elected and publicly gloating over it, he handed them a "silver platter" opportunity for pay-back and put his boss in the uncomfortable position of having to defend himself from the very thing Dunn and Wells were accusing him of to begin with...shame on you Bruce. I think the Sheriff is being somewhat restrained in his reaction, because if I were your boss and you backed me into a corner the way you have done him, I would fire you outright...not only for a lack of judgement, but for putting my integrity and the integrity of the department at risk. By working in law enforcement or in public service (such as being a county commissioner, mayor etc) in a small community like Fayette Co., you live in a glass house whether you like it or not...and by living in a glass house, you better think twice before you throw stones...they may get thrown back at you...!

All Smiles's picture
Submitted by All Smiles on Wed, 09/20/2006 - 5:03am.

Wait! If you are a student and get caught cheating, you will receive an "F". The teacher doesn't really want/care to hear about why you cheated, cheating is cheating, PERIOD. So does Bruce Jordan have an excuse?


Submitted by another concern... on Tue, 09/19/2006 - 11:14pm.

Let me say this. I have lived in Fayette County for a long time and yes I am a voter to. I have always supported Randall Johnson and believed him to be a good sheriff to the citizens of Fayette. I stand behind that. But, Bruce Jordan has been trained by Johnson on how this county should be protected. That being said I support Bruce Jordan and am proud that we have a detective that criminals are afraid to have on their trail. I'll even go a step further and say that if and when Johnson retires and i am hoping he does not. My family will give Bruce Jordan if he ran for sheriff the same support he has afforded us citizens for 27 years. I am disappointed that all of these people who are bad mouthing Bruce won't do it to him face to face. These people dont want to face him just like the criminals in this county and surrounding counties dont want to. As for Lee Sexton he as a lawyer has a duty to defend "anyone" he chooses. So stop persecuting the one who has protected you and your family for so long. Good Luck Bruce. Some of us are still behind you. Thanks

Submitted by ihaveone on Wed, 09/20/2006 - 8:21am.

DITTO !!!!
Well written and I too will support Bruce along with a lot of other Fayette County families. I have noticed that many of the negative comments about Bruce are written by people who do not even live in the county anymore. Go figure.
Bruce, if you read these Blogs - keep your chin up and know that there are still those of us who support you.

Submitted by IMNSHO on Tue, 09/19/2006 - 11:48pm.

You are entitled to your opinion, however misguided it may be. As to this: I am disappointed that all of these people who are bad mouthing Bruce won't do it to him face to face... The reason it cannot be done to his face is because, in his position of power, he has shown that he will not hesitate to retaliate against whoever criticizes him. Whether against the criticizer personally, professionally, or through their family, he has done it.

If you are still behind him, it must be only because you have not personally spoken to anyone in the SO about him, ever. When a person climbs the ladder of success, and steps on everyone on the way up, those people are NOT going to be there to support him on the way down.

Submitted by ihaveone on Wed, 09/20/2006 - 8:24am.

Maybe they do not do it face to face for fear of a LAW SUIT!

Submitted by IMNSHO on Wed, 09/20/2006 - 11:04am.

So you're saying that if I, face-to-face, told him I know he provided Whitewater High School (where his son attends) with an extra golf cart and a Gator (paid for and belonging to the SO, not the school), not for the SRO's use, but for the use of the school in general, and mostly used by the sports teams... if I told him that I knew about it and was going to tell the media about it, you're saying he would sue me? No, I don't think so. Since it is TRUE (along with many of the other things that have been said and many more that haven't), he wouldn't have a leg to stand on in court, and he knows it, and I don't consider him to be a generally stupid man.

Submitted by allend on Thu, 09/21/2006 - 11:08pm.

The Sheriff's Office has never purchased a gator to be loaned to the high schools or any other school. Some gators seized as stolen were put to county use when the owner could not be found because the serial numbers could not be found. The Gator has been loaned to Whiewater's baseball team and football team and would be loaned to any other County intity who might ask to use it. County to County cooperation is not that unusual. Case in point the Woolsey Fire Dept. built by the county is full of BOE school equipment being shared with each other. Taxpayers money being used at their best. Sounds like disgruntled employees making mountains out of nomality.

It's been a common practice for the Sheriff's Office to provide the schools with golf carts and other items for there athletic departments.

Submitted by IMNSHO on Fri, 09/22/2006 - 2:36pm.

...then why, as soon as BJ was out of the way, were the Gator and extra golf cart removed from WHS? Would it be because others, at the school and in the SO, knew that it was wrong for them to be there? Hmmmmmm?

ptctaxpayer's picture
Submitted by ptctaxpayer on Fri, 09/22/2006 - 3:37pm.

I agree with IMNSHO---- many people witnessed this FOR YEARS, and they all looked the other way. From the SO to the schools to Stonewall to the Courthouse. Now all the rats are running for cover. This is why stuff like this happens all the time everywhere because everyone gets in there and gets a little for themselves.


Submitted by thebiggun on Fri, 09/22/2006 - 7:03pm.

I was told a young lad that you can not be dishonest without someone knowing about it. When you have a sheriff's department that will not account to the public where it spends it money, well you should always wonder why. All we hear is the respect that everyone has for Johnson and how everyone is making him look bad behind his back. Do you really think all this could have been going on for all those years without him knowing? Because if this is true, he has been on vacation for the last 20 years. Just because you have been in office a long time, does not mean you are above reproach. Well he said in the Atlanta paper that the guy was lucky he did not wip him, when maybe he should have been taken Jordan to the wood shed a long time ago.

Submitted by IMNSHO on Fri, 09/22/2006 - 5:11pm.

My post was more about good people who, because of the power of BJ, were not able to do anything about some things, like these items being at WHS. Saying/Doing something would have meant losing their job. So the "gets a little for themselves" was more "keep their job and do as much good as they can otherwise." Even now, with the threat of BJ probably removed, many are looking over their shoulder nervously, just in case he does come back and retaliates.

I won't fault anyone who was under Bruce's authority. And there is only one who wasn't (the Sheriff). The important thing (for all the others) is that they are now setting things right, as quickly as possible.

Submitted by auntieemm on Fri, 09/22/2006 - 5:41am.

Oh, they haven't ASKED!!! Right.... The real question should be-What else don't they have?!!!!!!!
Taxpayer money being used at its best? I think not!!! Change the spin-it doesn't work.

Submitted by Hardtack on Fri, 09/22/2006 - 3:55am.

Oh boy, another can of worms. Sheriff's deprtment lends county equipment, dope stuff or not--it is the county's- without permission or documentation! This is what always happens when there is no checks and balances of money and equipment. Let the judges judge whether the Sheriff's department applies the law correctly, but let the accountants decide how the money is spent legally. Doesn't one high school, etc., deserve a "gator," whatever that is, as well as another? Who also might have used this equipment personally, since no one seems to care? Stuff like this can't be allowed to garner votes and popularity, it is not professional, but good old boy stuff.

Submitted by angelas eyes on Wed, 09/20/2006 - 12:19am.

Well spoken and there are many others who agree!!!!

Submitted by SadFayette on Tue, 09/19/2006 - 6:49pm.

Ah, yes….Lee Sexton…..He is a criminal defense lawyer. Let’s look at the objective record and try to determine why Bruce Jerrrrdan would hire Sexton……Hmmmm…..And why would a criminal defense lawyer want to represent a high ranking cop? Any thoughts ? It sends a message loud and clear: "If I'm going down, Randall, so are you..."

Let’s look at GOOGLE. Lee Sexton went to an unapproved law school at night. You can do that. He has never shied away from publicity. He abuses cops on the stand; says his clients have "rights". He sued a Fayette Sheriff for civil rights violations in a drug bust but then dismissed,tucked his tail and ran when the insurance company said they would seek penalties. He doesn’t mind going after somebody else’s insurance policy but says it would be unfair to do that to LAWYERS !!! When the Georgia Bar began debating a new rule that would require lawyers to disclose to clients whether or not they have malpractice insurance, Lee Sexton said it violated lawyers’ rights! So if I hire a lawyer, not only does he NOT have to have insurance to cover his mistake that will cost me money, but Lee Sexton says he can hide that fact. The State Bar says you should get disbarred if you do that. Lee Sexton says no. http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1099217137037

Then there is the story that Neal Boortz ran of Sexton suing to remove a statue which places police in a favorable light because Sexton thought it was "unfair" to criminals: “In Clayton County, Ga., there's a statue in front of the courthouse. The statue shows a police officer bending over to help a small child. Nice image, huh? A police officer befriending a child. Traditional Americana stuff… This particular [lawyer], Lee Sexton, doesn't like that statue in front of the Clayton County courthouse. The statue puts police officers in a positive light. He's afraid some juror might see that statue when he enters the courthouse and thus form a positive opinion of cops. So Sexton is thinking of filing a lawsuit to have the statue removed…Isn't that just wonderful? A lawyer who objects to police officers being presented to the public in a positive light.” http://www.papillonsartpalace.com/puBre.htm.

Interesting, huh….

PTC80's picture
Submitted by PTC80 on Wed, 09/20/2006 - 1:16am.

I had to dust off my ol' Citizen Online user ID, just to log on and comment about how great your reply is. I don't feel like looking all of that up, but if you're correct, then that's just hilarious. I don't like defense attorneys either - they just seem like such poor excuses for human beings most of the time. I know they are a necessary evil, but some of them are just plain apalling.
I hope the irony of 'SadFayette's' dissertation is not lost on the rest of the readers.


Submitted by 30YearResident on Wed, 09/20/2006 - 2:16pm.

Everybody hates lawyers, until they need one.

Submitted by trailwatcher on Thu, 09/21/2006 - 2:46pm.

Once the drug money account is looked into; there may be other expendtures that are questioned.No one is above the law!! Bruce's next book maybe written from inside the "Big House".

Submitted by lawaboveall on Thu, 09/21/2006 - 3:36pm.

Mr. Beverly needs to ask about the $200k over budget that the sheriff had to have covered from the county general fund at the end of the last fiscal year. Why did that not get any press? Why was he over budget? Can't be the legal fees, that was paid by the county.

And if Bruce sues the sheriff to get his job back, who pays the bill for that legal action?

Voice of Fayette Future's picture
Submitted by Voice of Fayett... on Thu, 09/21/2006 - 3:08pm.

Will Dr. Sams write the Endorsement for this one ?


Submitted by trailwatcher on Sat, 09/23/2006 - 9:04am.

There are so many stories in the BIG city reference ( now ) Lt. Jordan and his past actions.One story that needs to be told is the part that Lt.Jordan played in the fall out between Sheriff Johnson and the old chief of the Marshall's Office, Butch Hall.Why did Butch Hall leave the Sheriff Department??? This event like so many others is why Lt. Jordan should quickly step down; "Do the right thing for a change Bruce"

Git Real's picture
Submitted by Git Real on Sat, 09/23/2006 - 9:50am.

TW. I too am a trail watcher and am trying to understand which side has the "most" credibility. To clear up my position I am an ardent law enforcement supporter and I do not like the bad guys no matter which side they are one. So don't take my request out of context.

If you and others are going to level an accusation at Bruce will you tell your version of the story in an accurate and detailed manner so the rest of us can understand where you're coming from? Everyone comes on here hinting at the scurrilous conspiracies that Bruce has concocted over the years with very little or no evidence to prove their cases. We've heard everything slung from police brutality to having an affair with a dead lady. If Bruce is that bad a dude then I'm with you. Let's take him down.

But to date the accusations equate to Hugo Chavez's referring to President Bush as the "Devil". For all I know the sulphur odor you have in your nostrils may only be that of your own flatulence.


Submitted by sackett on Sat, 09/23/2006 - 4:03pm.

Who said she was dead?

Submitted by tsk tsk on Sat, 09/23/2006 - 5:39pm.

.

Submitted by angelas eyes on Sat, 09/23/2006 - 5:20pm.

Who are you referring to when you said: "who said she was dead?" I have been following all of the papers, news, blogs and etc...and I don't think there is nothing that wouldn't surprise me anymore!

tortugaocho's picture
Submitted by tortugaocho on Sat, 09/23/2006 - 5:08pm.

If you're talking about the gal that was there when the Vette T-tops got lost, she's probably just fine sitting on the same barstool.


Submitted by fcteacher on Sat, 09/23/2006 - 2:05pm.

This story just gets more and more interesting.....small town scandal. Unfortunately, if it's true, the citizens of this county are the real losers. I hope that we've not been taken advantage of, however, with each day, more and more stories are posted that make me doubt that. When I was a teacher I knew that I would be held to the fire should I choose to, or inadvertantly, do something wrong, or out-of-line. I would be held accountable to students, coworkers, administrators, my neighbors and friends, and the list goes on. I hate to think that someone in a postion, such as Mr. Jordan, would knowingly take advantage of said position. The thought both sickens and angers me. I hope the stories are not true and that faith can be restored in our county. If they are true, I hope he's dealt with appropriately, otherwise, what will happen to Fayette County? Who would want to live here? Not me.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.